Archive for the 'Media' Category



7-7 Researcher Tom Secker – On the Edge

I’ve had some free time to catch up on some videos downloaded some time ago, and I’ve just finished watching a program called On the Edge with guest Tom Secker.

http://www.   youtube   .com/watch?v=ql59RPRL4v0

Tom, creator of the claimed 7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction, was recommended to the program by J7T, i.e. the July 7 truth campaign. J7T are a small group of people – and they can get extremely agitated when shitty Israyhell gets a mention, they have poo-pooed “Zionist” connections not so long after 7/7 despite today J7T claiming We don’t have a clue what happened that day – but if you’ll excuse the liberty: We are pretty sure Zionist Israyhell is not involved . It’s not that surprising that Tom was recommended by them because Tom pushes the same ambiguity that J7T do, but in a reasoned and respectable way devoid of non-sequiturs, diversions and/or false accusations.

Tom is asked about the report of the supposed shootings at Canary Wharf (CW).  He avoids discussion on that. Well, actually, he does and he doesn’t avoid discussion of that issue. He ‘discusses’ it in so far as he mentions it in terms of other non-CW events.

In the interview, (28:48 start) Tom is asked about “the question of who was shot at Canary Wharf ” Note: The host “alex:g” should have added “media reports of…”.

Tom says

28:59

“One of the various things that came out in the reporting on the day of 7/7, was this notion that there had been some kind of police operation at CW, and there was even this rumour that suicide bombers had been shot there by police marksman.” Now that may or may not have happened.”

29:19

“I’m dubious [about the reports] to be honest…”

“…there’s a lot of different rumours going around on 7/7…”

“..Again, it’s a possibility [the shootings], but it’s something we have to have more solid evidence to go on than simply a few media reports saying this way or that”.

Was that a discussion of the possible shootings?

It didn’t look like it to me. It appeared that Tom was trying to ascribe the ‘CW shootings’ to rumour. Fine, but there is no way he can say for certain the reports were actually a rumour. And immediately after this, the discussion moves onto the return tickets. Tom himself says there’s a contradiction here mentioning the governments narrative binging up ONE report in The Mirror about the ‘return tickets’. He then goes on to elaborate on the ‘problem’ talking about the tickets as factual. Now as far as I remember, I’ve read people claiming the CW ‘shootings’ were mentioned on TV and they appeared in one or more newspapers. Tom discusses this one lone report as if it is factual giving credence to The Mirror’s return tickets, but unevenly didn’t apply this to the more reported CW shootings.

You know what?

It doesn’t really matter. Tom’s an individual. He is free to make his own judgements on what he thinks is strong evidence and what he thinks is something to be avoided. He exercises this liberty here regarding the CW ‘shootings, and makes the personal call that it’s something he finds not productive to discuss. OK. That’s a reasonable position to adopt. People shouldn’t throw horrible slander and lies against him if he says something others don’t happen to agree with.

34:44

“Obviously I have a suspicion that 7/7 was some kind of black-op. Otherwise I wouldn’t have made that film”

Here we see J7T being uneven. They recommended Tom who openly admits he has suspicions (see also 2:31 later) , but J7T fiercely attack and repeatedly libel other who have suspicions, one summised because they are suspicions+Israyhell.

Tom goes on to warn (in an advisory capacity) that independently formulated alternative narratives ‘need to know what covert-op looks like’. This is curious. Who has proposed an alternative conspiratorial narrative and doesn’t know the history of black-ops? It seems likely to me that anyone concluding 7/7 is a black-op/false-flag, then they would almost certainly have read up on other things like the Reichstag fire, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Nero’s Rome etc. I have extreme doubts someone would compose a narrative of 7/7 with only knowledge of 7/7. Perhaps Tom was alluding to something else, because what he said here isn’t particularly logical.

Tom mentions ‘people have pushed the connection between 9/11 and 7/7 for  various reasons’ (???)… ” I wonder what reasons Tom knows of ?, anyway…

36:02

“…Particularly with the 7/7 story, what’s so obvious to me, is the number of red herrings there are {I’ve seen that line almost verbatim elsewhere}..Number of things that just been taken down a particular path and it’s then turned out to be untrue.

Well Tom, I seriously doubt you know of any ‘red-herrings in progress’ but it would be nice of you would share them. A other ‘truthers’ have asserted this red herring thing but of course don’t know of any red herrings in progress or have zero proof (other than a reasonable sense of suspicion). But it makes them look smart by pretending they do KNOW these red herrings. What’s more, by asserting red-herrings are part of the 7/7 narrative, Tom is really strengthening his own suspicions that 7/7 was a black-op’ as red-herrings are deliberate acts. And that’s ok. As a thinking human being, he has the perfect right to have those feelings. It would be wise to wonder who, why and how all ‘those’ red herrings are put in place.

Tom continues:

“and the CCTV is a great example of that. You mentioned the conspiracy files and what you there is they got Nick Kollerstrom (NK) who is one of the people who thinks 7/7 was an inside job, was a covert op, and he’d spent three years basically going around saying there is no CCTV from London…”

Excuse me Tom. While I’m not that up to speed with what exactly NK did in those three years, I suspect it was a lot more than ‘just going around saying’ words which perhaps conjure up some homeless man making wild suggestions. Perhaps this would be a bit more accurate(?): “He’d spent three years personally researching, interviewing, gathering evidence and wirting on the subject in the belief there was no CCTV from London – which given none was released for years, wasn’t such an unreasonable thing to do.”  – or “going around saying there is no CCTV from London” If you want to stick to Toms description.

“…those four guys weren’t even in london that day, and claiming that one frame we’d seen from Lution was a fake. So what did they do? They roll out CCTV from Luton showing a nice long stretch of action so, kind of proving that it’s authentic, I mean I suppose the whole thing could be faked, but taking it at face value, and then they show him CCTV of these four guys walking through Kings Cross and he’s flabbergasted, ‘cos he’s been rolled down a cerain path only for them to cut him off.”

Kind of proving it’s authentic? huh? Is it authentic or not? Tom himself later allows for the possiblity that it wasn’t authentic. So Tom, you should really have said perhaps “suggesting the the audience that it was authentic”. Tom again is taking something at face value, which is what NK did before the footage was released – i.e. at face value there wasn’t going to be any footage. And Tom does say various people had requested that exact footage. Tom is impaling himself on his own sword somewhat. To the best of my recollection, the Luton video DOES NOT show the alleged ‘4 bombers’. If you can make them out to me and prove the tape is genuine, then ok, your words make sense.

As for the single frame, MANY people inc some in J7 made statements suggesting the single still frame outside Luton train station was fake, what with bars going through bodies and strange leg dirextions and no distinguishable faces, or if you prefer Toms description again “[NK] claimed the photos were fake” – which by the way there isn’t any proof that they are not fakes!

Maybe Nick did make a boob on the CCTV in London thing. Like any serious investigation, the leading model can then under improvement to fit the known evidence. But of course to those ‘loving liberal’ truthers who hate NK and wouldn’t hesitate to fling muck at him [Nick suspects Israyhelli connections] would use that to dismiss everything NK has ever done or said re 7/7.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn’t it Tom. It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that what you find ‘strange’ will eventually be given a palusible explaination. Don’t worry, I’m sure J7T won’t hate you, after all, you don’t mention the “I” word. So readers will have to excuse me for thinking that it wasn’t unreasonable to think there was going to be no CCTV footage. I’d hazard a guess that this crossed almost everyone’s mind at some stage. (c.f. 9/11, pentagon, hotel camera)

The ambiguous approach does have it’s merits, but as I’ve pointed out a couple of times before, it itself is limiting. An alternative narrative based on the facts is inherently closer to the real truth than some amorphous ‘blurr all’ ambiguity. Of course, alternative narratives (subject to human prejudice and biases) can fall foul of information in the hands of people(government) who themselves have an interest in trying to de-rail truth seekers, should the govt be involved with the deliberate killing of civilians. That said, it is mightily peculiar that those in possession of such material (which independent researchers can only scratch and scrape for) can only deliver a narrative that is less plausible than those independent researchers.

It tirns out that Nick probably made a mistake going on a BBC program intent to scorn independent narratives (while glossing over the govt’s Swiss cheese narrative) and J7 didn’t do this to their credit (one wonders why the BBC didn’t take the liberty of picking up on J7’s alternative narratives anyhow). My guess is Nick though he could publicise the problems with the govt’s narrative and show people there was an alternate explanation. But still, we all make mistakes.

Note: If someone proposing a ‘shitty Israyhell’ connection of 7/7 had a name like “alex:g” I can imagine the stinking ridicule that would flow their way from some quarters. Such an “Israyhell’s involved” researcher would also have suspicions flung at him for appearing on the mainstream media.

This interview shows clearly the rank hypocrisy amongst some who call for the truth, oops, I mean the truth(which doesn’t involve Israyhell).

2:31

“When 7/7 happened I instantly felt that this was something that didn’t really didn’t add up, that what what we were being told probably wasn’t true.”

Well done Tom for being honest and humanly flawed like the rest of us and acting on feelings.  It matters not what points I make here. Your effort to advance the truth emerging from that day is applauded.

Tom based his documentary on what he said was:

“the reported facts, at least what it is we’ve been told what reports say the media has said”

{Don’t forget the CW shootings folks}

Finally, that Jaguar, surely that’s a deliberate plant. Surely! I can’t believe the police(?) pouring over that CCTV and scruitinising it for month upon month, would not have ‘seen’ the issue of the Jag.

And what do you know, A car which appreas to be a Jag AMAZINGLY appears what also amazingly looks like a blue micra parked in Luton train station, in a helpful “visual aid” for readers see: J7T picture contained in the post A Nissan Micra Tardis?

Here’s some more of Tom’s words:

“When 7/7 happened I instantly [my emphasis] felt that this was something that didn’t really didn’t add up, that what what we were being told probably wwasn’t true.”

Advertisements

Dear white Europeans

“Dear white Europeans, please come out in mass protests condemning the terrorist attack in Oslo, don’t be silent, the moderates amongst you must reject him. If you don’t, how do we know you don’t all agree?”

Craig Murray also put up a good post entitled “Islamophobia Run Wild” about the BBC (and other Corporate MSM) on this terrorist attack.-

 

Phone Hacking Idiocy

In the UK, the usual idiots are getting into a lather about the latest electronic hijacking (mobile phone) incident which they have been privileged to be informed about. E.g. h_ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14027879 and last month: h_ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14040841

People may remember Henry Porter’s documentary “Suspect Nation”  (Henry is a journalist with the Observer – an offshoot from the tabloid newspaper The Guardian)

Suspect Nation ~ 1/5

Suspect Nation ~ 2/5

Suspect Nation ~ 3/5

Suspect Nation ~ 4/5

Suspect Nation ~ 5/5

But even Henry’s (now old) documentary was lame in the sense that was analogous to locking the stable door after the horse had bolted, that is the horse that bolted long long ago.

Whether designed for this purpose or not, the electronic age is a boon for the disgusting powers that be. With only common sense, I will assert with 100% confidence that…

You really must expect ANY electronic information about you, will be accessed by anyone that decides to take an interest in your life, for whatever reason, and even if you are not specifically under investigation, there will be (and are!) automated electronic programs that will search the electronic world at random for infomation which someone is interested in. If a random ‘scan’ snares some of your data, you are going to flagged and that information will then probably come under more attention, whereby more of your electroic dealings and private life will come under someone spotlight and be logged.

All this talk of encryption and we need more electronic security etc. is all guff. The medium itself is fundamentally ‘leaky’. Encryption simply prevents the small guy (e.g young nerd) from gaining access to the higher organisations, e.g. government and the pervasive shady organisations that collude with it. Oh, that would be those governments which  pontificate about being open the people and all that other BS, you know, the ones what do what they like and don’t have to explain why, because of the ‘national interest’. Like I said, BS!

Microsoft (MS) said the other day it’s cloud based information in Europe cannot be refused if US spy agencies what to look at it. And of course if a US spy agency gets your info, that means Israyhell gets your info. But something that didn’t get as much attention was that MS having a branch in almost every country in the world would have to follow the laws of that particular nation, hence ANY information MS has, would be, if requested to do so, given to in effect ANY government.

And it’s not just MS of course. ALL these megacorps will too.

Basically, if you use electronic media for some kind of action, someone, somewhere does or can know about it. DNA, Iris scans, fingerprint scans. bank transactions inc those over the internet. e-mails, facebook, political views…… You name it. Your life is an open book, and that, from an ordinary person point of view ‘s NOT good at all!

There is only one solution. If you want to maximise your privacy, stop using electronic media.

But NOBODY will.

So why don’t those people ‘shocked’ by all these MSM revelations just shut heck up.

Idiots.

Edmund Hillary – the first white man to climb Mt Everest is reported to have been asked:

“Why did you climb Everest” to which came the reply “Becuause it’s there”.

Ask a spy

“why do you do electronic spying” and they may answer “because I can”

An increasingly mainstream station criticising the mainstream.

An increasingly mainstream station (Russia Today or is it Russia Television, RT) criticising the mainstream, but mildly interesting anyway, and I’m all for more criticism of those who falsely claim to represent us.

NEW: Mainstream Miss, Having a go at my prediction of the future 2012 US election winner, Sarah Palin

h_ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GwtXEzjvZY

Nuclear Reactor Meltdown(s) in the USA ! 6-22-11 Gov’s let industry slide on safety violations!
{p.s. dunno why it repeats. This issue makes me wonder if it’s what catalysed criticism of RT recently amongst the usual British journo suspects}

h_ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvUpV5pO4Fg

Shades of the Listening Post on Al Jazeera English perhaps?

Ryan Dawson. War by Deception by sections and bonus features

War by Deception (sept 2010 rework) by sections
Chapter 1 Conspiracy Deniers vs Kooks ignore the extremes Covert ops are normal.
Chapter 2 Iran Contra comparison, 911 hypothesis
Chapter 3 Mass Media lies
Chapter 4 PNAC, Zionist origins for war hype This is the dry part of the film going over documentation, sorry I don’t have any giant owls or spooky symbolism to spice it up, but what I do have is reality, real people, real documented propaganda and real consequences.
Chapter 5 The Lemming Effect Neocons selling nuclear secrets, spies, lies, and Israeli ties
Chapter 6 Where was the cabal on 911?
Chapter 7 Anthrax and USreal Connecting Iraq and Al Qaeda to anthrax neither sent
Chapter 8 “Al Qaeda” Hijackers, are not what you’re told
Chapter 9 Disclaimer distancing from the 911 kook movement and Jones town sensationalism
Chapter 10 The 911 Commission/cover up
Chapter 11/12, 911 truck bombs and bombers caught Israelis released. WTC 7 and 911 damage control
Chapter 12/13 WTC 7 and the 911 damage control
The MIC How they waste your money[/size]
And what their long term plan is.
Extras
*The Bush and Schmitz families an orgy of global organized crime and weird sex scandals
* How They Fuck you 101
* DOD the revolving door
* Climate cultist don’t want you to see
* Iraq prewar lies chalk board flow chart
* Dear Richard Perle Fuck you (he even gets flicked off by a 1 year old)
* Obama same shit new ass hole
* Palestine RIP
* Blackmail… Congress possibly more backwards than the Vatican.

Anything not linked is loading. Chapter 10 is an extra. You can watch the film without it.
More information has recently come out about the 911 commission so what I am doing is making an extra chapter to go over the commission members first and then the bogus report separately. So check back for it.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
“It doesn’t matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us.” Batman Image

“If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?”-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed

BBC psycheporn once more

The pro-Zion BBC obviously thinks it’s clever. It believes it can push sexually suggestive pics to keep it’s visitors keep coming back for more. The BBC should stick to comedy and drama, the rest should be disbanded.

Unfortunately I don’t have the time to report as much of the BBC Bernaysian psychological mind tricks as I would like, but sometimes it is just too blatent not to get a mention.

Is this how the BBC thinks of Muslims not in it’s control?
You betcha!

 

Bonfire of the Insanities – The ‘significance’ of the wikipedia leaks

 In general I like conspiraloons; Brave souls who refuse to submit to the illusion that the dominant forces on the planet are benevolent and worthy of support simply because they are powerful. Well, ok, that’s not quite true, a significant number of them do still support the ‘deep state’ and have lines in the sand that are effortlessly redrawn should they ever become breached. They aren’t as ‘radical’ or ‘revolutionary’ as they might make out.

There goes another bunch of people that’s crossed me off their Christmas and Eid card list.

I’m honest enough with myself to see some of that in me. However, where there is a simple choice, e.g. engaging in ‘voting’ I don’t con myself into believing that by playing the game one can change the game.

Having said that, conspiraloons in general are detached from the mindset whereby just because there is a centre of power whose influence affects us that it must be courted and is automatically entitled to acceptability and ones support. Indeed most conspiraloons have the realisation that such power centres around the world – rungs on the power ladder if you will – be they Governments, Bankers, Zionists, Hijacked religions (some loons would simply say ‘religion’, period), so called Royalty etc, should by default be treated with suspicion, coldness or perhaps even hostility. I’d say loons on average are pretty firm (via confidence) in their beliefs and because of the actual nature of these beliefs, they are going to manifest them in their own lives and I would guess, this will cause pain and come at considerable personal cost. After all, they live in a world full of people beguiled by the very ‘World Order’ which loons are trying to resist.

But sometimes otherwise sensible behaviour can be nonsensical, and perhaps parallel the stupidity of people who think the way this planet is run is just fine, and that the 3 billion or so people who live in abject poverty are scroungers or don’t work hard enough or some other bullshit like that.

Come this latest wikileaks thing.

It seems some conspiraloons are wondering whether Assange is an asset/mole/plant/useful-useable-idiot because some of the leaks apparently say US ‘intelligence’ [sic] says things like Pakistan or Iran is helping the Taliban and so is therefore the leaks were really subterfuge to deliver propaganda against those two countries.

Huh, come again?

Yes, that’s right, some loons are thinking the wikileaks publication of the US intelligence reports is a psyop.

 

To be a bit stronger than what I was earlier, and deservedly so, some loons are acting like arseholes.

– Woah, steady on lw!

No, I won’t ‘steady on’, neither will I desist from having a conversation with myself!

Loons have an incapacity to deal with information that could be useful to them. Like Tom Sawyer slapping Becky’s face in the cave to break her out of her hysterics, loons need a good slap to stop them doing the equivalent of being like that kid at school stuck forever repeating the third year (p.s. no offence to those kids, I know you were stuck in a terrible school system).

This world is so full of crap that you cherry pick. Yip, that’s right. You do what those bastards Bush and bLiar did (to name just two of the hundreds). Difference is, loon cherry picking has moral authority and involves real cherries not made up bollocks.

So when some murderous slop in CENTCOM, or whatever lets slip some info, you use the ‘good’ bits, and throw the rest of their garbage in the trash can!

When Chomsky exposes those in the media for fully believing what they say – but that they only got there because of their embrace of the prevailing global hegemonic paradigm, then you use it. When Chomsky talks bullshit – and he does at times, you call him an ‘old toad’ and switch him off. When the BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 about 20 minutes before it did collapse, you use that, but then turn off all the other disgraceful crap they pump out – like John Simpsons interview with that nasty piece of British Trash in Kabul – the British Ambassador or some other pompous title that should actually read “Occupier, Killer, and legitimate Afghan Resistance target” When Clegg says the Iraq war was illegal, you use it. The rest of the time, you put the puppet back in his closet, embarrassed to see his face while thinking of all the promises he (or Cocaine Cameron) was always going to break.

US intelligence’ is always drawing up complete bullshit for many reasons, often for the purpose of internal consumption. They’ve been doing it for years. You get some lying bitch of a girl to lie that babies were thrown from incubators, or some Iraqi stooges to show a BBC presstitite ‘proof’ that Saddam built a nuke and actually detonated it (the vile propagandist, a British Judith Miller on the same page has an audio link in which she ridiculously claims “Gwynne Roberts: “UN inspectors missed a very large slice of the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme” – a lie then and a proven lie now, and flies in the face of the actual inspectors. They release it in a number of ways too.

Usually (if not always) it’s demonstrable bullshit, as has been the case with Bush defying a number of his own NIE’s about Irans supposed nuke weapon program, or as we have seen many many times before about Iranian weapons/IED’s and so forth in Iraq attacking USans.

But because the US internal shit has been entered the public domain via wikileaks irrespective of having been previously (at least in part) leaked already – deliberately of course – via Geoff Gannon/Judith Miller like presstitutes, or just via the usual reports from “(unnamed)official sources” , “A pentagon spokesman” or “a leaked NSA document”, that now wikileaks and/or Assange can’t be trusted.

And oh, by the way, lets not talk about the very real dirty shit that was exposed by these leaks.

The report that “The Truth Seeker” (graphic above)  links to, read like this…

Iran transforming Afghan war
 
Peter Goodspeed – The National Post July 31, 2010

The night Canadian Master Corporal Darrell Priede of Brantford died in Afghanistan, the Afghan war took a sudden dangerous new twist.

A stream of secret U.S. military intelligence reports released this week by the WikiLeaks website suggests the May 2007 death was the result of a Taliban attack with a heat-seeking, surface-to-air missile launched from the shoulder.

In all likelihood, the deadly weapon was provided by Iran.
 

Dear oh dear. This is recycled sewage. And it goes on. Shame on the numbskulls swallowing all these US reports as unchallengeable truth of the highest order. Shame on them for not being able to filter out the crap and spot the obvious psy-op-counter-intelligence-propaganda.

And there are many other people doing the same.

Idiots.

This brings up a wider point. Just because Assange/Wikileaks is quite well known now, what qualification is there that he’s been ‘comprimised’?

Oh dear.

I’m gonna stop now. What needed to be said… has been said.

Remedy:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE32tcojArI



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soV8IcTzuj8

–  

 


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
August 2019
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Advertisements