Archive for the 'AGW' Category

Three questions for warmists

1) Water vapor in the atmosphere is said to account for what RANGE of global waming ?

2) What is the latest calculation for the increase in global warming due to man made CO2?

3) If your a warmist, don’t you feel an complete idiot after reflecting upon the (correct) answers to the above two questions?









another anti-AGW post

It’s only very recently that I’ve watched something by Christopher Monckton (the RTE interview with Jin Corr was the first), but I like what I hear.

http://www.   youtube   .com/watch?v=kuovqFwUtDc&NR=1

YouTube his video’s if you’re interested.

 

Global CooWarming

Very battered and bruised from the loss of a very strong and pounding post I made over a month ago regarding a one of the BBC’s environmental newz articles, I dare to venture back into the arena.

This time regarding http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14476389

The article is about the apparent reduction in ‘growth rate’ of atmospheric methane. The sloppy article fails to say whether the rate is positive or negative (i.e. the actual level is increasing or decreasing – I don’t have time to read the source, I’m only commenting on the BBC part of it).

If the article was about the increase in growth rate, the article would surely not have hesitated to  say how elevated levels of methane contribute strongly to anthropogenic global warming (AGW).  One could be forgiven therefore to imagine an article about lower levels would mention something along the lines of “decreased growth rates of methane in the atmosphere may indicate a trend towards global cooling”.

But no.

Having FOUND the growth rate levels are down, we get the baseless supposition:

” there are suggestions that methane levels are now on the rise again.”

followed immediately by the new paragrpah

“Methane is regarded as one of the most potent greenhouse gases, trapping over 20 times more atmospheric heat than carbon dioxide. “

OK OK OK, this is the BBC – you gotta expect some crap, and the expectation sure don’t go by unmet.

By the way, in the medical profession, when certain increases are found e.g. Autism this is solely attributed to greater accuracy in diagnosis. But methane rates, either up or down, (how did they measure atmospheric methane in the industrial revolution? and who did that measuring? Ice core samples perhaps??).

There is also babble that the reason for the three decade decline in methane is because Asian farmers have switched to synthetic fertilisers instead of traditional manure fertilisers…Oh, so that over 30 years we much greater head of cattle producing much more cattle dung irrespective of whether it’s used in a paddy or not isn’t relevant. Marvellous.

More…

“”We think the trend we see in methane is best explained by dramatic changes in emissions linked to fossil fuel production and use which seem to have declined in the 1980s and 1990s. “

Errrm…

Source: http://gailtheactuary.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/world-fossil-fuel-production-bp.png

Yeah, pretty conclusive decline there.

Yet more…

“Climate sceptics who think that natural factors and not human activities play a more important role in temperature rise…”

Frist of all, one again look how it’s temperature “RISE” inclined, and in no way suggestive that the reduction in growth rate may signal a turning point towards a period of global cooling, hene deserving the script: “spectics believe natural factors could cause more cooling than anthropogenic factors”.

And what of the term “Climate sceptics”? What does this really mean? Is it supposed to mean people who deny there is a climate??? Is deployment of this term meant to ridicule? Shouldn’t the description be something along the lines of “sceptics of well publicides claims regarding levels of AGW” by the likes of the Al Gore and East Anglia Universities ‘Climatic Research Unit’ each of whom have been embroiled in questionable behaviour” etc?

And is the quoted sentence above saying ALL so called “climate sceptics” are like this? It could refer to just a particular subset but then it the sentence doesn’t really make much sense to single them out. It seems the claim is indeed aimed at ALL sceptics.

and to top it off…

“I think both studies are actually suggesting that human activities are playing a very important role in determining the methane levels in the atmosphere,” he explained.

As we use more and more fossil fuels, you can be sure it will start creeping up again slowly, I think it demonstrates pretty clearly that human activities have direct and pretty profound impacts on the levels of these gases in the atmosphere.”

This Dr Murat Aydin seems like an idiot to me. How does the result lead one to exclue natural factors? I guess by this very idiocy that Aydin is a pro-AGWer. He totally inverts what is FOUND… There is no creeping up at all. If anything there is a creeping down, no wait, the article says earlier on that the reduction was “substantial”

How crap.

P.S., today I heard Captain Planet (who does nothing against banks, governments and corporations what are raping the environment for a fist full of dollars) say:

“If the population keeps growing the way it is, tere will be too many people everywhere” – Captain Planet

Why do I have a feeling I know just which people dear Captain Planet would like to see a reduction in?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global warming by microwaves and not CO2

Microwaves can cause polar molecules to rotate. When they rotate they can lose their ‘microwaved’ energy by rotational based collisions, dissipating the energy in the form of heat in the process. That’s how a microwave oven works. Or so the theory goes.

Water is particularly sensitive to the microwaves, particularly the wavelengths employed in ovens.

Here then is a spur-of-the-moment thought.

Cellular communication (‘mobile phone’) networks need to be cellular due to signal drop off over relatively short distances. I speculate this is due to water and polar pollutants absorbing the microwaves. These molecular/particulate absorbers will therefore convert that EM radiation into heat radiation.

So IF what I say above is true, and 120 -> 380 ppb CO2 was such a big deal in terms of global warming, why then are are microwaves not demonized, especially given their proliferation over the last decade? Is it simply because nobody has (yet) thought of a way to milk money from people be cracking down on mobile phone use? so the chance they may contribute to global warming doesn’t matter?

Note : I don’t know the frequency that cellular networks broadcast on, the intensity of signal transmission or what the absorbtivity is at the wavelengths used.

Mark Dice and Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined

I’ve finished watching Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined by Jason Bermas. It features a guy called Mark Dice, an author and anti-NWO campaigner who I’ve never consciously come across before. I like the kinds of things Dice says so I’m adding his website to my links. You could do worse than to go to his site and check it out, or buy his books (no, I’m not on commission).

Here’s just one of a set of clips featuring Mark (I’m putting it first ‘cos I need a laugh).

Mark Dice: Boycott the Super Bowl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v€=h-xYvv6raV8

But here’s something a bit more serious…

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 1/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG7asd9fd8Q

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 2/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUqWo0zkVSY

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 3/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC2k5dCEaQk

As for the movie – Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined I thought it was very good indeed, as was The Obama Deception.

Quite a few people criticise Alex Jones (and his ‘stable’) for example becasue Alex is softly-softly on Israyhell (unless the USS Liberty is under discussion), but what the Jones stable do very well, is use mainstream media, FACTUAL government documents, declassified documents, secret memos, along with government spokespersons to make their point – esxposing THAT level of the NWO.

 A couple of people get very strung up about one or two trivial errors Jones himself made, e.g. when he got the date of the 2005 UK election wrong and from that, they therefore seem to ignore a lot of what the Jones said, some people also seem to dismiss him beacuse of his tone. His detractors are by the way supposedly in oppositon to the fake-glossy-magazine world we are encouraged to believe in. The monumental egos within the anti-NWO movement aside, I’ll reiterte that I think Jones has a vital role – one that he does very well – in taking on and exposing the particular level of the shadowy elite that he deals with.

I on the other hand believe the conspiracy doesn’t just stop with the ultra rich, as to me, the NWO is grounded in satanism, religious apocylapse and the anti-Christ.

What a cheery outlook I have on life, huh!

anyway, here you go…

Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined  2hours 14mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E

 

Authority and rules

Who has authority to tell us what to do?

Who can arrest us, try us and then punish us? Who can order us to pay tax, stop us watching or reading something?

Why are they able to do so?

The third point, “why”, is easily answered, because in any society there MUST be rules. A society without rules leads to abuse or infringement of one individual(s) upon another.

But so too do these abuses and infringements happen in a society with rules, as point two suggests. If when living in the UK I refuse to pay tax to the government to that my money wont contribute to the disgusting things it does with such passion – like killing over a million Iraqi’s or far more significantly using this fraudulent economic system as a means imposing global misery on about 1.4 billion people i.e. people earning $1 a day or less – a statistic which in August 2008, the World Bank announced with an underlying meaning that escapes words, the figure should be changed to $1.25 a day[1].

It could easily be argued that actually the more rules a society has, the more abuses and infringements occur because there are other factors to consider which haven’t yet been mentioned. Spin offs of this can also be seen in the field of “identity documentation” and records. Stories of identity theft have made it into the news provoking the knee-jerk reflexive action from “tough” politicians saying they will do more to protect people from identity theft…. by introducing more forms of personal identity of course!

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” – Historian, Baron John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton in 1887.

the Baron was right. The megalomania complex within man (or whispered into his ears) has produced filthy killers like Firaoun, King Herod, Richard The “Lionheart”, The Young Turks, Stalin, Begin, Pol Pot, Idi Admin, Joseph Kony, Tony bLiar and Bush II. All of these men acted in societies with rules, their rules – rules which in some cases may have been lacking in quantity but more than made up for in enactment.

So we need rules but rules can cause problems – even greater problems then they are supposed to solve. There seems no escape, but it is essential to pointed out that it’s the abuse of the ‘rules of society’ and most importantly the inflation in the quantity of rules (or inflexibility of those rules) and the plutocratic acquisition/application of those rules which all must be avoided. This side and the other extreme i.e. the society with no rules are to be avoided. Here the middle path carpeted with dew glistening lotus flowers in contrast to the burning coals of the extremes.

This means there are times where rules and their authoritarian use must can rejected, as for example with paying tax to a deplorable government.

It also means that one should not cave in to security guards abusing their power…

Armed Response to ‘Climategate’ question.
Journalist Phelim McAleer (‘Mine Your Own Business’, ‘Not Evil…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUtzMBfDrpI

thanks again to http://informationliberation.com/

[1] http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20040961~
menuPK:34480~pagePK:64257043~piPK:437376~theSitePK:4607,00.html

Absolutely crushed, like a gnat under an atmosphere of pure man made CO2

I have been absolutely crushed over on Craig Murray’s site in a discussion about Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).

Yes, that’s right, I’ve been pounded so hard with the most astute intellectualism, that I have been forced to whimper out of the discussion there. I simply became too embarrassed when I put forward what I believed was legitimate questions for examination.

Yip. On this topic, beware the hoard of ultra sharp swordsmen for they will surely cut you to ribbons.

It is very much to the credit that none of the Zorro’s engaged in ad hominen attacks, taunts or smear attempts e.g. by accusing people of a counter opinion of working for the oil industry and therefore making anything they said factually wrong.

These modern day cyber Shusaku Chiba’s, laid the facts out bare as noble professionals do and examined systematically each one in great detail. Specific references of information were displayed for all to see – should one wish to cross-check the citations .

Every point the pro-AGW’ers put across, had their reciprocal kindly embraced then examined with careful egalitarianism.

It was established with crystal clarity that 

1) it is imperative to spend billions in reducing the production of CO2.

2) There exists a fair scheme for doing step 1 above, it’s so simple that there’s not even any point in mentioning it!

3) The most bewildering source of uncomprehensible power within at least 4 light years of us,  i.e. the Sun, – an aspect of the debate which took centre stage in the discussion making it difficult to get a word in edgeways, was in the end found to be highlt irrelevant to climate change, sorry global warming.

4) The vast oceans covering about 2/3 of the planet and also hogged the discussion was like the Sun found to have no ability to temper any man made CO2.

4) The huge Boreal forests and remainder of the rainforests were found to have no impact either.

5) The initially touted pro-AGW scientific consensus’ quickly became non-issue too, but there was still a quantifies consensus more than offsetting the signatories to the Oregon petition.

6) The intellectual giants on Craig’s site, the majority of which were probably not scientists, nevertheless carried authoritativeness for the pro-AGW camp, but actual scientists who did sign the Oregon petition, weren’t competent enough or relatively too feeble minded to discuss the issues and have their opinions carry any weight.

7) ‘Hide the decline’ was taken out of context and actually means there was no decline, and there was no hiding of it either.

8) Computer code that is said to generate ‘hockey sticks’ when random data is fed into it, or returns ‘oops’ messages when the result isn’t to someone’s liking does not matter because hockey sticks are useful things and the game of hockey would become extinct with out them.

9) It’s anthropogenic CO2 that is the bane of Bangladeshi floods.

10) That energy reduction won’t decline, rather CO2 producing energy liberation will make way for this…

doesn’t merit discussion.

Guess I’ll have to re-evaluate this too:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQXY4tWaoI

and this…

Patrick J. Michaels discusses Climategate on CNN, Destroys TV Scientist Bill Nye

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffgj6Deni_Y

Thanks in both cases to http://informationliberation.com/

 

Just another coincIdence

I knew nothing about the movie 2012, other than the fact it was going to have something to do with the end of the world based upon the Myan calender.

Lets remind ourselves a litle bit about ‘Myan 2012’…

Regards to the movie 2012, as far as meaningless crap goes, it provided ok escapism. And maybe I shouldn’t engage in escapism, but I do, occasionally, even though I know it wastes life-force.

The graphics were some of the best I’ve seen – possibly the least fake so far and not so much “here’s some cgi… in your face”. Anyway, when watching it, I tried to spot any possible ‘hidden’ signs such as pyramids missing their capstone, set square and dividers, women in red dresses as well as distracting falsehoods etc. You know the score.

There were a few instances which some respected writers of symbolism could probably mention in a few articles or so, but my feeling was in regard to 2012 that these things were written in deliberately into the movie just to create talking points. And I feel that most modern movies deliberately do this just to create a hoo-haa purely for publicity.

These symbols are getting more  frequent in movies these days, and due to the internet information revolution, I ‘m pretty sure those who are concerned about such matters, generally, your ‘thinking kind of person’, has therefore come across exposee’s of Illuminati, freemasons, Jesuits, Roman Church conspiracies, pyramids, even aliens, UFO’s, HAARP blah blah blah.

As for the youth, who is the target audience of a lot of this stuff, It seems to me they get some kind of awe from all this, just like they used to with cold war propaganda, or Top Gun, Cowboys and Indians, and today mad Islamic/Arab terrorists kind of propaganda. So they pick up on it, it gets stuck in their brain, but they don’t really understand it and that is certainly isn’t anything about this ‘awe’ which is virtuous.

Please don’t be so sensitive with me to complain that the Illuminate have been placed alongside UFO’s. I’m not trying to smear those people who are Illuminati watchers, I’m simply listing previously esoteric subjects of research.

But there comes a point where sticking pyramids missing their capstone and all that, has little or no commercially exploitative use. Take for example the UK drivers licence. It features a hard to see pyramid with it’s capstone cut off thanks to a steering-wheel. The US banknotes for years have featured many symbols whose meaning are quite worrisome. Why put them all over the place where it serves no commercial purpose?

What then of the BBC who feature this advert even before their main banner?:

It’s for the Nokia E72.

Perhaps wasting even more life-force, I captured that image, specifically the frame which appears early on in the animated sequence. The message “How we respond is who we are” flashes in front of you pretty quickly which is why I decided to replay the advert and capture it. I guess there is some psychology at work there – e.g. in that you only manage to read the ‘respond’ bit and persue the advert, but of course the main thing about this is the one eye.

Is it just coincidence that the eye begins at half way across the image? At a simple level, it seems to me to by putting the focus on the eye the phone itself seems near incidental! Just how deeply the advertisers thought about these issues, the extent to which such things are planned and exaclty whether there are secret messages at work here, are open to speculation. But the fact is they are there, and they are almost everywhere!, and further still, they were there before this kind of knowledge became known by people concerned there’s something at play here..

Vigilant Citizen ( http://vigilantcitizen.com/ )  has done quite a lot of analysis on such things involving so called ‘pop stars’ such as Beyonce, Rihanna, Lady Gaga, Madonna (an open Kaballist), The Black Eyed Peas etc, and I must say I get the feeling this symbolism is put there intentionally (of course!) but doesn’t serve the purpose of simply trying to getnerate publicity. I get the feeling they are to project and implant a meaning or an agenda – whatever that may be. Personally I think it’s to pull you away from the things that matter, which to me ultimately mean it’s to rip you away (or keep you away) from realising the actual meaning of life. As a religious man I believe that it’s to pull you from the path of God.

These ‘performing artists’ (people doing other peoples art – I’d guess in the main, they’d just do what the director/script writer has decided)  and what they do, obviously has a massive commercial streak, but I really don’t think the target audience will understand exactly what they are watching and why they are watching it.

Why are we allowing the incredibly sedictive pictures that are are absolutely an artifical modernism, massively removed from real life, to become more and more widespread? Pornography is becoming a norm.

A few years ago at a public access computer cluster, a most gentile female colleague sat down beside me to use the computer. She obviously clicked on internet explorer and up popped some naked lady spead eagled with her most private bodily parts exposed in all their undifnifying glory. Of course it grabbed my attention. My elderly colleague sat frozen in her chair for what must have been about 5 seconds not moving a muscle. I think at first the image didnt register with her. I don’t think her brain was able to reconcile it’s sence of expectation with what was actually displayed in front of her eyes. Soon afterwards however I think she ‘saw’ it was stunned.

I came to her rescue and closed the window.

That was terrible. I am quite sure this dear woman had never seen a display of pornography like that in her entire life – and I’d guess she’s never has such sexual stuff put before her in public – and while others were present too! The modern world disgracefully tarnished this lady’s life. But porn and pseudo/gateway porn is everyhere. Sex sells. Thank you Edward Bernays and those who followed on from you.

Dungeons and Dragons. I LOVED this game and even after accepting the existance of God (the described as given by Islam) I keep feeling a desire to take it up again.

Drugs, Second Life and other online games, soap operas, neoDarwinism, AGW, financial credit… what are we doing here folks? TV Adverts on screens in busses, youthful skinned 14 year old girls on the cover of womens magazines telling you what the ‘norm’ is, so that you buy the products contained within in a hopeless quest to look that said 14 year old.

I will end this point which has gone off on a much needed ramble by mentioning the BBC post-Climategate. Although the Copenhagen summit is near, I think the BBC is doing CRP on AGW.

They include this graphic on this page:

Amazing that IPCC graphic. There isn’t any CO2 from most industrial/commercial processes, e.g. Aluminium, ammonia, iron manufacture, unless that is included (but not mentioned so blatently of course) in ‘fossil fuels’.

AGW is another distraction it clouds the eyes from Big Industry and makes you believe CO2 (one of the least harmful substances in the earth)  is a danger to us and must be stopped. While yet more industrial processes e.g. ones involving nuclear pollution that is poisoning the planet (50% of Americans are said to experience cancer according to the 3 hour documentary The Corporation ) don’t get a look in. It also forms a ‘life style’ whereby ‘(deluded)environmentalism‘ has become another modern day religion.

Committment in marraige is waining, kids are an inconvenience to be abourted because you don’t want to look fat in your bikini on holiday in Mallorca.

Every aspect of your life is under attack to stop you thinking about the real issues in life, cut you off and isolate you from society, making you a zombie, and worse still, a satan/occult enbraced zombie.

Just one more thing, getting distracted writing this, I browsed http://therealnews.com/ where I saw this:

 

~~~~~~~~~~

Aside: In The video, Obama said on Tuesday, 1st Dec 2009 said to Westpoint Military trainees

“Our Over arching goal remains the same. To disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and to prevent it’s capacity to threaten America and our allies in the future.”

But sadly, Peter Jay the News presenter, didn’t pick up on Obama mentioning Pakistan WITH Afghanistan. Surely Obama is signalling Pakistan is now on the list – gadually desentising USans. Dear people of Pakistan: beware the US lead action agaist you is going to escalate. Expect the US troops in your country. Chris Bollyn lists some further examples of  Obama referencing Afghanistan and Pakistan, although he too doesn’t pick up the significance of lumping of Pakistan together with Afghanistan noe the frequency at which it was done.

~~~~~~~~~~

Anyway, the cadets in the army reminded me of this…

–and

But while searching for that Hitlery clinton video, up popped this on my screen…

I erased some of the more vulgar words.

You may remember about 6 months ago a Kids YouTube channel was flooded with hard core porn videos.

All the above are of course just coincidence and a figment of my silly imagination. Don’t worry. It will be alright.

Everything is OK…


series here (thanks to http://atheonews.blogspot.com/ )

BBC watch Dec 09

You became familiar with a surprizing name
You heard many a meaningless slogan
You saw a flawlessly polished and glinting smile
– or was it just glare from the teleprompter?

This is what you had waited for
Like last time, the time before and the time before that too
You had wondered down a path never trod
Frequent signs from your television reassured you,
Numbed any pain
But this, this was the path of the yellow brick road.
Like a 911 jumper, we faithed somebody somewhere assembled something, making worthy our trusting leap.

And like the 911 jumper, you accelerate – much more than you imagined

Don’t worry, It will come
The affordable operation, wholesome food, respect when travelling abroad
Reasonably priced college places, the chance to own your own home
A telling off not a Tazering, from those who serve and protect
Unsnooped calls plus e-mails and no gangs offering medication you really don’t want.

There WILL be a trampoline, perhaps stacked cardboard boxes
A bed of sytrofoam or may even be a hurredly inflated pool – it was on the telly, or at least catching arms below
You are tumbled and tossed in the high-up wind, which fades while approaching the ground
Sight of what’s on the ground cannot be fixed. It’s bearingless and too confusing for comprehension.
Whether you understand what finally happens simply isn’t known.

Obama is ratcheting up the war in Afghanistan. I am utterly convinced it will embrace Pakistan. And here’s what the first mention of Obama on the BBC internatonal news cover page.

Such prominence.

and here’s what you get when you click the indept analysis of the latest globally significant move…

So glad the BBC is living up to it’s charter to keep you informated about important global events, which you fund, oh, I forgot to mention,  now those massively over sized adverts pay for too, while your licence fee goes up and up and up.

Interstingly there are some global warming stories in the front page too! Here’s snapshot…

Spot it? a person in the UN (no climate qualification mentioned at this stage) suggests AGW is wrong.

But having the last word with a much larger title and bolder heading states definitively that man HAS changed the climate.

Ho ho as Wogan would put it! BBC Gold!

And once again, nothing about chemical pollution: fertilizers, pesticides, GM contamination, PCB’s dioxins, CO, SO2, pharmaceutical waste, solvent and oil leakage, nuclear chemical waste and nuclear radioactive pollution.

Well done BBC. Another exemplory dispalay of the greatness.

 

George Monbiot et Wattsupwiththat a la CRU UEA

This blog has received relatively quite a bit of extra traffic looking for George Monbiot.

The reason is clear, Monbiots dismissal of climategate.

I am honoured that quite a few people would come here for some commentary on it, although others, here and here too, plus here have done a far better job of it than I could possibly do.

The sterling effort of others plus the fact I haven’t read any of the e-mails in their entirity are couple of reasons why I’ve not commented, and to be honest, the small amounts of the e-mails I have read are exceedingly boring!. So thanks to these concerned citizens who have taken up the tedium on my behalf and that of others.

What I did read was Georgieboy’s dismissal of the e-mails leaked/hacked e-mails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia(UEA) UK  (www.cru.uea.ac.uk/). By the way, these e-mails are now being said to have been stolen. Does the legality of theft apply to e-mail?. IA breach of privacy perhaps, but theft? Hummm…

Back to Monbiot… Read his article hosted on a numb er of sites including informationclearinghouse.info.

Now, Monbiot is being clever yet at the same time his attempt to do so actually turns into the sword of Damocles (albeit with the sword containing a fair % of rubber). You see, if queried about what he wrote, Monbiot would obviously protest he was simply beng funny when he dressing his comments up in satire, but actually, that is precicesly what would be needed for him to believe it. By applying lashings of satire upon it, it helps him to aviod a serious discussion on the matter. Al Franken did the same thing about 911 when he wrote in his book that he too got one of these reported warning phone calls on the morning of 911 before the planes hit. {actually the book is very good at fulfilling its intent, but it an exercise is extreme bipolarisation – one of the major problems afflicting so called democracy today}

BEFORE climate broke, Monbiot dismissed the anthropogenic global warming (man made via CO2 global warming) skeptics as he seemingly always does when evidence of a whatever conspiracy – but a real conspiracy, backed up with hard factual evidence – arises. And like all coincidence theorists, in damage limitation mode, he puts it down to a few rotten apples in the barrel. Kinda reminds me of the filthy killers of the USUK army and the kill for $ mercs, of the racism – the institutional racism – in the UK police force.

Well Gerorge, those rotten apples were operating with noone in their peer cirle pointing the finger to them calling them rotten. No. They were I woul say with little doubt representitive of the CO2 AGW scam.

Then there’s Monbiot’s apparent duality. He says of climategate:

“It’s no use pretending this isn’t a major blow.”

and then pretends everything’s alright. Well, if it is just a few rotten apples, why is it a major blow?

And I don’t know if anyone has notices but his ‘what it would take e-mail’ is written with quite a strong smell of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Is this accidental? One of the many coincidences people of Monbiots mind constantly witness as global events unfurl? I say not, for this readon: Georgieboy can’t quite hack it with the tired and quite redundant ‘antisemite’ label in this case but he’s alluding to it here. It’s the same old put a yellow star on it and then denouce those who point it out technique.

Am I wrong? Well perhaps if GM actually discussed the ‘hide the decline’ part of climategate, then I could well be, but he didn’t. The word decline doesn’t feature even once in his whole article, something that pro-governmnet 911’ers do rather a lot of.

Georgieboy says:

“They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence.”

Am I once again shouting at empty bustps when it seems to me George starts off with the numbers 3&4 then instantly after wards the numbers whittle down to 1&2. Of course he’s talking about a different issue, but he would have written this:

“They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. “

Do you think those two statements are quivanet? Does the rising numbers in the alternative wording not have a different mental imprint in your conscience or perhaps more validly, your sub-conscience? And wait, when you reverse it you might notice something interesting. How can there only be one ‘or perhaps two’ {as Monbiot puts it} bits of evidence yet have three or four scientists involved? Is the single piece of evidence, written words, split between (on average) two scientists??? Hummm… Well frem reading Monbiot’s article, we’ll simply never know because (remember the technique?) he doesn’t mention them!

Monbiot:

 “To bury man-made climate change, a far wider conspiracy would have to be revealed. “

Again George doesn’t treat us to what he according to his values and ideas would be the ‘wider’ conspiracy, which brings me to another point…. wider conspiracy. Wider is a relative term. His use of the term ‘wider’ actually says what happened was a conspiracy. But such things and how they are allowed to occur amongst the “man is to blame pro-AGW” circle again don’t appear inportant to Mr. Monbiot.

“There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.”

Og dear. George Moniot’s bad hair day.

In his effort to deny at all costs that he has bought into the somewhat ‘good concerned citizen’ thing, Monbiot points out that THERE IS DATA THAT POINTS TO A DECLINE. Once again, a discussion of that data away from all the AGW conspiracy isn’t important to ?Monbiot.

Heck! Isn’t that what is supposed to take centre stage?

  

I’ll end now by saying. Industrial pollution, pharmaceutical/chemical waste and radioactive pollution are FAR FAR more important that stupid CO2 and AGW > even it is true!

And lastly, not so long ago people were saying the temperature on Mars. Venus was rising and that explains why the earth is experiencing higher temps too. anti-AGW’s never addressed that point.

This world is nuts!

 


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930