Yeah, so good food costs you more, so what? Eating proper food is probably the best way to look after your health, so if you don’t think your food cum health is a worthy enough cause for you to spend your money on, then frankly speaking you are a daft.
I am currently engaging on a program to improve the way I eat.
Please look after you!
Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed
Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes
Prisonplanet.com
July 30, 2010
The ruling elite of France who have often spat in the eye of ordinary people world-wide including its own people, when for example it collaborated with the Nazi’s and helped send many ordinary decent Jewish people to a horrendous grave, has decided to crack down on something practiced by a number of its Muslim citizens.
Apparently, scum in the UK weren’t slow to take the opportunity to try and do the same in the UK, or was it the media that took it up and blamed the usual nazi racist scum to hide its own agenda? hummm…
–
Catherine NEVER mentioned wearing a veil in an Islamic context. She puts it solidly as a freedom of choice issue. [Note: I originally wrote a ‘womans’ issue but that description wasn’t as accurate as the ‘choice’ issue, something you will see from the videos]
Dr Taj Hargey insisted on trying to make it an Islamic issue, robbing the discussion of its main ‘freedom of choice’. Why was he doing this? Is veil-wearing a purely Muslim issue? Can non-Muslims NOT wear a veil?
“Muslins need to distinguish between what is culture [and] what is Creed.”
The doc didn’t say Muslims need to know many aspects of culture are not against Creed. The doc didn’t say the Qur’an does not forbid culture. I really don’t think Islam demands monoculturism. OK, I would conceed some Muslims say Islam itself should be the culture, although I seriously doubt anyone saying such thing would have thought such a thing, but instead just blurted out some kind of ‘protectionist’ people would have actually really thought in any depth as to such a statement.
“Face masking is a Byzantine and Persian Empire. It was absorbed into later Muslim society and then given a religious gloss.”
I am sure I heard someone tell me the prophets wives wore these garments. Perhaps I’m wrong. Note he says it’s a pre-Islamic Byzantine and Persian custom! (see later)
“If there [women wearing niqab/burqa] are being honest and say listen, I want to wear it because its a tribal customs, its my primitive cultural convention, that’s one thing.”
It certainly seems like the doc is saying the women are not being honest. As for the latter part, he says ‘that’s one thing’ and it just so happened to be the ‘thing’ i.e. a cultural convention, within the interview!, despite his attempts to bring it elsewhere doc. So if the women are want to do and be ‘honest’ (sheesh!) about it, i.e. saying they want to wear it from a cultural point of view then do you think the doc would be ok with it.
“Nowhere in the Quran does the word Niqab or Burqa exist.”
Errrm, doc, Nowhere in the Qur’an does it say women must not wear a face veil. Nowhere in the Qur’an does it say they have to show their face.
“No one [is] asking anyone how to dress but you are supposed to show your face.”
You are telling them how to dress!
“…we are supposed to be an equal society!…”
Careful doc… Do you support gay marriage, adoption of kids by gay couples, promotion of homosexuality in school? Are you saying erect penis should be allowed to be shown on TV because women’s breasts are allowed to be shown? Careful doc…!
“If politicians stop being pussyfooting and being craven about then I’m quite happy to support it [the ban] because it’s not a Qur’anic requirement”
Is it Quranic requirement that women must show their face? or is it a Dr Taj Hargey requirement? Somehow I suspect the latter.
“People can wear any type of costume or dress… They must reveal their face in public”
Whoops! So doctor, they CAN’T in fact wear anything they want in public.
“…this custom, face masking, is a pre-Islamic Byzantine and Persian custom, got nothing to do with Islam. In fact it’s unQuranic. Nothing in the Quran about it … we should opposing these tribal customs coming from Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan [and] other places like that”
Wait. He said for the second time it’s a pre-Islamic Byzantine and Persian custom, but now is shifting it to Saudi occupied Arabia and Coalition of the Killing occupied Afghanistan ! I think his veil is slipping. Maybe not. Maybe it’s pue coincidence that he’s switched attributing those (very non-Byzantine and non-Persian) Arabia/Afghanistan places which is probably the two countries most ignorant Americans and British would name in response to ‘Name two countries most associated with terrorism”
“We should say for security reasons…”
Ah, Whose security? The security of the state perhaps – the murderous state that believes it has some right to murder over 1 million Iraqi’s with impunity?
“…where’s social cohesion. You do not make social relations with someone in a mask. It’s impossible to do so”
So veiled women talking to veiled women have no social cohesion? LOL. I think what doc means is HE doesn’t get any social cohesion. Catherine fell foul of that ‘I wanna espouse western values” too when she said they can wear whatever they want. No they can’t wear what ever they want. In ANY society, but they SHOULD be allowed to wear niqab or Burka if they wish.
“Why are we giving way to these fundamentalist from Saudi Arabia Afghanistan and else. They are not having Qur’anic Islam.”
Aaaaah… Once again is the doctor showing his true colours. Is he yet another Imam for whom terrorism involves Muslims, yet another Iman for whom western global state sponsored terrorism is ‘defence’? It certainy seems so.
“Only found in so called reputes sayings of the prophet only written down 200 years after his death.”
The doctor is dismissing the ahadith is he not?
“For people to say this is a religious requirement, they are being deceitful and duplicitous”
There he goes again. Just listen to this guy bang on and on and on. He’s arguing with himself. NOBODY mentioned it was a religious requirement to wear a face veil. I bet the Zioscum and friends(slaves) of Zioscum in the UK just love this dude. Perhaps he’s got a mannequin of Ayaan Hirsi Ali (actually Ayaan Hirsi Magan) in his bedroom – an unvelied mannequin of course.
Personally and honestly speaking, when I see a woman in a black niqab I feel unusual, awkward even. But I’m OK with that. The veil wearing woman is making a statement she doesn’t wish to be looked at and I automatically find myself acting on that, I tend to avert my gaze and even keep some distance. As I said, I’m OK with that. What’s more important? My ‘right’ to stare/oogle at her, or her right not to be stared at?
I’ll be keeping my eye on Dr Taj Hargey (whose name involuntary makes me think of Hagee)
I truly hate the British political establishment. Almost everything about it stinks. In fact I should go further and say: The entire British establishment stinks.
It is incredible that the David Cameron, head of one of the greatest terror cells the world has ever known, i.e. the UK, has the gall to lecture the people of Pakistan about ‘shunning terrorism’. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10791182
I am sure the pathetic twit Cameron really does believe that there are is a significant force (and therefore amount of influential people) in Pakistan that have taken it upon themselves – perhaps out of boredom, or perhaps because there’s something about the scholars of their religion – to destroy anything so called ‘western’.
The atrocious Pakistani politicians (strongly US and UK educated) and the suffering they have brought their people has nothing to do with it.
The spineless way at which the Pakistani politicians brown nose the western elite has nothing to do with it.
The murderous acts of aggression of the Pakistani political elite on their own people has nothing to do with it.
The vile acts of torture the supporting structures of the Pakistani ruling class carried out within Pakistan has nothing to do with it.
That the Pakistani government invites US predator drones etc to KEEP bombing innocent people’s houses, villages, communities as nothing to do with it.
That Pakistani politicians have thieved and corrupted so corrosively from their people to the point where the only source of corruptible income now comes from the US keeping the Pakistani pseudo-democractic quazi-despotic country ticking has nothing to do with it
That the Coalition of the Killing carried out their pre 9-11 plan to invade Afghanistan, ruthlessly mowing down anyone unlucky enough to get in their way, are hunting down and assassinating school children, targeting the Taliban without legal process – who let’s not forget had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with 9-11 – all the while [the coalition has been] trying to impose the same shit in Afghanistan as they have been doing in Pakistan, has nothing to do with it.
Please don’t consider that resistance groups in Pakistan are not conducting operations against Japan, Ghana, Puerto Rica, Lithuania, Iceland. Don’t ever consider that!
Yes that’s right. That obnoxious David Cameron really believes some people in Pakistan are ‘bad’ and simply want to want to do what HE is busy doing – what almost every other British PM and Monarch have done in the past. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that Cameron believes Pakistani (and Afghani) people (etc) only have children to act as future terrorists for no reason listed above, but rather because they are just that way.
Cameron, as was fully predicted, is the usual slobbering twit of a crap PM, hypocritical in the extreme and doesn’t give a flying fox about what family he is going to killing later in any particular evening.
Should “Great(at killing, global oppression and global terrorism)Britain” ever be swallowed by a whale, its rotten PM and Monarchy included, is the day millions of decent and wholly innocent people will breathe a sigh of relief at not having to live in fear that a British(backed) bomb is heading their way, and I welcome the arrival of that day very much indeed.
Kucinich, Paul Force Pakistan Debate: The two congressmen offered a resolution ordering President Barack Obama to withdraw U.S. military personnel from Pakistan, saying their presence violates the War Powers Act since it was not approved by Congress. Continue reading
“In November 2009, Richard Barrett of the UN’s al-Qaeda-Taliban monitoring team said that while attacks by al-Qaeda and its operatives were decreasing in many parts of the world, the situation was worsening in North Africa. He was referring specifically to the Sahel region of southern Algeria, Niger, Mali and Mauritania.
While the UN statement fits the catastrophic image being portrayed of the Sahara-Sahel region by the US, European and other Western interests, the truth is not only very different, but even more serious in that both the launch of the Saharan-Sahelian front in the ‘global war on terror’ (GWOT) and the subsequent establishment of al-Qaeda in the region have been fabricated.”
Microwaves can cause polar molecules to rotate. When they rotate they can lose their ‘microwaved’ energy by rotational based collisions, dissipating the energy in the form of heat in the process. That’s how a microwave oven works. Or so the theory goes.
Water is particularly sensitive to the microwaves, particularly the wavelengths employed in ovens.
Here then is a spur-of-the-moment thought.
Cellular communication (‘mobile phone’) networks need to be cellular due to signal drop off over relatively short distances. I speculate this is due to water and polar pollutants absorbing the microwaves. These molecular/particulate absorbers will therefore convert that EM radiation into heat radiation.
So IF what I say above is true, and 120 -> 380 ppb CO2 was such a big deal in terms of global warming, why then are are microwaves not demonized, especially given their proliferation over the last decade? Is it simply because nobody has (yet) thought of a way to milk money from people be cracking down on mobile phone use? so the chance they may contribute to global warming doesn’t matter?
Note : I don’t know the frequency that cellular networks broadcast on, the intensity of signal transmission or what the absorbtivity is at the wavelengths used.
Jon Venables must NOW declare himself to the world as a sincere effort to recognise his crime sodden past and truly show remorse over Little Jamie Bulger in order to move into the future.
I am not sure if Denise and Jamie’s Dad will think about it, but I’m sure nothing else would be as effective a first step. Actually, I suspect they would feel justice was done if Thompson and Venables were locked away for life.
May I remind you, Venables was the one that the authorities thought had the best chance of rehabilitation. Doesn’t that show you that they are WRONG and that letting them out was wrong too? The fact Venables is now looking at child porn reveals a twisted mind. He killed a toddler – remember the tales that batteries were inserted into James anus? and now Venables is looking at child porn.
Dear lord, this guy wasn’t ‘cured’ he wasn’t ‘rehabilitated’. The authorities screwed up! Stick ’em both in jail, don’t endanger any more kids.
And what the hell is Thompson doing?
THE PUBLIC and Jamies PARENTS (should they wish) have a right to know exactly where these two toddler killers are at any time of day.
The United States once more is haranguing North Korea. This time (according to the MSM – which I positively hate to have to gain ‘news’ from) United Snakey is badgering N. Korea by conducting more military war games between itself and S.Korean. This DOES NOT mean that N. Korea can threaten to use it’s nukes and if it does, then it will be the only other tyrannical nation in the history of the planet to use nuclear bombs.
N. Korea has a right to resist US Hegemony – more power to their elbow, but the price that is seemingly paid for it is totally out of sync.
Fighting neo-liberal fascism with dictator based fascism – is pretty much the same thing right?
P.S. If N. Korea ever uses a nuke, then rightly or wrongly {wrongly of course} then it will be destroyed. It’s that simple.
Also if you’ve got a couple of minutes, Read Gilad’s latest excellent post…
Gilad Atzmon: British Jews Support Israeli War Crimes
Date Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 10:41PM. Link HERE.
Daleks (of the blue kind). “EX-TER-MIN-ATE the Muslims.” – No, I don’t think so.
Just what these EDL scum would say to the growing number of white indigenous (if there is such a thing) British Muslims is an interesting question. filth like this wouldn’t be able to handle an ‘Anglo-Saxon’ {as they ridiculously call themselves} non-brown Muslim. Watch them spontaneously combust.
Watch this (you’ll recognise some of the people in the above photo): English Defence League/Unite Against Fascism, Manchester, 10th Oct 2009
I have a ‘passion’ for thinking about the end times.
– you may have noticed
Some might say it’s ghoulish, but that might imply I’m looking forward to it and want it to happen. It’s kind of ‘exciting’ to think about such things, probably or partly because I’ve been programmed as such by the ‘moviefication’ or ‘tellyfication’ of disasters, which always portrays disasters as opportunities for triumph, awash with heroism {of the white western variety of course}. The more sensible bit of me puts this breach of reality into check and realises that: even if I wasn’t unwittingly influenced by Hollywood depiction of the end times, the real Armageddon will be unimaginably worse.
When I was young, I grew up in the cold war. Nuclear Armageddon was never far away (probably it was never allowed to be far away) and Nuclear things fascinated me so much that I wanted to be a ‘nuclear chemist’, even though I had probably just invented a brand new profession and didn’t actually know what a nuclear chemist would actually do! I can see very clearly that my nuclear ‘desires’ were heavily influenced by propaganda and video games, some of which lead me to believe that as a nuclear chemist in a post nuked world, I could make things not so bad – errrm somehow, that there was something one could actually do to fight and win – like bollocks you could.
MY ‘nuclear youth’ seems to have provided an early runner of Theological Armageddon but now I have more sense. I’m no psycho.
OK. lets get down to business.
I was reading a book on the Dajjal, the anti-Christ and something that had been nagging me in the background suddenly made became clear. The descriptions of the end times I had read seemed a quite unusual with regards to the modern world we live in today. They talk of people using swords, shooting arrows, horsemen, armies gathering and things unfolding as though nobody had knowledge of prophesied acts gleaned from the tens of thousands of books, oral stories, and e-media.
Why don’t nuclear weapons seem to be used? Why are conventional armies like in the time of old mentioned?
The atheists will claim because its nonsense and that the prophets of God didn’t really get divine knowledge as to these events and so naturally portrayed the end days in a very low technology society that the prophets saw in their day.
Some religious men will say it’s religious symbolism, although I think the prophets would know what a sword is and describe it correctly given that it is used as weapon, If the ‘sword’ did something other than what a normal sword does, or the swod was 100ft long, then one would have an arguement for saying the word sword was some kind of symbolism and be best word they could pick to describe something that they had never seen before.
But a possible more ‘conventional’ idea (and only Allah(SWT) knows) as to what will happen dawned upon me as to all this.
And in addition to things like swords being hung up, arrows being fired, conventional armies of old being assembled, there is no mention of the US, of South America, Of China, of Australia of most of Africa. There is no mention of aircraft, battleships. There is no mention of computers, machine guns, tanks, napalm and so forth. The descriptions are very much Middle East and Europe centered.
What explanation could account for this?
It hit me that the end-times are likely to happen in a world where there is virtually NO energy sources left. There is a description of Dajjal riding a donkey, which I would accept is symbolism for an aeroplane, but as far as I can tell, air power is all but gone from the end times and is certainly not significant at all.
A near total lack of energy would mean difficulty in travel – Hence no mention of the US, China, Australia, Russia even. Populations would be pretty much localised. The age of sail via wind power, would cause long journey times once more hence ‘isiolating’ far off lands making them very less significant in ME politics. Weapon wise, carrying a machine gun (whose whole ‘aura’ is energy expensive – including bullets!) or even muskets and rifles seem also to have felt the energy pinch. Swords however can be crafted in traditional fashion with renewable fuels such as wood.
No Nukes are mentioned so it appears that even they have fallen victim to a possible global extinction of energy. Even Dajjal’s donkey (plane) – assuming the symbolism of a donkey for a plane is correct – might be such a luxury in such a world and so its use is essentially zero – certainly there is little description of bombs/missiles (one would exptect the term flaming arrows) coming from the donkey, so it may just be a transport plane. Although the dajjal can appear to perform miracles so maybe he will have a real donkey of the unuaul description describes.
So it seems to me that in a scientifically conventional predictive way, there is a reasonalbe arguement for saying the actual physical appearace of the dajjal is quite a long way off. Oil, coal and nuclear have to be virtually extinct, or certainly unable to power any serious military hardware like a coal steam train on rails (easily sabotaged) carring cannons etc.
If all this is correct, this is ‘good’ from the point of view the end times are far, far away. But it’s bad in the sense that right now it feels like the conditions for Armageddon are already here and that at this day the world is already a terrible place to live, so I shudder in thinking how much worse it can get over the predicted ‘far away’ time for the real end of the world.
In focus: WHO responds to current critical scrutiny
In a letter to BMJ editors dated 8 June 2010, the Director-General strongly refuted allegations of conflicts of interest leveled at WHO in a recent editorial and feature published in the medical journal. “At no time, not for one second, did commercial interests enter my decision-making”, said the Director-General.
Living with the Conspiracy 24-7 
Recent Comments