There were 64,000 estimated new cases in England last week, down from 84,000 the week before. Chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson said the figures were difficult to interpret because officials said the impact of half-term could last for two weeks. Next week’s figures should give a fuller picture of how the virus is developing, he said. Figures for swine flu tend to be higher when children are in school as they are known to spread the virus easily. Thursday’s data showed a rise in the number of people dying from the virus, with 124 deaths in England – up from 105 in the previous week. The number of people in hospital has dropped slightly to 785, of whom 173 are in intensive care. In total, 182 people across the UK have died after contracting swine flu.

Source: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091112/tuk-half-term-sparks-fall-in-swine-flu-6323e80.html

Quick comment: Is “182 people across the UK have died after contracting swine flu.” the same as “182 people across the UK have died from contracting swine flu.” – I don’t think so. Notice the wording “64,000 estimated new cases” compared to 84,000 the week before. This gives an indication of supposed infectibity. At these rates, plus from what was reported previously, the population will autoimmune without any need for a stupid vaccine. Also the estimated figure is lower this week than the estimated figure last week. The science of statistics can prove useful, but unfortunately like beauty, statistics lie in the eye of the beholder. And statistics is the only science that can prove most people on the planet have more than the average number of legs. The statistical method of analysis should be open to examination. If it passes the test for lack of bias then fine, but I don’t think it’s hard to omagine the figures are simply cooked up.

SWINE FLU IS A MASSIVE SCAM imho.

Like all videos I (re)post here, I don’t necessarily endorse them, and I don’t have time to comment on them all, but I came across “thetruthgirls” a week or two ago and I like it :) (Cue Gerry and the Pacemakers…

-

- (nostalga ends)

thetruthergirls swine flu
Ukraine Mutated Swine Flu is a Bioweapon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekZG7D8YkNA

13 Year Old Toronto Boy Dies of H1N1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p22wCD69vI8

I Got My Vax Notice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcbrO6eT1f8

CFR Plots Vaccine Shortage Scam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Tl8pw99HNw
Vaccine Induced Swine Flu Outbreak on Ship
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9aJqT7kWx0

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/Images/2009/11/11/20091111134817808371_3.jpg

Tell me it’s just my imagination… Please!

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Many Muslims think it’s taboo to criticise Muslims. Well, I think some deserve to be criticised, and I would hope others would criticise me for any stupid things I do.

Whats getting my goat this time is in reference to this guy in the US who shot these other soldiers. To be honest, I can’t be bothered with examining the questions leading to conspiraces of what happened. If he was MK Ultra’ed, should that be a shock to anyone?

Anyway, what I want to say is the stupidity that followed after that.

I’m sure I heard/read somwhere about this that people were saying things like “I hoped he wasn’t a Muslim as that would make it harder for us Muslims already in the Army”.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

I refer to the Sydney Peace Prize awarded to John Pilger. When what seems like a month or two ago I heard he had won it, I was very extremely happy. Not just because he, unlike others or late, thoroughly deserve it, but because it meant he would have to give another speech and I LOVE the words and revelations of Mr. John Pilger. His denouncement of wars, the people and power behind them and the global misery it causes, are an oasis of journalism in an utterly corrupted world of filthy journalistic pretenders.

I wasn’t disappointed.

Take it away John…   http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=555

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Al Jazeera is in my opinion, one of the better news… errmmmm…  ‘organisations’. However it’s English branch (AJE) quite often displays the foul of a particular type of westerism which willing media whores like Faux News, CNN and the BBC take pride in chruning out whilst at the same time having the audacity of calling themselves ‘fair and balanced’.

AJE once broadcast David Frost asking his guest (I think the wife of Daniel Perle) ”are we winning the war on terror?” What a thoughtess idiot to say something like that. Frost carved out his career by giving the appearance that he thought the establishment should be challenged – or at least that what Frosts cheerleaders say.

Is Frost a charleton? perhaps he tailcoated, or maybe age really does mutate Brits into conservative racists (now a days in the process of being engineered into ’conservative bar-homosexulaity’ racists.). It could even be that others created Frost’s ‘image’, and the guy himself just ambled through life propelled by some self serving spin manchine. Who knows.

Anyway, as for AJE, some might say it has to appeal to it’s target audience – and as many, perhaps most English speakers will have a western outlook, then it may explain such westernisms, but I reject that view and think that it’s the foot in the door for money to begin to creep into journalism – a pandemic partly responsible for much misery on the planet today, and as I suggested earlier, it’s a particular brand of westernism - i.e. a bizzare mix of (economic)neoliberalism, neoconservatism, neofascism and philosophical ultraliberalism with a lashings of social darwinism, garnished with mind rotting entertainment. Eeeeew. It’s a FAR FAR cry from things the west should be about, yet pretends in its fullest capacity to support, like the Magna Carta, the US Bill of Rights, the supposed (popularly purported) Christian Reformist movements or La révolution.

Lets look at the evidence to hand:

A story on AJE: Indian Muslims denounce terrorism
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009113171026427902.html

Would Fascist xenophobic scum like Hitchens, Wilders, Melon E Philips, Aaronovich and all the mini-me’s out there, take note that ONCE AGAIN there are Muslims doing what you have for years accused what them of not doing, and that is denouncing terroism which the (wh/c)or(e)porate mainstream media calles “Islamic terrorism” flush in oxymoron glory. Got that you pork chop suckers? Not that facts and truth have ever been much concern to you before, and No, Hannity lovers, you aren’t that clever, we know your secret glee at when Muslims actually do this, for reasons a child could figure out.

http://www.youtube.com/v/TJK05g2j3Vs

Still:

Freedom fighters Terrorists going to chop our heads while we sleep at night. Be scared!!! Mullah Omar had a training camp, e i e i o, and on that camp he had some taliban, e i e i o. With a a taliban here, and a taliban there, here a taliban, there a taliban everywhere a taliban… Mullah Omar had a training camp e i e i o.

And now there’s Taliban 2! Yes, that’s right… Your favourite taliban boogie man comes in a variety of packages, each one specially designed to feed upon your fears of whoever or whatever target population you want.

*sigh*

The beef here is that in the report NOT ONE SINGLE journaistic elaboration on the story is given to the greatest terrorists of all times over the entire history of the planet: STATE TERROTISTS!!!! And isn’t it TOTALLY FRIGGING AMAZING THAT THERE HAS NEVER BEEN (AND WILL NEVER) BE A FALSE FLAG OPERATION CONDUCTED BUT THE PAKISTANI ARMY/AUTHORITIES, THE AFGHANI PUPPETS, OR THE NORTHER ALLIANCE, THE FILIPINO ARMY, ETC… WHICH HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AND REPORTED BY THE MEDIA… And those of you with a brain can probably recall some of the horrors of what happened in Algeria. ALL the fault of the Islamists of course (-rolls eyes-) – (pssst… lets not mention the people voted for an Islamic government – oh no!)

-

-

The second bit of journo junk is here: The Goldstone report: A Jewish view – By Rachel Barenblat http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/11/20091139240897444.html

Goldstone, so obviously biased against israel, in fact he’s quite obviously Pro-Palestinian according to conventional eyes, as he’s not dreaming up ways on how to exterminate them!

The report starts off well enough but as is ALMOST ALWAYS the case, descends into pushing Zionist ideals.

The First element of Zionism one needs to realise, if one is to try and understand Zionism, is that the fundamental principle of it is that of a percieved God given licence to the persuit of supremacy. God looks on in indifference to the great  human crimes committed to the others along the way.

The second is the: need for Zionist state. Not you must realise, ’a Jewish state’, as any serious analysist of Israyhell will concurr that Israyhell is absolutely NOT a Jewish state. If you believe otherwise then please, go away.

All Zionist and budding Zionists will push these points. Nearly EVERY discussion of Israel by people subscribing to Zionist ideals will contain either one or both of these elements. And this article: “The Goldstone report: A Jewish view” By Rachel Barenblat is no exception.

“Like many Jews, I want to believe that the one nation which was founded by adherents to my religious tradition will naturally be just and righteous. When the state fails to live up to that ethical mandate, my heart is broken.”

There you go. ANY discussion of Israyhell is OK, even ‘helpful’ suggestions as to how Israyhell can be brought into line with international law are permissible, and the premise underlying all this - sometimes on the subconscious level –  is that Israyhell has a right to exist. Well let me tell you something… It has absolutely no right to exist!! This fake state of Israyhell should be scuppered. Pronto!

And in direct reposnse to Ms. Barenblat, Israyhell has NEVER been the Glorious Israel of old, the magnificient state you yearn for. The old state (only for a very short period of time) – which was a state of immaculate manefesstion of mankinds love and obedience towards God. That Israel all of the Abrahamic (and Adamic!) faith would welcome the reemergence of Israel of Glory, and it IS coming again. It will be born when this filthy imposter is obliterated by the one the Zionists du jour desperately wanted to kill. ALL Abramahic doctrines show this Israel is coming and it’s shown perfectly clearly in the scriptures (apart from the scriptures you fiddled  e.g. Deuteronomy 23:20), but this piece of crap, modern Israyhell, the regime of tyrrany that feels the need to purpetrate at least one gross crime per day upon humble Palestinians, is an imposter state of the utmost evil.

Ms. Barenblat, Israyhell was founded by Zionists, some who hated the Jews, some who killed the Jews on ships, some who murdered British (to the indifference of the servile British govt), nearly all Israyhells founders were terrorists who then went on with a Satanic extermination of the Palestinian people that persists to this day. Ms. Barenblat, you are an utter muppet! Sorry but you are a muppet – your words say so. You heart should NEVER have have been anything other than broken. Israyhell is a secualar state of Zionism.

-

-

-

And the ’bad hair day’ (the height of banes some westerners have to deal with) for AJE just doesn’t end…

‘Afghan policeman’ kills UK troops
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/200911483320929768.html

Here is Al Jazeera in it’s finest “BBC lite” mode. Only the Coalition of the killing get a mention. Only British soldiers lives are counted. The Taliban or whoever the courageous freedom fighter is, gets portrayed as ‘the baddies’.

Some piece of scum called Dr Aminullah Habibi, suppsedly a “research fellow at the UK Defence Academy, a training facility for the country’s ministry of defence” gets to pimp the western ideals. What the hell does the defence of the UK have to do with Afghanistan. Absolutely NOTHING AT ALL.

And we have this pile of poo…

Gordon Brown, Britain’s prime minister, said the deaths were a “terrible loss”.

“They fought to make Afghanistan more secure, but above all to make Britain safer from the terrorism and extremism which continues to threaten us from the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said.

How sickening! Garden Broom’s lies get parroted without the slighest hint of a challenge.

Earlier on it was ‘reported’ (i.e. parroted) about the freedom fighter: “Every effort is being put into hunting him down.” - which makes me think the Nobel Prize Commission is being a bit pro-active this year.

Gorgon BrNWO contined his spiel…

“Addressing the UK parliament, Brown said: “It appears that they were targeted because they were engaged in what our enemies fear most – they were mentoring and training Afghan forces.”

Hahahahahaha! What a loser, and as if he gives a stuff about British cannon fodder. There’s a saying the people get the leaders they deserve. In which case almost the entire planet has some serious soul searching to do.

-

-

In conclusion:

Al Jazeera English – Your moment of shame!

-

-

-

Case study: Randomly pulled up lessons in proto-Zionism

la.indymedia.org/news/2006/04/155160_comment.php

http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Establishment hack and ex-spy, Frank Gard(i)ner, – a man who used to walk around Saudi occupied Arabia with mini Qur’ans in his ass pocket, (now I guess is an Mi5/Mi6 liason officer), sympathises with Briton Simon Mann, who is linked  with  mercenary terroism (apparently with state involvement!) via the rather dirty Sandline International.

Frankie boy whitewashes over Mann’s activities describing poor Mann as suffering “four hellish years in prison.”

Said Frank:

“He’s going to see a son he’s never seen, who was born when he was in prison. This is a man, who if he had served his whole sentence, would have come out in his 90s,”

Awwww. the little diddums!

Read this excellently written book:

  You won’t regret it.

And watch this:

BBC 3 Investigates – Thatcher and the Coup that Failed:
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/thatcher_coup.rm
This film uncovers the attempted coup in Equatorial Guinea, meeting the key players and dishing the dirt that no-one else knows. It tells the inside story of international power play, oil-fuelled greed, men with guns and the son of the former British Prime Minister

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

The Voting for Sharia in Somalia

April 20, 2009 – الاثنين 25 ربيع الثاني 1430 by Anwar alAwlaki  
Filed under Imam Anwar’s Blog
704 Comments (!!!)

The Somali parliament has voted unanimously for the implementation of Sharia which is seen as good news by many in the Muslim world – and it is – as it reflects the desire of the Somali people to live by the laws of Allah. However there are some issues that need to be highlighted… - source.

lw says: I hope they find a way to destroy the pimping of sex/porn into their society. Strong moralistic societies automatically bring about with them, a better level of a cleaner society. And at this point, I’m going to end with a smidgeon of a moan… lets hope it brings with it cleaner public toiets! General Muslim toilet hygene and mentality is highly shameful! 

-P.S. Anwar alAwlaki ’s wiki says: 23 August 2009, Awlaki was banned by local authorities in Kensington and Chelsea, London, from speaking via videolink to a fundraiser for Guantanamo detainees. source

-

-

-

-

Rewritten (I previously clicked ‘publish’ instead of ’save draught’!)

The Passionate Eye Anthrax War clip0of6  10:01

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upyEYpZd1js
The Passionate Eye Anthrax War clip1of6
10:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YAjv14ojrU

The Passionate Eye Anthrax War clip2of6
10:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaK_VlwIbig

The Passionate Eye Anthrax War clip3of6
10:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir1pylzOXco

The Passionate Eye Anthrax War clip5of6
10:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHADvk13YTg

In case of possible discontinuity above, the links below should ‘patch it’:

Anthrax War part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p5f4tC3qdI

Anthrax War part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgm5wYVJedY

-

-

Reading about the world, it’s history, economics, and struggles for power is I guess, kind of an obsession.

I’ve already ‘woken up’ (or is there another awakening to go through that I’m not yet aware of?). From time to time, in conversation with various people in various locations, I make reference to aspects of the stuff I’ve learned over the years i.e. the stuff I’ve come across (which in the mind of the rationally-paranoid, one might elaborrate: stuff that I have been allowed to learn) to probe their perceptions and hopefully throw out a few seeds to open a path of ‘awakening’ in them.

When discussing 9-11 with my father, I told him to keep an open mind. He said something like “I [he was refering to me] didn’t have an open mind on the issue, to which I said I had assessed the evidence and arrived at a conclusion. Overall w.r.t. 9-11 tt is one of the ultra rare occasions where I feel I ‘bettered’ my father in one of our late night conversations.

What is it achieving?

Perhaps very little, but I can be secure in the knowledge that I’ve done my bit to make people aware of the problem that we are facing.

I’m pretty savvy on dirty international politics, it’s getting to the point where often, ‘none can touch me’, although admittedly the occasional banana skin comes my way at times on issues where I think I have a strong handle, forcing a rethink.

I have moments where the mention of an individial brings their ’life-network’ (and all it’s baggage) into my mind. I’m  not bragging, just telling it like how it is. I also have moments where things are blank, w.r.t fringe players, but this isn’t very often. The nett effect is that I feel I’m pretty sharp on noticing disinformation.

And so to the main focus of the post. It’s about a Canadian 2009 documentary: “The Passionate Eye – Anthrax War.”  CBC (Canada)

I have doubts as to whether this documentary is legit or a work of disinformation. Those suspicions nagged on as I watched, there was no analysis of Bruce Ivins’s life to cement down a powder puff claim that Ivins’s was innocent.. Hatfill was exhonerated and the program made not mention of any other suspect.

The program was heading off into the direction that the spores weren’t from Fort Detrick (despite the Aimes strain being genetically specific to that laboratory). No mention of the biohazard inventory logs were mentioned either. The report developed what the investigation was ‘uncovering’ and suggested a bioweapons mafia but provided NO clear explanation of what this meant or who exactly this Mafia was, Instead lying on some quite loose information from some South African guy involved in bioengineering.

But wen Judith Miller, a willing Jezebel of a lady – a journalistic whore for the who pushed false rubbish through the press for the agenda of the Bush regime, then I jumped through the roof.

Like all good disinformation, truth is mixed with fiction to conceal the real story…  

Extracts from the 2009 program: “The Passionate Eye – Anthrax War.”  CBC (Canada)
Judith Miller
Investigative journalist
47.57

Judith Miller, Investigative journalist:

I’m always worried about what we don’t know, in an area that is so inherently secret and secretive. And work that is so politically sensitive, um, potentially diplomatically explosive.

One week before 9/11, a puliter prize winning journalist, Judith miller and two NY times colleagues broke a front page story revealing the US had been weaponising anthrax as part of several secret programs.

One such program, project Jeffereson, involved the CAI and Battelle, a private natioanl sevurity lab that sought to enjineer a potent new anthrax weapon.

Miller:
The Battelle lab was a contracter on project Jefferson and what they were trying to do was to, once again, figure out whether or not the Sovitest had combined two agents to make an anthrax that would resist our vaccine. And so for many years (laugh) they struggled to do this at this top secret labatory on the outskirts of Columbus Ohio.

49.19
Miller revealed that private contracters were capable of weaponising anthrax. But her report had been overshadowed by 9-11 and the anthrax attacks.

58:20
Ken Alibek the No 2 man in the Soviet biowarfare program before he defected to the west. Alibek went on to consult with the US government and assisted in the FBI’s [post 9-11] anthrax investigation.

He worries about the disappering line between bio defense, and bio offense.

49s
The Unites states is spending a huge amount of money, billions and billions of dollars for so called “bio defense”, they say.

They create viruses like Spanish flu virus again. What would be the purpose for this? In some countries mind, it could look like say, like a work to create some new biological weapons.

Today, Alibek runs a botech company in Kiev in  Ukraine. He is shadowed by a bodyguard.

-

Miller files two reports before 9-11 (the documentary only mentions one) where Miller broke a story about Anthrax. The documentary said two other journalists but the report from the NYT only yields Millers name (Perhaps Geff Gannon and his ‘brother’ were the other two – who knows) 

When Is Bomb Not a Bomb? Germ Experts Confront U.S.
By JUDITH MILLER
Published: Wednesday, September 5, 2001

source: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/05/international/05GERM.html
A former senior government lawyer yesterday vigorously disputed the Bush administration’s assertion that the global treaty banning biological weapons permits nations to test such arms for defensive purposes.

The lawyer, Mary Elizabeth Hoinkes, who was general counsel of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency from 1994 to 1999, said such an interpretation of the 1972 treaty was a “gross misrepresentation” that “risks doing serious violence” to an accord the United States has long championed.

The New York Times reported yesterday that the United States had made and tested a model of a small Soviet-designed biological bomb as part of a series of secret research projects that officials said were aimed at defending against a growing threat of a germ attack.

The projects were begun under the Clinton administration and approved then by Pentagon and Central Intelligence officials, but Ms. Hoinkes said she did not know details of the project at the time. She refused to discuss it further.

The treaty bars nations from developing, acquiring or stockpiling biological weapons to be used for “hostile purposes or in armed conflict.” It permits experiments on microbes, provided that quantities are small and the purpose is defensive.

An administration official contended this week that the treaty also allows such experiments as long as the aim is “protective,” not hostile.

The distinction, Ms. Hoinkes said, was “too cute by half.”

She said the treaty was intended to bar even initial research on munitions that spread disease. The Bush administration’s interpretation — apparently shared by the Clinton adminstration — gives nations too much latitude to research offensive weapons in the name of defense, Ms. Hoinkes asserted. “You see a room full of people manufacturing bombs, and they say, `I’m only doing this for defensive purposes and I have no intention of ever doing it for real because my heart is pure,’ ” she said.

State Department and other administration officials describe Ms. Hoinkes as a leading expert on the germ weapons treaty. She joined the State Department in 1976 and began working in 1981 at the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, which was merged into the State Department in 1999.

She was not alone in her dismay.

Spurgeon M. Keeny Jr., a deputy director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency from 1977 to 1981, expressed similar concerns about the interpretation of the treaty and how such an assertion would be perceived abroad.

“In the eyes of the world, it’s going to look like we’ve been clandestinely violating the treaty,” said Mr. Keeny, who is president of the Arms Control Association, nonpartisan experts who support efforts to curb weapons of mass destruction.

Bill Harlow, spokesman for the Central Intelligence Agency, which tested the bomb model, said yesterday that the device was not a weapon because it lacked a fuse and did not contain dangerous germs. “Everything we did was in full compliance with the treaty,” he said.

The State Department declined to discuss the experts’ arguments. A spokesman said the administration had found that the research programs were “in compliance” with existing treaties and that appropriate legal “mechanisms” were in place to conduct such reviews.

An international conference to discuss how to strengthen the germ treaty is scheduled for November, and Mr. Keeny said the administration could expect accusations that Washington had ignored a treaty that most nations have signed.

“If any other country was found to be doing what we were supposedly doing, they would call it a dangerous violation of the treaty, and it surely appears to be a violation of the treaty in terms of common interpretation,” he added.

Victoria Clarke, a Pentagon spokeswoman, also confirmed yesterday that the Defense Department had drawn up plans to produce small amounts of genetically modified anthrax, a deadly toxin, but that the project had been “put on hold” earlier this year to make sure it did not violate international treaties and domestic laws.

Still, she said, the Pentagon intends to press ahead with the anthrax project. Pentagon officials have said that producing the stronger poison would aid in developing vaccines and other defenses.

-

–

‘Germ-Making Plant’
By JUDITH MILLER
Published: September 4, 2001
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/04/international/04BIOW.html

-

-

- What I am suggesting is that Miller was told to pimp these stories out before 9-11 (an even Bush and gang knew was coming) so that if necessary, Millers story cold then be called upon to cast suggestions that private institutions were to blame for the anthrax attacks – that would be private institutions that the US government itself had ceeded licence to produce.

The documentary on one hand suggested Fort Detrick could not have manufactured this grade, yet they show and invertiew woth some guy who said they made it to that 1×10-6 m size. And to suggest a US Funded weapons lab was outperformed by a private company (who the US govt knew the identies of and would OBVIOUSLY have imposed strick seccurity conditions on them) to do something astounding as the near nano sized AIMES strain is just ridiculous.

I must say the Jewish element was flagged ( from which I will say an unscientific straw poll of the possibility of Zionist influence could be speculated upon – and that’s the only thing that should be infered by this statement!). And the program (although I had a bout of heavy-eye in the middle of it) didn’t mention Dr. Philip Zack a reported racist sporting Zionist attributes or the lady who tried to implace Hatfill with no evidence whatsoever – Ms. Rosenberg etc. etc

In summary, I believe this program has presented a piece of highly questionable work, peppering it with officials to legitimize it. 

The program also completely failed to suggest WHO could have killed these men involved in the bioweapons field. And WHY the US govt was subcontracting out this weapons research too and WHO owned those companies.

Was Israyhell mentioned once in the documentary? I really don’t think so. South Africa was, but not that South Africa and the Zionist regime had worked closely on nuclear arms making coperation in the development of biological weapons a possibility also.

Links:

http://www.newsfollowup.com/bioport.htm#Timeline%20study

http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/Battelle.shtml

-

-

-

-

-

Please kindly shut your mouth about Alex Jones, and watch his finest documentary yet:

Fall Of The Republic – The Presidency Of Barack H Obama – The Full Movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8

then, if you must, you can open your mouth and compare his movie with yours.

-

-

-

-

-