Mon Dec 7th 2009: I’m rewriting this (keeping all the same elements) to try and negate some of the extra sloppyness from sleep depravation.
Is Dr David Kelly still alive? Bear with me on this. I would say the question is less nonsensical than the assertion that he killed himself.
The current theories about Kelly is that he committed suicide or he was murdered. Both scenarios have the same outcome – that he is no longer alive on this planet. Of course he could be dead, but maybe you’ll keep an open mind about the possibility – even if slim, that in fact he may still be alive.
Here’s my reasons:
First and foremost and definately the most puzzling thing about Dr. David Kelly, is that of his family. The case for him being murdered is there, and in fact recently, Dec 5th 2009, The Truthseeker reports under the headline: “Dr Kelly WAS murdered”
“Six doctors who believe government scientist David Kelly was murdered have launched a ground-breaking legal action to demand the inquest into his death is reopened.”
You see there are many serious questions that suggest he was murdered. If I was one of Kelly’s family members I’d would never stop lobbying the government to answer all the conspiratorial Q’s raised. Wouldn’t you? Yet his family say absolutely nothing about his death. That is completely unnatural.
His briefing to Andrew Gilligan raises questions too. Why would Kelly feel the need to ‘get it out there’ that Campbell sexed up the dossier? (‘sexed up’ is a kind way of saying the bLiar/Campbell murdering filth deliberately lied). The supposed reasoning behind the ‘sexed up’ claims involves Kelly trying to blow the whistle on the governments lies – the end game was to enable the UK govt to control Iraq’s oil no matter how many innocent Iraqi people or USUK soldiers had to pay for it. But Kelly could have provided actual data with the effect that the UK govt would be able to try and lie their way out of it as they actually did. Remember that scumbag Campbell faking anger in fron to the Commons select committee? Supplying data would have been devistationg. He could have ‘accidentally’ left the documents on a train, or lost a laptop. he could have held them in his hand only to be photographed by eager paparazzi, or had his car or his home ‘burgled’. The ‘sexed up’ claim by Gilligan was rather empty of hard facts even though it was true. He could have taken a voice recorder in with him into any meetings and so on.
And as we know, the true claims that it was sexed up did not result in punitive measures against the murdering trash like bLair, Campbell, Scarlett etc…
Kelly’s briefing to a second female BBC journalist seems rather questionable too. Why do such a thing? Her account of all this seems pretty strange to me. Why would Kelly talk to 2 BBC journo’s? That increases his chance of being ‘sussed out’ and only an idiot wouldn’t realise the BBC is full of government spies.
His outing by the MoD. The story of his outing is peculiar too. Why out him? I don’t think I’ve ever heard a reasonable answer to this question.
If Dr. Kelly is still alive, then was the decision of Norman Baker MP to ‘stand down’ to conduct his investigation merely a act to try and reinforce the ‘fact’ Kelly was dead? It is very very strange that he points the finger primarily to Iraqi opposition groups. Once Kelly’s name was leaked, was there nobody watching him? Keeping tabs on him in case he was going to leak something else or have a dossier of proof stashed away for a rainy day? It seems highly likely to me that he would have been under surveilance. Wouldn’t the government have thought of him as a national security threat – a man of kis knowledge and expertise. Then how did ‘Mr. Bakers’ Iraqi opposition groups get to know where Kelly was. How come there was no intelligence that suggested these opposition groups were out to get Kelly. These groups were being wined and dined by the likes of Bush etc. Their groups would have full of snitches, they were in the pocket of the USUK for pity’s sake.
And what of the complete ineffectualness of Bakers report? Where are the police arrests, or even requests for suspects/key players to submit statements to the police? Nothing! Not one peep!
The strange details of the coroners report of arteries cut which are very rare indeed as having caused death. Then the pathological reports of the pharmalogical involvement in his supposed suicide. One could be forgiven that ‘alarm bells’ such as these are deliberately there to make people think he was murdered and didn’t commit suicide – i.e. you will still think he is dead.
Even if Kelly had genuinely made the ‘sexed up’ claims to Gilligan, it’s not that beyond possibility that they would still have a need for Kelly’s expertise. By many accounts Kelly was a major ‘warfare’ player behind the scenes. Maybe he is too valuable to murder.
Is Dr. David Kelly in fact still alive and that his family know this? Is that why they arn’t persuing things? Was his death was faked? Is it that Coroners didn’t in fact examine the body of Kelly but make up a loak of bunkum as to how Kelly died, or someone elses body was put there instead?
If Kelly is alive, we need to ask: why was his death faked?
It has already been mentioned that his expertise was highly valuable. There may be operational advantages to people believing Kelly is dead.