http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/en/index.html
Quote:
In focus: WHO responds to current critical scrutiny
In a letter to BMJ editors dated 8 June 2010, the Director-General strongly refuted allegations of conflicts of interest leveled at WHO in a recent editorial and feature published in the medical journal. “At no time, not for one second, did commercial interests enter my decision-making”, said the Director-General.WHO Director-General’s letter to BMJ editors
8 June 2010The international response to the influenza pandemic: WHO responds to the critics
10 June 2010
Someone getting jumpy? Expect suicides… Not quite sure from which side though. Hope those at the BMJ are vaccinated against SADS.
Swine Flu
Spanish Flu
H1N1
AH1N1
Novel H1N1
2009 H1N1
seems like the supposed virus itself isn’t the only thing liable to mutation.
–
–
–
–
–
–
Living with the Conspiracy 24-7 
“At no time, not for one second, did commercial interests enter my decision-making”,
That is very likely a true statement!
The swineflu vaccination campaign had as much to do with commercial interests as the decimation of Iraq had to do with oil interests! Yes many people/companies made a financial killing – that wasn’t the primemover for destroying the DNA of the Iraqi peoples anymore than creating an inimical untested vaccination regime for police-state/priming-for-population-reduction agendas inflicted upon the world’s peoples!
Look at the deconstruction here and one can see that the Director-General is telling the truth in her statement:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/swine-flu-is-real-swine.html
Best,
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Asalam Aliakum,
The Swine flu was nothing but a scar mongering scam to get the lemmings in line.
http://drmaxtor.blogspot.com/2009/12/hajj-destroys-swine-flu-hysteria.html
Zahir.
I have a very hard time believing Chan’s claim. She could put to rest allegations of If she published her financial connections and those close to her then we could see. What’s the chance she has shared in a company like Merck, GSK etc?
Haven’t official institutions not simply become covens of back scratchers?
Chan tries to make out the WHO are innocent of fear mongering? I see you were checking them out as this spin was being churned out. Do you second her defence? I gendered at the CDC and WHO pages occasionally and while certainly wishing to see some calming and reassuring worlds that the claimed pandemic was not much to worry about, I saw nothing of the kind.
The fact is, as things turned out the WHO was wrong. No doubt they’ll claim ‘better to be safe than sorry’ but I don’t think that’s good enough as it will just facilitate another health scam.
And I wonder if these scams are deliberate to fatigue us so that when a real bad one comes along we will be toast and they wont!
Salam DrM.
It had all the hallmarks of a scam. A number of people saw it coming. Did you know the body of Mark Sykes (who died of Spanish flu) was dug up shortly before (I think it was before) this H1N1 was supposed to have spread.
Another ‘coincidence’ of course…. as always.
Isn’t if funny how nobody seemed bothered about tracing it? An unusual thing perhaps, but also definately coincidence.
I do not believe that WHO officers are necessarily guilty of financial gains that you accuse them of. However, I believe they are guilty of crimes far worse. Evidently you did not read my previous link too carefully. Here is another which is more succinct:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/03/swineflu-postscript-hysteria-vs-reality.html
And the following was my letter to the Director of WHO in May 2009:
Click to access letter-to-dr-margaret-chan-director-general-who.pdf
It also contains my letter to editor which was sent to many a news rag:
print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/letter-to-editor-rich-nations-patents.html
Corruption are of many levels as one is surely well aware, not just of monies.
Public officials occupying such high positions like the Director of WHO are often more victims of ideological subversion and Tavistock, right alongside being made patsies, than mere greed for personal financial windfalls.
In general, at the global international level, it has never been about money. Only about control – full spectrum control over mankind. That’s surely not news!
And to what extent is this DG of WHO in on the real deal of strangulating mankind by enforcing of inimical quack medicine regime against nations’ own best interests, as opposed to personally benefiting financially from selling ill-tested vaccines, I do not know.
But as a high ranking errand-dame of an organization that has taken charge of all nations destinies through their long running conspiracy for world government, the DG of WHO minimally represents the very same interests as the errand-boys in the White House.
On occassion, these mercenaries may benefit financially just as Haliburton/BlackWater has done in Iraq – but that is an effect, not the cause.
Those wielding the prime-mover cause, almost always stay behind the scene and let their errand boys and girls do the dirty work. In this instance, look at the confluence of recommendations from CFR, White House, and Big-pharma – they all line up. A look at the ownership structure of the big-pharma leads to the owners of the FED, and to central banks!
And for those patsy technocrats hired into organizations like the UN to front for subversive interests, they are almost always kept squeaky clean.
I will wager ten cents that Dr. WHO is also squeaky clean – just as the statement made by her.
In fact, my letter to her indicates my belief that she is being made a patsy no different than tens of thousands of regular medical professionals administering inimical vaccinations and other therapies in the name of saving people. They merely follow AMA recommended practice as per their AMA endorsed medical training, and only follow FDA recommendations without their own due diligence. So, in this case, one of them has turned a bureacrat!
Thanks.
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Swine flu advisers’ ties to drug firms: Five WHO experts linked with vaccine producers By Sophie Borland
Last updated at 7:34 AM on 13th August 2010
Comments (52) Add to My Stories A third of the experts advising the World Health Organisation about the swine flu pandemic had ties to drugs firms, it has emerged.
Five of the 15 specialists who sat on the emergency committee had received funding from pharmaceutical giants, or were linked to them through their research.
The revelation will prompt speculation that the ‘pandemic’ was wildly overestimated and largely fuelled by the drugs industry who stood to benefit from the panic.
Last month it emerged that the Government had spent more than £1.2 billion tackling swine flu – most of it going towards vaccines
Last month it emerged that the Government had squandered more than £1.2 billion tackling swine flu – most of it going towards vaccines following experts’ dire predictions that as many as 65,000 Britons would die.
In fact the virus claimed just 457 lives – a third of those killed every year by ordinary seasonal flu.
But today it emerged that many of the scientists on the WHO’s emergency panel had links with firms including GlaxoSmithKline, who made millions manufacturing swine flu vaccines.
It follows revelations by the Daily Mail earlier this year that more than half of the scientists advising the British Government’s own taskforce on the pandemic had links to drugs giants.
One of the 15 scientists advising the WHO was British professor Neil Ferguson – who last year warned the pandemic would be so bad all schools would need to close.
It has since emerged that Professor Ferguson had acted as a consultant for Roche, who makes Tamiflu, as well as GSK Biologicals until 2007.
Professor Maria Zambon, who was also on the panel, from UK Health Protection Agency’s Centre for Infection, said she received funding from several vaccine makers, including Sanofi, Novartis, CSL, Baxter and GSK.
During the outbreak last year Professor Zambon warned that up to a third of school children in Britain had the virus without knowing as they did not have symptoms.
Meanwhile US professor Arnold Monto admitted he had done research for GlaxoSmithKline, Baxter, the two firms contracted to make the jabs, as well as Roche, which makes Tamiflu.
He had also done work for two other large firms Novartis and Sanofi Pasteur.
Critics warned that there was serious conflict of interest amongst these experts whose advice had led to the waste of vast sums of taxpayer’s money.
Labour MP Paul Flynn said: ‘A year ago, these experts told us the world was facing a grave health emergency.
‘On this occasion, regrettably, they got it wrong: their advice led WHO, the EU and national governments to vastly overrate the seriousness of the H1N1 epidemic, wasting large sums of public money and scaring the world unnecessarily.
‘With such conflicting pressures, we need to be absolutely certain that the advice of such experts is based on solid scientific evidence and is driven solely by the need to protect public health. The only way to do that is through total transparency.
‘When a future pandemic is declared, the public has a right to know, from the outset, who is recommending such a drastic step – as well as any links they may have to the pharmaceutical industry, which stands to profit from such a recommendation.’
Another expert Nancy Cox, from the US Centers for Disease Control, admitted she had received funding from the drugs industry group, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) for flu vaccine research and work on viruses.
British scientist John Wood admitted that his research unit at Britain’s National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), had undertaken work for Sanofi Pasteur, CSL, IFPMA, Novartis and Powdermed on influenza vaccine.
The panel were instrumental in advising the WHO to officially declare swine flu as the first pandemic in 40 years last June.
Earlier this year it emerged that 11 of the 20 members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, which advised the British Government on swine flu, had done work for the pharmaceutical industry or were linked to it through their universities.
A spokesman for the WHO denied that the experts’ work gave rise to a conflict of interest.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1302505/WHO-swine-flu-advisers-ties-drug-firms-Experts-linked-vaccine-producers.html
Zahir sorry for the lack of response for so long.
You said “And for those patsy technocrats hired into organizations like the UN to front for subversive interests, they are almost always kept squeaky clean.” – I wouldn’t so be so quick to say that… drugs, international child porn/paedophillia, child ritual sacrifice, money embezzlement/”investment” in global horror companies etc.
I think Ms. Chan bears a lot more responsibility for pushing the globalists agenda than what your more charitable response grants, patsy or otherwise – cos when she talks utter crap, I’m pretty sure she knows she’s doing it.