I think “Aangirfan” and I share reasonable overlap when it comes to our world views, generally, that an elite group of people is fracking the planet, in a number of different ways. As someone who (appears to) oppose the dominion of a rather sinister elite, his efforts are to be generally appreciated. But he provides me with a good example of something that irks me.
E.g. On Saturday 26th August 2012, Syrian troops were reported (by who? – we don’t know) to have entered the town of Daraya, south-west of Damascus. A day later Syrian troops were reported (by who? – again we don’t know) to be accused (once more, we don’t really know the originator of these accusations) of killing something like 200 civilians.
Just two days later, on Monday, August 27, 2012, Aangirfan puts up a post with the headline
“NATO FORCES MASSACRE CIVILIANS IN DARAYA” – source
Now, there may well have been some kind of force that has the backing of politicians and military men inside the NATO alliance, and that such a thing would be my default assumption, but something tells me Aangirfan isn’t in possession of evidence that would back up his claim…after probably less than 48 hours.
Aangirfan does this kind of thing quite a bit. Within a short space of time, it seems he knows exactly what happened and who did it. You will have to forgiive me for thinking that he is in fact NOT in possession of this kind of information. Aangirfan seems to jump the gun many times and lets his imagination run away with him, sometimes scraping around for connections that are pretty thin.
Even if what he says below is true:
“The civilians of the Daraya massacre were Pro-Assad.
They were ordered by the rebels to support them or die.
They refused to support the rebels.”
That still doesn’t mean NATO forces (as he puts it) can be proved to have indeed killed them., and which ‘rebels’ exactly are being mentioned here, Which civilians – all of them? If they were all killed how do we know this was said to them?
OK, that there are connections is something noteworthy and worth checking out, but Aangirfan doesn’t seem to check them out at all. It’s usually case closed for him. He could well be right, but I think his readers should treat his stuff with a reasonable amount of caution.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Living with the Conspiracy 24-7 
I guess aangirfan doesn ‘t have a hotline to all those shady activists with axes to grind putting out all those videos which “cannot be independently verified” (i.e. probably known to be fake) from which the Sky News, the ZBC etc etc know exactly which version of events occurred. How much caution should we use with any MSM story of Libya,Syria, Afghanistan…..Israel…?
and I thank Aang for pointing me to the Subversive Thinking Blog..subversivethinking.blogspot.de – search especially for “the dangerous ideas of Richard Dawkins”. Great stuff. A lightweight showman exposed.
Yes. It is easy to get stuck on the negatives. Angryfan (as I dub him) does much to be appreciated.
It’s just that a little finger wagging once in a while is generally a good thing. (e.g. the Alien invasion at the 2012 Zion Olympics, the false flag warnings and the rather ‘artistic prophecies’ – whoops!)