Archive for the 'money' Category

BBC prepping once more for a cashless future

Electronic money already makes up a significant amount of global ‘money’. Indeed, some sources say the amount eclipses actual (i.e. fiat money).

It looks like the collapse of money as we know it will happen soon within our lifetime. Of course there’s a fair amount of prepping to do on the population in the build up.

Loyal to the rotten UK establishment as ever the lamentable BBC obliges.

BBC prepping once more for a cashless future

(remove the underscores for the actual link)

Although totally bogus, fait money – the notes in your pocket today – does still have one virtue. It allows anonymous transactions. Anonymity as applied to individuals is an essential element of a healthy society, and of course this extends to financial  anonymity (within honest norms of course) and when that finally goes, heaven help us from the monster of a government and society that will result.

Gold at 42 cents an ounce

I’m a gold bug. I’ve bought it as a means of trying to give my measly savings some security against the obviously totally bogus totally manipulated paper money crap.

Gold had been rising steadily in (manipulated)price in the medium terms for about 10 years. So many ‘alternative’ websites were going on about gold going to $2,000, $3,000, $4,000, enve $5,000, etc an ounce.

Well where are those voices now? Gold reached it’s peak at about #1,900 and ounce now it’s about $1,570. It’s lost about 18% of it’s value. Where are those voices? Those crystal ballers who magically “knew” what price gold would go to.

Where are those voices? Why are they not crying at the fact that gold has lost 18% from it’s high. If it were a sham bank, the ‘alternative’ webosphere would be mocking the said fraudulent institution with glee, preparing the champagne for when the collapse went past the point of criticality.

Come on you Mistic Meg’ers (mistake meg!) when gold went up to $17,00… $1,800 you were going “I told you so”, well you didn’t see this 18% loss did ya?

I’ve been getting a tad tired of the ‘alternative’ webosphere on occasions, and often wonder if it’s not part of a game of ‘bipolarisation’. And the ‘crystal balling’ about gold prices is especially tiresome.

Well I’m tired now, so I’ll call it a day.

P.s. I’m not the slightest bit worried about the gold price, cos I’m only interested in the LONG TERM and savings. If you speculate on gold, well, you just as bas as those crap heads wheeling and dealing in derivatives. Gold at 42 cents an ounce does NOT worry me at all. I have total confidence that gold offers THE greatest safety net for savings protection. If gold really did go to 42 cents  an ounce, I’m fairly certain the fictional money we use today would experiencing far grater problems, e.g. there may only be 5,000,000p in circulation!

P.p.s. I know the value of gold hasn’t really increased or decreased, rahter the fictional value of the dollar has been manipulated relative to  gold. The upward trend of $ against ounce of gold was fully legitimate due to money being debt and the cranking up of the money presses in ‘quantitative easing’ exercises. That “gold has lost value” seems to me to be re-calibrrating or just simple  manipulative suppression. The long term future of gold is absolutly assured. So do yourself a favour don’t give a crap about the “price of gold”. Either going up or down. When you want to protect you earnings, buy gold. Do also with the sincere intention of spending it.

Still wrong

Bill Still. A name that deserves it’s own complete sentence. What can I say about Bill. A true legend in educating people about the history and nature of money.

Bill’s got some intersting ideas, which seem so simple, yet so powerful, with regards to significantly reducing the problems that stem from the current financial system.

The main problem that Bill focus’s on, is that of (so called) sovereign governments borrowing money from private bankers. Bill argues that if this situation ended, then a great destructive force would stop wrecking national economies and most importantly the suffering of the man on the street, would diminish.

By borrowing money from private banks (or the bank of the private bankers, like the US federal reserve), interest becomes payable upon it. While the USA was able to plunder resources of other countries, it was able to use those resources to offset (some in excess) the cost of borrowing money. But it’s become harder and much more expensive to wage those wars of theft. Hence the problem of borrowed money has (“sacred”)spiralled out of control. (All to plan of course).

Anyway, the problem with Bill is that his proposals are only a half-way house. Sorry, that’s unkind, let me re-quantify. Bill proposals are perhaps a “90% way house” in his favour, but Bills proposals will also ultimately cause problems.

Why? Because bill is an advocate of creating money, by creating/printing/minting debt free notes and coins (from materials that do not reflect the actual value of what they are constructed from). Although Bill has correctly identified a principle element of usury – the borrowing of money against which the amount due for repayment is greater (in monetary terms) than the principle (initial) amount borrowed. Bills call to creating money is simply a second dimension of the same usurious beast, even though it would result in lesser severity and have the associated problems occur over a longer time span.

The best form of money has as it’s prime property that of intrinsic (inherent/fundamental/inescapable/within itself) value*. If I am to sell an object, say a sheep, I want an object or token of payment that actually reflects the value of the sheep. e.g. a gold coin. What if that gold coin could be bought for $253. Which would I be happier to receive? – the gold coin or $253? I’d much prefer the gold coin. Why? Because the gold has intrinsic value but the value of the note is nominal i.e. the note has a purely fictional value given to it. and not a real value at all. By accepting the note, I’d be selling my sheep for a temporary illusion of value.

Yes, there’s a part of the value/cost of gold that is nominal, but the nominal amount is nowhere near as significant as for the note. The intrinsic value makes it have ‘value durability’. No matter that nominal fluctuation imposes itself upon the gold, the intrinsic value remains. This is not the case for nominal fiar currency. The value of the nominal value paper note is demonstrably unstable and subject to devaluation via inflation. As mentioned, Bill Still says that currency devaluation is largely because government borrow their money, But even if a government did print it’s own money, it would be creating money out of nothing i.e. ‘making money’ (which is almost exactly the same as the outcome of lending money on interest!) and then it would have a nominal value imposed upon it, subject to the political needs of the government. So Bill’s idea is in fact just a mini-me version of the current reality. Creating money is in itself inflationary robbing those who earn from the trade of their goods and services of the results and rewards of that trade. Robbing everyone of degrees of hard earned financial security; A scandalous rip-off.

And before you write in mentioning hyper inflation in Hapsburg Spain, realise that situation was much different from what would be the case today. It’s actually poetic justice that the gain of gold based on exploitation plunder and tyranny was self-destructive. In an ideal world where fair and honest trading takes place, I simply cannot believe large amounts of gold would a) be able to accumulate in such amounts b) that there would be no healthy economic ‘sink’ for that gold to be spent. In today’s world, there are many potential costly sinks today e.g. helping the 1 in 7 on the planet that do hungry each day, cleaning up pollution, providing decent housing / regeneration and health care, construction of mega projects such as PV arrays, irrigation or arid lands, research into sustainable energy etc etc etc. None of which were available in Hapsburg Imperialist Spain.

So Bill, you are still wrong. Gold is the ultimate in currency. Your solution, although it would reduce the severity of what we see today in global finance, would still cause more problems than is the case for the use of Gold and silver.

Bill has said why would you want a currency whose quantity is restrictive – I believe I have answered his query above. Bill (and others) also argue that it’s not the token that’s important, but who controls it. Again, I think I’ve scotched that ‘concern’ above.

I am NOT saying that the common man will be utterly free of the evil manipulation of money if gold and silver were to the principle form of money. What i am saying is there is no system that is better than the use of sliver and gold. The maximum number of people would benefit and the least amount of people would suffer.

If we all used gold and silver there would be little currency speculation, bolstering G&S’s retention of value even more.

* It has intrinsic properties because of its physical properties of being rare, soft and inert/indestructible, all of which make it perhaps the most desired material for jewellery/ornamentation/beautification as well as being physically useful.

P.S. Max Keiser is also wrong, for a similar reason. He advocates using interest as a financial control. Ellen Brown is also wrong. She advocates borrowing more money to spend her way out of some of the current economic troubles in the US (and wider) economy. Inflation causes a diseased economy. I posit the way to kill any Hapsburgian type problems would simply be to give a fair chink of gold and silver to the poor (perhaps from mass employment – putting the gold aside only to cater for payment of the labour of the poor). I suggest at a stroke that such a thing would have nullified any such negative Hapsburgian pressures.

‘Goldman Sachs rules the world’ – Really?

Conspiracy examiners (CE’s) such as myself, will not have failed to have seen Alessio Rastani appearance on the BBC recently.

Unlike some CE’s, I’m not going throw crap at him and make sneering smears against him, or pepper you with ‘warnings’ about him, that you should expect disappointment, from him or watch this space for reports ‘exposing’ him etc., pretty much all of which happened to Tony Farrell.  If you missed it, you can get the low-down on Tony in  this interview. One of Tony’s sins was that he didn’t appear on an approved list of alternative media, and dared opine that the state was involved with 7/7 hence was subject to a very ugly attack.

But prudent questions about the BBC’s role in the celebrated Alessio Rastani interview should be asked.

Where did they get this guy from? I think it’s a reasonable question, especially when Al Jazeera English (AJE) says of him:

“While Alessio Rastani has never worked for a major firm in the City of London – and actually lives in a small house owned by his girlfriend”source

Which BBC researcher sourced him?

Didn’t they pre-interview him to assess his ‘suitability’ for the topic at hand?

Did they have any idea of what he was going to say?

Anyway, the main purpose of my post is to say Rastani isn’t really that correct. It’s not Goldman Sachs (G.S.) that rules the world, it’s the people who rule Goldman Sachs that rule the world. A trivial point you may think, if so, I disagree with you. I actually think it’s very relevant. Why is an inanimate, faceless organisation that in itself rules nothing becoming the target of enmity, while the people cowering behind it’s name-plate get off scot-free? Why not look at the high level people involved with G.S. and ponder their political agenda and how that may work it’s way through G.S. – how that ends up affecting your life? Does it only touch you in a purely financial sense?

We are encouraged to think that the Goldmans of this world are just greedy, and this BBC ‘revelation’, plays along with that ever so nicely. Consequently, we are diverted into thinking ‘no world view imposes itself upon and through the macinations of corporations‘. Corporations are apolitical.

Yeah, utter nonsense.

Thankfully the AJE article touches on Goldman’s public-face owners/CEO’s, but only as much as a toe poke in an icy sea, and yip, you guessed it, AJE mention the big people behind G.S. in context of ‘greed for greeds sake’ only.

None of this is Rastani’s fault, I just think there’s a good chance someone in the BBC cunningly selected for this task. That’s a bit conspiratorial, but even if this BBC ‘researcher’ didn’t do it consciously, the filtration system that resulted in this researchers mind being employed by the BBC automatically sets up views like Rastani (although Rastani is an ‘expeme’ case) whereby the real culptits and their goals do NOT get a mention on the corporate media.

What’s resulted from all this is CE’s are cheering the ‘hit’ of G.S. and I think there being subtly hoodwinked.




Deep dish or thin crust?


Last month:

Drink Me


The Japanese are SCREWED!

lw’s law: The level of lies and spin are directly proportional to the level of severity.

And the corporategovernment of Japan has been lying and spinning a plenty.

And while on the subject of governments shovveling yet more crap on their poor populations (as if fraudultent money systems, banks and bail-outs weren’t enough), rather than nationalising TEPCO, The Japanese govt should

a) Sue TEPCO for damages encurred. (People already on the way to developing cancer should sue them too!)

b) Ensure NOT one TEPCO profit gained Yen is spared from being used in disaster management

c) Put all of TEPCO’s assets in ‘recievership’ as security to pay for any costs of this disaster.

d) Set in place a levvy other nuclear industries, a kind of ‘nuclear tax’ if you will, earmarked FROM THEIR PROFIT SHEETS, so funds are available in future for if (likely) when the next nuclear disaster stomps on Japanese people and society.

But the Japanese govt wont do any of this. They are in bed with the dreadful nuke industry.

As for this attention given the ‘US Robot” – Giving a US robot (Made in China) to the land that is a leader in the field of creating robots, doesn’t, IMHO!, seem like it’s going to achieve much.


Students and youth of the World unite.

Gerald Celente on Max Keizers “On the Edge”

On YouTubem it’s in 3 parts

On the Edge with Max Keiser-Global insurrection-02-25-2011-(Part1)

(P.S. I don’t agree with what Gereld says was the cause of WW1)


Ecnomic fraud

Why gold is a major step to a more sustainable and fair economy no matter how much is (currently) in the hands of the same old priviliged few.

“The exchange rate is one of the main drivers of economic policy, more so even than productivity,” – Brazilian Finance minister Guido Mantega. Source:

“In September last year he accused some rich countries of deliberately devaluing their currencies to boost exports and make their economies more competitive.”

Somehow I think he would have been very happy if it had been the other way around and Brazil (and himself in a personal capacity no doubt!) was seen to benefit from currency speculation, as is exemplorary of fraudulent economics. You keep your mouth damn shut until it’s your time to get hit. First they came for the communists… We see this from what the BBC reports he said earlier. “Finance minister Guido Mantega said Brazil was preparing moves to prevent further appreciation of its currency.” and indeed the whole point of the article that almost all countries will pull these stunts within a fraudulent economic system.

Also this “Forbes magazine ranks [Eike Batista, Brazil’s richest man] him the eighth richest man in the world, with a fortune of $27bn (£17bn).” – source:

Call me backward, but surely NO system of fair economics could see this amount of money being made in such a short time. They guy might be quite nice and be may give millions to charity, but there just doesn’t seem something right about a man having a personal fortune in excess of many small countries.

He could spend £16.9 of his £17 bn quite easily on stopping the 1 bn+ people across the planet who go hungry every day.

It’s just not right.

Use of gold and silver is the bedrock of an honest economy.

p.s. apologies for my rudeness in not replying so far to the comments left on this blog…

Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
July 2020