Aaaaah Lovely Pakistan

Like most places around the world, the people are good yet the state is an abomination.

]

Where have all the hero’s gone?

On the Viva Palestina Convoy 5 to Gaza that’s where.

Here’s a posting from one of the VP hero’s who visits the grave of grave of some of the Turkish martyrs that IsrayHELLi vermin assassinated on the Mavi Marmara 31st May 2010.

We spent the greater part of the day battling the notorious Istanbul traffic. On my visit here some 16 years ago, we stayed within the vicinity of all the major attractions & moving about by taxis was fairly easy, at least as I recall it. But today was sheer madness.

We set off at 10am for a gathering at Ayub Sulaiman Square where the Turkish, Arab & other foreign press was in presence. Interviews, speeches, mingling, chatting or just plain hanging around took us to just after 1 pm & upon the Zohor azan, we made our way to the closest mosque, Sultan Abu Ayub Al Ansari. Ayub Al Ansari was the prophet’s companion, whose house the prophet stayed in when he arrived in Madina. He died in jihad at the age of 80 & lies buried in this mosque which was built in 1510.

Right after we took off for the cemetery where the matyrs of the Mavi Marmara were buried. This was a most poignant moment. There were 2 graves, side by side. Their tombstones had their date of birth but not their date of death, in accordance with Islam that states that the matyrs do not die though we perceive them to be.

It was clearly emotional for many. Buried here are two strangers, yet they live in our hearts. We know them not, yet they’re dear to us. They’re our sons, our brothers who sacrificed the ultimate for the very cause we were here for. Prayers were offered, in congregation and in silence. There was no sadness, but a quiet dignity to the whole affair, a solemn respect. Many touched the tombstones as they filed past. It was surreal, yet so real.

–

–

And what was to come after leaving the cemetery compound while making our way to our vehicles? But makan of course! Sandwiches & juice. And I thought life in Malaysia revolved around food.

And then it was off to quite possibly the worst drive I’ve ever been on. For the next 4 hours, we seemed to be driving without any destination, though in essence we were driving through the city to create as much hype as possible & to show solidarity with the Turks, that the international community is with them. But the drive was just awful. Traffic was at a standstill at times, the saving grace being the show of support shown in the streets by almost everyone as our convoy passed them. Thankfully Azura & I weren’t driving today as our van was left behind for some minor work & were instead being driven. But it was still draining.

It ended with dinner of course & fine dining too. And now we’re all trying to get as much rest as possible before heading off to Ankara tomorrow morning. In spite of today Istanbul remains one of my favourite cities & I only wish it didn’t have to end so soon. Adieu & till we meet again, Insha Allah. Source: http://azratogaza.blogspot.com/

–

Here’s a recent truthout article about yet more Israyhelli terror which gets met with indefference by those who really ought to know (and do) much better.

http://www.truth-out.org/un-fact-finding-mission-says-israelis-executed-us-citizen-furkan-dogan63609

–

–

Some history of shitsrayHELL…

–

Reaping terror’s reward: get in there first – that’s the secret

---

By Stuart Littlewood

28 September 2010

Stuart Littlewood looks at how modern terrorism was in fact pioneered by the Zionists and how Israeli and the US behaviours fit the US definition of terrorism like a glove.

If it wasn’t for the “war on terror” America and Israel wouldn’t be enjoying such military fun and games and reaping such fat rewards. Whole new industries are flourishing thanks to the considerable effort they’ve devoted to sowing the seeds of terror.

The Institute of Terrorism Research and Response (ITRR), for example, is an American-Israeli corporation “created to help organizations succeed and prosper in a world threatened by terrorism”.

Its partners include The Israel Export and International Cooperation Institute – “your gateway to business in Israel”. Their global intelligence division even maintains a presence in London where, they claim, “our intelligence-gathering and analysis, research, training and consulting services reduce your vulnerability to global and regional forms of terrorist threats and mass-casualty events”. It’s just a coincidence, of course, that Britain’s most important security bodies – the Intelligence and Security Committee, the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Defence Committee – are all headed by senior Israel flag-wavers with access to highly classified material.

ITRR recently staged a Mass Casualty and Terrorism Workshop in Jerusalem attended by students from Philadelphia University. Topics included mass casualty management, security and counter-terrorism, forensic medicine as it relates to terrorism and visits to suicide bomber sites. “These site visits include actual video footage of the events… One student was amazed with the resiliency of the Israeli people and how quickly they are able to return a site ‘back to normal’.”

Just across the border in Gaza is the mother of all mass-casualty sites far more serious than anything Israel has had to cope with, although it caused it. A visit there would have opened students’ eyes to how the Palestinians are never given the chance to return to ‘normal’ after Israel’s endless terror onslaughts, robbed as they are of medical essentials and reconstruction materials.

I bet ITRR’s workshop didn’t cover that.

“First used by Zionists”

The other day I was sent a list of Zionist “firsts” pulled together in a handy aide-memoire. Let’s call them claims for the time being. I’ve seen evidence for some, but others are new to me. A friend who watches things closely says the listing has been posted in forums repeatedly, with requests for any corrections.

Let’s ask again. Can anyone refute these claims on delphiforums?

Here’s the roll-call on who introduced terrorism (along with biological, chemical and nuclear weapons) to the Middle East:

• Bombs in cafés: first used by Zionists in Palestine on 17 March 1937 in Jaffa. (actually grenades).
• Bombs on buses: first used by Zionists in Palestine on 20 August-26 September1937
• Drive-by shootings with automatic weapons: IZL and LHI in 1937-38 and 1947-48 (Morris, Righteous Victims, p681.)
• Bombs in market places: first used by Zionists on 6 July 1938 in Haifa. (delayed-action, electrically detonated)
• Bombing of a passenger ship: first used by the Zionists in Haifa on 25 November 1940, killing over 200 of their own fellows.
• Bombing of hotels: first used by Zionists on 22 July 1946 in Jerusalem (Menachem Begin went on to become prime minister of Israel).
• Suitcase bombing: first used by Zionists on 1 October 1946 against British embassy in Rome.
• Mining of ambulances: first used by Zionists on 31 October 1946 in Petah Tikvah
• Car-bomb: first used by Zionists against the British near Jaffa on 5 December 1946.
• Letter bombs: first used by Zionists in June 1947 against members of the British government, 20 of them.
• Parcel bomb: first used by Zionists against the British in London on 3 September 1947.
• Reprisal murder of hostages: first used by Zionists against the British in Netanya area on 29 July 1947.
• Truck-bombs: first used by Zionists on January 1948 in the centre of Jaffa, killing 26.
• Aircraft hijacking: world-first by Israeli jets December 1954 on a Syrian civilian airliner (random seizure of hostages to recover five spies) – 14 years before any Palestinian hijacking.

The only form of violent terrorism not introduced into Palestine by the Zionists was suicide bombing, a tactic used almost entirely by people fighting occupation of their “homeland” – think 1000s of Japanese in 1945, 100s of Tamils and 38 Lebanese in the 1980s – most of the latter being motivated by socialism/communism, not Islam – see http://amconmag.com/article/2005/jul/18/00017.

• Biological warfare – pathogens used by Zionists in 1948, prior to the seizure of Acre, putting typhus into the water supply.
• Chemical warfare – nerve gas very likely used by Zionists in February/March 2001 in at least eight attacks in Khan Younis and Gharbi refugee camps (Gaza) and the town of Al-Bireh (West Bank).
• Nuclear threats – made by Zionists e.g. 2003: “We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under.” – Remarks of Martin Van Creveld, a professor of military history at Israel’s Hebrew University, 1 February 2003.

And, if you think only Muslims need worry, then see http://www.masada2000.org/sharepain.html – “Israel has nuclear weapons and MUST use them and all those arming the Arabs must share the pain!”. Comes with cute music.

To these we could add “sofa slaughter” with armed drones. The Israelis use this armchair technique extensively in Gaza, unleashing death and destruction on civilians by remote control at no personal risk to themselves. There are interesting variations too. For example, during the 40-day siege of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem in 2002 the Israeli occupation force set up cranes on which were mounted robotic machine guns under video control. According to eye-witnesses, eight defenders, including the bell-ringer, were murdered, some by armchair button-pushers and some by regular snipers.

Right now we’re witnessing a cyber-terror attack against Iran with an ultra-sophisticated virus that disables thousands of industrial computers, including those controlling Iran’s nuclear programme. This is an extremely sinister development with frightening global implications. The presumption is that it’s Zionist inspired and implemented by Israeli stooges and sympathizers since no-one else hates and fears the Iranians this much, but the truth may never be known.

Banned horror weapons spread terror

There’s also the use, suspected or real, of prohibited weapons. In July 2006 doctors in Lebanon and Gaza were saying: “We never saw before wounds and corpses like those that arrive in the ward…” The majority of victims were women, children and elders caught in Israeli attacks in the street, in the market place and at home.

What they saw led doctors to believe that a new generation of weapons was being used. Common to all victims was the lack of visible wounds, but they had serious internal edema and hemorrhage with loss of blood from all orifices. All the bodies had a covering of dark powder, making them look black, but they were not burnt. Clothes and hair were not damaged or burnt.

Electron microscope scans showed the presence of phosphorous, iron and magnesium at below normally detectable levels. Elements that are used as additives to boost the blast of thermobaric (fuel-air energy) bombs and grenades were found on skin samples, but none of these could be seen by instruments normally used in hospitals and emergency wards.

Thermobaric weapons leave no fragments on or in the victims’ bodies, making it all the more difficult to provide proper care for the injured. “This fact already puts them outside established conventions of war, regardless of whether they are used against military or civilians,” say the doctors.

The effect of a thermobaric shell or grenade, according to the GlobalSecurity website, is devastating. “Those near the ignition point are obliterated. Those at the fringe are likely to suffer many internal, and thus invisible injuries, including burst eardrums and crushed inner ear organs, severe concussions, ruptured lungs and internal organs, and possibly blindness. The destruction, death and injury are caused by the blast wave.”

Another report, published by Defense Technology, says: “Each tissue type … is compressed, stretched, sheared or disintegrated by overload according to its material properties. Internal organs that contain air (sinuses, ears, lungs and intestines) are particularly vulnerable to blast.”

The United States uses 40mm thermobaric grenades developed for the war against “terror” in Afghanistan. These little beauties produce a thermobaric overpressure blast and “all enemy personnel within the effective radius will suffer lethal effects as opposed to the conventional fragmentation round.”

The grenades are fired from a specially developed weapon. “You can put six rounds on target in under three seconds,” one Marine Corps corporal said. “I thought this thing was sick.”

America is reported to have lost nuclear bombs, so it shouldn’t be too difficult for them to mislay shipments of thermobaric grenades, which in the wrong hands would wreak havoc in the metro or London’s Underground.

Hoist by their own petard

A perfectly good form of words is used to brand, outlaw and crush any organization, individual or country the US doesn’t like.

Under Executive Order 13224 (“Blocking Property and prohibiting Transactions with Persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support Terrorism”), Section 3, the term “terrorism” means an activity that:

(i) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and (ii) appears to be intended
(a) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(b) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(c) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping or hostage-taking.”

The order was signed 23 September 2001 by George W. Bush, the irony being that his definition of terrorism fits the United States and its bosom-buddy Israel like a glove.

Since then, of course, we’ve seen the Zionists commit the foulest act of state terrorism in recent times. During their Cast Lead onslaught they butchered at least 350 more children, and Gaza has been under daily attack ever since. So the “most moral army in the world” must have blown to bits, shredded, incinerated or smashed with snipers’ bullets at least 1,400 Palestinian youngsters in the last 10 years. The numbers left maimed or crippled don’t bear thinking about.

And let’s not forget the assassinations and extra-judicial executions. In the US there’s a presidential prohibition on assassination except in war situations, but if they can conjure up an intelligence “finding” that enables them to label the target a “terrorist”, and claim the murder was an act of self-defence in a war situation, they’re in the clear.

Assassination became official Israeli policy in 1999. Their preferred method is the air-strike, which is lazy and often messy, as demonstrated in 2002 when Israeli F-16 warplanes bombed the house of Sheikh Salah Shehadeh, the military commander of Hamas, in Gaza City killing not just him but at least 11 other Palestinians, including seven children, and wounding 120 others.

According to the Israeli human rights organisation B’Tselem, 408 Palestinians have been killed in the course of targeted assassinations since the second Intifada (uprising) began in 2000. This systematic extermination is regarded as legal and legitimate by Israel’s attorney-general.

In a sane world you’d expect the American and Israeli administrations to be hoist by their own petard, branded as “persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism”, and punished in the same way they seek to punish others.

Source: http://www.redress.cc/global/slittlewood20100928

---

Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk.

Balls in a ballsless world

It is impossible to not comment on Ahmadinejad’s iron balls declaration that many around the world are suspicious that the 9-11 was an inside job. (I’m paraphrasing)

It was, of course.

The accumulation of all the evidence allows us to arrive at that decision. As it does regrding the crime of the war against Iraq.

It is noteable at who walked out… Largely ‘white-scum-nations’, you know, the centres of power that have brought untold misery to the good ordinary people of this planet for more centuries than I’d like to count, while having the chutzpah to calim they are the most righteous states that have ever been.

*puke*

The history of these obnoxious bastards lying, conducting black-ops/false-flags is undenyable, and the reaction of those devils who went along with these dasterdly events reveals perfectly that they have not the  slightest bit interest in the truth.

Daniel Ellsberg, David Shayler, Craig Murray, the leaker of the Collateral Damage video, etc etc etc… were all subject to to hostilities by the state when they pubically exposed the states can-of-worms. The same has (obviously) happening to Jaddie babes.

The walk-out Ahmadinejad got for pointing the spotlight on the crown jewels which these scum-states use for the lawlwss slaughter from Sept 2001 into the forseeable future, actually gives some vindication to what he said at the UN on behalf of millions across the world.He did the same thing about the other crown jewels… what some dubb the holohoax (or as Finklestein said of it: shoah business / holocaust industry).

According to the IBBC (Israyhelli British Broading Corporation), the delagates that walked out were the US, UK, all other EU states, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Costa Rica. Most of them being those scum-states which don’t give a bluebottles gonad about slaughtering millions.

In the age of lies, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Well done President Ahmadinejad.

UPDATE:

–
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2010/09/201092417585294591.html

This is a dangerous game. Any UN ‘team’ will be studded with sabateurs, just like the original one was with that very slippery American Israyhelli Phillip Zlikow. So be careful Mahmood! You might get something that might thicken the muddy waters.

On a dad note: Marwan Bishara, an otherwise excellent journalist and intelligent man is acting like your commoner garden presstitute, saying of Ahmadinejad:

“So you can now say President Ahmadinejad is both a 9/11 denier and a Holocaust denier.” – source

Ridiculous!

Not to mention the fact Marwan is making the news here, tagging ‘value added’ properties onto the story, not reporting it or as journalists should do, challenge ahmadinejad on his claim and pick them apart. Marwan is an utter fool if he believes the 9-11 Commission Report. But hey, perhaps that’s why he’s precisely where he is.

Please note: In NONE of the Al Jazeera English reports is NO ONE including US citizens who agree with a new investigation is necessary, or wven those USans who believe their government did 9-11, or well known figures like the “(New)Jersey Girls”

In Their Own Words:

9/11 Press For Truth:

Al Jazeera English’s reportage here is certainly not to their credit. It is a very clear and display of operating firmly within the box of permitted dissent.

Shame.

–

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

Yip, there gonna burn some Qur’ans

Here’s some words of wisdom from someone I fell in love with him  almost the moment I met him. That’s brotherly Islamic love dear readers, not Hollywood Love. & thanks to the person who e-mail me this earlier.

–

Subject: Celebrating Eid and Burning the Quran by Idris Tawfiq

Asalaamu alaykum,

The more I read about the tragic events of September 11th 2001 in the United States, the more I feel that we will probably never get to the bottom of what really happened on that terrible day. What we do know for sure is that thousands of innocent people were cruelly murdered.

I think all educated and civilized people can also say with certainty that the religion of Islam itself was not responsible. Maybe misguided Muslims were involved, and their actions are to be condemned, but Islam cannot be held to blame for such an atrocity.

How sad it is, then, that a religious leader in the United States should be calling for the Quran to be burned on 11th September, calling Islam, Muhammad (pbuh) and Shariah Law as evil. On the other hand, it is very heartening to see that so many religious leaders, both in the United States and elsewhere, have made clear that such a Quran Burning Day does not represent their views at all.

How sad, too, that many misguided people will react in a violent way to such a provocation.

So how are Muslims to react to their holy book being burned? I think we should react with some Wisdom. If a whole country and its government were holding a Quran Burning Day, then Muslim leaders would be justified in reacting against that country and that government. To be quite honest, though, a small church with a congregation of only fifty people does not warrant overreaction. It is clear that they represent only themselves and a handful of bigotted people who would choose to follow them.

Instead, as Muslims, we can condemn such an insensitive and irreligious action, then try as best we can to build bridges between people of faith.

I remember last year, meeting His Eminence Archbishop Demetrios of America in his office in New York. The Archbishop told me that on 12th September 2001 he had gone down to Ground Zero to pay his respects, and the journalists there asked him if this atrocity did not shake his own faith. “On the contrary,” he replied. “Yesterday we witnessed here an explosion of evil. Today we are witnessing an explosion of love, as people of all faiths and of none come here to pray and to offer their condolences.”

Inshallah, this heinous Quran Burning episode can actually bring people of faith closer together, rather than driving them apart.

Happy Eid.

Idris Tawfiq

Love you Idris.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7186832044176923755

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

thepiratebay.org died yesterday

Update: Haha! Like the pheonix, thepiratebay.org has risen from the ashes on 8 Sept 2010.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1731683/police-raids-the-pirate-bay

There is certainly a case for music/movie/software companies to get payment for their goods. In that context, pirated electronic media has an element of ‘wrongness’ about it – especially if you can afford to pay a fee for its use. But this, in todays ‘commercial porn’  world – were it seems, every human action must now be accompanied by a financial transaction – is just about the only side of the story you hear.

What about the poor, why should they be denied access to this stuff – by what moral force can they be denied something (that they may find useful) simply because they don’t have money? Instead of money-making the world go around, shouldn’t morality make the world go around instead? Strongly connected to that is altruism accompanying morality.

And what about these companies who demand extortionately high prices for their goods e.g. the very pants Nightmare On Elm Street (Original) “JUST £6.99”, or companies trying to force people to essentially buy a new copy of their software (/licence) for every HDD it’s installed on or every CPU that accesses it? My opinion is if you buy the software, you are entitled to use it wherever you are, or once you’ve bought it, allow anyone you choose to use it or see it, much like your kitchen scales, or radio or padlock or whatever.

Then of course we have big companies, e.g. Micro$oft,  who make newer products which have compatibility issues with older versions, e.g. Microsoft Office 2007 and 2004 {Note the .<   >x ‘reader patch’ for software that only understood ‘non-x’ed’ .<   > is a minimalist attempt to quell anger. The minimalism gives annoying layout differences which of course could easily be negated should the correct level of effort and sophistication be provided by the patch, but the patch HAS to be minimalist because it would otherwise have negative economic consequences on the latest version – sly sods}.   Pulling the plug of ‘technical support’ on older versions of software has some effect of ‘fear-ing’ large institutions into going for the upgrade which of course then puts the squeeze on individuals to have the same upgraded system that their work place has. Having said that, it is true that things like Windows 98 has large publically available information of tweaks/bugs/patches/troubleshooting and so on, but with information spam and in effect growing phishing-like sites on the web, increasingly often good information is difficult to find.

All that sucks!

A long time ago, I purchased Netscape Navigator. A week or two after I did that, it was announced that it was to become open source – i.e. free. I cannot imagine that the decision to do this only came in period from when I bought the software up until the time they made the announcement. I felt very cheated. I seem to remember complaining but they didn’t return any money. I suspect they wouldn’t return money of anyone who bought it 3 minutes before the announcement either.

Software and media companies are a bit like pharmaceutical companies. The economic balance is WAY TOO SKEWED IN THEIR FAVOUR. So If people pirate their stuff, they shoulder some of the blame.

Why not regulate what a media/software/pharmaceutical company can charge based upon the number of people who use it? And if these companies over charge, as most of them greedily do, then allow others to tap into the otherwise protected intellectual property of the product involved. A bit like South Africa threatening to make anti-HIV drugs outside patent laws?

The near-total commercialisation of life is horrible. In that sence It gives me a certain pleasure when I hear of (poor)people using pirate software/media.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Stolen from afghancentral.blogspot.com

http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/
(http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/smearing-wikileaks-and-julian-assange.html)  

Monday, 23 August 2010  

Smearing Wikileaks And Julian Assange

I [afghancentral.blogspot.com] was going to post on the inevitable smears on Assange. Fortunately Chris Floyd at Empire Burlesque has done it quicker and better:

 We have the President of the United States — who has already openly proclaimed his “right” to assassinate anyone on earth, including American citizens, without the slightest due process of law, simply at his arbitrary command — now feverishly expanding the use of death squads, whose stealthy night raids on sleeping villages have already killed a vast number of innocent civilians in Afghanistan (as the Wikileaks documents show). This same administration is now running “black ops,” secret armies, proxy wars and other covert activities in more than 75 countries around the world. That is to say, the Obama Administration is now murdering people in their beds, fomenting bloody ethnic conflict, supporting and/or carrying out acts of terrorism, spreading corruption, assisting dictators, arming warlords, spreading hate and suffering all over the world — and doing it knowingly, proudly. (“Evil in broad daylight” indeed, as Arthur Silber details here.)  

And these are the moral paragons who have now turned their machinery of lies and smears against Wikileaks. For make no mistake; although the rape charges were manufactured in Sweden — which, incidentally, is where some of Wikileaks’ servers are located — they emanate from the proud deathlords in Washington. Indeed, didn’t we hear just a few weeks ago that the Peace Laureate’s people had launched a campaign of pressuring foreign governments to put fetters on Assange and his organization? Now Sweden’s center-right government — no, Rush, Sweden is no longer the super-socialist fairyland of your nightmares — has obviously hearkened to the master’s voice.

But although this first foray has been rebuffed, it is certain that what we are seeing is the beginning of a concerted effort to destroy Assange as a public figure and thereby discredit the work of Wikileaks — and by extension, the truth of its revelations.

 

   

And smearing, of course, is just the first step. If that doesn’t work … well, the avowed and openly proclaimed proponents of assassination certainly have other, more “prejudicial” methods at their disposal, nicht war?  

 

Comments on lwtc247 have been removed.  Go to:

http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/smearing-wikileaks-and-julian-assange.html 
to comment 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

BBC psycheporn once more

The pro-Zion BBC obviously thinks it’s clever. It believes it can push sexually suggestive pics to keep it’s visitors keep coming back for more. The BBC should stick to comedy and drama, the rest should be disbanded.

Unfortunately I don’t have the time to report as much of the BBC Bernaysian psychological mind tricks as I would like, but sometimes it is just too blatent not to get a mention.

Is this how the BBC thinks of Muslims not in it’s control?
You betcha!

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Relief: Absolutely – Calum Gilhooley

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1ZMN1hBBqM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8onfBZMSXU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-fY6HTq7-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFcuINv_734

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx-3trxxFFg

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Ryan Dawson (still) Rocks

Ry’s website has been been quiet recently. Turns out he’s been working on a new 17 (YouTube)part documentary of his ‘War by Deception’ classic.

My mouth’s watering.

Update: Here’s a previous version that Ryan made in 2008: War by Deception.
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=15034&p=104463#p104463

Here’s a clip from the (new) War by Deception. (to be released 9th Sept 2010)

link: ___http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5ZkGHuj_Fc

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

 

 

Subliminal sex

The link: ___http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qgu7RtVUxqA

^^ Nothing new to seasoned loons, but I decided to take a closer look at the ‘Little Mermaid” poster. Here’s a big version I found on the web.

Having watched the YouTube video above, perhaps you can see what I think I’ve spotted…

A clue perhaps:

Update: Thats not all…

–

–

I remember a few months back I went to see Toy Story 3. I was surprized to see some unusual pre-cartoon before the movie started. It was called ‘Day and Night’. After watching it I was quite disgusted as it was obviously pushing ideas into the heads of the kids that came to watch a movie – not this piece of crap to a captivated anticipating audience.

–

–

The guilty scumsuckers making this poison:

___http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko-27mN7Z2Y

–

–

–

–

–

–

–