Many Muslims think it’s taboo to criticise Muslims. Well, I think some deserve to be criticised, and I would hope others would criticise me for any stupid things I do.
Whats getting my goat this time is in reference to this guy in the US who shot these other soldiers. To be honest, I can’t be bothered with examining the questions leading to conspiraces of what happened. If he was MK Ultra’ed, should that be a shock to anyone?
Anyway, what I want to say is the stupidity that followed after that.
I’m sure I heard/read somwhere about this that people were saying things like “I hoped he wasn’t a Muslim as that would make it harder for us Muslims already in the Army”.
Al Jazeera is in my opinion, one of the better news… errmmmm… ‘organisations’. However it’s English branch (AJE) quite often displays the foul of a particular type of westerism which willing media whores like Faux News, CNN and the BBC take pride in chruning out whilst at the same time having the audacity of calling themselves ‘fair and balanced’.
AJE once broadcast David Frost asking his guest (I think the wife of Daniel Perle) ”are we winning the war on terror?” What a thoughtess idiot to say something like that. Frost carved out his career by giving the appearance that he thought the establishment should be challenged – or at least that what Frosts cheerleaders say.
Is Frost a charleton? perhaps he tailcoated, or maybe age really does mutate Brits into conservative racists (now a days in the process of being engineered into ’conservative bar-homosexulaity’ racists.). It could even be that others created Frost’s ‘image’, and the guy himself just ambled through life propelled by some self serving spin manchine. Who knows.
Anyway, as for AJE, some might say it has to appeal to it’s target audience – and as many, perhaps most English speakers will have a western outlook, then it may explain such westernisms, but I reject that view and think that it’s the foot in the door for money to begin to creep into journalism – a pandemic partly responsible for much misery on the planet today, and as I suggested earlier, it’s a particular brand of westernism - i.e. a bizzare mix of (economic)neoliberalism, neoconservatism, neofascism and philosophical ultraliberalism with a lashings of social darwinism, garnished with mind rotting entertainment. Eeeeew. It’s a FAR FAR cry from things the west should be about, yet pretends in its fullest capacity to support, like the Magna Carta, the US Bill of Rights, the supposed (popularly purported) Christian Reformist movements or La révolution.
Would Fascist xenophobic scum like Hitchens, Wilders, Melon E Philips, Aaronovich and all the mini-me’s out there, take note that ONCE AGAIN there are Muslims doing what you have for years accused what them of not doing, and that is denouncing terroism which the (wh/c)or(e)porate mainstream media calles “Islamic terrorism” flush in oxymoron glory. Got that you pork chop suckers? Not that facts and truth have ever been much concern to you before, and No, Hannity lovers, you aren’t that clever, we know your secret glee at when Muslims actually do this, for reasons a child could figure out.
Freedom fighters Terrorists going to chop our heads while we sleep at night. Be scared!!! Mullah Omar had a training camp, e i e i o, and on that camp he had some taliban, e i e i o. With a a taliban here, and a taliban there, here a taliban, there a taliban everywhere a taliban… Mullah Omar had a training camp e i e i o.
And now there’s Taliban 2! Yes, that’s right… Your favourite taliban boogie man comes in a variety of packages, each one specially designed to feed upon your fears of whoever or whatever target population you want.
*sigh*
The beef here is that in the report NOT ONE SINGLE journaistic elaboration on the story is given to the greatest terrorists of all times over the entire history of the planet: STATE TERROTISTS!!!! And isn’t it TOTALLY FRIGGING AMAZING THAT THERE HAS NEVER BEEN (AND WILL NEVER) BE A FALSE FLAG OPERATION CONDUCTED BUT THE PAKISTANI ARMY/AUTHORITIES, THE AFGHANI PUPPETS, OR THE NORTHER ALLIANCE, THE FILIPINO ARMY, ETC… WHICH HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AND REPORTED BY THE MEDIA… And those of you with a brain can probably recall some of the horrors of what happened in Algeria. ALL the fault of the Islamists of course (-rolls eyes-) – (pssst… lets not mention the people voted for an Islamic government – oh no!)
Goldstone, so obviously biased against israel, in fact he’s quite obviously Pro-Palestinian according to conventional eyes, as he’s not dreaming up ways on how to exterminate them!
The report starts off well enough but as is ALMOST ALWAYS the case, descends into pushing Zionist ideals.
The First element of Zionism one needs to realise, if one is to try and understand Zionism, is that the fundamental principle of it is that of a percieved God given licence to the persuit of supremacy. God looks on in indifference to the great human crimes committed to the others along the way.
The second is the: need for Zionist state. Not you must realise, ’a Jewish state’, as any serious analysist of Israyhell will concurr that Israyhell is absolutely NOT a Jewish state. If you believe otherwise then please, go away.
All Zionist and budding Zionists will push these points. Nearly EVERY discussion of Israel by people subscribing to Zionist ideals will contain either one or both of these elements. And this article: “The Goldstone report: A Jewish view” By Rachel Barenblat is no exception.
“Like many Jews, I want to believe that the one nation which was founded by adherents to my religious tradition will naturally be just and righteous. When the state fails to live up to that ethical mandate, my heart is broken.”
There you go. ANY discussion of Israyhell is OK, even ‘helpful’ suggestions as to how Israyhell can be brought into line with international law are permissible, and the premise underlying all this - sometimes on the subconscious level – is that Israyhell has a right to exist. Well let me tell you something… It has absolutely no right to exist!! This fake state of Israyhell should be scuppered. Pronto!
And in direct reposnse to Ms. Barenblat, Israyhell has NEVER been the Glorious Israel of old, the magnificient state you yearn for. The old state (only for a very short period of time) – which was a state of immaculate manefesstion of mankinds love and obedience towards God. That Israel all of the Abrahamic (and Adamic!) faith would welcome the reemergence of Israel of Glory, and it IS coming again. It will be born when this filthy imposter is obliterated by the one the Zionists du jour desperately wanted to kill. ALL Abramahic doctrines show this Israel is coming and it’s shown perfectly clearly in the scriptures (apart from the scriptures you fiddled e.g. Deuteronomy 23:20), but this piece of crap, modern Israyhell, the regime of tyrrany that feels the need to purpetrate at least one gross crime per day upon humble Palestinians, is an imposter state of the utmost evil.
Ms. Barenblat, Israyhell was founded by Zionists, some who hated the Jews, some who killed the Jews on ships, some who murdered British (to the indifference of the servile British govt), nearly all Israyhells founders were terrorists who then went on with a Satanic extermination of the Palestinian people that persists to this day. Ms. Barenblat, you are an utter muppet! Sorry but you are a muppet – your words say so. You heart should NEVER have have been anything other than broken. Israyhell is a secualar state of Zionism.
-
-
-
And the ’bad hair day’ (the height of banes some westerners have to deal with) for AJE just doesn’t end…
Here is Al Jazeera in it’s finest “BBC lite” mode. Only the Coalition of the killing get a mention. Only British soldiers lives are counted. The Taliban or whoever the courageous freedom fighter is, gets portrayed as ‘the baddies’.
Some piece of scum called Dr Aminullah Habibi, suppsedly a “research fellow at the UK Defence Academy, a training facility for the country’s ministry of defence” gets to pimp the western ideals. What the hell does the defence of the UK have to do with Afghanistan. Absolutely NOTHING AT ALL.
And we have this pile of poo…
Gordon Brown, Britain’s prime minister, said the deaths were a “terrible loss”.
“They fought to make Afghanistan more secure, but above all to make Britain safer from the terrorism and extremism which continues to threaten us from the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said.
How sickening! Garden Broom’s lies get parroted without the slighest hint of a challenge.
Earlier on it was ‘reported’ (i.e. parroted) about the freedom fighter: “Every effort is being put into hunting him down.” - which makes me think the Nobel Prize Commission is being a bit pro-active this year.
Gorgon BrNWO contined his spiel…
“Addressing the UK parliament, Brown said: “It appears that they were targeted because they were engaged in what our enemies fear most – they were mentoring and training Afghan forces.”
Hahahahahaha! What a loser, and as if he gives a stuff about British cannon fodder. There’s a saying the people get the leaders they deserve. In which case almost the entire planet has some serious soul searching to do.
-
-
In conclusion:
Al Jazeera English – Your moment of shame!
-
-
-
Case study: Randomly pulled up lessons in proto-Zionism
Reading about the world, it’s history, economics, and struggles for power is I guess, kind of an obsession.
I’ve already ‘woken up’ (or is there another awakening to go through that I’m not yet aware of?). From time to time, in conversation with various people in various locations, I make reference to aspects of the stuff I’ve learned over the years i.e. the stuff I’ve come across (which in the mind of the rationally-paranoid, one might elaborrate: stuff that I have been allowed to learn) to probe their perceptions and hopefully throw out a few seeds to open a path of ‘awakening’ in them.
When discussing 9-11 with my father, I told him to keep an open mind. He said something like “I [he was refering to me] didn’t have an open mind on the issue, to which I said I had assessed the evidence and arrived at a conclusion. Overall w.r.t. 9-11 tt is one of the ultra rare occasions where I feel I ‘bettered’ my father in one of our late night conversations.
What is it achieving?
Perhaps very little, but I can be secure in the knowledge that I’ve done my bit to make people aware of the problem that we are facing.
I’m pretty savvy on dirty international politics, it’s getting to the point where often, ‘none can touch me’, although admittedly the occasional banana skin comes my way at times on issues where I think I have a strong handle, forcing a rethink.
I have moments where the mention of an individial brings their ’life-network’ (and all it’s baggage) into my mind. I’m not bragging, just telling it like how it is. I also have moments where things are blank, w.r.t fringe players, but this isn’t very often. The nett effect is that I feel I’m pretty sharp on noticing disinformation.
And so to the main focus of the post. It’s about a Canadian 2009 documentary: “The Passionate Eye – Anthrax War.” CBC (Canada)
I have doubts as to whether this documentary is legit or a work of disinformation. Those suspicions nagged on as I watched, there was no analysis of Bruce Ivins’s life to cement down a powder puff claim that Ivins’s was innocent.. Hatfill was exhonerated and the program made not mention of any other suspect.
The program was heading off into the direction that the spores weren’t from Fort Detrick (despite the Aimes strain being genetically specific to that laboratory). No mention of the biohazard inventory logs were mentioned either. The report developed what the investigation was ‘uncovering’ and suggested a bioweapons mafia but provided NO clear explanation of what this meant or who exactly this Mafia was, Instead lying on some quite loose information from some South African guy involved in bioengineering.
But wen Judith Miller, a willing Jezebel of a lady – a journalistic whore for the who pushed false rubbish through the press for the agenda of the Bush regime, then I jumped through the roof.
Like all good disinformation, truth is mixed with fiction to conceal the real story…
Extracts from the 2009 program: “The Passionate Eye – Anthrax War.” CBC (Canada)
Judith Miller
Investigative journalist
47.57
Judith Miller, Investigative journalist:
I’m always worried about what we don’t know, in an area that is so inherently secret and secretive. And work that is so politically sensitive, um, potentially diplomatically explosive.
One week before 9/11, a puliter prize winning journalist, Judith miller and two NY times colleagues broke a front page story revealing the US had been weaponising anthrax as part of several secret programs.
One such program, project Jeffereson, involved the CAI and Battelle, a private natioanl sevurity lab that sought to enjineer a potent new anthrax weapon.
Miller:
The Battelle lab was a contracter on project Jefferson and what they were trying to do was to, once again, figure out whether or not the Sovitest had combined two agents to make an anthrax that would resist our vaccine. And so for many years (laugh) they struggled to do this at this top secret labatory on the outskirts of Columbus Ohio.
49.19
Miller revealed that private contracters were capable of weaponising anthrax. But her report had been overshadowed by 9-11 and the anthrax attacks.
58:20
Ken Alibek the No 2 man in the Soviet biowarfare program before he defected to the west. Alibek went on to consult with the US government and assisted in the FBI’s [post 9-11] anthrax investigation.
He worries about the disappering line between bio defense, and bio offense.
49s
The Unites states is spending a huge amount of money, billions and billions of dollars for so called “bio defense”, they say.
They create viruses like Spanish flu virus again. What would be the purpose for this? In some countries mind, it could look like say, like a work to create some new biological weapons.
Today, Alibek runs a botech company in Kiev in Ukraine. He is shadowed by a bodyguard.
-
Miller files two reports before 9-11 (the documentary only mentions one) where Miller broke a story about Anthrax. The documentary said two other journalists but the report from the NYT only yields Millers name (Perhaps Geff Gannon and his ‘brother’ were the other two – who knows)
When Is Bomb Not a Bomb? Germ Experts Confront U.S.
By JUDITH MILLER
Published: Wednesday, September 5, 2001
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/05/international/05GERM.html A former senior government lawyer yesterday vigorously disputed the Bush administration’s assertion that the global treaty banning biological weapons permits nations to test such arms for defensive purposes.
The lawyer, Mary Elizabeth Hoinkes, who was general counsel of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency from 1994 to 1999, said such an interpretation of the 1972 treaty was a “gross misrepresentation” that “risks doing serious violence” to an accord the United States has long championed.
The New York Times reported yesterday that the United States had made and tested a model of a small Soviet-designed biological bomb as part of a series of secret research projects that officials said were aimed at defending against a growing threat of a germ attack.
The projects were begun under the Clinton administration and approved then by Pentagon and Central Intelligence officials, but Ms. Hoinkes said she did not know details of the project at the time. She refused to discuss it further.
The treaty bars nations from developing, acquiring or stockpiling biological weapons to be used for “hostile purposes or in armed conflict.” It permits experiments on microbes, provided that quantities are small and the purpose is defensive.
An administration official contended this week that the treaty also allows such experiments as long as the aim is “protective,” not hostile.
The distinction, Ms. Hoinkes said, was “too cute by half.”
She said the treaty was intended to bar even initial research on munitions that spread disease. The Bush administration’s interpretation — apparently shared by the Clinton adminstration — gives nations too much latitude to research offensive weapons in the name of defense, Ms. Hoinkes asserted. “You see a room full of people manufacturing bombs, and they say, `I’m only doing this for defensive purposes and I have no intention of ever doing it for real because my heart is pure,’ ” she said.
State Department and other administration officials describe Ms. Hoinkes as a leading expert on the germ weapons treaty. She joined the State Department in 1976 and began working in 1981 at the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, which was merged into the State Department in 1999.
She was not alone in her dismay.
Spurgeon M. Keeny Jr., a deputy director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency from 1977 to 1981, expressed similar concerns about the interpretation of the treaty and how such an assertion would be perceived abroad.
“In the eyes of the world, it’s going to look like we’ve been clandestinely violating the treaty,” said Mr. Keeny, who is president of the Arms Control Association, nonpartisan experts who support efforts to curb weapons of mass destruction.
Bill Harlow, spokesman for the Central Intelligence Agency, which tested the bomb model, said yesterday that the device was not a weapon because it lacked a fuse and did not contain dangerous germs. “Everything we did was in full compliance with the treaty,” he said.
The State Department declined to discuss the experts’ arguments. A spokesman said the administration had found that the research programs were “in compliance” with existing treaties and that appropriate legal “mechanisms” were in place to conduct such reviews.
An international conference to discuss how to strengthen the germ treaty is scheduled for November, and Mr. Keeny said the administration could expect accusations that Washington had ignored a treaty that most nations have signed.
“If any other country was found to be doing what we were supposedly doing, they would call it a dangerous violation of the treaty, and it surely appears to be a violation of the treaty in terms of common interpretation,” he added.
Victoria Clarke, a Pentagon spokeswoman, also confirmed yesterday that the Defense Department had drawn up plans to produce small amounts of genetically modified anthrax, a deadly toxin, but that the project had been “put on hold” earlier this year to make sure it did not violate international treaties and domestic laws.
Still, she said, the Pentagon intends to press ahead with the anthrax project. Pentagon officials have said that producing the stronger poison would aid in developing vaccines and other defenses.
- What I am suggesting is that Miller was told to pimp these stories out before 9-11 (an even Bush and gang knew was coming) so that if necessary, Millers story cold then be called upon to cast suggestions that private institutions were to blame for the anthrax attacks – that would be private institutions that the US government itself had ceeded licence to produce.
The documentary on one hand suggested Fort Detrick could not have manufactured this grade, yet they show and invertiew woth some guy who said they made it to that 1×10-6 m size. And to suggest a US Funded weapons lab was outperformed by a private company (who the US govt knew the identies of and would OBVIOUSLY have imposed strick seccurity conditions on them) to do something astounding as the near nano sized AIMES strain is just ridiculous.
I must say the Jewish element was flagged ( from which I will say an unscientific straw poll of the possibility of Zionist influence could be speculated upon – and that’s the only thing that should be infered by this statement!). And the program (although I had a bout of heavy-eye in the middle of it) didn’t mention Dr. Philip Zack a reported racist sporting Zionist attributes or the lady who tried to implace Hatfill with no evidence whatsoever – Ms. Rosenberg etc. etc
In summary, I believe this program has presented a piece of highly questionable work, peppering it with officials to legitimize it.
The program also completely failed to suggest WHO could have killed these men involved in the bioweapons field. And WHY the US govt was subcontracting out this weapons research too and WHO owned those companies.
Was Israyhell mentioned once in the documentary? I really don’t think so. South Africa was, but not that South Africa and the Zionist regime had worked closely on nuclear arms making coperation in the development of biological weapons a possibility also.
Two Zionists who called themselved Jews are in a Chinese restaturant in Manhatten. They discuss the diaspora but get stuck when it comes to China. They call the waiter who promptly makes his way to their table.
“My friend and I were talking about the Jews and we were wondering about the Chinese Jews. Is there any Chinese Jews?”
The puzzled waiter pauses and says with a strong immigrants accent “I think there is none”. The amazed Jews asked him again, in disbelief the Jews had no presence in China. This time the waiter says “I will check for you” and goes off.
A minute or so later he returns.
“Well? said the Zionists, tucking into their braized trotters, “is there any Chinese Jews?” to which the waiter replied.
“Sir, we have apple Jews and orange Jews, but no Chinese Jews”
-
I heard that joke roughly as above, some time ago. It didn’t contain the word Zionists however, just Jews. I put the word Zionists in it because it is those people who call themselves Jews but are actually Zionists that I hate. There is a difference. But the traits of Zionism, turning a blind eye to the manufacture and propagation of Israyhell means (in my minds eye) that MOST Jews are bad Jews. The world has about 12-16M Jews (strangely the same number as before and after the holocaust if you warp your mind about that one – so report people accused of anti-semitism) and the number of them who support the theft and continual theft of Palestine are the majority.
There are great Jews however, Jews which could well be better in Gods ‘eyes’ than some Muslims, myself included, but these people are so few and far between. It is the Zionist killers, corporate and banking heads who themselves lay the claim to be Jews. Why then can this label not be used to identify them by? The answer is because it would include those great Jews I am deeply proud of. These Jews, a handful, protest against the creation of Israyhell and the Shaoh on it’s people. They research and denounce Zionist crimes against the Jews and they understand full well the threat these Zionists pose not just to Judaism, but monotheism and on an individual level, a threat to all people on the planet.
For it is the Zionist who call themselves Jews who pull the strings. George Galloway speaking yesterday the the Forum to Crimilalize War jumped on a great researcher, K. Gajendra Singh, an author who writes articles for www.informationclearinghouse.info [1] and http://www.uruknet.com/ [2] when Mr. Singh mentioned the Jews contol the banks (or did he say the media? – or both???). That statement was factually correct and Mr. Singh didn’t accuse “The Jews” of anything, yet George rather sharply took what was said as being an attack on all Jews. He said Jack Straw wasn’t Jewsish (I actually think he is) and Bush’s cabinet wasn’t Jewish (he mentioned about three – but avoided the Jewish ones that were in Bush’s cabinet) and I think he said Bush wasn’t a Jew and he did say Rupert Murdoch wasn’t a Jew. Well George, you don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist, which is intertwined with rank greed and power via corporatism. Just becasue ALL the string pullers don’t calim to be Jews, does not in any way mean they don’t work to the favout of the Zionists…. And they DO work in tandem with Zionists as they share common perspectives in the sence that they have a perverted superiority complex which not only breeds high aggorgance amongst their circle {or inverted pentagon}, but invites dislike and hatred upon them. And rightly so!
George doesn’t do well for himself when he rapidly starts cautioning people for using the Jew word, as he sometimes takes it out of context. George also can quickly spin peoples words into directions they did not mean.
As for democracy, GG himself is on record as saying the tories and labour are two cheecks of the same arse yet advocates Democracy (presumably based on a sililar style – perhaps with PR) as the best solution. Yet he said when defending himself for not voting for Cynthia McKinney (GG suppoted Kuchinicg in the primaries, then Obama in the 3 horse run off) as he said his choice was ‘rael politik’. So George defeated his own arguement about voting. He would of course say Vote for the alternative aprties, such as Respect Renewal, but applying his logic, voters should vote Tory or NeoLabour instead as only they have the chance of getting in. So the procedure of democracy will simply elect the one head of a two headed beast.
The modern record shows, voteing out one piece of scum like Bush and electing a new piece of scum like Obama, that democracy as we know it is bankrupt.
I advocate an end to the party system. I think this would go a long way to solving the problem. Some Muslims shriek at ‘democracy’ and they have a point. According to ‘western’ democracy, man can make the forbidden, legal e.g. homosexual sex, Mercy killings, Abortion and I would dare say, pre-emptive strikes too! But Muslims are surely aware that a council elected the Kalifah. One could say there was some democracy there, and even say if democracy was offered, then rejected again, then that too is democracy as the ‘peoples’ desire not to have what we know of democracy is actually a democratic choice.
Well as usual, I am falling asleep at this computer and I must end here. I’ll correct the usual poor language later, and try soon to give more feedback on the Criminalize War and Tribunal, although I would like to end by saying Sami al-Hajj and Mozzamam Beig’s speeches today were both horrifying and excellent. There’s still 220 prisoners in Guantanamo and probably thousands more in US spearheaded hell holes across the world.
Can’t sleep till I’ve mentioned the glorious Iraqi Resistance. It was good to hear them mentioned and some information given out as to their steadfastness and achievements. Most agreed to their legitimacy. Their cause it without question, one that is utterly justified. On day 1 of the conference JUBA the legendary sniper (false or whatever) had hsi name displayed on one of the slides.
I have to say the case to criminalize war was very powerful and comprehensive. Iraq is an utter nightmare by ALL accounts. The US and those who pull its strings want to leave a permanently sick people behind to man the oil pumps, but the noble Iraqi Resistance will never allow that.
Even 9-11 was discussed by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Ex-PM Tun Dr. Mahatir Mohammaed as being False Flags. Lauren Moret agreed and suggested other conspiracies too – vaccines and depopulation and DNA sabotage was mentioned, and Cynthia McKinney when she mentioned the counter intelligence programmes (COINTELPRO). Getting back to 9-11, Prof Chossudovsky mentioned the BBC (and CNN) news reporting WTC-7 collapsed 20 minutes before it did actially collapse (the Jane Standley reporter with Philip Hayton as anchor) and also “OBL in a Rawalpindi urology ward on 10th Sept 2001 – a place impossble not to meet CIA agents as anyone whose been to Rawalpindi will know” (near exact quote}
I think it was Moazzam Beig who said Africans were shipped from Africa to the American Hemisphere shackled in chains in the slave trade, but the same thing has happened again with the Guantanmo bay prisoners.
WAR SHOULD BE CRIMINALIZED. Please investigate this matter thoroughly yourself. I’m confident you’ll arrive at the same conclusion.
Actually my references to Barry Jennings has never had much detailed focus, but of course I’m aware of him in context of 9-11. I knew he died as it wsa widely reported amongst other conspiracy examiners. He died Aug 08.
From one of the best news services in the internet: Information Clearing House.
Manufacturing Consent For The Continued Occupation Of Afghanistan
Obama’s War
Tens of thousands of fresh American troops are now on the move in Afghanistan, led by a new commander and armed with a counterinsurgency plan that builds on the lessons of Iraq. But can U.S. forces succeed in a land long known as the “graveyard of empires”? And can the U.S. stop the Taliban in neighboring Pakistan, where U.S. troops are not allowed and the government is weak?
This program contains graphic language and violent imagery. Viewer discretion is advised.
AAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAHA HA HAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAA HAA HAA HAAAA HAHAHAHAA HAAA HAAAAA
- i’d like to point out, the laughter isn’t at the face Obomber won the Nobel peace prize, and not at the comments to the article, excellent as they may be.
The recent ‘Iran thing’ has lead to an escalation in rabid anti-Iranian propaganda and fantasies.
Neal (of Iron Clay, http://www.iron-clay.com) has for a couple of years now been naming the date in which ‘the attack’ will happen, and I find his analysis, (but obviously not his dates), holistically more credible than the rest, although I differ from him in the longevity of the Israyhelli state. I’m of the opinion it has yet to declare itself the power centre of the world from the fact it’s global e-money is administered from imposter Israel.
IAEA calls on Israel to sign Non-Proliferation Treaty
For the first time in 18 years, Israel, the United States and the Western powers were unsuccessful at preventing passage of a resolution calling on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
There has been yapper about the US not allowing Israeli aircraft from over flying Iraqi air space to make the attack on Iran as well.
However Israel is intending to use Saudi airspace for the job.
I’ve also said that France will be involved in the Iran attack … and here it is again
Iran has 3 months to stop uranium enrichment:
“But we are to make it absolutely clear that our window of opportunity will not remain open
indefinitely,” Frattini told a group of reporters on the sidelines of the United Nations General
Assembly. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090924/ap_on_re_us/un_un_g8_iran
I’ve also said that US and UK will be involved.
I’ve said that after the attack … which Israel will carry out to begin with mostly on it’s own, because of the civilian carnage and willful destruction the world will finally realise who these people are and turn to attack them.
Allison Loudermilk.
Your writing here is utterly disgraceful. It reeks of example of political Xenophobia verging on the imperialist supremacy.
Is it in your job specification on this site to rub your crystal ball and reveal the actual intent of the Iranian powers that be?
You said
“But how can they tell the Iranian operation is intended to make nuclear weapons rather than nuclear power? Secrecy, of course is a big clue. If the facility is above board, then there’s no point in hiding it”
That is a disgraceful accusation that Iran intends to make nuclear weapons.
So you 0.2 second armchair analysis trumps the CIA, NSA and IAEA amongst others.
I’d be tempted to advise you to go back to Wallmart and return your super discount acetate ball, but that would be putting the emphasis for wishful quazi-factoids on the ball, and not you, whereas it is no one other than YOU who are responsible for this drivel.
And you even ‘apparently’ contradict yourself in mentioning the plant is operating yet.
If I was able to probe your political perspective and ‘values, I wonder how many cigars I’d win.
The argument ‘if you’ve got nothing to hide, you have no reason to do something in secret’ is utterly bogus and discredited fallacy, and is best left to the murky realms of your own dark fantasy.
Seeing as you quote Obama, Brown and Sarkozy without question, I have the compulsion to do the same for (the largely ceremonial President) Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
“We don’t have any problems with inspections of the facility. We have no fears,” said Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, referring to calls for immediate access to the site by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog.
He countered the Obama/Brown and Sarkozy’s accusations of concealment saying there were no international requirements to declare any nuclear facility until 180 days before fissile material was introduced into it.
“Mr Obama is not a nuclear expert. We have to leave it to the IAEA to carry out its duties” he added.
You also said
“Iran might even let the U.N.’s nuclear detectives inspect it occasionally, rather than bar them and stockpile plutonium as North Korea has done.”
There is no night about it. Iran HAS allowed IEAS inspections of its facilities. You portray it as something that’s in the offing, and shovelling North Korea as a benchmark to Iran is preposterous.
Iran’s supreme leader has declared nuclear weapons as anti-Islamic. The authorities in Iran have said numerous times they are not pursuing nuclear weapons.
Most industrial militarised countries around the world have secret facilities. Do they draw your fire? Not to mention The US and Israel who use illegal white phosphorous weapons against civilians as demonstrated in places like Fallujah and Gaza.
Channel Four – Mark Thomas: Weapons Inspector
Mark takes on the role of UNTHOM weapons inspector, and sets out to find WMD – not in Iraq – but in Britain and the US http://www.indybay.org/uploads/unthom.rm
What a miserable sloppy and unprofessional article you wrote. I feel the compulsion to review your other ‘articles’ to see what lurks within them, and your morbid cander with nuclear weapons
Really! How anti-scientific of you.
Now, lets look forward to you writing of nuclear issues in the context of the US/UK/Russia/France/china/India/Pakistan and Israel – the former five being in breach of the NPT by constantly upgrading their weapons systems, and lets not forget, the first of those is the only country ever to use nuclear weapons – on civilians – TWICE!
UPDATE: The specific details causing this post are given at the end.
A good friend told me today of news that the Zionist scum in Hebron shot and killed a Palestinian who had recently graduated from the International Islamic University of Malaysia ( IIUM ) (locally called UIA : Universiti Islam Antarabangsa).
They shot him in the chest and the legs. They kicked his body. and denied his family access to his body for days.
israeli soldiers have their picture taken with their dead palestinian 'trophy' (library photo)
When celebrating Eid this year, please remember the blessed peaceful life you have been given. Then ask yourself whether you have some responsibility to do something so that others may also have a peaceful and happy Eid/Hari Raya next year.
As we celebrate the joyous occasion of Eid, let us nnot forget the struggles of our Palestinian brothers and sisters. One such person that I have seen in Malaysia perfoming a nasheed by Friends of AlAqsa is brother Obaidah… please take time to read his tragic story…
Obaidah AlQudsi, a Palestinian artist known among his friends for his beautiful voice and lovely character. A few days ago, Obaidah passed away in an Israeli hospital after being held as an injured prisoner. On 26th August, Obaidah was heading to the Abraham Mosque in the Old City of Hebron. While walking to the mosque, Israeli soldiers shot him 4 explosive bullets; two in the abdomen and two in his legs.
Obaidah, the peaceful soul was murdered in the street in cold blood. Ambulance vehicles were banned from attending to his bleeding body for 30 minutes. Seeing him bleeding didn’t satisfy their evil lust for blood, hence they beat up his body mercilessly. After awhile, he was arrested and sent to an Israeli hospital in occupied Jerusalem. Ever since Obaidah was under their custody, he was in coma. Obaidah spent about 3 weeks in the Israeli hospital; and his family was not allowed to visit him until the last day of his life!
On the morning of 13th September, Obaidah’s soul departed to its Creator seeking His ultimate justice. Hasbunallahu wane’mal wakeel.
Obaidah will always be remembered among his family and friends forhis sweet voice and lovely smile. His poetry and nasheed will always be celebrated by Palestinians, Muslims and all free people of the world as true words of wisdom and honor.
Synopsis about the martyr : Obaidah Maher Abdul Mu’ti al Qudsi Dwaik
Born in 1984 in Hebron city, Palestine to a respected family. His father is a well known uztaz and businessman.
Obaidah joined International Islamic University (IIUM) and earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Communications and Journalism. At the University, Obaidah was active in cocurricular activities and always a forerunner in working for any Ummatic issues. Obaidah was elected iinto the main board of AlAqsa Friends Society in 2003, and from 2004-2007, he led the famous AlAqsa Nasheed groups in IIUM.
In 2008, he returned home in Palestine to live with his family and run his father’s business. He got engaged a few months later and arranged for his wedding to be held right after eid alfitri. Unfortunately, the criminal Zionist soldiers won’t let his family celebrate this eid happily, not let Obaidah’s fiancee have a future with him!
AlFatihah for our brother Obaidah. InshaAllah those who are slain unjustly be rewarded a place in Jannah……
Salams,
–friend of lwtc247–
-
lwtc247 says: May the evil bastards and those who support them rot in hell!
Recent Comments