Stupid stupid stupid – I’m sick of stupidity

We all know about the supposed bomb beside the Danish embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan yesterday.

If like the Mainstream Media (MSM) we totally ignore even the thinnest possibility that the attack could have been a set up, and we believe the speculation, that Al-Qaeda did it (the organisation that strangely adopted the American label for it) then you have no choice but to say: stupid stupid stupid!

Just like virtually all the so called “Al-Qaeda” acts of terrorism.

Well bombers whoever and wherever you are, well done for killing a Pakistani cleaner, probably a Muslim, probably a financially poor one, probably with dependents that are now motherless, as well as the other 5 whose lives taken by your tyrannical hand. Be proud of yourselves you pathetic miserable despotic murderers.

And let’s keep with this, that somehow, God knows how, the US war OF Terror, the Xenophobia and the Islamophobic is justified, that all this isn’t a bloody sham, that the intelligence wasn’t in fact fixed around the policy, that they didn’t knowingly decide to sacrifice ‘their own’ when they didn’t lie about reasons for invading Iraq, that Saddam did actually detonate a nuclear bomb, that WTC7 didn’t collapse symmetrically (top floors didn’t cave in first) and that this man

Ex-ISI (Pakistan Intelligence Services) Lieutenant General Mahmood Ahmed didn’t wire $100,000 USD to a supposed Mohammed Atta just before 9-11, {breathe} , Sticking with all that for a second you have to wonder how 19 men with boxcutters and Osama bin Laded managed to defeat a  hugely manpowered multi-billion dollar civillian and military, security and defence system only now to be incapable of blowing up a bomb to damage the Danish Embassy.

Bit of a operational gulf there matey!

And what of bombing the Embassy anyhow?

Once again you have to say stupid stupid stupid! and you could probably add onto that “unIslamic unIslamic unIslamic” besides.

If you believe the Danish involvement in the cartoons was wrong you don’t take it upon yourself to murder innocent civillians you pratts! Please tell me what method of Jurisprudence allowed for that act of mass murder? Please tell me what in your stupid tiny little minds did you think you could possibly have achieved? Who the hell appointed you as guardians of Islam? Who are you to decare ‘murtard’ (apostate – not French mustard) or ally of the infidels?

Let me ask you more questions the hope it will penetrate your stupid little heads.

Why haven’t you ever damaged (rendering useless) Danish goods like cheeses, biscuits, books, toys and so forth? Why not use your supposed world wide organisation to do something easy and effectlive like that? Why don’t you call on others who would support such actions to join you, rather than disgusting acts like slaughtering poor cleaners, who any Muslim with a heart and mind finds repulsive.

Stupidity? – And there’s more…

Then we get stupid idiots like: Abdullah Ahmed Ali who made a suicide video, and “researched making an explosive device” {his words} and says

If we are going to make threats there is no point doing it with a firecracker, you have got to do it with credibility…We did not want to kill or injure anyone. Something small enough to cause a large bang, maybe some smoke. Something that would be considered serious and credible, something to generate that mass media attention.


Abdullah Ahmed Ali – Idiots who play
EXACTLY into the hands of those he
supposedly resits. Prat!

repeat: “there is no point doing it with a firecracker, you have got to do it with credibility”– What a bell-end! Of course there’s a point to using a firecracker, so you wont and they can’t accuse you of endangering life (Note: should be careful here, 21/7 non-bombers were sentenced for having tupperware containers filled with chapatti flour, however they supposedly had detonators contaning explosives). What possible credibility would you lose out on if you did use a firecracker? Do you really think if there was no smoke, say, like something like a pebble filled sock lobbed into the Commons chamber that the media wouldn’t report it? Something as simple as urinating in the doorway of an army recruitment centre would also make it, as would hacking away at the mass murderer Churchill’s statue and the other monuments in London for example as a protest. Even internet activity.

What a feeble minded prat!

It’s idiots like this fool who hold me back from completely ruling out the wafer thin possibility that maybe there is some kind of Islamic militant activity out there doing some of the things they are accused of. Mind you, that’s as far as I go.

Maybe when he lies in the fascists jail having brought more opportunity for the Islamophobic oppressors to do what they do best, perhaps he’ll start the think about his stupidity and realise what a zero he has been.




— IF it’s true — !!




11 Responses to “Stupid stupid stupid – I’m sick of stupidity”

  1. 2 lwtc247 June 4, 2008 at 4:39 am

    Thank you for your empathic comment on this post about stupidity.

    Sorry if I bored you about the murder of 6 people.

    Enjoy your day.

  2. 3 Beelzebufo June 4, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    sorry, it was more your feeble minded conspiritorial non-sequiturs I couldn’t fight through Put me to sleep. With you on the stupidity thing, though.

  3. 4 lwtc247 June 5, 2008 at 7:19 am

    Thank you once again for adding to the post regarding stupidity.

    It’s a pity you didn’t list any of ‘my’ “feeble minded conspiritorial non-sequiturs” written above. I would have been interested in listening to the grounds on which you dispute it.

    Guess I’ll never know.

  4. 5 Beelzebufo June 5, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    I felt certain you’d know what I was referencing. I’m uninterested in debating the fallacies of your arguments and assumptions because if you (or anyone) wants to believe in something as abstract as a convoluted conspiracy theory, then it is impossible to persuade them to the contrary. Evidence against or for, or a lack of evidence either way suddenly all become supporting evidence in your world.

    I happen to believe in global warming, but such behavior is one of the biggest liabilities of the environmentalists’ movement. Yes, I know we’re not talking about global warming.

    Anyway, the whole discussion is very tiresome, frustrating, and boring and I’ve already had it before with people I know are very intelligent. Sorry.

  5. 6 lwtc247 June 6, 2008 at 4:08 am

    No need to apologise. I appreciate the time you’ve taken to post here. I still feel a bit aggrieved that you haven’t specified any “conspiratorial non-sequiturs” you say I wrote earlier, consequently I feel the tone of your posts was a little unjustified. All Points I wrote above are factual

    “…impossible to persuade them to the contrary” – That is the default charge commonly cited by supporters of the official conspiracy theory – the one you have decided is the truth.

    I don’t accept the official conspiracy theory simply because an honest analysis of the facts and their significance, is to accept an outcome of least probability. Rather than say “I don’t know”, I have decided that based on the facts that the greatest probability is that 9-11 and 7-7 involved the state.

    There are PROVEN conspiracies, such as Iraq.

    Scott Ritter was told his weapons there would always be weapons unaccounted for no matter what he did. – See his speech at the Royal College of Surgeons Ireland. See HERE and HERE {sadly mp3 link has expired. I’ll try and find a copy later}

    Fake Niger Uranium Documents were made by persons unknown.

    Valerie Plames CIA identity was blown to discredit Joe Wilson her husband, who proved the Niger documents were forgeries.

    The BBC said Saddam exploded a nuclear bomb

    David Kelly had proved claims by Colon Powell were false (Powell himself before his lying panto in front of the UN was unhappy with what he was supposed to sell to the world. Kelly also disapproved of the 45 minute lie which Bliar tried to spin out of later. A conspiracy saw the assination of Dr. David Kelly – a conclusion by Norman Baker MP who condused a strong investigation into it.

    John Bolton Had José Bustani sacked because Bustani was looking for ways to avoid a war.

    Impossible demands were made by CIA agents in the UN weapons inspection teams so that Hans Blix would be forced to pull out the weapons inspectors

    Curveball was a known liar.

    The US and UK governments plagiarised a students thesis to add to the case for war.

    The British bugged the UN and both they and the US tried blackmailing members of the security council to vote for war.

    The Downing St Memo proved the intelligence was fixed around the policy.

    Operation Gladio is another PROVEN exposed conspiracy.

    I believe the facts show the official conspiracy of 9-11 is a lie, and that the states involvements are well covered. I believe the gaping holes in 7-7 also more strongly suggest that too involved elements of the state {some bloggers I have enormous amounts of respect for and are more involved with uncovering info about 7-7, e.g. J7 truth, actually take a more open view of it, but that doesn’t cause me any problem, because I know their approach to it is honest and simply looking for the truth}

    If you knew me better you would have read that my writings on the matter were familiar with me, you would realise that is not the case.

    I have maintained that if proof that the official version of 9-11 or 7-7 was given by a independent inquiry (not under the Jim’ll Fix It’ of the Inquiries act 2005 which considered all the evidence, then I could accept it. Whereas you accept it without such an Inquiry. That is your right, but you position is far more tenuous and convoluted than mine.

    “Evidence against or for, or a lack of evidence either way suddenly all become supporting evidence in your world.” – whereas in your world nothing is allowed to challenges the conventional thought stream.

    ”I happen to believe in global warming, but such behavior is one of the biggest liabilities of the environmentalists’ movement” – Fair enough, but again, I suspect you seal off any dissenting opinions what would challenge your set conclusion.

    One again. Thanks for the critical input.

  6. 7 Beelzebufo June 6, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    See? Tiresome. I’ve already been over all this and found the evidence far less than compelling and requiring far too many people to behave in ways too strongly opposed to human nature for the set up to work.

    Plus too much of the alleged physical evidence has turned up to be flawed conclusions and people jumping at shadows.

    Regardless, it’s not that I’m against contrary evidence, I’m just in favor of evidence being rational in a world populated by humans, not movie scripts.

    I think your opinion is stupid, you think my opinion is stupid. The only difference is that I’m not interested in trying to change your opinion and you seem to be interested in changing mine, or feel some need to try.

    So tell me: who’s intolerant of contrary opinions here?

  7. 8 BZ June 6, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Oh look, it’s a coincidence theorist…

  8. 9 Beelzebufo June 6, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    some people see the face of jesus on a wheat cracker, too. Some people dig up reasons why it’s a sign from god, some people think it’s a coincidence.

  9. 10 bz June 6, 2008 at 6:19 pm

    Sensible people look at the facts. Enjoy your cracker!

  10. 11 lwtc247 June 8, 2008 at 10:50 am


    Tiresome? If felt the pain of the million+++ Iraqis or hundreds of thousands of Afghanis slaughtered and/or tortured somehow I don’t think you’d be so dismissive.

    But it seems like no matter what hard factual evidence is provided to you, you’re just not interested. You already dismissed all serious facts regarding 9-11 Iraq, 7/7 and so on.

    That’s your right, even if it is demonstrably erroneous.

    I don’t think your mind can be changed. I present evidence and on at least three occasions now, you haven’t.

    I don’t know where intolerance you are talking about, certainly emanating from me. Another unfounded accusation I must say.

    “some people see the face of jesus on a wheat cracker” – Pity you take such a fact and graft it upon anyone that doesn’t fall into your dismissive perspective.

    Thanks anyway for engaging.

    All the best.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
June 2008

%d bloggers like this: