Update: Sept 21st 2009. The Truthseeker’s website appears to be have been attacked.
See: “The Truthseeker (Rixon Stewart) is currently unavailable” at:
Some see conspiracies involving ‘conspiracy theorists’ as they are labelled these days.
I talk about a reposted article called “David and Goliath?” by Rixon Stewart – July 12, 2008 on “The Truthseeker”‘s website. Have a read (see link at top), it’s quite short.
Rixon complains Icke lifts the work of others and that Icke had a go at David Davis Tory MP. I think 15 megapixels StefZ [starting here, and his later ‘core’ post, refrenced by Lord Patel is here] also had some research lifted by Icke which Icke used to ‘expose’ David Davis.
To be fair to the respected Truthseeker, Rixon’s article certainly isn’t calling for the silence of Icke, despite some of the accusations being mere conjecture and will, if influential, have the effect of making Icke somewhat quieter.
But some of Rixons baseless conjecture is that Icke plays a role of an establishment agent. Other than the fact that Icke may (I say ‘may’, but personally I think the words ‘almost 100% likely’ are a better measure) be wrong in what he says about lizards and religion, there is no proof if Icke being an agent of the state what so ever! Icke attacks what some would call ‘organised religion’, and the core of my outlook on light is a belief in monotheistic faith, so there’s no backhand reason why I am supporting Icke other than what I write here. I also believe Icke simply re-hashes aspects of monotheism into his own version – accompanied by his own visions and communications with beings he says occupies different dimenstions, and ‘the One’ so I’m not a Ikean Paladin by any means.
Mr. Stewart, you in particular should know better – that really, such claims should be backed up with substance. Simply labelling Icke as some kind of establishment ‘asset’, is virtually the same game that the “George jackass idiot dubya Bush” and his tin-pot yet prolifically murderous criminal regime carried out for about 7 years.
As for the content of his books, it’s silly to criticise Icke on the % of things he apportions the content of his books too. e.g. Richard Tomlinson’s affidavit getting little coverage at the expense of the Diana conspiracy. Icke can focus on whatever he wants whenever he wants wherever he wants. They are his books! Why not comment on his videos in which reptiles and Diana form only a minor part of what he says? In fact in the ‘DD debunking’ I don’t think Icke mentioned reptiles once! And if he actually did, it certainly wasn’t allotted significant attention.
What of yours or anybodies writings and research? Whose research springs forth from a vacuum? Nobodies. Icke’s use of publicised research is fair practice. Icke has said thinks like “I’ve been researching this for many years” but he never says his findings are his alone- at least I’ve never heard him say such a thing and I’ve seen auite a lot of ‘Icke stuff’, and he has referenced other researchers. DI certainly isn’t shy is identifying Credo Mutwa as a suource of information.
Mr Rixon, I must say I am very surprised at your apparent belief that David Davis is genuine. The political actions of DD, to me at least, mean we cannot embrace his as some kind of political saviour. One example is that DD voted for the war against Iraq – See HERE. As you will know, over 1m dead millions more refugees, millions more WILL die from DU and unexploded munitions. Don’t dare try and defend him saying he made an error. When it comes to what was always going to be hundreds of thousands of lives, you DONT vote for war unless the case is 100% proven or so damn near to 100 that such a conclusion is accepatble. The BS against Iraq was a plain as the nose on your face. IF that is, it isn’t DELIBERATELY ignored. DD has the blood of countless children on his hands. His “error” was a disgrace.
DD chickened out of a debate with DI, and I’m flabbergasted at you portraying NeoLabour as being kind of “scared” to field a candidate or enter the debate on the issue of big brother. It is really very silly indeed that you take what NeoLab and the LDems at face value. One can very easily say NeoLabour and the LibDems – both parties, within which the “Friends of the harbinger of death“, sorry, the “Friends of Israyhell” are the biggest and most powerful lobby groups, could equally well, in fact more easily be said to have deliberately NOT put up a candidate so that DD would win! Bingo! In gets the ‘establishment rebel, and that Mr Rixon, has a good chance of not being a conspiracy in my underpants.
Real Politick, I personally gave DD the benefit of the very large doubt following his decision to call the by-election, but If Icke had won that would have been fine too. I accept my speaking favourably of DD in context of big brother meant I recieved criticism. It was is merited criticism and came from political commentators I admire greatly. I was aware at the time I may have been supporting a string-pulled-hack, but it was his principle I wanted to see win the election not particularly the man himself.
So what you said about Icke being a stooge actually applies more strongly to DD.
As It happens I support you article criticising Icke, as I would welcome an article criticising ANYONE, including any ill-warranted things I happened to say. But it’s worthless without substance, and yours had no substance.
Please understand my criticism of you is nothing personal and I really appreciate much of what you put on your website.
But here’s a tip to you and everyone else… If Icke is an asset (or you or me) then CHERRYPICK. If you suspect psyops at work, then flush that bit of what they say down the toilet and pick info that goes against the rotten elements of the VERY ROTTEN establishment. David Ickes site, in start contrast to the claims made in your article, has provided masses of information about masonry, illuminati (if you subscribe to that), financial fraud, political fraud, false flags, illegal torture and inhuman experiments… da da da da da.
I’m making this an ‘open letter’ because at the moment, I don’t see / know of a ‘comments’ section you have.
UPDATE: I will e-mail this letter to you at the editor at thetruthseeker .co .uk
Best wishes thanks for your website – the same goes to David Icke.