For some, that question is enough to stop them believing anything other than the official conspiracy theory or ‘official narrative’ as others may phrase it.
But lets be frank, it is a thoroughly stupid stance to take.
1) That someone involved in one of the most significant world shaking event would, having initially been a willing participant, simply MUST admit to the fact later. This ‘opening’ condition alone, is likely to result in the majority of participants having a very strong reason to keep it secret.
2) Given the likely real suspects behind 9/11 and the dirty things they get up to, it is more than reasonable to believe any potential squealer would face execution with a similar threat facing their families.
3) Imagine some false-flag (FF) has occurred and a squealer came forth 7 years alter. From the time the event happened up until the ‘confession’ the false flag was still a false-flag. It does not magically become a FF simply when someone admits to it.
4) Even if a confession does come forth, the following powerful filters need to be successfully penetrated; The ‘confession’ needs
a) mass exposure
b) mass communication (not necessarily the same as a)
c) mass acceptance.
These filters even when overcome still don’t guarantee people will abandon the adopted mental barrier heading this post.
5) Not all FF’s will have a whistle-blower. To believe that to date, the FF’s and black-ops that have been exposed are the only FF / black-ops that have ever occurred and that no deadly secret has ever been taken to the grave is simply the philosophical stance of cretin.
The weight of ALL evidence towards official forces being involved in 9-11 is simply overwhelming relative to the ‘official conspiracy story’, and in my opinion is is well beyond all reasonable doubt.
Why should justice and punitive action NOT be taken just because of the idiots who adopt such pathetic stances as “If 9/11 was a false flag operation, why hasn’t anyone squealed?” The only answer to that is surely this: Because in reality, possibly deep in their conscious, they prefer and benefit from the consequences that followed the FF rather than the consequences of having true justice be served and all ramifications from that.
What a world, huh!
Suggested reading: “Conspiracy Theorists & Cognitive Dissonance” by http://eleveneleventruth.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/conspiracy-theorists-cognitive-dissonance/
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
De Menezes didn’t squeal.
Indeed, dead men don’t talk.
Felix, I’d be interested to hear your view on what I’ll call “The Jean Charles deMenezes [JCdM] assassination”
Precautionary I’d call it. Followed by lockdown. File under Kelly, Williams etc etc. The official story is pure nonsense. Quite a bit in common with the Duggan file.
Re: JCDM, Precautionary against what – them thinking he may have been a terrorist (assumes in a number of ways 7-7 wasn’t a FF) or that they though he may have known/come across something which may have exposed them?
He just had to be an electrician didn’t he. I have a feeling that if his profession was a bank clerk, burger flipper or ASDA shelf stacker he wouldn’t have been assassinated.
Kelly, Williams, Duggan, Calvi, Bull, Webb……. what did they know. Seems to me keeping a secret isn’t so secure after all.
As Charlie Sheen says, this article is “WGININN!”
I just hope I never see anything I ought not to have.
If you’re anything like me Felix, you will probably only have mostly 2nd hand info on the NWO. So it’s unlikely we will be in the cross-hairs, although, these megalomaniacs are totally renegade so may not think twice about killing the messenger either.