Anthony Weaver decided to do what the establishment loathes to do, that is, subject one of it’s own to the law.
Here is a quote from the BBC propaganda outlet:
“Mr Weaver, 62, said he wanted to prosecute Ms Smith under Section 2 (1) of the Fraud Act 2006.
He told the judge he could provide witnesses to testify that Ms Smith only slept at her sister’s on average three times a week and that her main home was in Redditch.
Outside court, Mr Weaver said he was disappointed to leave without a summons but would consider contacting Scotland Yard although he said he thought it was “a dead end” and that he been “fobbed off”.
There is “enormous anger” across the country about MPs’ expense claims and he said he wants more members of the public to follow his example.
He said: “If you believe a Member of Parliament is guilty of fraud, go to your nearest magistrates court, type out four lines alleging the fraud and ask for a summons.”
The case will be heard again at the City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on 26 June.” – Source
Good on you mate. But of course like we saw with murderous cesspit bLiar, (s)he who works for the establishment gets protection from the establishment.
Even the annoying Prof David Starkey (who revels in stressing the ‘lia’ in parliament) is suggesting revolution.
‘tarkey suggesting a Brit Revolution.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_week/8063136.stm
and
Dr David Starkey ‘debates’ the ideas in his film with Andrew Neil, Pinky and Perky.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_week/8063131.stm
–
–
–
–
–
Recent Comments