shortly after I heard Jimmy Walter paid a large advert in the NY Times questioning 9-11…
Meet Jimmy Walter:
Confronting the evidence 2h 40m 32s. A ‘classic’ 9-11 (Sept 11th 2004) conspiracy examiner video
I imagined someone would enventually ask him to fund the building of replica models of WTC 1,2 and 7 to prove the building were brought down by explosives. {The first time I saw the ’squibs’, I was absolutely horrified} But nobody did ask, and so nobody funded it, including, of course, the US govt.
Now somebody has made a model. You’ll never guess what they found…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAk1V5lQFZI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK3eZt85ijI
-
-
-
-
-
The fire condition in building 7 is usually described as ‘a few small fires’ and repeated very often by the ‘truthers’. The fires appeared small because of the wind direction. As the fires advanced across the north face breaking out the windows the wind from the north entered these windows accelerating the fires but forcing the smoke and flame into the building leaving little external visual evidence of the raging fires within. This is what is responsible for the reports that there were ‘only a few small fires’ showing in the pictures taken from the north side of Building 7. There were large fires on many floors which is proved by the sequential window breakage across the building, and a short look at the pictures taken on the south side of the building would show complete obscuration of the building by the smoke. Again only one side of the evidence is presented by the ‘truthers’
Thanks for the time you spent writing in.
While not ruling out what you say (it could be correct), please list the source of the wind data of that day. Quote: “the wind from the north” and if you’d be so good as to explain how you came across that data. Thanks.
A northern wind is defined as having come from the North. It therefore blows TO the south. The North face of WTC7 is shown in this pic..
http://prisonplanet.com/images/august2006/230806wtc8a.jpg
You said “As the fires advanced across the north face breaking out the windows the wind from the north entered these windows accelerating the fires but forcing the smoke and flame into the building leaving little external visual evidence of the raging fires within.”
There are no North facing windows that are broken. Oops, sorry, there is one (out of about 200+). There is no sign of fire damage near that single window.
Looking at the smoke on the East side of WTC 7, it’s almost rising directly upwards, not to the south. In fact, if anything, there may perhaps be a slight movement to smoke TO the north, heading into the wind which you claim came from the north.
Lets assume however that the picture you told us to look at are actually wrong and the north windows are significantly broken and the picture is wrong yet again in that in that they do show fire damage. You then go on to say “the fires appear small” Does that mean the fires WERE small or were actually big but only looked small, and if the latter how could they actually be big (as you imply) but only look small?
and they all fell down. stop it before it happens again
Re: happening again, I wonder what the next shock will be?
The ‘dirty bomb’ hasn’t emerged – yet.
To accept N.Kleins take o it the shock is gonna have to be pretty damn big.
Vaccine shock – methinks so.