More beef with Northy

Revised wording 17th Apr:

On the straw-man creator, non-sequiter sower Rachel North in her excessive slurrs about one-size-fits-all ‘conspiraloons’, I feel like saying a bit more. It’s doubtful thick skulled R will understand any such comment but so what… long live blogs.  

Rachel, If a fully independent enquiry (outside the jail of the  Inquiries Act 2005) about 7-7, an enquiry that examined ALL aspects, actually found that 4 Muslims did bomb London on 7-7, then fine – 4 Muslim suicide bombers killed 52 people. If other honest court cases find that there are networks of Muslims in the UK trying to do the same thing then great.

So don’t cast you idiotic aspersions willy nilly in the way that you do, as if nobody will ever accept it could possibly have been the case, and that nobody could ever accept there isn’t a group of Muslims plotting to inflict pain and misery.

You see, your rebuttals are as unstable as your emotional state. Your never answer points of contention in fact you do exactly what you accuse skeptics of (skeptics or fruitloop loons as you like to name call – reminds me of the nasty bully element in school) and that is, you get the teeny weensiest bit of a something (which may or may not be true) and you say its definite proof that the skeptics are wrong. Well YOUR wrong. There isn’t one thing you have ever “rebutted” from which a handful or so of other strong queries spring forth. While you swallow the most meagre bit of illogical ill reasonsed propaganda and outright crapola even before the proverbial drop of a hat, you just can’t comprehend why people don’t believe everything the government say. Unlike in your world, one government statement doesn’t  dismiss all other consequential lines of questioning.

Just one example is this… If as you harp on about “the CCTV times were wrong” something about mobile phones/watches/clocks or whatever it was you said, but then, HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU ASSERT ANY TIME LINE (OR DISPROVE ALTERNATIVE TIME LINES) THAT YOU ARE NOW CLINGING TO AND REPORT IN RESPECT OF THE LATEST 7/7 TRIAL? You have taken it upon yourself to disbelieve the time on the CCTV that raised serious questions about the whole 7-7 narrative. You dismiss it becasue it doesn’t feed into your perception. All other times are correct except the ones that bring about suspicion of alternative explanations to the narrative of what happened that day. Magic! 

You just don’t get it do you?

You post about ‘day one of the trial’ verges on racism and islamophobia – certainly some of your contributors let the mask slip. You seem to think ‘truthers’ (and I’m not embarrassed to use the word despite your best attempts to ridicule people who actually do want the truth, and you too claim to want the truth in your called for a non-independent enquiry, but of course its only your preconcieved truth that doesn’t deserve your unfounded and mean ridicule) have a crush of these for men and Muslims in general. I wonder if you consider yourself to be living in Londonistan?

 With regards as to your ‘lunch with a truther’ (Friday, April 11, 2008), being a personal victim of your bizarre imagination, I’d like to say thanks for reporting it. ‘cos it seems I am now likely to know what DIDN’T happen.


4 Responses to “More beef with Northy”

  1. 1 paul April 19, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    It’s a curious situation where people accused of being complicit in a case which has not been tried affirms the facts of that untried case. The defendants have no business defending themselves that way, all they have to do is prove that they had nothing to do with the events in question. The prosecution will have to show some direct link. Anything else is irrelevant.
    They are, no doubt, going to take a fall for a few dodgy text messages and computer file ownership.
    The maitresse of misery is showing all the skills that have made her britain’s number 1 pole dancing correspondent. Excuse me while I pour bleach into my mind’s eye after typing that.

  2. 2 lwtc247 April 21, 2008 at 2:31 am

    “The prosecution will have to show some direct link.” – I so wish that was the case paul, but I am afraid these men will be imprisoned but to a flood of “ifs” and “perhaps”

    It seems to be the way the prosecution is operating.

  3. 3 Antipholus Papps April 25, 2008 at 8:28 am

    ‘We believe what we want to believe and recognise only those facts that conform to that belief.’ Francis Bacon

    I assume that, in seeking a career in journalism, Rachel is obliged to think within a mainstream mindset. It’s also a frightening leap of imagination to realise that the very same government that can cheerfully murder people far away for political ends, can just as cheerfully murder people closer to home for political ends.

  4. 4 lwtc247 April 25, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Antipholus Papps

    I agree. Rachels the same old MSM bore that Like Paul Wood – didn’t report the genocide in Fallujah becasue he didn’t see it. Rachel the MSM darling. Rachel the person that Champions victims by rejecting anything other than the cobblers the gub’nt peddle to us.

    Sadist and mass murderer Tony bLiar fiddled the intelligence around the policy. The scumbag knowingly sent British people to their deaths. Why then wouldn’t he have killed 52 other Brits on 7/7 in pursuit of that very same policy?

    Seems to me like he would. Seems to me like he did.

    Whether I’m right or wrong, I’ve certainly got a good and very strong reason for thinking so, bolstered by that other dodgy dossier called the Official Narrative

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
April 2008

%d bloggers like this: