Fresh views on Peak Oil?

Fresh views on Peak Oil?

Hopefully I’ll provide one or two new things to think about in this short post about Peak oil.

Personally, I don’t buy the biotic theory of oil, i.e. that it is (continually) being made by bacteria in the ground. Oil is toxic to life forms – is it not? Because of the nature of oil, it is reasonable to think that what makes it toxic to large creatures makes it toxic to smaller creatures too. And if I am wrong, you’d think an extract and analysis of a sample of oil would reveal the presence of this bacteria and as far as I know, there aint no bacteria there. If there was you just know what people would be trying to make that bacteria do now! Also, I think radiocarbon dating suggests much of the worlds oil came from a couple of periods millions of years ago abou 150 million years ago and about 60 million years ago), i.e. not last November.

Having said that, when I began to think about the ‘official’ explanation of how oil came about, I became shocked at what had come to believe on the matter. Now I am forced to keep that explanation at arms length! Of course, if you, likeI did, just accept what you are told on the matter, the oddities of oil simply wouldn’t have occurred to you. So lets explor that: Just how a few dead fish could sink the bottom of the ocean (without being eaten by other fish or rotting in the process, having its flesh disperse in the sea) and then accumulate in such quantity over such huge periods of time without being washed away, or have it’s fats/oils from rising to the top of the sea as its body decayed or have their abundance kept in check by predation forces – remember the foxes and rabbits simulation?) and then that the dead fish found it’s way into the middle of an outer casing of impermeable/impervious rock followed by oxygen and nitrogen stripping reactions and to then become subject to huge pressures and temperatures in the thin crust to form oil, *breathe*,  simply defies any leniency I can give such a set of circumstances.

So I can’t settle on its origin, but I’m pretty sure it’s quantity/availability is finite and that’s where the problem starts.

I know there’s a flood of ‘peak oil-ers’ and I’ve watched many of the documentaries relating to peak oil. Many  people who appear on them are ‘suddeners’ i.e. peak oil gets talked about as though the ‘end’ of oil will happen in a few months having rapid and serious consequences which will leave people stranded. When I first started being exposed to peak oil discussion, I kind of bought into that, but now I don’t. I’ve changed into a ‘slower’ and it’s a hardening opinion within my, catalysed by a documentary I saw recently called The end of Suburbia, which actually made me impatient and irritated at some of the stuff being said. I believed I spotted many holes/flaws in that documentary and ‘suddener’ thinking.

Peak oil is often talked about as demand outstripping supply. And I’m sure I’ve seen charts showing demand going up and up and up while supply goes down and down and down. The way I see it, is that if someone/something – say a business – can’t get their demand fulfilled, then it will go bust. Meaning it will be removed from the demand equation. So I don’t think the up up up depiction is particularly valid.

As demand increases, the price will increase. This will, over time, simply mean that the poor won’t be able to afford (much of) it. That will again take demand out of the system. Additionally as production of crude diminishes, recycling, conservation and preservation will do a bit to offset demand too. Wind, geothermal, tide, solar and wind will necessarily come online while McDonalds (a corporation known to fund Zionism) for example, will simply stop dishing out those rubbishy plastic toys with it’s happy meals. Poorer people in the developed and developing nations who can’t afford £5 a litre for petrol, will simply be forced to car pool or use public transport or move house to be located very close to their place of work. Bicycles will become more popular and likely greater provision will be made for that. The energy intense / resource intense consumers will have to make adjustments too, like not buying as many cars or TV sets as before. They will take cloth shopping bags with them and glass bottles to refill. They will be forced to sort out their rubbish (as already happens in the UK and Germany) into efficient piles of glass, metal, specific plastics etc. Companies too will shift manufacture towards smarter more efficient and innovative designs. They will no longer be able to get away with designing their products to fail after a certain period of time as they currently do. GM based food will skyrocket. The people behind GM food simply don’t give a crap about any potential poisoning. They just want to make money and the people eating GM will want it because they believe it will be ‘cheaper’ (not thinking of the health issues and costs of course).

Tragically, the writing’s on the wall that Nuclear energy (p.s. nuke heads also don’t really give a crap about nuclear pollution/waste either) will be used to generate hydrogen gas , freeing oil/hydrocarbons from sources of combustion to increasingly exclusive use as chemical feedstock’s (e.g. fertilisers) and tyres, road stuffs, general and specialist polymers etc etc. Indeed, I predict with little hesitation that a largely recyclable solvent and energy efficient system/s (e.g. ionic liquids) will become useable in the near future and recycle much of the polymers already in use. I’d expect a gradual revitalisation of the rubber forestry industry.  I also expect ordinary people to slowly begin to growing their own foods in gardens, nearby public land or in pots, window boxes etc. More people will stick a set of solar panels on their roof too (I used to think solar panels were an energy sink, but doubt that now). I feel the population will eventually start to decline simply due to real global pollution; Note: that’s nuclear waste pollution and chemical pollution, not this CO2 hoax pollution thing. Actually, there are a variety of ways that could come about and many of them are not very savoury – just ask prince Philip.

As the oil begins to run out, life will change, I think there’s no dispute about that. Those 600 million out of the approx 6,800 million that are well off should be OK. It’ll be the poor who suffer and/or have to make the greatest adjustment.

And of course, as the oil begins to run out, more and more of it will begin to earmarked for military use, to attempt to assert control over the dwindling supplies. When peak oil really does begin to bite (LONG into the future if what I’ve said above makes sense) the elite will probably populate to luxurious locations in minimally polluted tropical lands with tankers offshore filled with supplies of fuel guarded by a private army. Tankers with cables leading to shore, or simply tap into previously stored capped reserves or those deliberately pumped into the ground. You can bet your life that the elite will be virtually unaffected by the end of oil, and while the rest of us are living lives unfamiliar to us today, their life will be the life of riley. They will also seek to control biofuel resources throughout the world.

In conclusion: Post peak oil is expected to be a slow, long drawn out affair. If you’re wealthy, you’ll not get hit all that bad. If you’re poor, life may become harder – all those above you (in monetary terms, i.e. socially and politically) will simply stand on you to keep their heads above water. Life will change, but not coallspe. Suburbia will become gardens of agriculture. The mass multinational ‘DEVELOPED WORLD’ will face little if any starvation (but there WILL be starvation in the 3rd World – absolutely). There will not be ‘shoot-out’s over a tin of beans’ type scenarios either. These instant ‘just add water’ peak oil disaster scenarios are simply unsustainable in my view.

Global warming by microwaves and not CO2

Microwaves can cause polar molecules to rotate. When they rotate they can lose their ‘microwaved’ energy by rotational based collisions, dissipating the energy in the form of heat in the process. That’s how a microwave oven works. Or so the theory goes.

Water is particularly sensitive to the microwaves, particularly the wavelengths employed in ovens.

Here then is a spur-of-the-moment thought.

Cellular communication (‘mobile phone’) networks need to be cellular due to signal drop off over relatively short distances. I speculate this is due to water and polar pollutants absorbing the microwaves. These molecular/particulate absorbers will therefore convert that EM radiation into heat radiation.

So IF what I say above is true, and 120 -> 380 ppb CO2 was such a big deal in terms of global warming, why then are are microwaves not demonized, especially given their proliferation over the last decade? Is it simply because nobody has (yet) thought of a way to milk money from people be cracking down on mobile phone use? so the chance they may contribute to global warming doesn’t matter?

Note : I don’t know the frequency that cellular networks broadcast on, the intensity of signal transmission or what the absorbtivity is at the wavelengths used.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

The Muslim (nuclear)bomb

There have been chatter and reports recently, talking about Pakistans nuclear weapons.

A group I have loads of respect for, Hizb ut-Tahrir, quote the Pakistan Observer as saying

“A rumor is in circulation that when Zardari went to USA with a begging bowl, so-called Friends of Pakistan Forum (FPF) was created and an offer of $100 billion was made in return for our nuclear program.”

And the other day, Ayman al-Zawahiri was reported in the UK guardian to have ‘warned’ that the US wants to seize Pakistan nuclear arsenal.

It has been said a number of times that Pakistans bomb is the ‘Islamic bomb’ or the ‘Muslim bomb’. similar things are said about an Iranian bomb – you know, the one not being built by the Iranians. Claims of an Islamic bomb are ABSOLUTELY RUBBISH! First off, don’t you dare associate me, a Muslim with a nuclear weapon. Keep your rotten filthy bomb of mass obliteration and don’t you dare try and butter me with your sin of making the Pakistan people ‘eat grass’ (as was said by Bhutto’s father), to allow the bomb to be make.

The notion that Pakistans bomb somehow defends ‘the Muslims’ or in some wat protects ‘Islam’  is way beyond a sick and perverted joke.

The US knew Pakistan was building nuclear weapons ages ago, just like the US knew Israyhell was building nuclear weapons ages ago, and it knew the UK was doing all sorts of underhand and probably illegal things to assist it’s bastard Ziochild. Pakistan is sometimes held up as a bastion of Islam. If it is then it’s certainly not amongst the ruling elite in Pakistan stink. They are murderers, they are corrupt, they see to it that its people are tortured, it made them ‘eat grass’, an when the earthquakes struck a few yers back it didn’t do anything to cut it’s military expendature to have more money to spend on helping the affected people. It uses Zionist fiat money, and it’s leaders preach the usual introverted nationalism. It attacks mosques and kills it people inside it, men and women. Alhamdulillah, the people however can be quite different, a common story in namy countries around the world.

The bomb isn’t to protect these good ‘salt of the earth’ humble and decent people of Pakistan who the state tortures, thieves from and keeps in terrible poverty. And the bomb isn’t even to protect the tortuterers, the thieves and the wealth sucking scum rulers of Pakistan either. It’s my opinion, which you’re perfectly at liberty to scoff at, is that the bomb is to protect the regional and geopolitical status quo. The people, get locked into the mindset of being a nuclear nation and that any attack on that fiat-currency-corrupted-nation (by outsiders) could result in a nuclear attack and of course a nuclear retaliation. The notion of ‘Pakistan’ has solidified – a nation breeding militants’ – as portrayed in the Islam hating West, a permanent rogue to operate on the world state forever, churning out terror sleeper cell across the democratic and freedom loving nations (*puke*) that scatter the planet.

Bogey man Zawahiri, who stragenly enough managed to escape from his jail cell in the dirty-Mubarak-regeime occupying Egypt, gives the impression the US wants to get it’s hands on Pakistans nuclear weapons. Hah! what a dreadful attempt at propaganda. Zawahiri is saying Pakistans govt, establishment and army/air force is in some way in opposition to US or leaning towards what we are told is  Al-Qaeda. Ha ha ha. If Zawahiri did say that it shows he’s (or his image, understand the difference) is being used as a US puppet, OR the Guardian is printing a fictional article writte by the likes of that horrible man Frank Gardner.

Well  I’m going to go now, laughing at the unwinding crap about the swine flu AH1N1 with its mass vaccination plans for the UK of an untested virus, and oh by the way they accidently(?) let rip it was used to infect ferrets, monkeys and mice. Do you understand the significance of that?

Swine flu ‘hits airways harder’
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/email/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8148709.stm Quote:
” researchers carried out their work on ferrets, monkeys and mice” – do you understand the significance of that statement? 

Everyone will get vaccine against swine flu
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article6689955.ece

Not sure when I’ll be back, but I know when I do come back that if the same dirty leaders, greed and horror hand of Zionism still rule the planet, then it’s gonna be a lot worse.

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

Investigate WTC 1,2 and 7 using scale models.

shortly after I heard Jimmy Walter paid a large advert in the NY Times questioning 9-11…

Meet Jimmy Walter:
Confronting the evidence 2h 40m 32s. A ‘classic’ 9-11 (Sept 11th 2004) conspiracy examiner video 

I imagined someone would enventually ask him to fund the building of replica models of WTC 1,2 and 7 to prove the building were brought down by explosives. {The first time I saw the ‘squibs’, I was absolutely horrified} But nobody did ask, and so nobody funded it, including, of course, the US govt.

Now somebody has made a model. You’ll never guess what they found…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAk1V5lQFZI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK3eZt85ijI

 

–

–

–

–

–

What are you doing to bring peace to peoples lives???

Don’t just sit back and watch, get involved. Do something.

http://www.perdana4peace.org/ 
(click link above to see image below in full)

http://www.perdana4peace.org/

Good collection of speaches and documents on the global peace movement.

http://www.youtube.com/BRussellsTribunal – BRussells Tribunal (yes, they did spell it that way)

This weekend you could do worse than to check out the Global Peace Organisation (Perdana4Peace – based in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia) for inspration to expend some physical effort to help your fellow man.

–

–

–

–

 

White trash 2

There is no doubt the planet would be a beautiful place if three countries simply didn’t exist.

The most murderous countries, the most oppressive, the most cruel and the most hypocritical of countries. The UK, the USA and Their bastard child Israyhell.

World peace could have been within touching distance had that axis of evil been wiped from the pages of history.

You won’t see THIS on FOX: Afghan Children Left to Die After US Bombings

http://rethinkafghanistan.com/videos.php

–

–

–

–

–

 

Earth hour/day my ass.

It’s earth hour in about 30 minutes time. Earth hour follows on from what Australia did last year (update: actually it was two years ago – my how the time flies) where it turned off the lights for about an hour for what everyone said was in the name of environmentalism. http://www.earthhour.org/home/

Well, to earth day, I say a very loud ___LOBBOX !___

“Oh lwtc, what a horrible thing to say. How can you not care about the environment”
Ha ha, its precisely because I care about the environment that I’m going to proudly ignore it and thankfully I’m not the only one.

“Huh? Has lwtc gone nuts?” Well as a conspiraloon I’m already branded as nuts by some people, and if your one of them, then do yourself a favour and read no further. Look, I’ll even provide an escape link to make it easy for you. Bye bye.

If however I’ve tweaked your interested, then I’m glad you decided to stay, don’t worry you don’t even have to swallow any red couloured pills either.

Right. Earth day. lets employ bipolar mode. After all, it is how most people operate.

Poll (is Earth day symbolic or practical)

If it’s a) then to participate in earth day is bloody stupid and dangerous self delusion.

You believe your act of symbolism has made a statement about the environment/planet, and ‘you’ve done your part’. Tomorrow you’re likely to waste just as much energy as you’ve always done, only now you’ll think you’ve made a difference. You are likely to feed off that which in turn is likely you give you increase your inertia to actually do something meaningful.

Lets face it, we all delude ourselves at times, and THIS IS ONE OF THOSE TIMES. You’ve got to face reality if you really want to make meaningful change. Not just fool yourself into thinking you want meaningful change. Yeah, that’s right – look inside yourself, find those inner demons/laziness/apathy and self erected psychological walls covering up your own failings. Once you’ve found them, tell them where to go!

If you really want to improve things, then throw away your old traditional light bulbs and spend some of your money on those energy saving bulbs so every day you’ll be saving energy. Car pool. Do some more walking. When the corporate newz comes on, turn it off for an hour or two. Come on, do it! On yer bike! At the very least, if the issue of environmentalism is so important to you, then start to make those meaningful changes to your life starting tomorrow. Sitting on your bum for an hour in the dark is a joke.

Living in a fantasy world, believing you are doing something to change it when in fact you are not, isn’t for me, and I suspect the fact you’re still reading this means you, or a part of you, feels the same.

If you chose b) then you are walking straight into a fascist trap.

Any energy saved, lets say in the form of oil, will ultimately, as we are on the edge of the post peak oil future, to going to increasingly be, the preserve of the wealthy few.

The scale at which energy (resource, production, distribution, consumption and application) will be monopolised, will be on a scale in proportion to the elites wealth and modified, allocating extra rations to those less wealthy people who are needed to keep that wealthy elite firmly in place. Who are these elite? What drives them / what are their beliefs? How much of society do they hold sway over? It is dominated by Zionistic principles of superiority. Here, for those with secondary myopia and foolish denial of that facts, here’s that escape link again. Bon voyage.

Yes that’s right folks. The powerful countries of the world (the majority of those whose politics is ‘Zion heavy’ – a serfdom of increasing ferocity) will try with more and more desperation, violence and coercion try to control with an ever tightening grip for themselves but mostly for those who pull their strings.

You really gotta think ‘Big Picture’ here. Mini-movie doesn’t cut it.

Leaders should lead (by example) this lazy corrupt rabble of idiots who project themselves as leaders won’t be sitting in the dark for an hour will they? And even if they do, what REAL changes will they be making other than symbolism?

What laws are they going to introduce that will cause their companies, or the companies of their buddies, to have lower profits for the sake of the environment. Yeah that’s right… they aren’t.

And here is where it gets sinister.

Already those who have already said they won’t comply with it are being looked upon badly by those people who want to play the game of symbolism. As the Earth days come eventually a greater degree of ‘social outcast’ will befall those who refuse to comply for whatever reason and no matter how VALID that reason is. Yes folks. There is an element of social manipulation at play here. Is this innocent or deliberate? I’d say it’s deliberate but only from the hand of the usual suspects, but only succeed with the unbeknownst help of the masses of ignorant dupes (and hypocrites) have jointed the ‘I care for the environment’ bandwagon.

Eventually as the cheap energy runs out, I suspect Earth day will reveal its ugly hand. The power companies will announce power-cuts and when we protest, the ‘Earth lobby dupes’ (inc. those of noble intentions) will with the energy companies form the necessary levee against those who protest it. “Well many people want to preserve the environment and agree with the cuts, so why don’t you”. Spot the loaded and scurrilous question? Other social engineering factors already exist in a number of different guises.

Guess what, tomorrow is the opening day of Formula 1 motor racing and guess where it is being staged… Australia. F1 really is a TOTAL WASTE OF TIME and WASTES STAGGERING AMOUNTS OF ENERGY. Think of them guzzling their champagne while your sitting in the dark being eaten by mosquito’s that you can’t see to swat them, or smashing your tows into the corner of a wall, or treading on an upturned plug.

Earth hour/day my ass!

‘Whose Earth’ is what we should be asking.
–

–

–

–

–

Evolution & Theology – Great news?

9th April 2009. Please read these two posts first:

a) Evolution – a look at the mutation waddle (February 7, 2008)
https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/evolution-a-look-at-the-mutation-twaddle/

b) Why I can’t accept the evolutionists (8th June 2008)
https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/why-i-cant-accept-the-evolutionists/

thank you.

{13-Mar 09: The original publication date of this post was 3-March 2009. I am changing the date of this post to 12 march so that it comes second after my latest post: “Listen, oh ye Christians to thy learned and righteous scholars” which, in my opinion, addresses the fundamental force behind evolutionary thinking, the ‘movement’ and associated propaganda.

False religions such as neoDarwinism need to be exposed for the pile of spin and dreamt-up fantasies, devoid of science, yet projected as science, for lies that they are (lets debte that if you disagree) and they WILL be exposed. In the mean time, one should not let evolution, or Illuminati, Common Purpose, Black Pope, Freemasosny, Truth Vibrations, Druidism etc. distract us from the ULTIMATE, all embracing conspiracy and that is to pull you away from God. That dear readers, the deviations from the ONE way of life, which guarantees success in this life and the next, are the ROOT cause of ALL conflict that has ever been and ever will be. 

That is why this post, is of today, being placed number two on my blog. I welcome and still want to hear in particular, people who support what has become publically known as Darwins theory of evolution to try and convince me otherwise.}

I beleive passionately about debating “things Evolution” such as:

1) The origin of the first life form on earth.
2) Consciousness, morality (amongst orgnaic molecules) and metaphysics.
3) The complete lack of fossils  showing mankind came from apes and absence of missing link for ALL other spcies.
4) Why, with hundreds of thousands of species, do we not recognise instances of speciation today, and why in amongst a sea of mutations, can nobody declare regressive mutations?.
5) The mechanism and mathematics of speciation.
6) Exonuclear DNA and the emergence of viral form of life.
7) Enzymic replication mechanisms whose synthesis dependens entirely fully functional cells designed (in part) for that purpose.
6) The origin, dynamics and mechanics of warm and cold blooded fauna (i.e. the split between warm and cold blooded animals)
7) The microscale development of symbiotic relationships. (e.g. wasps that lay their eggs in one creature only)
8) The divisions between the plant and animal kindgom including slime moulds and fungi.
9) The chemical synthesis and assembly of cells – the only structure known to be support life
10) The physics of the big bang.
11) The age and elemental composition of the Earth in comparison to the known atomic physics of nuclear stability, synthesis and abundance. (e.g. where did the elemets after iron come from? – was there time for a pre-solar system supernovae – inc star formation etc.)
12) The inevitability of death.
13) The scientific components within Monotheism (see leter).
14) Why the branches of ‘Evolutionists’ spend little time, if any!, attacking Satanism but spend large amounts of time attacking Monotheism {I originally had that in reverse! Sorry}.
15) Lets examine the amount of time spent scruitinising religion as apposed to the theories NeoDarwinism.
16) The actual ‘religious’ beliefs (inc Kabalism etc) of those who play a strong role in ‘leading’ our society.
17) What Darwin actually theorised inc. caveats issued, all minus the spin

Yeah, bring on the discussions. But why do I get the feeling there will be little or no discussion on these matters. I suspect it as usuall the focus will be on trying to disprove God and NOT on the scientific claims/validity of neoDarwinism

Vatican hosts Darwin conference – BBC
Page last updated at 02:27 GMT, Tuesday, 3 March 2009

 

This has been sent to me over the years…

Findings  of Dr. Tariq Al Swaidan 
might  grasp your  attention: 
Dr.Tarig Al Swaidan discovered some  verses in the 
Holy  Qur’an 
That mention one thing is equal to  another, 
i.e. men are equal to  women. 
Although this makes sense  grammatically, 
the astonishing fact is that the number  of 
times the word man appears  in   
the Holy  Qur’an 
is 24 and number of times  the word 
woman appears is also  24, 
therefore not only is this phrase  correct in 
the grammatical sense but also true  mathematically, 
i.e. 24 =  24. 
Upon  further analysis of various  verses,
he discovered that this is consistent  throughout the whole

Holy Qur’an 
where it says one thing  is like another. 
See below for astonishing result  of 
the words mentioned number  of times in  Arabic 
Holy Qur’an 
Dunia (one name for  life) 115 . 
Aakhirat (one name for the life after this  world) 115 
Malaika  (Angels) 88 .  Shayteen (Satan) 88 
Life 145 Death 145 
Benefit 50 Corrupt 50 
People 50 Messengers 50 
Eblees (king of  devils) 11 .  Seek refuge from Eblees 11 
Museebah  (calamity) 75 .  Thanks ! 75 
Spending  (Sadaqah) 73 .  Satisfaction 73 
People who are  mislead   17 Dead  people 17 
Muslimeen 41 J Jihad 41 
Gold 8 Easy  life 8 
Magic 60 Fitnah (dissuasion,  misleading) ! 60 
Zakat (Taxes Muslims pay to the  poor) 32 
Barakah (Increasing or blessings of  wealth) 32 
Mind 49    Noor 49 
Tongue 25 Sermon 25 
Desite 8 Fear 8 
Speaking  publicly 18 Publicising 18 
Hardship 114 …. Patience 114 
Muhammed 4 Sharee’ah (Muhammed’s teachings) 4 
Man 24 . Woman 24 
And amazingly enough have a look how many  times 
the following words  appear: 
Salat 5,  Month 12 , Day 365, (N.b. Gregorian callendar = 1582)
Sea 32,  Land 13 
Sea + land = 32 + 13 = 45 
Sea = 32/45*100q.=71.11111111% 
Land = 13/45*100 =  28.88888889% 
Sea + land   100.00% 
Modern science has only recently proven that  the water covers 
71.111% of the 
earth, while the land  covers 28.889%. 

Is this all a  coincidence?   Question  is that 
Who taught  Prophet Muhammed(PBUH) all this? 
Reply automatically comes in  mind  
ALMIGHTY ALLAH 
taught him. 

This as  the 
Holy Qur’an 
also tells us  this. 
please pass this on to all your  friends 
Ayat 87 of Suraa  (Chapter) 
Al-Anbia  !para 17 : 
LA ILAHA ILA ANTA 
SUBHANAKA  INI KUNTU MINA ZALIMEEN. 

 

–

–

–

–

–

Common Purpose on da BBC

Update: Wed,  11 March 2009:
The Investigators with Jonathan Maitland. BBC Radio 5 live. Latest Episode: The Investigators: Secret Society? 08 Mar 09. Critics claim “it’s a secret society for careerists,” while members insist it’s a legitimate training provider for the public and voluntary sectors. Who’s right? The Investigators ask what is Common Purpose? We speak to the man leading the campaign against them, an expert on conspiracy theories, and the organisation themselves to help answer that question. MP3 download file = http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/5lr/5lr_20090308-1630a.mp3 (Duration: 20mins | File Size: 10MB)  – lwtc247 says: Havent listened to it yet. Don’t know how good it is.
End up Update.

 

For what it’s worth, the BBC has an article on Common Purpose. http://tinyurl.com/db22u8

More worthy than most BBC stories is a post made by StefZ (Famous for 15 megapixels) about CP in Sept 2007 – almost a year and a half before the UK State propaganda and disinformation service a.k.a. “the BBC” did. StefZ’s post is called “The Common Enemy“.

As a side note, it is interesting how reactionary the BBC has become in recent years. Increasingly it simply responds to news that people already know and applies its spin after, rather than breaking new news and new information to us. When it does have a scoop, it’s seems like it reports in such a fashion as to steer your thinking. First impressions last kind of thinking I surmise.

Common purposes website can be accessed by clicking here: http://tinyurl.com/d3cg4z (today I don’t feel like linking directly to them)

If CP was an organisation with a secret agenda (and it probably is given the lack of altruism in the world today) then, I would guess like for any large scale secret society,  that it’s wholly unlikely that ALL of its members will be fully in on the plot. Most organisational structures operate on a need to know basis – employing a pyramidal/compartmentalisation of knowledge type structure. So it’s worth pointing out that if CP was a secret group you can’t just look at one member for signs to prove it is a shadowy group, you should look deeper. Conversely, if it wasn’t a secret group, then none of its members would be in on the plot – obviously, as there would be no plot!

This leads to: A member of CP who seems on the level, may well be, OR, he could be good at disguising his agenda. So we should look at more than simple individuals (like state sponsored assassin Cressida Dick of the Metropolitan Police, a CP member who unless I am mistaken was promoted after she ordered the killing of a innocent man, Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes).

If it was up to me to plan for a dark and deadly secret society with the order of to put the world at my feet for whatever purpose I saw fit, I’d encourage a myriad of secret societies, all to appeal to various people. People who believe in something can easily be manipulated or guided to do certain things {which can be used for good as well as for bad}. Not only would I try and tempt people into some secret society, but I’d encourage many people to affiliate with public organisations too. Division is, after all, the name of the game. And we see this in many aspects of society today.

While I believe variety is the spice of life, I should contextualise my belief. The differences bringing forth this spice(good), refer to harmonious and non-exploitative ones. As a consequence of free choice, we have differing opinions on many issues. But a grouping of like-minded people is beneficial in that it forges bonds of community. If that community is essentially benign in terms of dispensing oppression, then tolerance towards it should not be disputed. This actually encompasses religion too – let other people choose a different flavour of ice cream if they wish.

The question is… Is CP benign or does it have an agenda? If it was benign then as a political and societal structure which impinges upon our lives, it should be open to scruitiny, but it values its secrecy.

Brian Gerrish is the man attributed with uncovering CP and he’ll be speaking at the Alternative View II conference in London at the end of May 2009. www.thealternativeview.co.uk/

 – And please, by my mention of conference that taking place, don’t assume I subscribe to ALL views of ALL presenters that will be speaking there. I would like to say however I am saddened by them using the old “tickets are selling fast – so get yours now before it’s too late” tactic. For heavens sake… not much of an “alternative” mindset displayed there when it comes to their own commercial activities! It reminds me of when DavidIcke started appealing to people to donate money to him to keep hius research going accepting credit card donations, or even iraqwar.mirror-world.ru asking for donations employing the facilities of J.P. Morgan Chase bank a number of years ago.  
Why is it that the BBC doesn’t ask what IS THE Common Purpose? Who is behind it? What political leanings to they have? And why isn’t the energy and resources being poured into CP – like many ‘state associated’ bodies, being put into stopping starvation, poverty, oppression and ecological damage.

I think I already know those answers.

UPDATE: Must say: One useful thing about all these short-sighted conspiracies (e.g. Israyhell brought down the Turkish plane at Schiphol airport – Feb ’09 – because Erdogan was angry that he didn’t have as much time to speak as Shimong Perez at Davos) and deluge of ‘exposed’ secret societies is the extra layers of protection it affords the eternal conspiracy.
–

–

–

–

–

–

 

I wanna bank…

I wanna bank that doesn’t lend money on interest.

A bank that the depositors have a major say in the banks decisions.

Whare a universal and reasonable limit is put on any large investors – for a fair change. why not!

I want a bank to facilitate transitions using gold and silver as money.

I want the bank to employ house building craftsmen to build good and affordable housing (or better perhaps: renovation)

It may probably help if house buyers agreed to pay their salary into the banks account.

I want the government to pay this bank because of the community service it provides.

I want the bank to have a role in the financial matters of the small businesses it sets up, providing expertise and advice.

I want the bank to be a shareholder in the companies it establishes.

I don’t want the bank to engage in fractional reserve banking.

I don’t want the bank to lend or invest in fraudulent or oppressive industries.

I don’t want a bank that finances state sponsored terrorism.

I don’t want a bank that makes no more profit than is needed to pay it’s employees a decent wage.

Why can’t I have such a bank?

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–