Thanks Beyonce for revealing to me the effectual end of the world. Twas very kind of you.
Just one thing. where the hell is Londen?
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Examining issues of 9-11 and 7-7, along with analysis and opinion on global politics.
Thanks Beyonce for revealing to me the effectual end of the world. Twas very kind of you.
Just one thing. where the hell is Londen?
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Due to a general request by Craig Murray, I repost his article…
America’s Vassal Acts Decisively and Illegally
by craig on August 16, 2012 11:30 am in Uncategorized
UPDATE
100,000 HITS IN 100 MINUTES CRASHED THE SITE. WE DON’T KNOW YET IF GENUINE INTEREST OR DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACK. OUR BRILLIANT WEBHOSTS HAVE QUADRUPLED THE RESOURCE, BUT IF YOU CAN HELP TAKE THE STRAIN BY REPOSTING I WOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL.
I returned to the UK today to be astonished by private confirmation from within the FCO that the UK government has indeed decided – after immense pressure from the Obama administration – to enter the Ecuadorean Embassy and seize Julian Assange.
This will be, beyond any argument, a blatant breach of the Vienna Convention of 1961, to which the UK is one of the original parties and which encodes the centuries – arguably millennia – of practice which have enabled diplomatic relations to function. The Vienna Convention is the most subscribed single international treaty in the world.
The provisions of the Vienna Convention on the status of diplomatic premises are expressed in deliberately absolute terms. There is no modification or qualification elsewhere in the treaty.
Article 22
1.The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter
them, except with the consent of the head of the mission.
2.The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises
of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the
mission or impairment of its dignity.
3.The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of
transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.
Not even the Chinese government tried to enter the US Embassy to arrest the Chinese dissident Chen Guangchen. Even during the decades of the Cold War, defectors or dissidents were never seized from each other’s embassies. Murder in Samarkand relates in detail my attempts in the British Embassy to help Uzbek dissidents. This terrible breach of international law will result in British Embassies being subject to raids and harassment worldwide.
The government’s calculation is that, unlike Ecuador, Britain is a strong enough power to deter such intrusions. This is yet another symptom of the “might is right” principle in international relations, in the era of the neo-conservative abandonment of the idea of the rule of international law.
The British Government bases its argument on domestic British legislation. But the domestic legislation of a country cannot counter its obligations in international law, unless it chooses to withdraw from them. If the government does not wish to follow the obligations imposed on it by the Vienna Convention, it has the right to resile from it – which would leave British diplomats with no protection worldwide.
I hope to have more information soon on the threats used by the US administration. William Hague had been supporting the move against the concerted advice of his own officials; Ken Clarke has been opposing the move against the advice of his. I gather the decision to act has been taken in Number 10.
There appears to have been no input of any kind from the Liberal Democrats. That opens a wider question – there appears to be no “liberal” impact now in any question of coalition policy. It is amazing how government salaries and privileges and ministerial limousines are worth far more than any belief to these people. I cannot now conceive how I was a member of that party for over thirty years, deluded into a genuine belief that they had principles.
Will comment on this later, God willing:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
See 19:39 timeline
“There’s a pattern here, and I think It’s highly likely that all three of these men: Martin [Abdullah] McDaid, Mohammed Qayum Khan [a.k.a. Mohammed Quayyum Khan, a.k.a. ‘Q’], Mohammed Junaid Babar [4 years in prison] were all working for the security services- either British or American “
Why not the so called “Israeli” intelligence services Tom?
–
–
p.s. the youtube page with Tom’s performance had this horrible coincidence on the side menu.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
The BBC says:
“A totally innocent 18 year old youth on the threshold of a promising life was brutally cut down in the street in front of eye witnesses by a racist thuggish gang,” he told Dobson and Norris.
“You were both members of that gang. I have no doubt at all that you fully subscribed to its views and attitudes.”
He said the assault was “a brief but co-ordinated attack, a racist taunt, a charge and a swallowing up of Stephen Lawrence”.
“I’m sure that you knew one of your group was armed with a knife that night,” the judge said. “The evidence does not prove you had the knife, but the holder had it with your approval.”
Mr Justice Treacy said the encounter was not premeditated but Dobson and Norris had been prepared to attack if the opportunity arose.
The evidence does not prove thy had the knife, but the holder had it with your approval…. So there is no evidence these people killed Stephen Lawrence, yet they are sentenced for murder. That just doesn’t make sense. And the judge cannot assert that the knife wielder did hold it with the approval of Dobson and Norris (although one suspects they probably did).
Given the lack of evidence, shouldn’t Dobson and Norris be standing trial for difference charges other than murder? It matters not that they are probably vile scum, what matters is the law is carried properly.
I can’t believe that Dobson and Norris will have any appeal turned down (unless those considering the appeal act politically).
Dobson and Norris are surely victims of a perversion of justice.
Older post: https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/justice-for-stephen-lawrence-and-wider-implications/
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Finally American (more accurately: ‘USan’) leadership that I don’t mind: The Occupy Wall St. protests. This weekend has seen a number of similar protests around the world.
No, I won’t attempt to smear them by posting a video of one of their activists reading out their manifesto or demands, after which the crowd, very likely for morale building / unity / solidarity reasons then go ahead and repeat, but I’m sure you can find plenty of places in the ‘alternative’ media/blogosphere that will.
John Pilger, my favourite Journalist, was talking at a demo in London the other day on the 10th Anniversary of the US/NATA global bomb fest, which has perhaps claimed 2,000,000 million innocent lives so far.
John said “Civil disobedience is the only way now”. John is wrong IF it doesn’t include public based austerity measures against the state which is screwing them over. For example:
a) Refusal to pay taxes
b) Refusing to keep their money in banks.
there are more, but those two are perhaps the most potent.
And the good news for a change is that there are reports of this very thing happening…
“NYPD Criminals Arrest Protesters For Trying To Close Their Citibank Accounts “
– Source: http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/15/nypd-criminals-arrest-protesters-for-trying-to-close-their-citibank-accounts/
More power to their elbow.
Don’t see the pathetic BBC covering or this, do you? Ho ho ho.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
While these riots – which I feel the media is massively hyping up – may have been initiated by the cold blooded killing (with with it seems, the common ‘post-incident-cover-up) of Mark Duggan, and later assault on a young girl by a gang of police thugs by another name, there’s a pretty good chance that resentment against the post 9-11 modus operandi of the fascist democratic State, along with that of a very dirty Metropolitan Police Force, has built up over the years to the point that the riots were pretty much inevitable.
The obsequiousness of the State towards the rich along with its mass-murder based foreign policy are horrid enough, and that these riots are doing noting at all to change that and actually hurt the ‘ordinary folk’, deserve nothing less than the fiery grave they are currently inflicting on some to right now.
Yeah, the lamentable media is – for the sake of its own rotten agenda – publishing these “See, the common fold are paying a price” stories, but nobody could argue that such stories should NOT appear.
It is simply wrong that the real centres of power and money – which are responsible for imposing the massive financial debacle upon us all – are NOT the target of peoples anger.
Where is the mass invasion of Westminster? Where are the citizens arrests of Police officers? Where is the sacking of the courts that fear to uphold the smallest moral law against butchers bLiar, Brown, Cameron ‘n his ventriloquists Dummy Nick Clegg et al? Where are the crowds throwing the ‘royal’ family out into the streets and handing the gold plated rooms of Buckingham palace to the homeless and hungry? Where are the massive withdrawls of money from the banks? Where is the pathetic ‘organised anti-war’ movement calls for non-payment of tax?
It’s no bloody where, that’s where.
This riot is just going to ‘achieve’ one thing and one thing alone, and that is to knife in the back, the energy needed for the real and utterly necessary overthrow of the establishment.
Oh how the filthy rich (a title usually deserved) must be raising their champagne glasses to these riots.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
And I’m not in least bit sad, well, apart that is from the fact that Buck palace, Westminster, The City, The old Lady of Threadneedle St, MP’s fifth homes, LLoyds, BBC Newz Central, etc are NOT on the targets. Once again, the masses exercising mass stupidity.
And what’s the bet they will keep paying taxes?
Here, just for you.
oops, wrong song.. 8)
and yes, the song is in English.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Newer Post (4th Jan 2012): https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/on-the-stephen-lawrence-murder-trial-post-sentencing/
Salam All.
Will the killing of Stephen Lawrence (1993) finally see some justice getting done? If the track record is anything to go by, then I think we’d have to answer ‘No’, but we shall see.
The particular things I’d like to point out here, are that despite the problem of the police force being institutionally racist, a rare and welcome declaration, (which obscurely enough some senior members of the police force rejected), they are still racist, in fact, now, I think they are much worse, as my ex- work colleague Ahmer Rafiq (1996) would testify and a number of others like Jean Charles deMenezez – if they hadn’t had their brains blown out all over the floor of a London underground Tube train that is.
So, even when a clear first step has been identified which could act as a catalyst for reform, nothing became of it.
This should not surprise us because like the polices institutionalised racism, they are institutionally despotic too and that will ALWAYS remain; their apparent heavy membership within satanic freemasonry (2000) and continued allowed non-declaration testifies to that. And to believe declaration of masonry to other possibly Freemasons, is a ‘check and balance’ against secrety and cabals, is a joke, isn’t it? Police Complaints Authority anyone? IAEA, etc etc.
So the justice of sorting out ‘the filth’ (a word I believe was more frequently used to refer to the London Metropolitan Police more than others forces) remains unfulfilled.
As to double jeopardy, DJ, (the prohibition of having to stand trial again for the same trial having previously been found ‘not guilty’) these few early ‘post- DJ scrapping re-trials’ are an INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS precedent. To me, it seem inevitable that this (and so called ‘hate laws’) will come back to haunt the most vulnerable people in the UK, while appearing to support them. To my untrained legal mind, I think this legal principle must not be allowed to be fudged, even though it may mean that Stephens alledged killers may get off free. The LONG term and anthropomorphic dimension might outweigh one particular case – don’t they?
That sounds horrible, I know. But I am only thinking of the increasingly tyrannical law enforcement(/on the spot creation) branch that seem hell-bent on repeatedly stitching up more and people in the future as the societal structure of the UK continues to collapse.
It’s the easiest thing in the world to place someone’s DNA somewhere, or as we see nowadays not even bothering with that – just making fantasy stories, a la 7.7.2005 narrative, if you didn’t manage to stitch them up properly the first time.
It’s an awful line in the sand to draw, but for now, that’s my current feeling.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Recent Comments