Land of the (no so) free#8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

cognitive dissonance – Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers

=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4&NR=1

The youtube page has three other links relating to this. Please go there to get the other links.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Why Are We All in Debt Part

Why Are We All in Debt Part 1/4

Why Are We All in Debt Part 2/4

Why Are We All in Debt Part 3/4

Why Are We All in Debt Part 3/4

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

 

NATO assassinate Afghan peace negotiator Burhanuddin Rabbani

The BBC instantly blames the ‘taliban’ – the group who are not the mythical Al Qaida, alleged interpretors of 9/11, but th group that reportedly offered to hand Osama bin Laden over to the US for trial, if the US was to deliver proof of OBL’s involvement with 9-11.

So I will take it that NATO assassinated him.

I just don’t believe that all these assassinations are done by people defending themselves from 800 lb bombs and sadistic NATO soldiers.

Burhanuddin Rabbani’s peace was probably not the kind of peace the USUK scum-suckers were probably looking for. i.e. it probably didn’t involve acting as a hooker to some global corporation conglomerate while smiling at the passing trucks stealing your natural resources overseas, being booted off your land for a NATO airbase at the same time, while worrying that in 13 years time some USan soldier will rape your newborn little girl.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Psychology 2

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Who wants to live forever?

I’ve recently had some discussion of this question.

Yes, it’s an age old question and one that you yourself have probably had a number of past discussions on. Personally, I sometimes revisit these kinds of questions, because as I advance in years, I gain different perspectives as do the generally ageing people around me which opens up a new avenues for stimulating contemplation.

Well, either that or I’ve simply forgotten!

Re: older minds giving more productive discussions: It does take some time to get ‘clued up’ on such matters hence youthful thinking can, in the main, appear as ‘has been‘ or unproductive thinking, reinventing the wheel if you like, so perhaps older more seasoned and experienced minds are becoming more valuable to me. Yet at the same time, as the video below will point out, a conversation between a) Aubrey de Grey (formerly of Cambridge) with and Sherwin B. Nuland of Yale b) Aubrey de Grey with Martin Raff of UCL, seems ‘devoid of any possible intellectual divide based on youth’, but that’s because I’m talking about people from all different walks of life and not within scientific specialisation.

The main point of this post is to ask you if you would want to live forever and if yes or no, your reasons why, but that question rapidly diverts onto the question of can death be cheated, within which I make some assumptions:

1) The vast majority of those who believe in God accept (or will one day accept) death

2) Those who do not believe in God will seek ways to cheat death.
http://w   ww.youtube.com/watch?v=pxYTiAbEASo

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

We shall seek the truth, brothers and sisters [The official truth]

Would have been interesting to take 5 “government conspiracy theorists” to talk to people like David Ray Griffin, Steve Jones, Richard Gage or Niels Harrit.

P.S. The fruity 5 in the actual BBC video don’t mention Israyhell. That’ll please those who usually push needles into their eyes to avert ones gaze.

I’m just wondering what happened to the pink leotard?

If I get a few weeks, I’ll point out some of the stuff in this comedy hour.

“I think Charlote might be a particularly tough nut to crack.” – Ho ho!

http://w   ww.youtube.com/watch?v=H_bO-z5SYfE

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Invisibly Visible (Identifying Masonic Symbols) pt.1of3

Invisibly Visible (Identifying Masonic Symbols) pt.2of3

Invisibly Visible (Identifying Masonic Symbols) pt.3of3

–

13 Masonic Secrets 1 of 13

13 Masonic Secrets 2 of 13

etc.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Fukashima as fabricated terror Fukishama – was it nuked?

No.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

AJE mind games?

Is Al Jazeera English (AJE) deliberately using the wording “pull” to normalise or numbify peoples minds against this ‘9-11 loaded’ word’? – i.e. the pull word used in the infamous Larry Silverstein interview in which he mentioned watching WTC7’s collapse?

The AJE article in question says “Israel pulls envoy after embassy attack “. Isn’t the usual way to report these things like this: ABC withdraws envoy/ambassador? Isn’t AJE’s title an unusual one? I think what AJE says is grammatically incorrect. The article was written by “Al Jazeera and sources ” – Well, at least the “Last Modified: 10 Sep 2011 07:45” version is.

A friend of mine said Silversteins famous “pull” comment was similarly grammatically incorrect either (in context of getting firemen out of WTC7)

WTC 7 – Pull It By Larry Silverstein

by the way, the alledged comment to firemen was challenged by a “We Are Change” activist:

Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies

“…the slang in those terms is related the a certain aspect of English, its an adjective. You do not say “pull it ” to bring out people”

If my friend is correct, it is even more pucluar that AJE are also doing it. So I’m even more suspicious of AJE. And dear AJE fans, don’t bother writing in to me to tell me how AJE is good on XYZ and tht reporter PQR is what a journalist should be. I’m NOT talking about individuals here, I’m taking about the whole ethos of AJ and AJE.

Well the mainstream media have done an absolutely pathetic job at bringing up many – or perhaps more accurately: ANY questionalbe points of the events of 9-11.

How far down the inescapable hole have we gone I wonder? Just what are we going to find at the very bottom of it I wonder.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Source: Al Jazeera and sources