Archive for the 'environment' Category

Three questions for warmists

1) Water vapor in the atmosphere is said to account for what RANGE of global waming ?

2) What is the latest calculation for the increase in global warming due to man made CO2?

3) If your a warmist, don’t you feel an complete idiot after reflecting upon the (correct) answers to the above two questions?









another anti-AGW post

It’s only very recently that I’ve watched something by Christopher Monckton (the RTE interview with Jin Corr was the first), but I like what I hear.

http://www.   youtube   .com/watch?v=kuovqFwUtDc&NR=1

YouTube his video’s if you’re interested.

 

Twilight

It finally looks like Brits and Yanks are starting to pay the price for the bankruptcy of perverted economic and moral bankruptcy (neo-imperialism) they allowed continue (largely unopposed and suckled off) for decades if not centuries. In all honesty, I can’t say I have any sympathy for them, after all, they keep voting for proven killers and killers-to-be, they are utterly deluded that the political system UK and US (I don’t care if you call it Democracy or what – as it’s totally irrelevent) is anything other a great failure.

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”   – (Galatians 6:7 KJV)

The greatest protests the world has ever seen (Feb 2003)  against the looming obliteration of Iraq were encouraging (despite the fact Iraq had been under 12 years of murderous sanctions and wicked bombings by the rAF and USAF) but when the bombing started, those same people were pretty much content that ‘Febuary’s first step‘ meant that they had done their ‘bit’. How miserable.

As regards to the self declared non-elected leaders of the so called anti-war movement, they proved to be a disgrace. manufactured dissent, firmly thinking within the box, (I’m beginning to hate the expression “Thinking outside the box” because  ‘outside the box’ is not really outside the box at all. It’s actually still well within the establishments box – that of permitted dissent, besides, saying ‘out of the box’ is just about said by almost everyone these days who are attempting self-projection, believing they are subtly callin themselves clever, but in actual fact, they are drawing attention to themselves by trotting out tired and boring populist expressions. Saying ‘thinking outside box’ is now confirmation they are actually in sheeple box. I’ll grant Steve Jobs an honourable exception here) or simply cowards;

Actually it’s all three.

The so called ‘anti-war’ movement should have called for certain politicians (bLiar, Straw & Brown for a start) should have been hung drawn and quartered – not an extreme act at all, as it’s a similar philosophy bLiar & Co. used (so called pre-emptive military action*) – putting bLiars head on a spike outside Westminster would have saved a million innocent lives, but in fact it’s even more moral based compared to bLiars pretence at a moral stance, in that bLiar’s justification was a clear lie, Saddam was never going to attack, but it was abundantly clear bastard bLiar and jackass BuSh, Howard and Aznar were going to destroy Iraq – illegally. Lets not forget those so called Muslim Countries that did nothing, or those like France, China and Russia that stood by calculating no detriment to their own interests (and very likely thought they would ‘gain’ in the long term from it).  

Selfish Brits of course would have none of putting bLiars demon head on a spike – for passers by to spit at. It’s simply not on to kill a pathological liar, a cheat, hypocrite, willing partner in infanticide (over half a million Iraqi kids during 12 years of abhorrent sanctions). Blair is English, speaks English, wealthy, held power, and is white. All attributes which entitle him to escape punishment for his murder lust. Iraqi’s on the other hand are poor, darker-skinned, powerless, Iraqi and Muslim… BOMBS AWAY !!!

So the justice of having bLiar publically executed is unlikely to be realised, but at least they could have called for him to be publically beaten to a pulp, allowed to recover and then beaten to a pulp again and again; treatment herr mudjesties forces did to the people of Iraq.

Or at least allow some Iraqi mourners whose kids were blown to smithereens to given a damn good shiner and had a bloodied nose and a decent scar across his repulsive face and scratch his eyes out with their fingernails.

Despite the failing of the ridiculous so called ‘ant-war’ movement, people should not have ceded their morality to these anti-war ‘leaders’ and/or buried their moral conscience into an emotion-proof dungeon. They should stopped paying tax, refused to purchase goods from nations in the correctly named Coalition of the Killing, they should have taken out as much of their money from the banks and so on. But no, they were unwilling to risk any ‘luxury’. February (for those who bothered) was fine. And if you didn’t do any of those things, you could try, starting from tomorrow.

Today the UK and UK citizens still vote of liars, cheats, embezzlers, killers, killers-to-be, immoral shells (probably freemasonic/cabbalistic Satan worshippers – openly conscious of the fact or not) wanting to bend the law to their advantage and use it as a club to pummel the people who voted for them, while giving reassurances that everything’s ok, we’ll all pull through. I haven’t heard that other war-criminal Winston Churchill’s been called upon yet, but the stopwatch is running.

Face facts. Voters hands are bloodied with the crimes of the elect-ees. There is no escape from that.

So, the fact the western snake is starting to consuming its own tail, is actually a strange sence of poetic justice.

I do feel sorry for those that DID speak out against the white hot evil their nation spewed (and keeps spewing) out, but such people are tiny in number.

This post follows partly from watching Francis Fukuyama on fora.tv. Re: Noam Chomsky, StefZ said on Famous for 15 megapixels wrote something like “people keep saying Chomsky is a leading intellectual”. Fukuyama seems to be same. He’s preaching to the choir and gets promoted and admired by it. I first heard this (similar) ‘in-house’ point on the BBC”s Question Time in which Salman Rushdie’s literary award was dismissed as it was a bit of a Trades Union award / closed shop kind of honourarium. Fukuyama says some absolutely ridiculous and incredibly ignorant things (which I may describe in one of my final posts {assuming this isn’t it}) His rubbish words lapped up by his audience (TED’s a bit like this too – got it’s head up it’s ass, believing it occupies some kind of multi-dimensional high ground)  show what deep shit the planet we are in, a secular occidental bog of collapse. All of these occidentials (and Tariq Ramadan sadly seems little different) are like this. Beyond Sun Tzu, Confusious and Lao Tzu name 5 Chinese intellextons. Beyond Ghandi, and Siddhartha Gautama, name 5 leading Intellectuals, Name 10 African Intellectuals. Name 10 South American intellectuals. Don’t be surprised if you can’t – the West won’t let you. You’re only an intellectual if you play the game. And what a sick game it is.  

As well as residual feelings from my previous post, this post is also a result from the commentators on Craig Murray’s site and indeed Craig Murray himself. Craig posted something about no hope a week or so ago expressing he saw no hope and failed to realise the way he’s courting (conventional)politics with zero resistance (see above)  is why there is no hope. The commentators on that post and his subsequent post are the same. His commentators are of course far worse (I actually have a decent amount of respect for Mr. Murray, but it pains me that he’s performing like a half-way house). The commentators are those who talk-the-talk mighty fine, but don’t walk-the-walk, yet they believe they are radicals or true liberals and that the system is perhaps sound but just going through a rough period. Hah! Dupes(many of them). “Ooooh, we are going to drown” they cementing their feet in large blocks and throwing themselves off the jetty.

I am old, and no longer have fresh questions to ask about this world. I know how it run, I know the score. I know where it’s headed. Indeed Mr. Murray, there is no hope at all – at least in places where this globalised hegemony reaches – which is pretty much everywhere.

I look back on my youth (up to perhaps my mid 20’s) and remember a time when I thought there was actually something good and exciting about this world. I was really scared of it’s vastness and diversity.

Not now.

It’s all the same and it stinks. It’s suffocating the good people – mostly poor and innocent – people of traditional culture and values.

The western heartless, godless self pontificating/promoting arrogant world is fast approaching it’s doom. It’s fully realisable. Actually, it’s could be postponed but definately not with a prevailing ‘mind’.

Let the TSA continue to humiliate the people who voted for Clinton / Bush / Obama or whatever tyrant puppet is in control. Let the Irish idiots who voted for their funny-money politicians and loved them when they yields were high and the champagne flowed feel the consequences of their acton. Let the Brits feel austerity and have moe lies and deceptions flow from the mouths of the people they voted for (and will vote for next time) while more Yemeni, Somali, Pakistani, Haitians, Burmese, Roma, and of course the Palestinians in an ongoing Holocaust and other peoples etc.. continute to be oppressed by these secular power holding vampires.

It’s just a pity the good people will suffer too. 

My posts here are going to become very infrequent. There is no point. Even those USans who know 911 was a lie (WTC 7 – the main achillies heel of that horrific (ritual?) massacre) won’t do anything meaningful to stop the rot. The centres of power in China will continue as long as it believes it’s elite is making money, as will Russia, Brazil, India, The huge central asian ‘Stans’ are all on the same path, and I will not forget to mention the rotten seed of it all:  Israyhell. Israyhell is close to openly assuming it’s apocaplypic position as leadingnation in the world and so their champagne will also run dry soon. The powerfully built Jew with curly hair proclaiming(falsley) to be the messiah is almost ready to make his appearance. His paradise will he hell and his hell will be paradise, but you’re already in his paradise, faux-democray being a useful tool propagating it, and you will just vote again in his paradise to get even more paradise. And if you don’t believe the dajjal will get you, the dying environment and the GM(junk) food will.

After a last fling of time wasting, I’m purging my time wasting hobbies and am going to knuckle down with acquiring knowledge of my Creator and worshipping him accordingly.

That’s all that matters. Nothing else.

I will try and respond to the funny and thought provoking, most welcomed comments people graciously spend their time leaving here, and I may, occasionally, when I’ve decided to read current events for a quick break, post here again but like this world is entering its twilight, so is this blog while spiritual being makes effort to emerge from its self imposed twilight.

The twilight is just about here now, but I’ll leave with this; A pic of from the newz-journo-junk organisation called the BBC. Source: http://www.ZION-NEWS-OUTLET.co.uk/news/uk-11773665
(copy the link and although the above is correct, to read the article, replace the ‘ZION-NEWS-OUTLET’ part with ‘bbc’)

Big heads up to http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/ by the way.

* of course there was nothing pre-emptive about it. The Pre-emptive doctrine was ‘strike them before they strike us’ and of course you realise they would NEVER have struck us. but shich is the extent ir perverse and mind-rotting ssumes you act now to

Global warming by microwaves and not CO2

Microwaves can cause polar molecules to rotate. When they rotate they can lose their ‘microwaved’ energy by rotational based collisions, dissipating the energy in the form of heat in the process. That’s how a microwave oven works. Or so the theory goes.

Water is particularly sensitive to the microwaves, particularly the wavelengths employed in ovens.

Here then is a spur-of-the-moment thought.

Cellular communication (‘mobile phone’) networks need to be cellular due to signal drop off over relatively short distances. I speculate this is due to water and polar pollutants absorbing the microwaves. These molecular/particulate absorbers will therefore convert that EM radiation into heat radiation.

So IF what I say above is true, and 120 -> 380 ppb CO2 was such a big deal in terms of global warming, why then are are microwaves not demonized, especially given their proliferation over the last decade? Is it simply because nobody has (yet) thought of a way to milk money from people be cracking down on mobile phone use? so the chance they may contribute to global warming doesn’t matter?

Note : I don’t know the frequency that cellular networks broadcast on, the intensity of signal transmission or what the absorbtivity is at the wavelengths used.

The Well From Hell

Watch the below ‘MUST WATCH VIDEO’ after reading this… http://stefzucconi.blogspot.com/2010/06/new-bp-logo-contest.html 

The video:  MUST-WATCH VIDEO: The Well From Hell – How the Deepwater Horizon Event Is Turning Into A Regional Catastrophe – By Adrian Salbuchi (30/6/10) contains one or two trivial errors, but makes interesting watching. Hat tip once again to Matthias Chang at Future Fast Forward

Actually, this BP well- fracture, like Chemtrails, sees something inside of me which makes it difficult to accept such things are deliberate.  Just like I can’t believe the stories that the American technology used in the Chernobyl Nucler plant were designed to fail, causing the accident (In fact that to me is the equivolent of saying the 9-11 planes were holograms… dear oh dear oh dear).

Yes, it’s true I am granting the people involved and accused of these ecological disasters with ‘sanity’ (who’s to say for certain?) but one the reason I can’t accept it, is that the people who do such things will also be effected as will no doube the global elite. They too depend to some extent on the oceans and decent air.

Who knows.

What we DO know, is that the oceans, seas are skies ARE being polluted.

Brave Green World

No. I’m not supporting the Green Party. The UK election is an utter sham. About 30% of people (perhaps 50% in a hung Parliament) who vote in it WILL become accessories to the forthcoming global torture, genocide, anti-theistic, global poverty and usury racket. And NO party will stand up to that abomination, the 60+ year occupation of Palestine otherwise known as Israyhell. Not that the voters care about such things mind you.

Brave Green World refers to this Paxman interview with the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas  ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8656835.stm ).

On initial inspection, it seems like the Green Party has some ‘different’ ideas as to what should happen in the UK, a ‘radical’ party. But no. The appearance is a sham. The only ‘radical’ thing about this party is that  it has found a new way of churning out the same old crap, while maintaining the existing framework.

That said, Ms. Lucas did quite well from an seemingly scornful Paxman, and an audience primed to snigger at Paxmans attempts to make the Greens look like a party full of nuts, albeit organically grown.

The points covered were:

Tax. Green policy 50% on incomes over 100,000 instead of 150,000. Spending pledges mean we will need Another 72 billion pounds. Did you spot that? ANOTHER. This means there is no fundamental restructuring planned – no radical overhaul in which the monetary figures would really be unknown. The Greens would keep this dreadful system going. Green my ass. 

Limit on Incomes – The Wayne Rooney question. Highest paid position in a company can’t be >10x the lowest wage. What will happen to the Wayne Rooney’s in the Country (who would probably flee the Country). Oh dear. In a way it was a nice try but once again, utterly naieve and stupid. As the core systems would be maintained, all it would mean is that a series of companies would suddenly appear to service the rich people. Depending on current income, the rich would buy a current salary based % share of this company which would apportion profits according to the share allocations. To support this,  MEGALITH companies would likely spring up which would subcontract out low paid jobs through micky-mouse labour companies. The whole economic system would be massively statified. OR some other massive ‘get-a-round’ would be established.  You see Greenies? Any possible ‘radicalism’ you may have needs a clean break from the current system, but the interview showed that even pseudo-radicalism will NEVER be accepted by the estiblishment – including the British Government Propaganda machine that pays Jeremy to operate within the boundaries of ‘current norms’

Jez took aim at the Greens and didn’t really pull punches – not that you could pull a punch the rather silly Green stance of ‘radicalism within conventionalism’. Ho ho..!  

Citizen Income – A SPECIFICALLY GREEN policy not actually for the coming Parliament. A very interesting idea which could actually clean up the benefit system. The citizens income is simply taxed back from the working population in proportion to their earnings. V V interesting, but it’s within the rotten Capitalist system.

Immigration – Jez didn’t address the EU open gate policy. update: Was it in this section that the ‘welcome aboard homosexuals’ got it’s mandatory look-in?. Pity there wasn’t more time, perhaps 6 million would have got a shout too.

Vegetarianism – A PERCIEVED DOMINANTLY GREEN policy.

Family Size / Population – A PERCIEVED DOMINANTLY GREEN policy. This can very quickly get into Eugenics. I might start paying attention in all this i.e. population control, IF the population control measures were top down, rather than bottom up, so the wealthiest people only allowed to have one child maximum. For say 20 generations. Forced sterilization after birth, If the child dies, no replacement, and on childbirth 20% of their total wealth must go a fund to the poorest people on the planet. Something along those lines would make me sut up and listen. 

In the clip, Jez didn’t ask about the Army, Nuclear Weapons, Pollution control, water purification, Industrial and Iraq/Afghanistan/Palestine

Well, of course he didn’t ask about the latter three. who cares about genocide – it’s not happening in the UK, and the people are encouraed to think about genocide of Muslims even less.

The ‘Brave New Green World’ would be the old anti-green, crap, war loving disgusting world is has was before.

NEXT!

 

Are you watching BBC? Are you wa-a-ch-hing Bee Bee Cee?

If so, WHY?

Light entertainment, OK forgiveable. News and political analysis? Lordy you’ve got it bad. You know, sometimes after eating your greens you get home and catch your own reflection in the mirror. “Why the hell didn’t someone tell me I had that dark dreen spinach lodged im my teeth. I must have looked like an ass.” Well I am here to tell you just that. If you are watching the BBC Newz (‘newz’ cos it sure aint’ news!) you’ve got not just spinach in your teeth, but you’ve got cat litter on your cheek too, and your flies were down or you tucked your skirt in your undies.

The methodology of the BBC Newz can be sussed out by lifeforms highter than the water nymph genus, with the exception of the leming. If you are a leming, and most people are, or a life form equal or less than that of the water nymph, then get Media Lens’s book “Newspeak” and you will learn something and give the evolutionists a chance to spin out another hipottysis.

I’ll give you the lowdown: They, the Beeb, are pretty consistent in their reporting methodology. It therefore has become established. They incessently refer to themselves as balanced/unbiased and not opinionated (complete lobbox, of course). but you know what happens when a lie is repeated often enough – it works for Nazis {although strangely enough, not that well for bLiar nazi. He must have been horrified when he kept repeating the same old shit and yet a significant body refused to believe it. No woonder Megadeath bLiar had heart flutters. P.S. If he dies before me, I seriously intend to dance on his grave! Who wants to join me? lets make an event out of it – Seriously!}

Very few have enough exposure to show what a sack of spuds the BBC claim really is. So the BBCs lies stick. Its reporting ‘style’ gets entrenched into the mind, beguiling you to the desired effect that you believe the BBC claims of fairness and unopinionated reportage are just that.

Trouble is, their style is opinionated, and very much so! It gives copious positve/supportive opinions, suppositions and grace without any serious or meaningful challenge when, what one may call ‘western orthodoxy’ (i.e. hegemony} is at issue, yet it smears and opinionates you into hostility towards things alien to the aformentnioned orthodoxy. So then, that style is the benchmark (or the norm if you like me have never liked that silly ‘benchmark’ phrase)  which remember is ‘fair and balanced’. When (as rarely happens) that orthodoxy does get a fair challenge, then because it’s out of the established norm and there said to be biased.

See how it works? Look at a few BBC articles about the US and then compare them with Palesine and see if what I am saying doesn’t ring true.

Guess what? here’s the bitter part: YOU are partially to blame! Yes YOU! You who have abdicated individual responsibility to hold the BBC accountable by employment of your own critical faculties and innate sence of honesty and justice to make the BBC really live up to what it claims itself to be. YOU sit there unperterbed while the BBC beams it’s mind warping crap into your head. Like I said, entertainment – ok, who honestly doesn’t need trivial catharsis from time to time. But when it comes to (real)news and current affairs, then boy, you’ve got some ‘splainin to do {as Nancy Sinatra might say}

If you’re life is comfy you probably won’t care about this, as the instinctive humanity is probably entombed by the mindset others have imparted unto you. Are you sniggering? Then my point is made as you are unlikely to have with real honesty, contemplated these words.

OK. I’m gonna stop bashing you now, not because I’m worried about my stats which are doing nicely in the footsteps of the dodo, but because the point has been made and it’s YOU and you alone who bears the responsibility to look at yourself and start asking yourself the difficult and necesary questions – and believe you me, if you are honest in answering those questions, the liberation it should being is, to borrow a phase a highlt repseced Professor said when giving a lecture on solid state ionics talking about his first publication: “better than sex”.

You may not be ready yet to do that so I’ll get back to the point… The BBC.

There is a reason why the BBC is this way. It didn’t just start being this way one crisp spring morning, and actually, the BBC is a general reflection of what can genuinely be described as the corporate mainstream media. That media and the orthodoxy it protects (mentioned earlier) is heavily interlaced with this capatilist insanity that sees 1/6th of the population go hungry each day and is busy toxifying the world. (Not with trivial CO2 – I’m talking about ACTUAL pollution – chemical, pharmaceutical, biological and nuclear waste!  The BBC with all its resources should do what Michael Moores’s Corporate chicken used to do: expose corporate crime! Unless you’ve taken some time out to examine corporate crime, You probably don’t appreciate it’s depth.

Misha Glenny investigates global crime networks
youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO1Me-MY-Q0

The problem is a toxic rotten fruit coctail of western orthodox politics, the media, corporatite organisted crime, and of course, those at the top of all that pulling (and allowed to pull) those strings. No cigar in guessing who and any particular beliefs they may hold, but for many the line stops at greedy bankers, which is a bit like going for a walk in the Gloucestershire countryside in July’s heavy summer, only to see sticks and mud.

So here, (finally), is some REAL news, the kind of stuff the BBC should spend significant amounts of time bringing to your attention to get you off your chair and demand an end to this peverse capitalism.

You know it makes sence to bury this BBC rubbish and use media that isn’t a corporate whore.

More news worthy of your consideration that you wont find on the BBC…


http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=114871&ionid=351020104
see also: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16693

 

 

 

Common Purpose on da BBC

Update: Wed,  11 March 2009:
The Investigators with Jonathan Maitland. BBC Radio 5 live. Latest Episode: The Investigators: Secret Society? 08 Mar 09. Critics claim “it’s a secret society for careerists,” while members insist it’s a legitimate training provider for the public and voluntary sectors. Who’s right? The Investigators ask what is Common Purpose? We speak to the man leading the campaign against them, an expert on conspiracy theories, and the organisation themselves to help answer that question. MP3 download file = http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/5lr/5lr_20090308-1630a.mp3 (Duration: 20mins | File Size: 10MB)  – lwtc247 says: Havent listened to it yet. Don’t know how good it is.
End up Update.

 

For what it’s worth, the BBC has an article on Common Purpose. http://tinyurl.com/db22u8

common-purpose-article-on-da-bbc

More worthy than most BBC stories is a post made by StefZ (Famous for 15 megapixels) about CP in Sept 2007 – almost a year and a half before the UK State propaganda and disinformation service a.k.a. “the BBC” did. StefZ’s post is called “The Common Enemy“.

As a side note, it is interesting how reactionary the BBC has become in recent years. Increasingly it simply responds to news that people already know and applies its spin after, rather than breaking new news and new information to us. When it does have a scoop, it’s seems like it reports in such a fashion as to steer your thinking. First impressions last kind of thinking I surmise.

Common purposes website can be accessed by clicking here: http://tinyurl.com/d3cg4z (today I don’t feel like linking directly to them)

If CP was an organisation with a secret agenda (and it probably is given the lack of altruism in the world today) then, I would guess like for any large scale secret society,  that it’s wholly unlikely that ALL of its members will be fully in on the plot. Most organisational structures operate on a need to know basis – employing a pyramidal/compartmentalisation of knowledge type structure. So it’s worth pointing out that if CP was a secret group you can’t just look at one member for signs to prove it is a shadowy group, you should look deeper. Conversely, if it wasn’t a secret group, then none of its members would be in on the plot – obviously, as there would be no plot!

This leads to: A member of CP who seems on the level, may well be, OR, he could be good at disguising his agenda. So we should look at more than simple individuals (like state sponsored assassin Cressida Dick of the Metropolitan Police, a CP member who unless I am mistaken was promoted after she ordered the killing of a innocent man, Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes).

If it was up to me to plan for a dark and deadly secret society with the order of to put the world at my feet for whatever purpose I saw fit, I’d encourage a myriad of secret societies, all to appeal to various people. People who believe in something can easily be manipulated or guided to do certain things {which can be used for good as well as for bad}. Not only would I try and tempt people into some secret society, but I’d encourage many people to affiliate with public organisations too. Division is, after all, the name of the game. And we see this in many aspects of society today.

While I believe variety is the spice of life, I should contextualise my belief. The differences bringing forth this spice(good), refer to harmonious and non-exploitative ones. As a consequence of free choice, we have differing opinions on many issues. But a grouping of like-minded people is beneficial in that it forges bonds of community. If that community is essentially benign in terms of dispensing oppression, then tolerance towards it should not be disputed. This actually encompasses religion too – let other people choose a different flavour of ice cream if they wish.

The question is… Is CP benign or does it have an agenda? If it was benign then as a political and societal structure which impinges upon our lives, it should be open to scruitiny, but it values its secrecy.

Brian Gerrish is the man attributed with uncovering CP and he’ll be speaking at the Alternative View II conference in London at the end of May 2009. www.thealternativeview.co.uk/

alternative-view-ii

 – And please, by my mention of conference that taking place, don’t assume I subscribe to ALL views of ALL presenters that will be speaking there. I would like to say however I am saddened by them using the old “tickets are selling fast – so get yours now before it’s too late” tactic. For heavens sake… not much of an “alternative” mindset displayed there when it comes to their own commercial activities! It reminds me of when DavidIcke started appealing to people to donate money to him to keep hius research going accepting credit card donations, or even iraqwar.mirror-world.ru asking for donations employing the facilities of J.P. Morgan Chase bank a number of years ago.  
Why is it that the BBC doesn’t ask what IS THE Common Purpose? Who is behind it? What political leanings to they have? And why isn’t the energy and resources being poured into CP – like many ‘state associated’ bodies, being put into stopping starvation, poverty, oppression and ecological damage.

I think I already know those answers.

UPDATE: Must say: One useful thing about all these short-sighted conspiracies (e.g. Israyhell brought down the Turkish plane at Schiphol airport – Feb ’09 – because Erdogan was angry that he didn’t have as much time to speak as Shimong Perez at Davos) and deluge of ‘exposed’ secret societies is the extra layers of protection it affords the eternal conspiracy.

fallen-angel

 

That Nuclear Issue again

Today I had the opportunity to hear a talk by Professor Philippe Quentin of the Nuclear Study Center of Bordeaux-Gradignan, Bordeaux 1 University. Although the professor was pro-nuclear, it was refreshing to hear some honesty on the subject.  He was speaking at the Department of Physics in University Malaya.

The biggest problem Prof Quentin identified, was the long-life radio active fission products and daughter nuclei of the fission decay series. The Prof gave some very vague mention of some research that had been done to address the problem, but of course, there is no problem to the nuclear waste issue….

Mu Jaw nearly hit the floor when the Prof’s  chapperone, a gentleman who I presume was a member of the Physics department said

 “There is no nuclear waste, it’s just that we don’t know how to use/deal with the isotopes formed from nuclear processes.” – member of the Physics department, University Malaya  

To use that logic, there isn’t any waste anywhere and will never be any waste ever! That is the kind of silly thing I had become accustomed to and is spoken freely by nuclear advocates. It really is sad that such otherwise intelligent people become so silly because of their passion for nuclear energy. I should say Professor Quentin didn’t say those words, but he didn’t interject or make a correction either, not helping to remove any false perceptions arising as a result. 

Sadly, the old anthropogenic CO2 thingy raised it’s head, and had a couple of slides dedicated to it, including the “correlation” between CO2 and global temp over thousands of years graph. Sadly, no mention of the effect of global temps by the Sun. An accompanying graph showed the CO2 content said to have raised from about 30% – from something like 300 ppm to about 400 ppm (note: approx figures!)

At the end I put forward the following point:

‘Exhaust’ gases from a gas fired station is about 95% (note: cooling tower function) steam with about 5% CO2. {Those were the figures told to me after a plant operative took us on a school tour of an Irish gas-fired powerstation in Co. Cork many moons ago) If we have a nuclear power station instead of a CO2 producing powerstation, that vapour will still be present, and given water vapour is a very much more significant greenhouse gas than CO2, it makes the issue of CO2 a near irrelevance.’

My point wasn’t dealt with properly. The best the Prof. could offer was that that there isn’t a mechanism of removing CO2 from the environment. Which of course lead to me saying ‘yes there is, the oceans absorb huge amounts of CO2″, but the point was just kind of hanging.

Some points were made that why can’t Malaysia have nuclear energy too, like India and Pakistan? There was also an pseudo-politic appeal made like “the (far)West hasn’t any right to stop developing countries embracing nuclear energy.” A daft point really, drawing on an emotive issue – that of western imperialism to garner pro-nuclear support, which is a trivial or non-issue.

Prof Quentin said the French govt (who the French embassy in KL were supporting his trip) was encouraging of countries to go ahead with nuclear energy, and mentioned collaboration with the Vietnamese.

One good point was about the holistic nature of science and the body of ‘nuclear knowledge’ that having a reactor must involve. One student said something like: 

“If we are weak on the envirnomental protection/management aspect of nuclear energy/waste, doesn’t that give a case for not going ahead with a nuclear program”

It was a good point, but I knew how it was would be replied to. The Prof replied saying something like “It’s important to develop that sector too”

At the end I had a chance to mention that Germany (I’ll provide details later) win something like 2023 is set to abandon it’s nuclear energy program, despite it being fully aware of the problems with aquiring other and  sufficient energy sources. I said this in response to some people coming out with the old “there is no other choice” type ‘logic’. The Prof said he disagreed with the German decision and predicted they would have problems later. He pointed to Sweden who had also preciously decared they would shut down their nuclear generators but never actually did do, and I think he said they might have opened new ones.

I tried not to hog the Q session (and look too aggressive – partly in recognition of the Prof’s general sincerity and overall honesty – plus he looked a bit like my Dad so I kept seeing my dearest father standing in front of me) so didn’t mention that something like an institute of German consumer affairs said 20+ power stations could be rendered superfluous if all buildings were made to adopt the standards that new German building standards must adhere to. That is a very large reduction in the amount of power necessity.

I also didn’t put forward these points, but they are very relevant.

1) It’s said we need energy sources to replace the ones that are currently running out. Why? This is saying we want to maintain this lifestyle, in which a significant proportion of energy is spent making super massive profits for globalised corporations, leaving the workers pecking at the crumbs. We should be looking to change lifestyle and design life in to be able to take part in a sustainable and highly energy efficient way, but this isn’t being discussed. There is no merit in continuing this crazy situation.

2) If nuclear advocated were to sign an agreement in which they agreed to clean up any nuclear disaster and decommission nuclear power plants and do the labwork containing and reprocessing waste, I suspect there would be few if any people in favour of nuclear energy. You see, such advocates sit safely in their ivory towers knowing some poor sod will be the one who develops complications due to nuclear power exposure.

3) Energetically speaking, it seems to LOT easier to me to capture CO2 (via point of origin) and trnasform it into non-CO2(g) products (polycarbonates for example – a high strength transparent polymer for use in construction) to remove CO2 from a possible (!) connection with global warming, rather than try and bombard waste with say 1 GeV particles from a cyclotron, or via MOX fuel / 4th Generation stations etc.

The case against nuclear energy still FIRMLY STANDS.

My thanks to UM (and the staff member who I’m sure would realise the folly of his ‘there is no nuclear waste’ statement) and to Prof. Quentin for today. The more honest and accepting approach to the debate is very welcomed shoudl relegate all the pro-nuclear rubbish arguements into the bin where they they firmly belong. I could be persuaded that there is a case for nuclear energy, but that’s still a million miles away.

Endnote:

Curiously(?), the event was billed as “Co-founder of Greenpeace making a case for nuclear [energy]” which is completely wrong, and once again, seems typical of the kind of rubbish pro-nuclear ‘lobby’ droll out in an attempt to inflict their nuclear nightmare upon us all. Add the NIMBY issue to point two above that the prosthelytizers of nuclear energy have the ‘no waste, waste’ buried in their own back garden, et voila, case closed.

The Second most important information you’ll ever come across.

You’ve heard the occasional story, caught the odd glimpse, smelt the odd whiff, fleetingly, tasted something strange.
You’ve touched the odd sign. You know something’s coming but the disconnect is still too much.

I sincerely hope this make the connect.

And thanks mate (you will knwo who you are) for bringing this to my attention. 

Words fail me with regard to the subliminal sex things in the ‘kids stuff’., much of which I’ve not seen before.
PLEASE, EVEN IF YOUR NOT RELIGIOUS, WATCH THESE VIDEOS. YOU DON’T NEED TO BE RELIGIOUS TO SEE SOME OF THE POISON IS BEING WORKED UPON YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES. REJECT THE RELIGION ELEMENT IF YOU WILL.

Unfortunately, there is a fair bit of timewasting going on, esp for seasoned loons, and particularly annoying (part 9) are the multiple slides of the guys who made the series, but it’s the message that counts and the extent of what’s going on. As ever Cherrypick.

 

the-arrivals

 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7367903051208043151&ei=jDGPSdWPGYrOwgOF4uijCw&q=the+arrivals
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9029661222818161361&ei=jDGPSdWPGYrOwgOF4uijCw&q=the+arrivals
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8146028122471551086&ei=jDGPSdWPGYrOwgOF4uijCw&q=the+arrivals
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4223455946008320012&ei=jDGPSdWPGYrOwgOF4uijCw&q=the+arrivals

TORRENT: http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/2400871/The-Arrivals-PLEASE-DOWNLOAD-AND-WAKE-UP!!



Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
July 2020
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031