Posts Tagged 'Nuclear weapons'

Rubbish about Pakistans Nukes

There is a lot of talk around that the US is trying to destabilise Pakistan to rid it of nukes. I say not.

Frankly, it’s utter rubbish.

The US knew full well that Pakistan was(supposedly) developing a nuclear sector. I researched it. I’ve read of US historical reports which discuss the development program. I would call anyone an idiot who doesn’t believe the US has heavily infiltrated Pakistan – one of the most corrupt countries around, exemplified by its heads of state. The leadership is 100% pro-western.

What’s more, who hell wants to pinch a nuke and who the hell could use it if they did pinch it? there are a lot of “For Dummies Books’ on the market but “How to deploy and detonate a stolen Pakistani nuke” isn’t one of them! There isn’t a book like this “The complete idiots guide to nuking  your enemies - and get away with it!” – although there is a limited edition sporting the caveat “unless you’re a terrorist nation state like the USA”.

Picture it, go on! Picture it! Imagine what it would take to go from planning to steal a nuke to using it and living with the consequences here and thereafter. And what the hell would one or even a copule of nuke do? As if the world will not instantly turn on anyone using one. (Note: I am aware of the reports of possible false-flags involving stolen nukes or ‘missing’ nukes such as those lost by the US) So come on! THINK!!!! What’s the liklyhood a resistane movement would do such a thing?

All this talk about phony organisations – especially blended to confuse but leave the impression Islam is a principle trait – wanting to get nukes is utter bollocks! Muslims understand perfectly well the damage a Nuke would do makes it haram. And of course all this talk takes focus away from the scummy powers that already have these insane weapons. Oh by the way suffers of political bipolarity, Mother Russia via Putins caretaker Medvedev has announced Russia it to upgrade its weapon arsenal in defiance of the NPT, which calls on countries to take steps to disarm.

Nothing like ‘talk of nukes’ to nuke the intellect. Does anyone seriously believe it?

The US is in Pakistan for a number of reasons. Energy considerations are just a small part. The fundamental reason is those who dictate US foreign policy are conducting a war against Islam because it is the Muslims who pose the greatest threat to the shitty fake state known as Israyhell from bringing it’s false (like the imposter state itself) messiah to being.

It’s a Satan thing!

Always has been and always will.

Some talk of the Pakistani nuke in glorious terms - as though it’s something to be proud of. Well it’s not! The scumbag leader (Benny Butto’s Father) said something like For the sake of Pakistan’s development of its nuclear sector (probably in reference to a bomb) the people might have to eat grass. And he wasn’t wrong. What a piece of trash he is to make people live like that so he, with US knowledge, can make a nuclear weapon.

What, so Muslims are clever now because they can make a disgusting weapon and loads of radioactive pollutants in the process? Rather ironic don’t ya think…

Alanis Morissette
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9yUVgrmPY

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

US has enough weapons grade material to build a nuclear bomb – report

us-nuclear-sites-manhattan-project

The BBC is hosting a weird article about a bottle found that contains plutonium.

Page last updated at 13:54 GMT, Monday, 2 March 2009
US nuclear relic found in bottle 
By Paul Rincon, Science reporter, BBC News website 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7918618.stm
 

[the bottle] contains the oldest sample of bomb-grade plutonium… the plutonium was manufactured at the prototype X-10 reactor at Oak Ridge in Tennessee, which began operating in 1943, a year after the Manhattan Project was authorised.

Lets take a gander at some Nuclear weapons history:

In 1938 when scientists in Germany successfully split a uranium atom by bombarding it with neutrons….Prodded by Szilard, Albert Einstein, world‐renowned German physicist who had fled to the United States, wrote to President Franklin D. Roosevelt on 2 August 1939 warning that the Nazis might develop an atomic bomb….In spring 1942, Ernest Lawrence of the University of California, Berkeley, demonstrated that in addition to the scarce uranium isotope U‐235, the more available U‐238 could be converted into a new element, plutonium - source

Doesn’t this seem a bit strange to you? To me it suggests from 1938 up until 1945, a total of just 7 years, using 1930′s and early 1940′s technology, the US was able to locate uranium, mine it, purify it, process it into Pu and then build a plutonium based bomb. 7 YEARS !!!.  

Is that likely? Is that possible?? The Manhattan project was officially pretty big, but to do it in 7 years it must have been absolutely HUGE right? And remember, there are no accounts in history that says top secret information about the Manhattan project was known to others outside the US.

WARNING:::  POSSIBLE CONSPIRACY THEORY AHEAD:::

Is it possible therefore, that the US had actually embarked upon a nuclear weapons program LONG before 1939? For bloody obvious reasons. Once again, I get the feeling that I’ve been fed a pile of horse dung. Because it was so secret, the Govt would have had total control over release of information about it. Can we trust that the US government came clean about the matter?

Oh, and just for comparisons sake, lets see a US lung cancer map…

 

us-cancer-mortality-rates
http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/environment/spatial/ewc_sdi/images/us_cancer_lg.png

 

Endnote: I find this strangely funny “Brit nuke subs exposed on Google Earth
GCHQ. MI6 and SAS also laid bare”
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/02/google_earth_base_shocker/

-

-

-

-

-

Nuclear war looms?

If Russia is the resistance to the US, as described in conventional politics, then we are closer to some form of aggression now between the two than we have been for quite a long time.

Since (weirdly) the Russian military put faith in Yeltsin (who seemingly didn’t give a toss about Russia as long as Boris lived a life of luxury and prestidge) and the monetarists moved in, the US and UK have never ceased to interfere with it. Neither have they ceased their hipocrisy. Russia isn’t totally blameless for some of the criticism levvied against it, and the blood is thick on their hands as you may like to discover in relation to the war against Chechnya. But neither does it deserve all the muck thrown at it.

While I think all the important human parts in the machinery nuclear war machine are not so stupid to allow a full scale nuclear war, the possibility of a limited exhange cannot be ruled out. The previous post with three frames from the movie “Threads” gives such a plausible senario. All it takes is a number of misunderstandings and miscalculations for any confrontation to initiate and spiral out of control.

In this context, the actions by the US and UK (and Israyhell) in relation to Georgia and the missile defence shield are exactly the senarios that could lead to direct confrontation.

The horrors of a limited nuclear echange should never be undersimated and it is vitally important that we do what we can to stop our governments ever classing with Russia (and vice versa). In addition to threads, you may like to watch this QED program that appears on Google. It’s called “QED: Nuclear War – A Guide To Armageddon“.

 

It really is a massive failure from us CITIZENS who have allowed these dirty foul politicians to put us back in the situation where we enter the shadows of a nuclear confrontation. Sadly if we maintain this current position of apathy and self-indulgence, we shall never be free of it.

Take care…

-

Update: BBC nuclear bomb script released 
 
“Scripts were written to reassure the public the BBC was “still there”
A script written by the BBC and the government to be broadcast in the event of a nuclear attack has been published.”
– source http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7648042.stm

 Disaster management psychology exposed.

“It has previously been revealed the BBC stockpiled entertainment programmes to boost public morale in the event of a war.” 

-DYeah. That would be just great. isaster management psychology exposed.

“In the event of a nuclear attack, staff were told to stay in hiding for 14 days, when it would be safe to leave.”

Hummmm. Thats interesting.

 

-

-

 

Why are we still heading towards this?

-

-

-

-

Threads” by Barry Hines was made in 1984.

Why is it that we still haven’t learned ANYTHING ?

-

-

-

-

-

Russia tramples on the grave of the NPT.

h-bomb.jpg   

Like ALL countries that have nuclear weapons, Russia has no intention to scrap them, in fact it’s upgrading them, Just like the UK is upgrading theirs, just like when France exploded nuclear explosions in the South Pacific.

Well done Russia for staying in the league of devils.

The NPT isn’t worth the paper it’s written on !!!

In light of this, we may empirical conclude that in order to best protect your country from savage regimes like the US or UK, then one should develop ones own nuclear deterrent.

Critics may argue that the more nuclear weapons we have, the more likely it is that they will be used – see Dr. Helen Caldicott[1], Founder & President, Nuclear Policy Research Institute (NPRI) speech in 2005 at the KL Peace Forum, in which she describes how we were within ten seconds from being annihilated in Jan 1995 when mad drunk Yeltzin opened the ‘football’.

But the US will never give up its nuclear weapons, either will Zionist occupied Palestine – ESPECIALLY Zionist occupied Palestine (read some religious history to figure out why) and so the ideal whereby nuclear weapons are a thing of the past, simply is just extending the time period that these nations have nuclear weapons as the ‘process’ of lobbying goes on (c.f. the Iraq anti-war movement in the occidental countries).

Is it possible that by proliferation, the danger of nuclear war WILL get so great that we will be forced to come to our senses on this issue and not just scrap nuclear weapons but actually seek global peace? Deadlines can do that and on the nuclear holocaust issue, the word deadline is both literally and metaphorically appropriate.

Put yourself in the hands of a country like North Korea. If the US attacks, what difference does it make to them if they are killed by chemical weapons (like white phosphorous that the US used in Fallujah) or by a nuclear explosion? At lest if they have a nuclear deterrent, the chance of a US attack is virtually nil.

So then, with yet another affirmation of the death of the NPT, shouldn’t smaller countries develop their own nuclear deterrent?

Refs:

[1] http://www.flamingpear.com.my/gpf/6-Dr%20Helen%20Caldicott,%20MD.wmv

-

-

-

-


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers