In general I like conspiraloons; Brave souls who refuse to submit to the illusion that the dominant forces on the planet are benevolent and worthy of support simply because they are powerful. Well, ok, that’s not quite true, a significant number of them do still support the ‘deep state’ and have lines in the sand that are effortlessly redrawn should they ever become breached. They aren’t as ‘radical’ or ‘revolutionary’ as they might make out.
There goes another bunch of people that’s crossed me off their Christmas and Eid card list.
I’m honest enough with myself to see some of that in me. However, where there is a simple choice, e.g. engaging in ‘voting’ I don’t con myself into believing that by playing the game one can change the game.
Having said that, conspiraloons in general are detached from the mindset whereby just because there is a centre of power whose influence affects us that it must be courted and is automatically entitled to acceptability and ones support. Indeed most conspiraloons have the realisation that such power centres around the world – rungs on the power ladder if you will – be they Governments, Bankers, Zionists, Hijacked religions (some loons would simply say ‘religion’, period), so called Royalty etc, should by default be treated with suspicion, coldness or perhaps even hostility. I’d say loons on average are pretty firm (via confidence) in their beliefs and because of the actual nature of these beliefs, they are going to manifest them in their own lives and I would guess, this will cause pain and come at considerable personal cost. After all, they live in a world full of people beguiled by the very ‘World Order’ which loons are trying to resist.
But sometimes otherwise sensible behaviour can be nonsensical, and perhaps parallel the stupidity of people who think the way this planet is run is just fine, and that the 3 billion or so people who live in abject poverty are scroungers or don’t work hard enough or some other bullshit like that.
Come this latest wikileaks thing.
It seems some conspiraloons are wondering whether Assange is an asset/mole/plant/useful-useable-idiot because some of the leaks apparently say US ‘intelligence’ [sic] says things like Pakistan or Iran is helping the Taliban and so is therefore the leaks were really subterfuge to deliver propaganda against those two countries.
Huh, come again?
Yes, that’s right, some loons are thinking the wikileaks publication of the US intelligence reports is a psyop.
To be a bit stronger than what I was earlier, and deservedly so, some loons are acting like arseholes.
– Woah, steady on lw!
No, I won’t ‘steady on’, neither will I desist from having a conversation with myself!
Loons have an incapacity to deal with information that could be useful to them. Like Tom Sawyer slapping Becky’s face in the cave to break her out of her hysterics, loons need a good slap to stop them doing the equivalent of being like that kid at school stuck forever repeating the third year (p.s. no offence to those kids, I know you were stuck in a terrible school system).
This world is so full of crap that you cherry pick. Yip, that’s right. You do what those bastards Bush and bLiar did (to name just two of the hundreds). Difference is, loon cherry picking has moral authority and involves real cherries not made up bollocks.
So when some murderous slop in CENTCOM, or whatever lets slip some info, you use the ‘good’ bits, and throw the rest of their garbage in the trash can!
When Chomsky exposes those in the media for fully believing what they say – but that they only got there because of their embrace of the prevailing global hegemonic paradigm, then you use it. When Chomsky talks bullshit – and he does at times, you call him an ‘old toad’ and switch him off. When the BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 about 20 minutes before it did collapse, you use that, but then turn off all the other disgraceful crap they pump out – like John Simpsons interview with that nasty piece of British Trash in Kabul – the British Ambassador or some other pompous title that should actually read “Occupier, Killer, and legitimate Afghan Resistance target” When Clegg says the Iraq war was illegal, you use it. The rest of the time, you put the puppet back in his closet, embarrassed to see his face while thinking of all the promises he (or Cocaine Cameron) was always going to break.
US intelligence’ is always drawing up complete bullshit for many reasons, often for the purpose of internal consumption. They’ve been doing it for years. You get some lying bitch of a girl to lie that babies were thrown from incubators, or some Iraqi stooges to show a BBC presstitite ‘proof’ that Saddam built a nuke and actually detonated it (the vile propagandist, a British Judith Miller on the same page has an audio link in which she ridiculously claims “Gwynne Roberts: “UN inspectors missed a very large slice of the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme” – a lie then and a proven lie now, and flies in the face of the actual inspectors. They release it in a number of ways too.
Usually (if not always) it’s demonstrable bullshit, as has been the case with Bush defying a number of his own NIE’s about Irans supposed nuke weapon program, or as we have seen many many times before about Iranian weapons/IED’s and so forth in Iraq attacking USans.
But because the US internal shit has been entered the public domain via wikileaks irrespective of having been previously (at least in part) leaked already – deliberately of course – via Geoff Gannon/Judith Miller like presstitutes, or just via the usual reports from “(unnamed)official sources” , “A pentagon spokesman” or “a leaked NSA document”, that now wikileaks and/or Assange can’t be trusted.
And oh, by the way, lets not talk about the very real dirty shit that was exposed by these leaks.
The report that “The Truth Seeker” (graphic above) links to, read like this…
Iran transforming Afghan war
Peter Goodspeed – The National Post July 31, 2010
The night Canadian Master Corporal Darrell Priede of Brantford died in Afghanistan, the Afghan war took a sudden dangerous new twist.
A stream of secret U.S. military intelligence reports released this week by the WikiLeaks website suggests the May 2007 death was the result of a Taliban attack with a heat-seeking, surface-to-air missile launched from the shoulder.
In all likelihood, the deadly weapon was provided by Iran.
Dear oh dear. This is recycled sewage. And it goes on. Shame on the numbskulls swallowing all these US reports as unchallengeable truth of the highest order. Shame on them for not being able to filter out the crap and spot the obvious psy-op-counter-intelligence-propaganda.
And there are many other people doing the same.
This brings up a wider point. Just because Assange/Wikileaks is quite well known now, what qualification is there that he’s been ‘comprimised’?
I’m gonna stop now. What needed to be said… has been said.