Archive for May 13th, 2008

Neocon chicken-coup panic.

This from my NZ friend and raving Conspiraloon Iron-Clay ( ) Neil. I’ve taken the liberty of adding a postscript comment and livening up the post with some graphics content.

Neils preamble: I’m just wondering what Sir ‘Hell’en Clark would have to say about this …. I mean the Counter Terrorist Squad is directly under the PM’s office and answers only to her and the American President, and as the very basis for this law is now clearly in question, I’d be interested in having her comment .. Helen?? Emails as above … feel free.


Neocons Admit that “War On Terror” Is a Hoax

Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax.

Douglas Feith, sharing more than one uncanny resemblance to Postman Pat


In fact, starting right after 9/11 — at the latest — the goal has always been to create “regime change” and instability in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Lebanon so as to protect Israel. And the goal was never really to destroy Al Qaeda.

As reported in a new article in Asia Times:

Three weeks after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, former US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld established an official military objective of not only removing the Saddam Hussein regime by force but overturning the regime in Iran, as well as in Syria and four other countries in the Middle East, according to a document quoted extensively in then-under secretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith’s recently published account of the Iraq war decisions. Feith’s account further indicates that this aggressive aim of remaking the map of the Middle East by military force and the threat of force was supported explicitly by the country’s top military leaders.

Feith’s book, War and Decision, released last month, provides excerpts of the paper Rumsfeld sent to President George W Bush on September 30, 2001, calling for the administration to focus not on taking down Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network but on the aim of establishing “new regimes” in a series of states…


General Wesley Clark, who commanded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization bombing campaign in the Kosovo war, recalls in his 2003 book Winning Modern Wars being told by a friend in the Pentagon in November 2001 that the list of states that Rumsfeld and deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz wanted to take down included Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia [and Lebanon].


When this writer asked Feith . . . which of the six regimes on the Clark list were included in the Rumsfeld paper, he replied, “All of them.”


The Defense Department guidance document made it clear that US military aims in regard to those states would go well beyond any ties to terrorism. The document said the Defense Department would also seek to isolate and weaken those states and to “disrupt, damage or destroy” their military capacities – not necessarily limited to weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Where does Israel come in?

Well, the Asia Times article continues:

Rumsfeld’s paper was given to the White House only two weeks after Bush had approved a US military operation in Afghanistan directed against bin Laden and the Taliban regime. Despite that decision, Rumsfeld’s proposal called explicitly for postponing indefinitely US airstrikes and the use of ground forces in support of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in order to try to catch bin Laden.

Instead, the Rumsfeld paper argued that the US should target states that had supported anti-Israel forces such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

After the bombing of two US embassies in East Africa [in 1988] by al-Qaeda operatives, State Department counter-terrorism official Michael Sheehan proposed supporting the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in Afghanistan against bin Laden’s sponsor, the Taliban regime. However, senior US military leaders “refused to consider it”, according to a 2004 account by Richard H Shultz, Junior, a military specialist at Tufts University.

A senior officer on the Joint Staff told State Department counter-terrorism director Sheehan he had heard terrorist strikes characterized more than once by colleagues as a “small price to pay for being a superpower”.

And if “terrorist strikes” were a “small price to pay for being a superpower”- and that is the reason that the U.S. government refused to disrupt the alleged planners of the 9/11 attacks – doesn’t that add weight to the claim that the U.S. government intentionally allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur? In other words, doesn’t this statement by a senior officer of the Joint Chiefs of Staff tend to prove that 9/11 was intentionally allowed to occur as the “New Pearl Harbor” which would allow America to act like “a superpower” and re-make the Middle East in its own (and Israel’s) image?

This is not an unreasonable question, especially given that Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and most of the other key architects of the “war on terror” were part of the Project for a New American Century and its plea for a “New Pearl Harbor” to justify expansion of American militarism and regime change in the Middle East.

And remember that many of the key members of PNAC and architects of the “war on terror” had previously created the “Clean Break” strategy for Israel, which called for a policy of war and regime change against Israel’s enemies.

The war on terror was never intended to be about fighting terrorism. As even Newsweek has now admitted, the war on terror is a hoax.

NeoLegal proof of “Douglas Feith’s” links to terrorism.


lwtc247 Postscript: There was a short movie produced recently called KILL THE MESSENGER based around Sibel Edmonds, made after she finally decided not to comply with the gagging order placed upon her. [Who is Sibel Edmonds?] In the movie it is revealed that Feith is connected to passing US military secrets to Turkey and there’s the usual Israyhell connection too. Check it out –download it here.

See also “For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets” The TimesOnline


Headaches and Guantanamo


Yesterday I had a terrible headache. I still have the remnants of it today but it’s not painful.

I had precious little sleep the night before and not enough thin-drinks (water or juice as opposed to coffee with sweetened condensed milk or ‘ovaline’ type drinks etc…) during the day. Tired eyes and squinting due to yesterdays intense sunlight along with work being a bit more stressful than usual all added up to a big mental whack!

I had to seek darkness and a total lack of mental stimulation as even consciously thinking hurt. I took 3 tablets , drank a it of water and had about 13 hours sleep.

These days, if I feel the warning signs of a headache coming on I don’t bother to wait for it to develop. I just pop a pill. Unfortunately yesterday, I didn’t make enough effort to go out of my way and get a headache tablet – and I paid the penalty!

I’ve often thought things like: by taking these tablets, have I stopped some kind of natural mechanism that would ordinarily keep a headache bearable? and now that I take tablets, are the headaches getting worse and so on? I often think the answer is yes, but on most occasions the tablets work, and I don’t know how long it would to assess any possible benfefits of ‘cold turkey’ and I don’t really want all the additional pain if these natural mechanisms didn’t exist.



Finally, when the pain subsided a bit, what came to mind was the torture victims in Guantamo bay, held in Camp Delta, a torture camp which allows US military personnel to indulge in their most beloved sadism, torturing them there so the change of legal action is minimised.

Previously tortured, blindfolded, ear-muffed,
breathing restricted, writsts tightly bound – circulation restricted,
forced to kneel on sharp stones – perhaps for hours
Hands unable to touch things, Back aches, leg muscles cramp and deform,
Just another USA at work in Gunatamano bay

These poor people will get headaches and probably due to their unimaginably more stressful conditions, will be far more frequent and possibly worse than mine. If yesterday I was put in a dark room naked, cuffed, cold and with some junk thrash metal ‘music’ blasting away at me for hours on end, after ferociously vomiting I honestly have no idea what would have happened to me. I am pretty sure I’d suffer some form of mental trauma and probably persistent trauma. I’d confess to the shooting of Lincoln, Archduke Ferdinand and for being Guy Fawks financier.


The worlds silence is appalling. People have accepted what’s happening there, many no doubt as a result of the fake War OF Terror drilled into them. (and If your an Uzbek or Iraqi’ that drilling is physical).

Even if there were “Al-Qaeda” – which if yor read about them is very very unlikely, (irrespective of my belief that Al-Qaeda is more phoney than real) then after about 6.5 years daily toture and detention they will have no value what so ever. Better just prosecute them according to the law. But that would deny the torture masters of their ‘pain fix’ wouldn’t it.

When the British detainees were released I said to myself ‘this is a bad day for the others at Guantanamo’ as now the Brits will shut up about the demonic torture going on there every day, and won’t even issue insincere protestations about it. Sadly I was right.




Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
May 2008