BBsCum

The BBC newz (newz, ‘cos it certainty ain’t news) and current department really turns my stomach. Medialens [1, 2, 3] amongst others has consistently uncovered the filth (my words, not their) that gets passed off as journalism, and not only that, but insanely the worlds best journalism – so they would have us believe]. Far from the pinnacle of journalism, it’s the pinnacle of propaganda and downright lies.

Here’s an article stolen from: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.mx/2012/07/bbc-rides-with-al-qaeda-in-aleppo-syria.html (thanks to ICH for publicising it]

–

BBC Rides with Al Qaeda in Aleppo, Syria

BBC Covers Up War Crimes – Misleads Over Syrian Security Operations.
by Tony CartalucciUpdate: Indeed BBC did not see “MIGs” bombing Aleppo, though it appears they weren’t even anti-tank SU-25’s but rather training aircraft. Aero L-39 Albatros are also not even “Russian-made” as the BBC claimed. The article below has been amended to reflect this information. Read here for more. 

July 25, 2012 – When big lies must be told, BBC is there. From Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya and now Syria, BBC has paved the way for Western disinformation meant to mange public perception around a war the public would otherwise never support or tolerate.

The BBC, caught on record producing entire “documentaries” on behalf of corporate-financier interests, has already been caught in immense lies regarding the NATO-fueled destabilization of Syria. This includes the disingenuous use of photos from Iraq, to depict a so-called “massacre” in the village of Houla, Syria.

Now, as NATO’s Al Qaeda mercenaries operating under the banner of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” flow over the Turkish-Syrian border in an attempt to overrun the city of Aleppo, BBC is there, attempting to manipulate the public’s perception as the conflict unfolds.

BBC’s Ian Pannell admits he rode with a convoy of milatnt fighters into Aleppo at night. He claims many are desperate for the FSA to succeed, “clamoring for freedom denied by their president,” but concedes many others fear an “Islamic takeover” and sectarian “division and bloodshed.” The latter of course, is self-evident, while the former is the repeated, unfounded mantra of the Western media used to cover up the latter.

Pannell poses amongst staged settings, claiming a single burning tire equates to a barricade set up by the militants (see more on the use of burning tires as propaganda here and here). He concedes that militants are taking to the rooftops with sniper rifles in the districts they claim they control – begging one to wonder where else terrorist snipers have been, and how many “sniper” deaths have been mistakenly blamed on the government.

Covering Up FSA War Crimes

Pannell then attempts to cover up serious war crimes committed by the FSA militants he is traveling with, claiming that men the FSA arbitrarily rounded up while “seeking revenge” were “suspected Shabiha,” harking back to Libya’s NATO-backed terrorist death squads rounding up and killing Libya’s black communities in orgies of sectarian genocide – which outlets like the BBC defended as simply rebels targeting “suspected African mercenaries.” Pannell papers over what he just reported with the unqualified claim that there is “little justice” on either side. What became of the FSA’s victims is not revealed.

Image: From BBC’s Ian Pannell – young men “suspected” of being “Shabiha” are rounded up as the FSA “seeks revenge.” BBC fails categorically to explain how NATO-backed terrorists can “liberate” a city that is admittedly pro-government – but it appears it will be done through terrorism, brutality, mass murder, and intimidation. 

….

BBC reporter Ian Pannell’s failure to report on the war crimes he admitted witnessing, smacks of endorsement and complicity – an attempt to preserve the romanticism the West has desperately tried to associate with their FSA death squads. Pannell’s report also confirms earlier descriptions of widespread atrocities committed by the so-called “Free Syrian Army.”

In Libya, when the government of Muammar Qaddafi collapsed, and as Libyan terrorists overran the last of the nation’s security forces, entire cities of Libya’s blacks were overrun, their populations either mass-murdered, imprisoned, or forced to flee to refugee camps. These are people who had lived in Libya for generations. A similar fate awaits Syrians should NATO prevail.

BBC Confirms Syrian Army Use of Heavy Weapons ARE Proportional to FSA Threats

Pannell’s propaganda in Aleppo continues, where he admits FSA militants possess tanks they allegedly “captured” from the Syrian military, but then, showing video of what is either an anti-tank SU-25 aircraft or an Aero L-39 Albatros training jet, rolling in with machine guns, claims it marks a “dramatic escalation” and a sign of “desperation.”

Image: From BBC’s Ian Pannell -FSA tanks are positioned in or around Aleppo, according to BBC. The myth that NATO-backed militants are “lightly armed” is unraveling as they attempt to take on large cities flush with cameras and media from both sides. Eager propagandists attempting to portray victories have more than once shown “captured tanks” in the hands of militants. Heavy militant weapons beget heavy government weapons. 

….

In reality the Syrian army is using force directly proportional to the threats NATO-backed militants have presented. Tanks and heavy weapons mounted on trucks, also featured in the BBC report, are legitimate targets for government heavy weapons. The precision an SU-25 lends the battlefield versus heavy artillery bombardments when neutralizing FSA heavy weapons is the only conceivable way to minimize civilian casualties.

Images: (Top) From BBC’s Ian Pannell – BBC and other Western media outlets have claimed “MIGs” are bombing Aleppo’s civilian populations. This all based on a single “tweet” made by BBC’s Ian Pannell. Pannell now reports this video depicts what he saw – which in reality is either an anti-tank SU-25 or Aero L-39 deploying machine guns, not bombs, versus what Pannell already admits are FSA heavy weapons, not civilian populations. (Bottom) Several orthographic views of the SU-25 and Aero L-39 for comparison. 

….

And as the Western media is so found of reminding its viewers, Aleppo is decidedly pro-government, and pro-President Bashar al-Assad. Therefore to indiscriminately use disproportionate force serves no purpose for the Syrian government, who has gone through extraordinary lengths and placed its soldiers at great risk to minimize damage to the city and its inhabitants – a city and population that serves both an important role economically and culturally for all Syrian people.

Remember Fallujah, Iraq

A government is put in a difficult position when armed gangs enter a city “seeking revenge” as BBC’s Ian Pannell puts it, when these gangs have trucks mounted with heavy weapons as well as tanks in their possession. For the West, to berate the Syrian government and portray its security operations as unmitigated “brutality” is disingenuous at best, especially considering the militants are there solely because of years of financial, military, and political support from the US, Israel, and the Gulf State despots.

Image: Western hypocrisy – Fallujah, Iraq in 2004 was bombarded by artillery and airstrikes for weeks leading up to the final invasion. When over 10,000 troops entered the city, they were accompanied by tanks, and supported by heavy artillery and airstrikes. When the West is subjugating others, heavy weapons seems acceptable – but not when another nation attempts to defend itself from admittedly Western-backed terrorists. 

….

The West might want to also revisit the lessons it learned from flattening the Iraqi city of Fallujhah, twice. The US bombarded the city for weeks prior to its final invasion in 2004, where over 10,000 troops entered with heavy artillery and air support. Apparently it is acceptable for the West to subjugate others using such tactics, but nations are prohibited from using similar tactics to defend themselves. The Syrian uprising was a foreign-plot stretching back as far as 2007, foreign militants admittedly flowing over the border from across the Arab World, admittedly armed and funded by the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.

The Battle of Fullujah is considered a notch in the belt of Western military prowess, while the West condemns Syria’s attempts to defend one of its most important cities from foreign-subversion and destruction. While NATO believes it can still win the geopolitical battle it is waging against the Syrian people, it has already long lost the battle for moral superiority.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

It’s a loony conspiracy theory, unless it’s OUR loony conspiracy theory.

Sadly, I’m still unable to get the time to comment on my last two posts. I’ll repost them when I’ve commented. But I HAVE to comment on this.

That horrible Frank ‘Goebels’ Gardner is peddling his trade again.

see: h___ttp://www.b___bc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18015935 (remove the underscores)

Frank in my eyes, is the kind of creature I really don’t like. I have zero confidence that he isn’t part of a British establishment cum ‘intelligence’ [sic] ring placed in the media (like they so often are) just to spread propaganda.

Well here, the BBC allows its “security” correspondent (pfffff!) to trot out his own little conspiracy theory, that the Syrian regime is engaging in false flag operations against itself. The BBC allows this because it fits in nicely with whitey is mighty and white-knightly while darky is naughty and dark-knightly. Where’s your proof Pffffrank?

The weird Lyse Doucet plays the game too, reporting – without challenge:
“The opposition says the attacks were carried out by the government itself to discredit rebel forces.”

Come on Frank, why not talk about 9-11 then you creep.

By the way, do you still keep miniature Qur’ans in your ass pocket?

Please note: It is actually entirely possible that Frank is actually onto something. I have no love for the Syrian tyranny, like many so called “Muslim” governments. Who seem to think torture, oppression and idol worship of the countries leader  is one of the pillars of Islam. Well, maybe that’s a bit harsh. They are after all largely propped up by their pro-Zionist western masters, so what do you expect. However, the bare faced cheek of the BBC to only channel certain conspiracy theories is just vile.

And actually, Frank would know a thing or two about false flags, wouldn’t ya Frankie.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

‘Goldman Sachs rules the world’ – Really?

Conspiracy examiners (CE’s) such as myself, will not have failed to have seen Alessio Rastani appearance on the BBC recently.

Unlike some CE’s, I’m not going throw crap at him and make sneering smears against him, or pepper you with ‘warnings’ about him, that you should expect disappointment, from him or watch this space for reports ‘exposing’ him etc., pretty much all of which happened to Tony Farrell.  If you missed it, you can get the low-down on Tony in  this interview. One of Tony’s sins was that he didn’t appear on an approved list of alternative media, and dared opine that the state was involved with 7/7 hence was subject to a very ugly attack.

But prudent questions about the BBC’s role in the celebrated Alessio Rastani interview should be asked.

–

Where did they get this guy from? I think it’s a reasonable question, especially when Al Jazeera English (AJE) says of him:

“While Alessio Rastani has never worked for a major firm in the City of London – and actually lives in a small house owned by his girlfriend” – source

Which BBC researcher sourced him?

Didn’t they pre-interview him to assess his ‘suitability’ for the topic at hand?

Did they have any idea of what he was going to say?

–

Anyway, the main purpose of my post is to say Rastani isn’t really that correct. It’s not Goldman Sachs (G.S.) that rules the world, it’s the people who rule Goldman Sachs that rule the world. A trivial point you may think, if so, I disagree with you. I actually think it’s very relevant. Why is an inanimate, faceless organisation that in itself rules nothing becoming the target of enmity, while the people cowering behind it’s name-plate get off scot-free? Why not look at the high level people involved with G.S. and ponder their political agenda and how that may work it’s way through G.S. – how that ends up affecting your life? Does it only touch you in a purely financial sense?

We are encouraged to think that the Goldmans of this world are just greedy, and this BBC ‘revelation’, plays along with that ever so nicely. Consequently, we are diverted into thinking ‘no world view imposes itself upon and through the macinations of corporations‘. Corporations are apolitical.

Yeah, utter nonsense.

Thankfully the AJE article touches on Goldman’s public-face owners/CEO’s, but only as much as a toe poke in an icy sea, and yip, you guessed it, AJE mention the big people behind G.S. in context of ‘greed for greeds sake’ only.

None of this is Rastani’s fault, I just think there’s a good chance someone in the BBC cunningly selected for this task. That’s a bit conspiratorial, but even if this BBC ‘researcher’ didn’t do it consciously, the filtration system that resulted in this researchers mind being employed by the BBC automatically sets up views like Rastani (although Rastani is an ‘expeme’ case) whereby the real culptits and their goals do NOT get a mention on the corporate media.

What’s resulted from all this is CE’s are cheering the ‘hit’ of G.S. and I think there being subtly hoodwinked.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

AJE mind games?

Is Al Jazeera English (AJE) deliberately using the wording “pull” to normalise or numbify peoples minds against this ‘9-11 loaded’ word’? – i.e. the pull word used in the infamous Larry Silverstein interview in which he mentioned watching WTC7’s collapse?

The AJE article in question says “Israel pulls envoy after embassy attack “. Isn’t the usual way to report these things like this: ABC withdraws envoy/ambassador? Isn’t AJE’s title an unusual one? I think what AJE says is grammatically incorrect. The article was written by “Al Jazeera and sources ” – Well, at least the “Last Modified: 10 Sep 2011 07:45” version is.

A friend of mine said Silversteins famous “pull” comment was similarly grammatically incorrect either (in context of getting firemen out of WTC7)

WTC 7 – Pull It By Larry Silverstein

by the way, the alledged comment to firemen was challenged by a “We Are Change” activist:

Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies

“…the slang in those terms is related the a certain aspect of English, its an adjective. You do not say “pull it ” to bring out people”

If my friend is correct, it is even more pucluar that AJE are also doing it. So I’m even more suspicious of AJE. And dear AJE fans, don’t bother writing in to me to tell me how AJE is good on XYZ and tht reporter PQR is what a journalist should be. I’m NOT talking about individuals here, I’m taking about the whole ethos of AJ and AJE.

Well the mainstream media have done an absolutely pathetic job at bringing up many – or perhaps more accurately: ANY questionalbe points of the events of 9-11.

How far down the inescapable hole have we gone I wonder? Just what are we going to find at the very bottom of it I wonder.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Source: Al Jazeera and sources

Dear white Europeans

“Dear white Europeans, please come out in mass protests condemning the terrorist attack in Oslo, don’t be silent, the moderates amongst you must reject him. If you don’t, how do we know you don’t all agree?”

–

Craig Murray also put up a good post entitled “Islamophobia Run Wild” about the BBC (and other Corporate MSM) on this terrorist attack.-

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Phone Hacking Idiocy

In the UK, the usual idiots are getting into a lather about the latest electronic hijacking (mobile phone) incident which they have been privileged to be informed about. E.g. h_ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14027879 and last month: h_ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14040841

People may remember Henry Porter’s documentary “Suspect Nation”  (Henry is a journalist with the Observer – an offshoot from the tabloid newspaper The Guardian)

Suspect Nation ~ 1/5

Suspect Nation ~ 2/5

Suspect Nation ~ 3/5

Suspect Nation ~ 4/5

Suspect Nation ~ 5/5

–

But even Henry’s (now old) documentary was lame in the sense that was analogous to locking the stable door after the horse had bolted, that is the horse that bolted long long ago.

Whether designed for this purpose or not, the electronic age is a boon for the disgusting powers that be. With only common sense, I will assert with 100% confidence that…

You really must expect ANY electronic information about you, will be accessed by anyone that decides to take an interest in your life, for whatever reason, and even if you are not specifically under investigation, there will be (and are!) automated electronic programs that will search the electronic world at random for infomation which someone is interested in. If a random ‘scan’ snares some of your data, you are going to flagged and that information will then probably come under more attention, whereby more of your electroic dealings and private life will come under someone spotlight and be logged.

All this talk of encryption and we need more electronic security etc. is all guff. The medium itself is fundamentally ‘leaky’. Encryption simply prevents the small guy (e.g young nerd) from gaining access to the higher organisations, e.g. government and the pervasive shady organisations that collude with it. Oh, that would be those governments which  pontificate about being open the people and all that other BS, you know, the ones what do what they like and don’t have to explain why, because of the ‘national interest’. Like I said, BS!

Microsoft (MS) said the other day it’s cloud based information in Europe cannot be refused if US spy agencies what to look at it. And of course if a US spy agency gets your info, that means Israyhell gets your info. But something that didn’t get as much attention was that MS having a branch in almost every country in the world would have to follow the laws of that particular nation, hence ANY information MS has, would be, if requested to do so, given to in effect ANY government.

And it’s not just MS of course. ALL these megacorps will too.

Basically, if you use electronic media for some kind of action, someone, somewhere does or can know about it. DNA, Iris scans, fingerprint scans. bank transactions inc those over the internet. e-mails, facebook, political views…… You name it. Your life is an open book, and that, from an ordinary person point of view ‘s NOT good at all!

There is only one solution. If you want to maximise your privacy, stop using electronic media.

But NOBODY will.

So why don’t those people ‘shocked’ by all these MSM revelations just shut heck up.

Idiots.

–

Edmund Hillary – the first white man to climb Mt Everest is reported to have been asked:

“Why did you climb Everest” to which came the reply “Becuause it’s there”.

Ask a spy

“why do you do electronic spying” and they may answer “because I can”

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

An increasingly mainstream station criticising the mainstream.

An increasingly mainstream station (Russia Today or is it Russia Television, RT) criticising the mainstream, but mildly interesting anyway, and I’m all for more criticism of those who falsely claim to represent us.

NEW: Mainstream Miss, TheAlyonaShow
Having a go at my prediction of the future 2012 US election winner, Sarah Palin

h_ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GwtXEzjvZY

Nuclear Reactor Meltdown(s) in the USA ! 6-22-11 Gov’s let industry slide on safety violations!
{p.s. dunno why it repeats. This issue makes me wonder if it’s what catalysed criticism of RT recently amongst the usual British journo suspects}

h_ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvUpV5pO4Fg

Shades of the Listening Post on Al Jazeera English perhaps?

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Bonfire of the Insanities – The ‘significance’ of the wikipedia leaks

 In general I like conspiraloons; Brave souls who refuse to submit to the illusion that the dominant forces on the planet are benevolent and worthy of support simply because they are powerful. Well, ok, that’s not quite true, a significant number of them do still support the ‘deep state’ and have lines in the sand that are effortlessly redrawn should they ever become breached. They aren’t as ‘radical’ or ‘revolutionary’ as they might make out.

There goes another bunch of people that’s crossed me off their Christmas and Eid card list.

I’m honest enough with myself to see some of that in me. However, where there is a simple choice, e.g. engaging in ‘voting’ I don’t con myself into believing that by playing the game one can change the game.

Having said that, conspiraloons in general are detached from the mindset whereby just because there is a centre of power whose influence affects us that it must be courted and is automatically entitled to acceptability and ones support. Indeed most conspiraloons have the realisation that such power centres around the world – rungs on the power ladder if you will – be they Governments, Bankers, Zionists, Hijacked religions (some loons would simply say ‘religion’, period), so called Royalty etc, should by default be treated with suspicion, coldness or perhaps even hostility. I’d say loons on average are pretty firm (via confidence) in their beliefs and because of the actual nature of these beliefs, they are going to manifest them in their own lives and I would guess, this will cause pain and come at considerable personal cost. After all, they live in a world full of people beguiled by the very ‘World Order’ which loons are trying to resist.

But sometimes otherwise sensible behaviour can be nonsensical, and perhaps parallel the stupidity of people who think the way this planet is run is just fine, and that the 3 billion or so people who live in abject poverty are scroungers or don’t work hard enough or some other bullshit like that.

Come this latest wikileaks thing.

It seems some conspiraloons are wondering whether Assange is an asset/mole/plant/useful-useable-idiot because some of the leaks apparently say US ‘intelligence’ [sic] says things like Pakistan or Iran is helping the Taliban and so is therefore the leaks were really subterfuge to deliver propaganda against those two countries.

Huh, come again?

Yes, that’s right, some loons are thinking the wikileaks publication of the US intelligence reports is a psyop.

 

To be a bit stronger than what I was earlier, and deservedly so, some loons are acting like arseholes.

– Woah, steady on lw!

No, I won’t ‘steady on’, neither will I desist from having a conversation with myself!

Loons have an incapacity to deal with information that could be useful to them. Like Tom Sawyer slapping Becky’s face in the cave to break her out of her hysterics, loons need a good slap to stop them doing the equivalent of being like that kid at school stuck forever repeating the third year (p.s. no offence to those kids, I know you were stuck in a terrible school system).

This world is so full of crap that you cherry pick. Yip, that’s right. You do what those bastards Bush and bLiar did (to name just two of the hundreds). Difference is, loon cherry picking has moral authority and involves real cherries not made up bollocks.

So when some murderous slop in CENTCOM, or whatever lets slip some info, you use the ‘good’ bits, and throw the rest of their garbage in the trash can!

When Chomsky exposes those in the media for fully believing what they say – but that they only got there because of their embrace of the prevailing global hegemonic paradigm, then you use it. When Chomsky talks bullshit – and he does at times, you call him an ‘old toad’ and switch him off. When the BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 about 20 minutes before it did collapse, you use that, but then turn off all the other disgraceful crap they pump out – like John Simpsons interview with that nasty piece of British Trash in Kabul – the British Ambassador or some other pompous title that should actually read “Occupier, Killer, and legitimate Afghan Resistance target” When Clegg says the Iraq war was illegal, you use it. The rest of the time, you put the puppet back in his closet, embarrassed to see his face while thinking of all the promises he (or Cocaine Cameron) was always going to break.

US intelligence’ is always drawing up complete bullshit for many reasons, often for the purpose of internal consumption. They’ve been doing it for years. You get some lying bitch of a girl to lie that babies were thrown from incubators, or some Iraqi stooges to show a BBC presstitite ‘proof’ that Saddam built a nuke and actually detonated it (the vile propagandist, a British Judith Miller on the same page has an audio link in which she ridiculously claims “Gwynne Roberts: “UN inspectors missed a very large slice of the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme” – a lie then and a proven lie now, and flies in the face of the actual inspectors. They release it in a number of ways too.

Usually (if not always) it’s demonstrable bullshit, as has been the case with Bush defying a number of his own NIE’s about Irans supposed nuke weapon program, or as we have seen many many times before about Iranian weapons/IED’s and so forth in Iraq attacking USans.

But because the US internal shit has been entered the public domain via wikileaks irrespective of having been previously (at least in part) leaked already – deliberately of course – via Geoff Gannon/Judith Miller like presstitutes, or just via the usual reports from “(unnamed)official sources” , “A pentagon spokesman” or “a leaked NSA document”, that now wikileaks and/or Assange can’t be trusted.

And oh, by the way, lets not talk about the very real dirty shit that was exposed by these leaks.

The report that “The Truth Seeker” (graphic above)  links to, read like this…

Iran transforming Afghan war
 
Peter Goodspeed – The National Post July 31, 2010

The night Canadian Master Corporal Darrell Priede of Brantford died in Afghanistan, the Afghan war took a sudden dangerous new twist.

A stream of secret U.S. military intelligence reports released this week by the WikiLeaks website suggests the May 2007 death was the result of a Taliban attack with a heat-seeking, surface-to-air missile launched from the shoulder.

In all likelihood, the deadly weapon was provided by Iran.
 

Dear oh dear. This is recycled sewage. And it goes on. Shame on the numbskulls swallowing all these US reports as unchallengeable truth of the highest order. Shame on them for not being able to filter out the crap and spot the obvious psy-op-counter-intelligence-propaganda.

And there are many other people doing the same.

Idiots.

This brings up a wider point. Just because Assange/Wikileaks is quite well known now, what qualification is there that he’s been ‘comprimised’?

Oh dear.

I’m gonna stop now. What needed to be said… has been said.

Remedy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE32tcojArI

–

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soV8IcTzuj8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–  

 

Mark Dice and Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined

I’ve finished watching Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined by Jason Bermas. It features a guy called Mark Dice, an author and anti-NWO campaigner who I’ve never consciously come across before. I like the kinds of things Dice says so I’m adding his website to my links. You could do worse than to go to his site and check it out, or buy his books (no, I’m not on commission).

Here’s just one of a set of clips featuring Mark (I’m putting it first ‘cos I need a laugh).

Mark Dice: Boycott the Super Bowl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v€=h-xYvv6raV8

–

But here’s something a bit more serious…

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 1/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG7asd9fd8Q

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 2/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUqWo0zkVSY

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 3/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC2k5dCEaQk

As for the movie – Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined I thought it was very good indeed, as was The Obama Deception.

Quite a few people criticise Alex Jones (and his ‘stable’) for example becasue Alex is softly-softly on Israyhell (unless the USS Liberty is under discussion), but what the Jones stable do very well, is use mainstream media, FACTUAL government documents, declassified documents, secret memos, along with government spokespersons to make their point – esxposing THAT level of the NWO.

 A couple of people get very strung up about one or two trivial errors Jones himself made, e.g. when he got the date of the 2005 UK election wrong and from that, they therefore seem to ignore a lot of what the Jones said, some people also seem to dismiss him beacuse of his tone. His detractors are by the way supposedly in oppositon to the fake-glossy-magazine world we are encouraged to believe in. The monumental egos within the anti-NWO movement aside, I’ll reiterte that I think Jones has a vital role – one that he does very well – in taking on and exposing the particular level of the shadowy elite that he deals with.

I on the other hand believe the conspiracy doesn’t just stop with the ultra rich, as to me, the NWO is grounded in satanism, religious apocylapse and the anti-Christ.

What a cheery outlook I have on life, huh!

anyway, here you go…

Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined  2hours 14mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

News and yet more Newz

One of these comes from a UK government funded corporation, the other from an indpendently funded news base. Guess which is which.

This gives me a sliver of opportunity to slip in some nostalgia…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW8HqoDV_lM

The one at the bottom (the news item that is, not the kid in the video) came from the independently (non government) funded  news base globalresearch.ca the one at the top came from the government funded BBC.

Did you guess correctly?

Good. Now we’ll begin…

errr are you sitting confortably?

Here’s the URL’s if yor interested.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16667
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/default.stm 

Yeah I know, I could have made it tougher. I didn’t play fair – a bit like the BBC really. Well you can probably guess at what’s coming next.

The BBC… hummm where to start? Perhaps this: The BBC is a training camp for journalistic genocide. Its propaganda is flagrant and crass but that’s all it needs to be. A form of Occams razor that billows upon the masses. A presstitite  – the self employeed variety, one that actually looks sexy but inside is a utter mess.

If you are new here, yo might wondering what’s rubbing me up the wrong way? Well look at the BBC headline. Put the routing that dominates your life to the side for just a moment and look at it closely. Think about it.

Can UK US stop extremsim in Yemen?

Oh boy!

It’s implying that Yemen [yes YEMEN – the country, the coutry of 203,850 sq miles (527,970 sq km)]  has extremism in it,  the WHOLE country! If this implication isn’t delibate*, then the journalism presented is the culinary equivalent akin to a hard boiled egg. So now you think Yeme n is an exremist country what other propaganda alpha-waves enter your primed skull?

UK US. Hey, wait a minute. What the HELL does this have to do withthe UK? 
N-O-T-H-I-N-G—A-T—A-L-L    that’s what.

Are you not offended yet at what the BBC is doing to you? Are you not outraged that this disgusting filth? You should be. It’s WORSE than the Nazis! Worse? Yeah because the Nazi’s were nearly 70 years ago! WE should have learned. Actually YOU should have learned!!!! (OK they perverted your schooling – you have an atoms wothh of an excuse)

Why put the UK first? Well the rather descriptice USUK would be frowned upon, a little bit like the planet Uranus properly pronounced “Your Anus” (which is kind of funny really) is now pronunced Your-ran-us a bit like your highess (altho I think your heighness should also be pronounced “Your Anus” – if you said it quickly enough and semi-mumbled it, you might just get away with it :)

But is it really an attempt to avoid saying “YOU SUCK” No. As aluded to before it’s an attempt to rope the UK in to the next phase of the War OF  Terror – one that I think has taken most of us by surprise. It superglue’s us to the United Snakes, or AmeriKKKa as it’s somethimes known. I think I might start thinking of it as Israyhells back yard, or playgroind…. or toilet! An Iraqi friend of mine told me today he thought the US in it’s collapse will break out into a civil war. I think he’s right. The battle lines will be divided roughly between the good decnt salt of the earth people who at some stage say through the rotten corporate mainstream media  and those on the other side that eats and drinks from the Zionist banquet. Unfortantely I think the Zionist side will win and the decent people massacred (ZioMurFeDo – the martial art: The way of the Zionist Murder Fest). Those that survive will be left separating sourting out scrap metal in the FEMA camps. You know the way the Americans (and Ozzies to a degree) are damn lazy and just steal names of places like NEW York, New Orleans, New Hampshire and so on? Well I wonder if there’s a FEMA camp in New Belsen, New Treblinka to New Auschwitz. If not then in some odd way, perhaps there should be. They could twin with any three towns in the Gaza strip. They might have to forgo mutual sighseeing though – and food and water and medicine.

Getting back to “UK US” Not only that, but the question has buried in it some kind of “right” like a moral right or a human right or even a legal right to ‘sort out’ Yemen.

Man, this British BBC junk just gets worse and worse. Bury the BBC before it buried you.

Next the Swin(dl)e Flu… bt actually no comment is needed really. The headline summaries the con pretty well. Yes people died and so its orignins MUST be investigated in the public area and by independent investigators. But of course, this ain’t gonn happen. Wonder what the next lab modified virus wull be and when they will release it, supported by a whoreporate mainstream media announcing early on ‘200 dead’ and then blame others for scaremongering other than themselves. Oh, we’re back to the BBC and its newz again. And maybe next time, they’ll discuss its bird/pig.human make-up having allowed a few days to ‘discover’ its genetic charasteristcs from the time they sent it for analysis – unlike last time. hey guess what… were back at the BBC again!

Notice anything worth being concerned about?

I’ll leave you now with a snippted from the ever worthy Aletho News…

http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/uk-to-follow-us-intervention-in-yemen/

–

–

–

–

–

–

–