Archive for June, 2010

Iblis didn’t bow to humans – In a sence, I think I can understand why.

That title is horrible, but it gets the point across and I’m too tired and pressed for time to try and think of an alternative. Man is said to have been Gods greatest creation. Iblis refused to bow down before man. Given what I’m feeling about ‘many’ people these days, I can understand why bowing down before man might have been an ‘issue’. Of course I’m not excising Satans defiance of God.

The other day I was attending a philosophical discourse (actually ‘talk’ with a lot of Q and A – would perhaps be more representative descriptor) examining “Islam (in terms of immigration) in Europe”.

It was a worthwhile use of time, and I was glad to attend it. The good doc posed a number of apparently pushme-pullyou Q’s as one may expect from good philosophers ;) By the way, I wish philosophers would not only ask skilful and quirky Q’s but propose skilful solutions, even if they don’t hold a piece of paper that identifies them as being “qualified” (what ever that means) in political science.

I had the opportunity – rather, I took it – to challenge some of the assumptions I heard. For example the ‘negative’ image of Muslims due to 911 and Madrid etc, I advised caution on these ‘facts’ {not that the speaker was saying they were facts, but I’m pretty sure the audience was taking them to be so}. I pointed out that even if one accepts the 911 stuff, out of the 1 billion + Muslims, only a relative handful are involved in terrorism. Yeah, it’s the kind of thing one would expect to encounter in the first few pages of a “beginners guide to challenging your own perceptions’”, but still, it needed to be said. These ‘givens’ are quite prolific!

Some of what the audience said was slightly surreal and actually agitating, because while most of the Muslims in the ‘audience’ were challenging the basis of the European Islamophobia, many of the Muslims in the audience had inside them the same seeds but whose only difference was these seeds had already germinated in the mind of Europeans to result in their European Islamophobia. One such “seed” is a general acceptance that the Muslims did 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Killing Van Gough* etc. I was the only one to challenge what occurred to me was a “tried ‘n convicted / done ‘n dusted” belief in the official narratives of these violent events.

This is a disease amongst Muslims. They positively lap up accusations of gross crimes of terrorism upon themselves – a bit like the Germans that have been forced to be so guilty of the Jewish holocaust that they stand back once again at the Palestinian Holocaust despite them singing to the orchestrators tune of ‘never again’.

Pah! – but at the same time absolutely incredible that they are happeing today.

A real ‘crunch’ moment was someone said ‘we have to deal with the realities’

Do people actually understand what really means?

I think not!

I think they just blurt out catchphrases in an attempt to appear clever, supermarket philosophy if you will, to be intellectually lazy and avoid perturbing their safety zone.

I tried to inform them. “Whose Reality?” I asked.

You see, once you ‘deal with the reality’ what happens after that is that you have accepted the reality set by others – you become bound to operate within it, complete with its bent and twisted rules. You strip yourself of power. It’s a mugs game, a dereliction of duty to oneself and society. A failure of your own human-ness.

By NOT ‘dealing with the reality’ i.e. grabbing hold of your own destiny and making the reality in defiance of someone else’s dictated reality, I’m not talking about producing chocolate houses in the woods, giant beanstalks or geese that lay golden eggs. I’m talking about the parameters of human society, not a fairytale as a reality.

This world is CRAP because WE, you and me, have allowed it to be CRAP.

The ‘comfort zone’ is incredibly captivating and sticky. It’s also incredibly selfish and dumb.

After I had done my bit, I felt a bit like not much had soaked through their skulls, once again denting the supposed ‘potential’ of today’s humankind.

A couple of days later, I was involved in a workshop of conflict resolution. Two groups were assembled to take an opposing view of some issue. The group I was in was to defend a policy of positive discrimination in favour of an indigenous population against the wealth and educational dominance of an immigrant population. I was supposed to argue this way, but there was an opportunity here to probe people mind about what they think life is all about.

I asked Q’s like by what standard are you saying the indigenous population are ‘left behind’. You see it was the immigrants economics and way of life that was the benchmark. If the indigenous population weren’t forced into that system in the first place but allowed to operate in whatever way THEY saw fit then if they stuck with their traditions, the ‘left behind’ thing becomes a non issue. The people in my group simply couldn’t understand what I was saying. To them it was inconceivable, like I was speaking Martian. They ended up trying to ‘explain it to me’ as if I was dumb (which I may well be, but I wasn’t dumb in this case!) and that it was ME that simply couldn’t grasp the concept. I was the dumb ‘outsider’ I actually felt quite intellectually superior to these people – which in a number of ways is worrying; As I’m sure you’ll probably agree.

I’ll end with the last point today. This story:

Study examines scientists’ ‘climate credibility’

Page last updated at 08:47 GMT, Tuesday, 22 June 2010 09:47 UK
By Pallab Ghosh

“Some 98% of climate scientists that publish research on the subject support the view that human activities are warming the planet, a study suggests.” – source:

Crikey. The HUGE majority of academic papers I’ve seen attach “hopeful” (that’s being diplomatic!) taglines to their papers saying things like “This will contribute to a cure for HIV/Cancer/Malaria” blah blah blah. One highly respected academic confided in me that they attach stuff entertaining a Darwinian viewpoint to their papers or else their papers simply won’t get published, but they themselves don’t believe anything to do with Darwinism at all.

The point is, the game is rigged and if you don’t pander to it, then your toast. It’s a ‘Mark of the Beast’ kind of thing. This BBC story, like so many BBC newz stories is meaningless bumfluff.

Man it’s been a weird few weeks.

* ‘A Muslim (not the singular) may have killed Theo Van Gogh, but no actual act of violence (which automatically gets promoted to terrorism or even better still ‘ISLAMIC terrorism’) springs forth from the vacuum, yet that is how these events are spun out, that there is a bunch of backwards men who out of their own choice decided non-Muslims must be exterminated. And not springing forth from the vacuum is NOT an excuse for acts of violence, and similarly there are provocative acts that DO require a violent response – when for example a demon like Tony Blair robs the lives of 1,400,000 men women and children. The killing of Blair’s murder by those who are his victims is a very persuasive argument – an act of natural justice.

No War for Israel in Iran – Keep Americans Safe – David Duke


No War for Israel in Iran – Keep Americans Safe – David Duke

David Duke is portrayed as a racist and anti-Semite (yeah, that would be the falsified modern day definition).
It has got to the point where; When the Western ‘populist’ (usually corporate) media trash starts to demonise someone, then I feel it’s reasonably safe to take by default that this person may well have an important view on things which should be listened to, and the aren’t likely to be nearly as bad as they say.

In a way, it reminds me of the saying “Don’t believe anything until it’s officially denied”
Yes, our ‘glorious’ leaders of the ‘free’ world (LOL) have lied so much, that when one inverts the disease that trickles from their lips, one often gets a better and more accurate picture of what exactly is going on.
God help us, and empower the truth tellers.
Great Video.


More personal thoughts and Mahabharat


Having gone to the Zoo yesterday, staring at the monkeys and orangutans, I thought about NeoDarwinism. It was easy to imagine/feel we humans were chimps/monkeys – the timing of their motions were almost the same as us. You might know what I mean by that if you think about spiders, snakes cockroaches etc. They can at times, move very quickly – quicker than our average 0.2s reaction time, and when they move so quick they induce some level of fear in us – they can do things before we can react to it. But the usual behaviour of chimps/monkeys is within out time reference. Hence they ‘seem’ human. There are some who believe we were an ape-like being at one time and split from apes/gorillas/monkeys/chimps etc.

Anyway, the monkeys testicles were on open display and I imagined a man in place of the monkey. He’d likely cover up his testicles and penis. Then I got thinking of some TV programs that showed animals behaving in ways thought of as being exclusive to humans – using tools etc – the program essentially tried to ‘do away’ with any difference between us. But the program didn’t mention shame / embarrassment which I don’t think animans have. I wonder if the program deliberately put up ‘false’ differentials (straw man) between humans and apes/chimps whatever. Back to shame… It’s funny how we feel shame. I pointed out to a person nearby that “it’s funny how they are not ashamed yet we as humans are”. The person replied that’s why they are called animals and when people behave badly, the term animal is quite appropriate.

Later when in the shower, I thought of the monkeys, nakedness and shame again. I tried to think about how if we were monkeys – as the Neodarwinists insist, then how could a sense of shame develop? I don’t think it can be explained in an ‘evolutionist sense’ but surely must come from innate knowledge of advanced thinking hence it seemed to yet again diminishes the evolutionists usual baseless arguments.

Not strongly related to all this: I was recalling some past experiences and one of which relates to when I was University. My housemates made fun of me for watching a dramatization of the Mahabharat because of its special effects. No need to comment further on that. (Mahabharat went on for about two years – once a week for about 40 mins each week).

I get the feeling some Muslims are scared to engage in learning or even exposing themselves to other religions because they think they might lose their faith or they might see serious religious crimes such as Shirk, but to me, I can watch/enquire about other religions without losing my faith in the Islamic reassertion of worship to The One God. Simple studies of comparative religion interests me because I can see the residues of the Universal messages of The One God (even in polytheistic faith!) and fundamental truths throughout the world. It really is amazing. SubhanAllah.

I should say Mahabharat helped me become a Muslim. In a way (not in totality) it significantly expanded my cultural awareness from Western – trash-centric – “culture”, to to that of the great ancient civilisations (Egyptian/Pharaohanic culture had an air of being too long expired and Aztec/Incan had too little depth of history/analysis)   


Episode 1 here:

(WITH subtitles)



Remember the journalists and peace activists murdered by the Israeli Forces

Updated with a Viva Palestina Malaysia Video at the end…

Remember the journalists and peace activists murdered by the Israeli Forces From Turkey

Remember the journalists and peace activists murdered by the Israeli Forces

From Turkey
And there are tens of thousands more victims of Israyhelli terrorism from all over the planet.
I like this a LOT.

The Jews

Anyone who has researched “The Jews” is most likely to have discovered the term cannot be satisfactorily defined.

However “The Jews” gives us a handle people can work with. It seems to me most of “The Jews”, being Askenazim and therefore not included in the Abrahmic Covenant of the Hebrews, don’t seem “Jewish” (rather they seem Jew-ish, but that is a stain on the “Jewish” religion as they almost certainly do not practice the Code of Laws given to the Hebrew prople of old.

The term Zionist is far more descriptive of the global bane that like a hot gas star that answers to noone, occasionally lets out a solar flare practically toasting anything in its path.

Most “Jews” support Israyhell and hence most “Jews” are Zionists, but this is a problem for non-Zionist Jews, which although there are not many, means they get saddled with all the vile rot the Zionists so. This has long been the case causing ordinary humble Jews problems with persecution for years. So although most Jews are Zionists, please distinguish them accordingly.

This is a first attempt at categorising (with a degree of quantification) “The Jews”

And here’s some links I’m rather partial to.

Redress Information & Analysis

Gaza flotilla protest saturday 5th June 2010 London lifeline 4 Gaza.jpg



Don’t for pity’s sake go to the protest and think ‘job done’. Thats one reason why the Br(sh)ittish Army and the Unites Snakes army are still killing and maiming innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The protest is THE FIRST simple STEP. After you need to take it to the higher level. Boycott that filthy murderous state Israyhell. Show these Supramacist bastards that there is a price to pay on this earth as well as the next.

BOYCOTT Israeli goods, Make your boycott public. Encourage the good people you know to do so likewise. Boycott companies that do business with Israyhell or donate to organisations like the JUF. E.g. McDonalds donate to the JUF and are heavily intertwined with it. Change banks from banks, like LLoydsTSB, who harm the Palestinians (even better try not to use or minimise the need for a bank at all!)

Write to your MP but don’t expect it to result in anything – in fact expect it to resut in nothing.

The global institutions have failed us. Detach from them and act in your own capacity to remove this carbuncle of a SuperTerror State a.k.a. israyhell.

A text from Lebannon…

“Long ago, I was made to understand that Palestine was not Palestine;
I was also informed that Palestinians were not Palestinians;
They also explained to me that ethnic cleansing was not ethnic cleansing.
And when naive old me saw freedom fighters
they patiently showed me that they were not freedom fighters,
and that resistance was not resistance.
And when, stupidly, I noticed arrogance, oppression and humiliation
they benevolently enlightened me so I can see that arrogance was not
oppression was not oppression, and humiliation was not humiliation.
I saw misery, racism, inhumanity and a concentration camp.
But they told me that they were experts
in misery, racism, inhumanity and concentrations camps
and I have to take their word for it:
this was not misery, racism, inhumanity and a concentrations camp.
Over the years they’ve taught me so many things:
invasion was not invasion, occupation was not occupation,
colonialism was not colonialism and apartheid was not apartheid…
They opened my simple mind to even more complex truths
that my poor brain could not on its own compute like:
‘having nuclear weapons’ was not ‘having nuclear weapons’,
‘not having weapons of mass destruction’ was ‘having weapons of mass
And, democracy (in the Gaza strip) was not democracy.
Having second class citizens (in Israel) was democracy.
So you’ll excuse me if I am not surprised to learn today
that there were more things that I thought were evident that are not:
peace activists are not peace activists, piracy is not piracy,
the massacre of unarmed people is not the massacre of unarmed people.
I have such a limited brain and my ignorance is unlimited.
And they’re so intelligent. Really.”

Ghassan Hage

Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
June 2010