Pakistan flood relief

At what point should one say “The murderous Pakistanti army should FIRST have all (or a significant proportion of) it’s finding diverted to help the poor ordinary people of Pakistan before one donates aid”?

I remember the terrible landslides a few years ago? What did the Pakistani govt do? Retained max funding for it’s horrible army and let the poor people starve, scrounging international aid.

If you know otherwise, let me know.

–

–

–

–

–

–

Dr David Kelly and other psyops

I have little time to reply to comments left at the moment. Will do so when able.

Just want to post this…

Dr Kelly: Just one in five believes it was suicide:
The survey also reveals that eight out of ten people want
a full inquest. With senior MPs making the same demand,
the Coalition is under strong pressure to act. – source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1303356/Dr-David-Kelly-Just-believes-suicide.html

Yeah, and 5/5 of them believe he is actually dead. Intersting huh?

2) Eyewitness account of the killing of 10 aid workers in Afghanistan : For the first time, the lone survivor of the killing of 10 members of the International Assistance Mission (IAM) – which included the British doctor Karen Woo – has described the horror of their last moments.

What a fishy story. Sounds like psyops to me.

–

And finally, the BBC, it’s pushing yet more of its psycheporn. The BBC very often puts pics on its website that resemble matters sexual. How crass the BBC is – although no doubt the people in the ‘art dept’ probably think they are clever by pulling on peoples attention grabbing cables – without the readers conscious knowledge. Here’s looking forward to the day the BBC dies.

–

–

–

–

–

Stinks like false flag preparation to me.

Inquest to begin into secret bomb experiment death

By DAVID STRINGER
The Associated Press

Tuesday, August 3, 2010; 1:10 AM

LONDON — A long-awaited investigation into the death of a British scientist killed during secret U.K.-U.S. experiments to build homemade bombs likely to be used by terrorists is scheduled to begin Tuesday.

Coroner Peter Dean will open an inquest into the death of Terry Jupp, who died in 2002 during weapons tests on a remote island used as a military facility off England’s eastern coast.

Jupp, 46, worked for the military’s forensic explosive laboratory and suffered severe burns when a crude bomb spontaneously exploded during the tests on Aug. 14, 2002. He died of his injuries six days later.

The inquest into his death has been delayed for eight years over concerns about the sensitivity of evidence related to the team’s classified experiments.

Two of Jupp’s managers at the government’s military science service – the Defense, Scientific and Technology Laboratory – were charged with manslaughter following an inquiry into the blast. Both denied the allegation.
ad_icon

Prosecutors withdrew a charge against scientist Maurice Marshall in 2007, but declined to disclose their reasons citing security concerns.

Gareth Patterson, a prosecution lawyer, told a hearing at London’s Old Bailey court in 2007 that the charge against Marshall had been withdrawn following a review of “the decision at a very high level.”

“The difficulties of the sensitivities of this case are such that I cannot go into too much detail about the information in open court. That information involves further evidence involving the results of a series of tests carried out by one of the prosecution witnesses,” he told the court.

Military scientist Robert Weighill was cleared of a similar charge in 2005, when a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence.

Both Marshall and Weighill are expected to give evidence to the inquest hearing.

Some parts of the inquest, to be heard before a jury at Southend Crown Court, about 40 miles (70 kilometers) east of London, will be held in private on national security grounds.

Britain’s Ministry of Defense said work has been carried out to censor some classified documents for use at the inquest, but denied it had contributed to the eight-year delay.

“The MOD has cooperated fully, decisions on when the inquest should take place are a matter for the coroner,” a defense ministry spokesman said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with policy.

The precise nature of experiments the scientists were conducting when Jupp died have never been explained, though the program is thought to have been a collaboration with the U.S. Los Alamos national laboratory in New Mexico.

Britain’s defense ministry has denied claims the team was working on a program to test whether terrorists could build so called “dirty bombs,” which use conventional explosives to scatter radiological material.

“There were no radiological tests involved,” the defense ministry spokesman said.

Part of the team’s work involved attempts to construct bombs from widely available ingredients, including hydrogen peroxide. Similar bombs were later used in the 2005 suicide attacks on London mass transit, which killed 52 commuters.

The inquest hearing is expected to last up to four weeks.

Inquest to begin into secret bomb experiment death

<!– use this image if logged in –> Network News <!– a href=”#LOGIN-URL” class=”NN-gray-btn”>Login</a –> X Profile Tweet 0 View More Activity // TOOLBOX Resize Print E-mail Reprints // = 0 ) ? wp_article.comments_period : 3 ; if ( typeof thisNode == ‘undefined’ ) thisNode = ‘admin’ ; // (wp_article.allow_comments) && !(black list) && (white list) of ancestors and sections goes here if ( SITELIFE_ENABLED && ( typeof wp_article != “undefined” && typeof wp_article.allow_comments != “undefined” && wp_article.allow_comments != “no” ) && !( thisNode.match(/\/wires$/) || thisNode.match(/^artsandliving\/(entertainmentguide|travel\/index)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^business\/(portfolio)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^metro\/(obituaries)($|\/)/) ) && ( thisNode.match(/^(artsandliving|business|cars|education|health|jobs|liveonline|metro|nation|opinions?|realestate|religion|politics|sports|technology|world|kidspost|media)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^print\/(washpostmagazine|style|sundayarts|sundaysource|weekend)($|\/)/) )) { COMMENTS_ALLOWED = true ; document.write(” #ArticleCommentsWrapper {display:block}; ]]>”); if(! checkDaysOld(comments_period) ) { COMMENTS_ACTIVE = true ; } else { COMMENTS_ACTIVE = false ; } } else { document.write(”); } // –>// <![CDATA[ if (SITELIFE_ENABLED) { // Include the WPNI functions to display SiteLife content on the page. document.write(“\n”); } // ]]> COMMENT 0 Comments // <![CDATA[ if ( COMMENTS_ALLOWED ) { if( COMMENTS_ACTIVE) { // document.write(‘POST A COMMENT ‘); document.write(‘BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT ‘); document.write( getDisplayUserName()+’ ‘); document.write(‘ ‘+getFakeForm()+’ ‘); document.write(‘ Discussion Policy ‘); document.write(‘ ‘); document.write(‘ ‘); } else { document.write(‘COMMENTS ARE CLOSED ‘); } } // ]]> Your browser’s settings may be preventing you from commenting on and viewing comments about this item. See instructions for fixing the problem. Discussion Policy CLOSE Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain “signatures” by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. // Who’s Blogging » Links to this article //

By DAVID STRINGER

The Associated Press
Tuesday, August 3, 2010; 1:10 AM

LONDON — A long-awaited investigation into the death of a British scientist killed during secret U.K.-U.S. experiments to build homemade bombs likely to be used by terrorists is scheduled to begin Tuesday.

Coroner Peter Dean will open an inquest into the death of Terry Jupp, who died in 2002 during weapons tests on a remote island used as a military facility off England’s eastern coast.

Jupp, 46, worked for the military’s forensic explosive laboratory and suffered severe burns when a crude bomb spontaneously exploded during the tests on Aug. 14, 2002. He died of his injuries six days later.

The inquest into his death has been delayed for eight years over concerns about the sensitivity of evidence related to the team’s classified experiments.

Two of Jupp’s managers at the government’s military science service – the Defense, Scientific and Technology Laboratory – were charged with manslaughter following an inquiry into the blast. Both denied the allegation.

// // <![CDATA[
if ( show_doubleclick_ad && ( adTemplate & INLINE_ARTICLE_AD ) == INLINE_ARTICLE_AD && inlineAdGraf )
{
document.write(‘

‘) ;
}
// ]]>

Prosecutors withdrew a charge against scientist Maurice Marshall in 2007, but declined to disclose their reasons citing security concerns.

Gareth Patterson, a prosecution lawyer, told a hearing at London’s Old Bailey court in 2007 that the charge against Marshall had been withdrawn following a review of “the decision at a very high level.”

“The difficulties of the sensitivities of this case are such that I cannot go into too much detail about the information in open court. That information involves further evidence involving the results of a series of tests carried out by one of the prosecution witnesses,” he told the court.

Military scientist Robert Weighill was cleared of a similar charge in 2005, when a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence.

Both Marshall and Weighill are expected to give evidence to the inquest hearing.

Some parts of the inquest, to be heard before a jury at Southend Crown Court, about 40 miles (70 kilometers) east of London, will be held in private on national security grounds.

Britain’s Ministry of Defense said work has been carried out to censor some classified documents for use at the inquest, but denied it had contributed to the eight-year delay.

“The MOD has cooperated fully, decisions on when the inquest should take place are a matter for the coroner,” a defense ministry spokesman said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with policy.

The precise nature of experiments the scientists were conducting when Jupp died have never been explained, though the program is thought to have been a collaboration with the U.S. Los Alamos national laboratory in New Mexico.

Britain’s defense ministry has denied claims the team was working on a program to test whether terrorists could build so called “dirty bombs,” which use conventional explosives to scatter radiological material.

“There were no radiological tests involved,” the defense ministry spokesman said.

Part of the team’s work involved attempts to construct bombs from widely available ingredients, including hydrogen peroxide. Similar bombs were later used in the 2005 suicide attacks on London mass transit, which killed 52 commuters.

The inquest hearing is expected to last up to four weeks.

symbolicious

Oooooh an inverted pentagram – just another coincidence you understand. Noting to worry about. Carry on.

Btw, soon there will be no such thing as a job anymore. That’s right. There are no jobs, only ‘roles’

e

There seems to be a few missing, like a few more around W1A 1AA and Holyrood  etc.

Majority owner Lion Capital is hoping to sell the company for as much as £250m, according to the Sunday Times.

Oooh, a lion too. Great stuff.

–

Must admit though the food looks pretty damn good although I wonder what they serve?

A Beelzebub Breakfast, Baphomet Brunch, Lucifer Lunch, Tortures Tea, Demonic Dinner, Satan Supper?

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Bonfire of the Insanities – The ‘significance’ of the wikipedia leaks

 In general I like conspiraloons; Brave souls who refuse to submit to the illusion that the dominant forces on the planet are benevolent and worthy of support simply because they are powerful. Well, ok, that’s not quite true, a significant number of them do still support the ‘deep state’ and have lines in the sand that are effortlessly redrawn should they ever become breached. They aren’t as ‘radical’ or ‘revolutionary’ as they might make out.

There goes another bunch of people that’s crossed me off their Christmas and Eid card list.

I’m honest enough with myself to see some of that in me. However, where there is a simple choice, e.g. engaging in ‘voting’ I don’t con myself into believing that by playing the game one can change the game.

Having said that, conspiraloons in general are detached from the mindset whereby just because there is a centre of power whose influence affects us that it must be courted and is automatically entitled to acceptability and ones support. Indeed most conspiraloons have the realisation that such power centres around the world – rungs on the power ladder if you will – be they Governments, Bankers, Zionists, Hijacked religions (some loons would simply say ‘religion’, period), so called Royalty etc, should by default be treated with suspicion, coldness or perhaps even hostility. I’d say loons on average are pretty firm (via confidence) in their beliefs and because of the actual nature of these beliefs, they are going to manifest them in their own lives and I would guess, this will cause pain and come at considerable personal cost. After all, they live in a world full of people beguiled by the very ‘World Order’ which loons are trying to resist.

But sometimes otherwise sensible behaviour can be nonsensical, and perhaps parallel the stupidity of people who think the way this planet is run is just fine, and that the 3 billion or so people who live in abject poverty are scroungers or don’t work hard enough or some other bullshit like that.

Come this latest wikileaks thing.

It seems some conspiraloons are wondering whether Assange is an asset/mole/plant/useful-useable-idiot because some of the leaks apparently say US ‘intelligence’ [sic] says things like Pakistan or Iran is helping the Taliban and so is therefore the leaks were really subterfuge to deliver propaganda against those two countries.

Huh, come again?

Yes, that’s right, some loons are thinking the wikileaks publication of the US intelligence reports is a psyop.

 

To be a bit stronger than what I was earlier, and deservedly so, some loons are acting like arseholes.

– Woah, steady on lw!

No, I won’t ‘steady on’, neither will I desist from having a conversation with myself!

Loons have an incapacity to deal with information that could be useful to them. Like Tom Sawyer slapping Becky’s face in the cave to break her out of her hysterics, loons need a good slap to stop them doing the equivalent of being like that kid at school stuck forever repeating the third year (p.s. no offence to those kids, I know you were stuck in a terrible school system).

This world is so full of crap that you cherry pick. Yip, that’s right. You do what those bastards Bush and bLiar did (to name just two of the hundreds). Difference is, loon cherry picking has moral authority and involves real cherries not made up bollocks.

So when some murderous slop in CENTCOM, or whatever lets slip some info, you use the ‘good’ bits, and throw the rest of their garbage in the trash can!

When Chomsky exposes those in the media for fully believing what they say – but that they only got there because of their embrace of the prevailing global hegemonic paradigm, then you use it. When Chomsky talks bullshit – and he does at times, you call him an ‘old toad’ and switch him off. When the BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 about 20 minutes before it did collapse, you use that, but then turn off all the other disgraceful crap they pump out – like John Simpsons interview with that nasty piece of British Trash in Kabul – the British Ambassador or some other pompous title that should actually read “Occupier, Killer, and legitimate Afghan Resistance target” When Clegg says the Iraq war was illegal, you use it. The rest of the time, you put the puppet back in his closet, embarrassed to see his face while thinking of all the promises he (or Cocaine Cameron) was always going to break.

US intelligence’ is always drawing up complete bullshit for many reasons, often for the purpose of internal consumption. They’ve been doing it for years. You get some lying bitch of a girl to lie that babies were thrown from incubators, or some Iraqi stooges to show a BBC presstitite ‘proof’ that Saddam built a nuke and actually detonated it (the vile propagandist, a British Judith Miller on the same page has an audio link in which she ridiculously claims “Gwynne Roberts: “UN inspectors missed a very large slice of the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme” – a lie then and a proven lie now, and flies in the face of the actual inspectors. They release it in a number of ways too.

Usually (if not always) it’s demonstrable bullshit, as has been the case with Bush defying a number of his own NIE’s about Irans supposed nuke weapon program, or as we have seen many many times before about Iranian weapons/IED’s and so forth in Iraq attacking USans.

But because the US internal shit has been entered the public domain via wikileaks irrespective of having been previously (at least in part) leaked already – deliberately of course – via Geoff Gannon/Judith Miller like presstitutes, or just via the usual reports from “(unnamed)official sources” , “A pentagon spokesman” or “a leaked NSA document”, that now wikileaks and/or Assange can’t be trusted.

And oh, by the way, lets not talk about the very real dirty shit that was exposed by these leaks.

The report that “The Truth Seeker” (graphic above)  links to, read like this…

Iran transforming Afghan war
 
Peter Goodspeed – The National Post July 31, 2010

The night Canadian Master Corporal Darrell Priede of Brantford died in Afghanistan, the Afghan war took a sudden dangerous new twist.

A stream of secret U.S. military intelligence reports released this week by the WikiLeaks website suggests the May 2007 death was the result of a Taliban attack with a heat-seeking, surface-to-air missile launched from the shoulder.

In all likelihood, the deadly weapon was provided by Iran.
 

Dear oh dear. This is recycled sewage. And it goes on. Shame on the numbskulls swallowing all these US reports as unchallengeable truth of the highest order. Shame on them for not being able to filter out the crap and spot the obvious psy-op-counter-intelligence-propaganda.

And there are many other people doing the same.

Idiots.

This brings up a wider point. Just because Assange/Wikileaks is quite well known now, what qualification is there that he’s been ‘comprimised’?

Oh dear.

I’m gonna stop now. What needed to be said… has been said.

Remedy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE32tcojArI

–

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soV8IcTzuj8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–