David Miliband, who has nothing whatsoever to do with Zionism and has no anti-Iran feelings at all, has “demanded” Iran release staff at its Tehran embassy, who were arrested on Saturday.
OR ELSE…
he’ll get the BBC to write bad stories about Iran, put sanctions on Iran, not interfere aganst an initial Israyhelli strike against Iran, send British seamen into Iranian waters for propaganda, work with US intelligence in it’s efforts to make propaganda against Iran and advise the US on how to make use of its hundred million dollar budget to destablisise Iran.
Just like Iranan Human right’s lawer Shirin Ebadi, was awareded her prize by occidental predjuiced trades union, Henry Kissinger was also awarded the Nobel preace prize for bringing to an ‘end’ HIS killing of millions upon millions of people is South East Asia in an undeclared and of course thoroughly illegal war, the dirty war’ in the 60’s and 70’s.
Well the old vampire, Henry ‘the shit’ Kissenger, is still in people devouring mode…
You Tube: Kissinger threatens regime change in Iran if coup fails (Thanks to The Truthseeker)
But I can embed this, which you could do worst things with your life than spening 1m33s watching it, like watching PMQ’a for 1m33s or spend 1m33s reading a NeoLab/NeoCon/”Liberal” manefesto of pledges to be broking in the not too distant future.
But not as good as Sam T’s ebolaworld (- hunt around!) The George Bush Show (or the second series Dubya-Doo)
Update: The MS data Dr. Chris Busby posted on Blairwatch is showing now: This is what it says as of 10th June 2009:
The data are up on the website of the Low Level Radiation Campaign. The measurements were made at Harwell. Isotope ratio in the soil sample was 108. Toatal U was 13mg/kg. LOD was 0.0002mg/kgU238 and 0.0001mg/kgU235. Instrument was Agilent ICPMS. Diffetnt method alpha spectrometry gave same result in different lab. We have now found EU in a car filter. Check out llrc.org. Thank you. Chris
End of update.
The BBC newz and current affairz division, ever the nucleus of stinking lies (evidence #1) in support of mass murder, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ‘environmentalcide’, report on a particular illegal bombing of Sytria by the Zionist entity in 2007 2006.
Amongst those who followed this, you will probably remember there was a strange information vacuum on behalf of the Syrians. The pro-Zionist corporate mainstream media (to give it it’s proper, full title), may have assisted in the silence from Syria, but news on the anti-NWO news outlets whch I read were also pretty much devoid of Syrian comminiques.
Anyway, before you read further please the the BBC newz article HERE.
Hopefully you will have read the earlier evidence #1 above, and so, on reading this:
“Now in a confidential report obtained by the BBC…”
then, if you’re capable of at least half an independent thought, you would now have a rather large ’pinch of salt’ in your mind. Continuing directly from where we left off, the BBC newz article says:
“it [the report] says it has discovered new traces of uranium of a type not included in Syria’s declared nuclear material.”
——————————————————————————————————-
Asside:
does this cry then ring out:
“A ha! I knew it. Those damn Arab/Muslims. I knew they were up to something. I knew the fascile, politically correct respect I felt compelled to give them wasn’t sustainable. They deserve to be bombed.”
People who may think that way remind me of that nasty man called Winston Churchill…
I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.
I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.” – source
Supporters of ‘Death by Churchill’ may counter he only wanted to make their eyes water. What nonsense. He was pimping for weapons to fascilitate his desire for military advantage/supremacy potenial, much like all weapon pimps before him and those who followed him when they bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, sprayed Agent Orange across SouthEast Asia, used depleted uranium and white phosphorous against the people of Fallujah and Gaza. He was deliberately underplaying it. To think that by making peoples eyes water they would them agree to be colonbised is ridiculous and offering apologies for imperialistic murder. Harmless lachrymatory substances had long been known (e.g. thiopropanal S-oxide – the volatile gas produced from damaged onion cells or Allyl isothiocyanate, reported to be a dangerous lachrymator. His pretence that gas was just to make peoples eyes water is shown for the sack of crap it is when in 1920 he wrote to Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare:
“the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.” – source
Here Churchill is revealing that to permanently disabling them, something that doesn’t happen if you just make their eyes water, would be more advantageous to British imperilism because the would be too sick to fight but dain the resources of the those targeted for British colonisation.
Churchill gloves really comes out of his fake concern against human suffering when in a prime ministerial minute (1944) he writes:
“I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard.” – Winston Churchill 6th July 2944. Personal minute aka the “Secret Poison Gas Memo” – source
Eerily, in that same source, we see this written by British scumbad Bomber(i.e. killer) Harris saying:
“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.” Remember other British filthy killers Tony bLiar / Alistair Campbell / John Scarlett / Geff ‘Hoon / Richard Dearlove / Lard Goldsmith 45 minute lie?
and interestingly enough, Churchill didn’t consider the V1 and V2 bombs even reaching the level of a “serious nuisance” yet these bombs are often cited as justification for the destruction of Dresden, Munich and other British strocities.
——————————————————————————————————-
Of course the BBC does it’s part to foment angst towards the Arabs and the Iranians, who are tossed into this report. Iran let’s not forget, is absolutely within its its right to develop nuclear energy even though it is ridiculously stupid to do so.
Right. Now this post is coming to an end, who spotted the flaw?
Come on, surely someone spotted it?
(Huh>? lwtc really has gone mad this time…)
What do you think the Israyhelli’s bombed the Syrian target with? Have a guess. go on? There must be someone that can guess?? Here’s some clues:
TITLE: Bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads used by Israel against civilian targets in Lebanon
By: Dr. Doug Rokke
www: (http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m28056&hd=0&size=1&l=e)
Dr. Doug Rokke is former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project
Those reports came from the ironically named ‘Blairwatch‘ – a site which at times was unashemed in displaying it’s pro-Zionism (depending on which author was posting at the time) - unless to happen to think it’s OK to delete the scientific Mass Spectroscopy iosotopic anaysis given by Chris Busby which proved:
Israel did in fact use enriched uranium to bomb Lebanon in the summer of 2006.
The BBC doesn’t give a toss about news nor does it care about exposing Zionist rot, in fact it seems to relish opportunities to cover it up at each and every opportunity.
I need your help to get a name for work of … I guess you’d have to call it classical music. It’s been on my brain for a while.
Just like Wagners Tannhauser Overture (first movement) did, looping around in my head devoid of a name. I suspected it was by Wagner but wasn’t entirely sure. I wondered through hours of classical works trying to find it. Eventually I got my hands on some Wagner and felt the trail getting close and bingo I found it.
On Youtube you can get a few versions of the piece, like the one conducted by Zubin Mehta with the New York Philharmonc, Rene Leibowitz with the Royal Philharmonic from 1962 and even Toscanini apparently from 1948!!!
Toscanini:
But actually it’s use here is pretty damn good too…
(http://www.metacafe.com/watch/430148/whats_opera_doc)
and is probably the best use of the somewhat overreated Valkyries.
I cannot leave this out either:
-
I know, I’m getting carried away, but that guy kinda represents my musical abilities so the only clue I can give as to the identity of the piece I’m looking for is this: (C, D#, G) * 4, (D, F, G#) * 4…
To me it sounded a bit like Chopan (whether it is or not I don’t know), and so I tried to trial and error (again) my way through Chopan’s works (and he’s got tonnes! of stuff!!) but I couldn’t find it. One thing that I found which knocked me for six was this video posted a couple of weeks ago.
Valerie Kim (11) 2009 May 16th playing Chopin – Fantasie Impromptu.
I mean holy moley! The girl’s 11 years old! Tony Chong on al Jazeera a few months back (at least I think it was TC) said China had 15 million classical violin players and millions (literally) of them are top class vilionists who practice almost every hour in the day. If true, that’s absolutely amazing!
Getting carried away again.
If anyone could suggest a name I’d be grateful. P.S. I think it was also used as the opening theme tune for the computer game “Imperium” which a quick scan on the web reveals it was by Electronic Arts and came out in 1990.
When I was young I really wanted to see a ghost and no movie made me scared. But as I get older, I fear at the thought of seeing a ghost, and now, even this old advert freaks me out.
Even movies that previously had no effect make me feel terrible inside. Why? Is it ‘natural’ that this happens? If so, what inside of me has changed?
I heard this ‘arguement’ time and time again when I lived in the UK. In the past perhaps that was true, but certainly not now.
I went here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8071021.stmPage last updated at 01:16 GMT, Thursday, 28 May 2009 02:16 UK “Ocean monster shows hidden depths” and there was an video on offer with a picture of some mechanical hand presumably operating in the deep ocean.
I clicked on it and all I got an advert for the Philippines. This thing has happened before. I got some Hyundai advert constantly appearing where some BBC article related footage should have been. I refreshed the page and again the ‘underwater’ still frame showed, but this time on clicking the ‘play’ button, all I got now was a Cathay Pacific advert.
This is terrible. I suspect the BBC are deliberately misleading readers to click adverts in the pretence that they will see something interesting instead.
If I am wrong and the BBC has a ‘code’ problem, why is it that there is never a problem with showing the adverts but there is showing their footage?
The adverts are increasing as are the dreadful scams played out upon their readers, yet the BBC licence fee never gets smaller.
Throw the BBC into the drain where it belongs. Boycott the rubbish licence. Don’t let inspectors enter your home.
Recent Comments