In a weird kind of way, I was hoping that on the Mohamed Merah killings, some ‘conspiracy’ stuff debunking the official story about it would have surfaced, because it’s frankly nearly impossible to feel at ease knowing someone shot and killed little innocent children with an utterly perverse and disgustingly wrong perspective that Islam granted him authority to take innocent life like that.
Well the nasty little shit seems dead now. Good riddance to shitty rubbish. The little souls Merah decide to extract will get their right for the Divine to dispense True Justice.
I’m saying this because it looks like Merah DID indeed kill those kids. I have no reason to believe that EVERYONE who has seen the video and report what it contains is lying. Just as Zionist violence unleashed upon the Palestinians is evil, so to were Merah’s acts, although the likelihood there’s a lot of spin about him is I think practically a certainty.
Shame on you for blackening Islam. We are a better world on your departure.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Living with the Conspiracy 24-7 
Tell me then what you believe from press reporting then, and why. I start off with nothing. All I know is that a lot of police were shown hanging around in the street with some noises in the background. What does that show? Nothing. Everything can be faked.
“PARIS (AP) — Officials say an autopsy on the body of the gunman suspected of carrying out the killing spree in the city of Toulouse shows he died of two bullet wounds — but that he was hit by some 20 bullets, mainly in the arms and legs.
The judicial and police officials said Friday that a bullet wound to the left temple and another to the abdomen of 23-year-old Mohamed Merah were fatal.”
http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2012/mar/23/autopsy-of-french-gunman-shows-some-20-bullets/
Who said it? “officials” did, and the journalist stenographers duly write it down. We then believe it.
“Most of the impacts were on the arms and legs, Elisabeth Allannic [spokeswoman for Paris prosecutor Francois Molins] said. There were two deadly wounds on the front left temple and crossing his abdomen, she said”
From the following web article,
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/11420#.T3HhntkRTCM
I deduce that no autopsies were carried out on the 4 alleged victims…..
“The French president sent his Foreign Secretary of State Alain Juppe as well his Interior and Police Secretary of State to Toulouse to support the family. They also intervened not to let the Doctors make any autopsies to the murdered.”
Why???
I could be wrong, this is an age of mass deception. I just felt this to be true:
“Zied Tarrouche, al-Jazeera’s bureau chief in Paris, said he had watched the video and it showed all of the killings.
“You see all of the attacks carried out in Toulouse and Montauban, that’s to say the murder of the first soldier, then the three soldiers and finally the attack on the school,” he told French channel BFM TV.
“You hear the voice of the person who carried out the killings,” he added.
“You also hear the victims’ cries.
“My feelings are those of any human being who sees horrible things.”
And if it wasn’t Merah, then some shit killed those kids.
There is an issue here however, that concludes no person has ever done these acts because the are ALL false flags. Wisdom (I hope it’s wisdom anyway) sees me adopt a default stance that these things are false flags, but one must remain open to the possibility that there will be occasions when these little shits will pop up.
I reserve the right to believe Merah didn’t do it on production of plausible and (reasonably) unbiased evidence.
I don’t see any as yet.
Al Jazeera……the biggest faker of the lot.
Re: autopsies, I don’t know if that’s OK in Jewish circles. ??? .
So, a suspicious death involving someone of the jewish faith, and you are not allowed to find out the cause of death? I hope not. My mind’s open but there is precious little in the independent public domain to support the official narrative. Sarkozy needs re-electing, so it’s good timing for a strong crackdown…
“there is precious little in the independent public domain to support the official narrative.” – True, but there’s not much substance to suggest otherwise either.
ok.. but while we are here (or nearby) here’s another funny one:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/somalia/9158321/Judith-Tebbutts-family-lost-for-words-after-release.html
to summarise: she witnessed a murder, allegedly but we don’t hear any more of the murder or being a witness to it. The words used now are “passing away” “losing David” etc. I thought the guy was murdered in cold blood!!! And the story itself has died. And again, I find no trace of a funeral or autopsy mentioned on the webb for the husband.
And the recent film footage of which there are a few different clips is just plainly weird.
“Al Jazeera……the biggest faker of the lot.” – I’m not denying that. [Scotch that, Israyhell is the biggest faker] Is ALL the stuff they do fake though? I don’t see any reason to believe this is fake. Of course the censorship of the video opens a wide door to the possibility of a scan, but it dosn’t assure it.
@ Flix on 27 March.
Yeah, it is weird, and it does provide justification for suspicion as to what’s really going on here. It’s annoying too in that I wonder whyon earth can’t these official agencies just do things properly and transparently without leaving gaping room for doubt and suspicion. The obvious reply I suppose, would be “because it’s been manipulated or is a fully blown stitch-up”, but personally, I just can’t say either way with satisfactory certainty, but in this case I’ll sadly go with the official story….. for now.