Archive for the 'Sociological discussion' Category

Darling Dave lets his hate rip – in disguise

Darling Dave lets his hate rip.

“Multiculturalism has failed” because the British prime minister, past cocaine snorter, David Cameron hath spoken.

Herr Merkel of Germany said something similar a few months ago too, which sparked a slightly more logicalflaw-spotting-type-reply from me than this more angry one.

Have C&M undertaken painstaking sociological research over the years, interviewing hundreds of different people from a diverse set of cultural and religious backgrounds, studying and pondering over the sea of factors involved in mixed societies, experiencing life amongst highly diverse people’s proud of their culture, customs and faith? Have they met with sociologists the world over and read reports detailing (or even summarising) an accurate global consensus?

No.

Of course not.

They’re just talking utter bollocks – the rule rather than the exception.

One may argue, reasonably, that one doesn’t have to be a recognised expert in a field to know something about it, or hold accurate knowledge about it, so can we give this grace to cokey Cameron and herr Merkel?

Once more, No..

Why? Because these Pepe le Pew’s don’t define what being ‘British’ or ‘German’ means, although one suspects it could well allude to something like the following:

  • Getting drunk, pissing and vomiting on the streets and somewhere along the way trying to screw some poor girl – the one that just finished brushing your vomit of her clothes five minutes ago – the same girl that for some reason doesn’t fall for your mating ritual involving putting a traffic cone on your head.
  • Not washing your ass or urinary parts after you go to the toilet.
  • Binning your unborn baby because it will make you look fat or slow down your career. Cokey Dave’s reference to liberalism don’t you know.
  • Feeling some pride at military parades in amongst them lurk some psychopaths that have done to humans what you could never have imagined in your worst nightmares.
  • Voting without shame for proven liars and mass murderers in a parliament that has participated in some of the greatest killing sprees in the history of man.
  • Believing that there is something ‘good’ or ‘special’ about being British because of repeated propaganda telling you so.
  • Not being able to speak out / stop people having sex in public in something called ‘Dogging’
  • Have some saggy hag bagpuss think she has some claim over you thinking you are her subject.

<i><b>Tip:</b> don’t be a tit and send in a list of the failings of others, thanks.</i>

So why is the rolled-up-bullseye-one so ambiguous about it? Because it’s not multiculturalism that he’s attacking, it’s Islam. The little plop doesn’t even try and think of a new disguise for his attack, or have the balls to be honest about his xenophobia.

I am a British citizen and I’m pretty certain I don’t conform to what jumped up little jerk like Cameron tries to pimp what being British is, which remember, he doesn’t define it, so I can only guess, but whatever the little pratt’s idea is about what being British must entail, it has absolutely no right to have any power over me.

I’ve come to the conclusion that nationalism is a farce – nay, worse than that, it’s a ploy along the lines of divide and rule. Stuff your phoney idea of nations and marketing spin as to what any national identity must involve. Stick the union jack where the sun don’t shine Dave. Now that’s real liberalism Dave, not your phoney dictate-as-liberalism.

Not only am I a (an ashamedly) British citizen, but I’m a Muslim too. I reject the UK’s perverse laws that consistently fail to be upheld against the biggest criminals in the society. I spy with my little eye false-flags that killed probably 56 people in London on 7-7. I know well your Imperialist history and neo-imperial contemporary history. I know your lies about Iraq, Iran, the Palestinians and Israyhell ad nauseaum. Your ‘hero’ Churchill used chemical weapons on Arab villiagers and firebombed cities of families in Germany.

I want Shariah law. As a British citizen I, and every other British citizen who wants it, have a perfect right to want it and have it. Under it, hopefully you and the thoroughly rotten establishment you preside over will get your just rewards for your monumental crimes. All the other Muslims, white, brown, black or whatever living in Britain have the right to demand that too, and pursue it, and when we become a majority voice in the country you and your EDL/BBD fan clubs should shut-up about it. Liberal Democracy you see Dave ;) But of course what you mean by liberal democracy isn’t liberal democracy, which like being British, you avoid defining.

Until that day, the Muslims of the UK will follow the way of life God prescribed for them but will likely respect the way the UK is administered, however they by no means should stand quiet in the face of evil as witnessed by your foreign crusades.

There is not the slightest bit scared about Britain’s past that must be preserved. It’s past sucks and it’s bulk is akin to an encyclopaedia of war. Britain’s with a Muslim mindset at it’s helm offers real and better direction. {Tip: Avoid a second chance for titdom status by pointing the shambles of Islamic (so called) ‘leadership’ overseas as representative of what I’m saying here}

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Here’s a rip from the Brit govt’s propaganda bureau.

5 February 2011 Last updated at 06:54 GMT 

State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron

David Cameron
Mr Cameron will signal a tougher stance on groups
promoting Islamist extremism
Related Stories

The prime minister will criticise “state multiculturalism” in his first speech on radicalisation and the causes of terrorism since being elected.

Addressing a security conference in Germany, David Cameron will argue the UK needs a stronger national identity to prevent people turning to extremism.

Different cultures are encouraged to live apart, and objectionable views met with “passive tolerance”, he will say.

He will also signal a tougher stance on groups promoting Islamist extremism.

You see? it’s bloody obvious that Druggy Dave’s attack is about Islam, not multiculturalism. After just a few measly sentence length paragraphs, ISLAM becomes the focus. No mention of Orthodox Jews who retain their Kosher foods, clothing, ways, and close community [not that there should be]. No mention about Hindu’s whose caste system is still practices even among Christian Indians because Dave and Merkels issue is with Islam, period!

Mr Cameron is to suggest there will be greater scrutiny of some Muslim groups that get public money but do little to tackle extremism.

Reality is of course much different from what this little fart is going to drool out. You’d be hard pressed to positively identify much Muslims-within-britain-extremism at all – p.s. government crystal ball show trials on what people thought or might have done in the future don’t count. ! Neither will I cout the extremism that lurks on the halls of Westminster palace and the darkened glass buildings of the City. No group has any obligation to tackle what the GOVERNMENT defines as extremism (does anyone really believe the governmnet will be unbiased in this??), which I believe is classified as anything resembling resistance to the UK government penchant for killing, something permeating the armed forces and the dirty cops marauding in the streets of Britain.

Ministers should refuse to share platforms or engage with such groups, which should be denied access to public funds and barred from spreading their message in universities and prisons, he will argue.

Cameron is going to encourage some establishment whore to declare at their own (guided) discretion, whose ‘message’ can be heard and whose can’t. It’s pretty clear to see that if any group speaks the hard truth but it isn’t to the Governments or Israyhells favour, then one expects an attempt to shut it up.

“Frankly, we need a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism,” the prime minister will say.

What??

“Let’s properly judge these organisations: Do they believe in universal human rights – including for women and people of other faiths? Do they believe in equality of all before the law? Do they believe in democracy and the right of people to elect their own government? Do they encourage integration or separatism?

These organisations read: Islamic organisations and ABSOLUTELY NOT JEWISH ORGANISATIONS THAT OPENLY FUND AND SUPPORT ISRAYHELLI TERRORISM

“These are the sorts of questions we need to ask. Fail these tests and the presumption should be not to engage with organisations,” he will add.

 

“Start Quote

We have even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values”

End Quote David Cameron

But Muslim youth group The Ramadhan Foundation said that, by singling out Muslims, Mr Cameron had fed “hysteria and paranoia”.

Well, Cameron and all the British establishment have been working on that for years. Muslim groups to try and get into the game to change the game are deluded. Well intentioned perhaps, but deluded.

Chief executive Mohammed Shafiq said: “British Muslims abhor terrorism and extremism and we have worked hard to eradicate this evil from our country.

Yes the do, and as it’s the British government that are the oxygen, heat AND fuel for terrorism most muslims of sound mind abhor the British governments actions and those of Israyhell. That’s why Cameron is stirring the crap here.

“But to suggest that we do not sign up to the values of tolerance, respect and freedom is deeply offensive and incorrect.

Indeed and in fact it’s Cameron that’s frothing out lack of tolerance. QED!

“Multiculturalism is about understanding each others faiths and cultures whilst being proud of our British citizenship.”

Personally I feel there is almost nothing to proud of in the slightest, but as I said to a respected friend the other day, the UK actually allows some aspects of Islam that Islamic countries will not – and that is (soon to become WAS) freedom of speech. That I guess is something one can be proud of in Blighty.

BBC political correspondent Ben Wright said the prime minister would be delivering a stark message to his audience in Munich – that European countries must “wake up to what’s happening within their borders”.

The British establishment has already attempted to form a non-uniformed brown shirt brigade reporting anything “suspicious” e.g. A Muslim talking on the phone or overhearing a word of Arabic or having olive skin.

Mr Cameron will draw a clear distinction between Islam the religion and what he describes as “Islamist extremism” – a political ideology he says attracts people who feel “rootless” within their own countries.

Will he bollocks! It won’t happen as Islam is his target. What he will do, is try and paint it so that it doesn’t look like it’s Islam that he’s after.

“We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing.”

What about British extremism, the extremism you preside over you dog!

The government is currently reviewing its policy to prevent violent extremism, known as Prevent, which is a key part of its wider counter-terrorism strategy.

Do you mean we will try harder to set up gullible people and keep the same disgusting foreign policy? Yes. I suspect you do.

‘I am a Londoner too’

What’s that a reference to Cameron? The false flag of 7/7 perhaps? The greatest act of terrorism in recent history? A gross act of treason against the British people? You scum! But say for a moment you are right and that 7/7 was an act of terrorism by 4 Muslims. How should we  weigh it against the 1.3 million killed in Iraq and the families you keep killing in Afghanistan today? Anyway, typical southerner, the world revolves around London.

A genuinely liberal country “believes in certain values and actively promotes them,” Mr Cameron will say.

Crap. Anyone can say your hollow words.

“Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law. Equal rights, regardless of race, sex or sexuality.

Oh come on now Dave. You really have no shame. Who taught you that chutzpa? Tzipi Livni over the phone after you told her you would act to stop the law from prosecuting her terrorism that killed over 400 children terrorists

“It says to its citizens: This is what defines us as a society. To belong here is to believe these things.

Definition that you dare not try define. You fraud.

“Each of us in our own countries must be unambiguous and hard-nosed about this defence of our liberty.”

I’m going to be sick. And I know there will be thousands if not millions of people who will lap up your words. Maybe the EDL will have an honourary doctorate for you.

He will say that under the “doctrine of state multiculturalism”, different cultures have been encouraged to live separate lives.

People of the same culture, mother tongue and religion want to stick together. Get used to it. It’s their right and some, perhaps even a lot take up that right. They are still human beings. Not your slaves.

“We have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. We have even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values.”

I think I’ve hit upon just a few reasons earlier as to why that might be.

Building a stronger sense of national and local identity holds “the key to achieving true cohesion” by allowing people to say “I am a Muslim, I am a Hindu, I am a Christian, but I am a Londoner… too”, he will say.

Listen up you worm, you ain’t no Muslim, but you are a terrorist Dave and a supporter of terrorism. That’s right Davey boy, you, not me. but of course, you know that, but don’t give a toss do ya Dave.

Dave fails to mention anything about Brits abroad who stick in their own fish and chip serving ghettos and fail to learn the local language and merge into the ways of the locals.

I reject your spiteful xenophobia. Dave you obnoxious creep, crawl back beneath your rock!

Twilight

It finally looks like Brits and Yanks are starting to pay the price for the bankruptcy of perverted economic and moral bankruptcy (neo-imperialism) they allowed continue (largely unopposed and suckled off) for decades if not centuries. In all honesty, I can’t say I have any sympathy for them, after all, they keep voting for proven killers and killers-to-be, they are utterly deluded that the political system UK and US (I don’t care if you call it Democracy or what – as it’s totally irrelevent) is anything other a great failure.

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”   – (Galatians 6:7 KJV)

The greatest protests the world has ever seen (Feb 2003)  against the looming obliteration of Iraq were encouraging (despite the fact Iraq had been under 12 years of murderous sanctions and wicked bombings by the rAF and USAF) but when the bombing started, those same people were pretty much content that ‘Febuary’s first step‘ meant that they had done their ‘bit’. How miserable.

As regards to the self declared non-elected leaders of the so called anti-war movement, they proved to be a disgrace. manufactured dissent, firmly thinking within the box, (I’m beginning to hate the expression “Thinking outside the box” because  ‘outside the box’ is not really outside the box at all. It’s actually still well within the establishments box – that of permitted dissent, besides, saying ‘out of the box’ is just about said by almost everyone these days who are attempting self-projection, believing they are subtly callin themselves clever, but in actual fact, they are drawing attention to themselves by trotting out tired and boring populist expressions. Saying ‘thinking outside box’ is now confirmation they are actually in sheeple box. I’ll grant Steve Jobs an honourable exception here) or simply cowards;

Actually it’s all three.

The so called ‘anti-war’ movement should have called for certain politicians (bLiar, Straw & Brown for a start) should have been hung drawn and quartered – not an extreme act at all, as it’s a similar philosophy bLiar & Co. used (so called pre-emptive military action*) – putting bLiars head on a spike outside Westminster would have saved a million innocent lives, but in fact it’s even more moral based compared to bLiars pretence at a moral stance, in that bLiar’s justification was a clear lie, Saddam was never going to attack, but it was abundantly clear bastard bLiar and jackass BuSh, Howard and Aznar were going to destroy Iraq – illegally. Lets not forget those so called Muslim Countries that did nothing, or those like France, China and Russia that stood by calculating no detriment to their own interests (and very likely thought they would ‘gain’ in the long term from it).  

Selfish Brits of course would have none of putting bLiars demon head on a spike – for passers by to spit at. It’s simply not on to kill a pathological liar, a cheat, hypocrite, willing partner in infanticide (over half a million Iraqi kids during 12 years of abhorrent sanctions). Blair is English, speaks English, wealthy, held power, and is white. All attributes which entitle him to escape punishment for his murder lust. Iraqi’s on the other hand are poor, darker-skinned, powerless, Iraqi and Muslim… BOMBS AWAY !!!

So the justice of having bLiar publically executed is unlikely to be realised, but at least they could have called for him to be publically beaten to a pulp, allowed to recover and then beaten to a pulp again and again; treatment herr mudjesties forces did to the people of Iraq.

Or at least allow some Iraqi mourners whose kids were blown to smithereens to given a damn good shiner and had a bloodied nose and a decent scar across his repulsive face and scratch his eyes out with their fingernails.

Despite the failing of the ridiculous so called ‘ant-war’ movement, people should not have ceded their morality to these anti-war ‘leaders’ and/or buried their moral conscience into an emotion-proof dungeon. They should stopped paying tax, refused to purchase goods from nations in the correctly named Coalition of the Killing, they should have taken out as much of their money from the banks and so on. But no, they were unwilling to risk any ‘luxury’. February (for those who bothered) was fine. And if you didn’t do any of those things, you could try, starting from tomorrow.

Today the UK and UK citizens still vote of liars, cheats, embezzlers, killers, killers-to-be, immoral shells (probably freemasonic/cabbalistic Satan worshippers – openly conscious of the fact or not) wanting to bend the law to their advantage and use it as a club to pummel the people who voted for them, while giving reassurances that everything’s ok, we’ll all pull through. I haven’t heard that other war-criminal Winston Churchill’s been called upon yet, but the stopwatch is running.

Face facts. Voters hands are bloodied with the crimes of the elect-ees. There is no escape from that.

So, the fact the western snake is starting to consuming its own tail, is actually a strange sence of poetic justice.

I do feel sorry for those that DID speak out against the white hot evil their nation spewed (and keeps spewing) out, but such people are tiny in number.

This post follows partly from watching Francis Fukuyama on fora.tv. Re: Noam Chomsky, StefZ said on Famous for 15 megapixels wrote something like “people keep saying Chomsky is a leading intellectual”. Fukuyama seems to be same. He’s preaching to the choir and gets promoted and admired by it. I first heard this (similar) ‘in-house’ point on the BBC”s Question Time in which Salman Rushdie’s literary award was dismissed as it was a bit of a Trades Union award / closed shop kind of honourarium. Fukuyama says some absolutely ridiculous and incredibly ignorant things (which I may describe in one of my final posts {assuming this isn’t it}) His rubbish words lapped up by his audience (TED’s a bit like this too – got it’s head up it’s ass, believing it occupies some kind of multi-dimensional high ground)  show what deep shit the planet we are in, a secular occidental bog of collapse. All of these occidentials (and Tariq Ramadan sadly seems little different) are like this. Beyond Sun Tzu, Confusious and Lao Tzu name 5 Chinese intellextons. Beyond Ghandi, and Siddhartha Gautama, name 5 leading Intellectuals, Name 10 African Intellectuals. Name 10 South American intellectuals. Don’t be surprised if you can’t – the West won’t let you. You’re only an intellectual if you play the game. And what a sick game it is.  

As well as residual feelings from my previous post, this post is also a result from the commentators on Craig Murray’s site and indeed Craig Murray himself. Craig posted something about no hope a week or so ago expressing he saw no hope and failed to realise the way he’s courting (conventional)politics with zero resistance (see above)  is why there is no hope. The commentators on that post and his subsequent post are the same. His commentators are of course far worse (I actually have a decent amount of respect for Mr. Murray, but it pains me that he’s performing like a half-way house). The commentators are those who talk-the-talk mighty fine, but don’t walk-the-walk, yet they believe they are radicals or true liberals and that the system is perhaps sound but just going through a rough period. Hah! Dupes(many of them). “Ooooh, we are going to drown” they cementing their feet in large blocks and throwing themselves off the jetty.

I am old, and no longer have fresh questions to ask about this world. I know how it run, I know the score. I know where it’s headed. Indeed Mr. Murray, there is no hope at all – at least in places where this globalised hegemony reaches – which is pretty much everywhere.

I look back on my youth (up to perhaps my mid 20’s) and remember a time when I thought there was actually something good and exciting about this world. I was really scared of it’s vastness and diversity.

Not now.

It’s all the same and it stinks. It’s suffocating the good people – mostly poor and innocent – people of traditional culture and values.

The western heartless, godless self pontificating/promoting arrogant world is fast approaching it’s doom. It’s fully realisable. Actually, it’s could be postponed but definately not with a prevailing ‘mind’.

Let the TSA continue to humiliate the people who voted for Clinton / Bush / Obama or whatever tyrant puppet is in control. Let the Irish idiots who voted for their funny-money politicians and loved them when they yields were high and the champagne flowed feel the consequences of their acton. Let the Brits feel austerity and have moe lies and deceptions flow from the mouths of the people they voted for (and will vote for next time) while more Yemeni, Somali, Pakistani, Haitians, Burmese, Roma, and of course the Palestinians in an ongoing Holocaust and other peoples etc.. continute to be oppressed by these secular power holding vampires.

It’s just a pity the good people will suffer too. 

My posts here are going to become very infrequent. There is no point. Even those USans who know 911 was a lie (WTC 7 – the main achillies heel of that horrific (ritual?) massacre) won’t do anything meaningful to stop the rot. The centres of power in China will continue as long as it believes it’s elite is making money, as will Russia, Brazil, India, The huge central asian ‘Stans’ are all on the same path, and I will not forget to mention the rotten seed of it all:  Israyhell. Israyhell is close to openly assuming it’s apocaplypic position as leadingnation in the world and so their champagne will also run dry soon. The powerfully built Jew with curly hair proclaiming(falsley) to be the messiah is almost ready to make his appearance. His paradise will he hell and his hell will be paradise, but you’re already in his paradise, faux-democray being a useful tool propagating it, and you will just vote again in his paradise to get even more paradise. And if you don’t believe the dajjal will get you, the dying environment and the GM(junk) food will.

After a last fling of time wasting, I’m purging my time wasting hobbies and am going to knuckle down with acquiring knowledge of my Creator and worshipping him accordingly.

That’s all that matters. Nothing else.

I will try and respond to the funny and thought provoking, most welcomed comments people graciously spend their time leaving here, and I may, occasionally, when I’ve decided to read current events for a quick break, post here again but like this world is entering its twilight, so is this blog while spiritual being makes effort to emerge from its self imposed twilight.

The twilight is just about here now, but I’ll leave with this; A pic of from the newz-journo-junk organisation called the BBC. Source: http://www.ZION-NEWS-OUTLET.co.uk/news/uk-11773665
(copy the link and although the above is correct, to read the article, replace the ‘ZION-NEWS-OUTLET’ part with ‘bbc’)

Big heads up to http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/ by the way.

* of course there was nothing pre-emptive about it. The Pre-emptive doctrine was ‘strike them before they strike us’ and of course you realise they would NEVER have struck us. but shich is the extent ir perverse and mind-rotting ssumes you act now to

Riz Khan – Are we living in the end times – Slavoj Zizek

Interesting guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIpiXJW3dYE

Generally, when I see a worshippers of Marx proselytising, visions of my old Student Union president appear before my eyes and is coupled with a strong feeling of wanting to say to him ‘grow up’. Zizek’s ‘thinking out of the Marx (match)box’ is refreshing, taking those bits Marxism (which by the way Marx likely rehashed cum swiped from Socrates) that are sensible but leaving off the “I ♥ marx”  underpants.

It’s going to be interesting to see the atheists expressions of denial morph to horror should they ever have the aptitude to see that their own predictions of turmoil map onto eschatology, but then again, fantasy is deadly seductive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8LPn4irao

Mark Dice and Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined

I’ve finished watching Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined by Jason Bermas. It features a guy called Mark Dice, an author and anti-NWO campaigner who I’ve never consciously come across before. I like the kinds of things Dice says so I’m adding his website to my links. You could do worse than to go to his site and check it out, or buy his books (no, I’m not on commission).

Here’s just one of a set of clips featuring Mark (I’m putting it first ‘cos I need a laugh).

Mark Dice: Boycott the Super Bowl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v€=h-xYvv6raV8

But here’s something a bit more serious…

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 1/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG7asd9fd8Q

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 2/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUqWo0zkVSY

Mark Dice on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 3/3: When Will The People Wake Up! (Boardcast 20th Feb 2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC2k5dCEaQk

As for the movie – Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined I thought it was very good indeed, as was The Obama Deception.

Quite a few people criticise Alex Jones (and his ‘stable’) for example becasue Alex is softly-softly on Israyhell (unless the USS Liberty is under discussion), but what the Jones stable do very well, is use mainstream media, FACTUAL government documents, declassified documents, secret memos, along with government spokespersons to make their point – esxposing THAT level of the NWO.

 A couple of people get very strung up about one or two trivial errors Jones himself made, e.g. when he got the date of the 2005 UK election wrong and from that, they therefore seem to ignore a lot of what the Jones said, some people also seem to dismiss him beacuse of his tone. His detractors are by the way supposedly in oppositon to the fake-glossy-magazine world we are encouraged to believe in. The monumental egos within the anti-NWO movement aside, I’ll reiterte that I think Jones has a vital role – one that he does very well – in taking on and exposing the particular level of the shadowy elite that he deals with.

I on the other hand believe the conspiracy doesn’t just stop with the ultra rich, as to me, the NWO is grounded in satanism, religious apocylapse and the anti-Christ.

What a cheery outlook I have on life, huh!

anyway, here you go…

Invisible Empire – A New World Order Defined  2hours 14mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E

 

Zahir. I saw your article on ICH. You make a very strong case, but I still believe courting the fringe is a necessity, as isolationism is no formula for success, and let’s be honest, parts of the fringe aren’t that bad.

Anyway, Here’s one such fringe I reccomend people try and ‘network’ into (yeah, I know, that term really sucks!)

http://understandingdeeppolitics.org/

youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHHM2XIkV18

 

What are you doing to bring peace to peoples lives???

Don’t just sit back and watch, get involved. Do something.

http://www.perdana4peace.org/ 
(click link above to see image below in full)

global peace perdana - BRussells Tribunal - minimin big area

http://www.perdana4peace.org/

Good collection of speaches and documents on the global peace movement.

http://www.youtube.com/BRussellsTribunal – BRussells Tribunal (yes, they did spell it that way)

This weekend you could do worse than to check out the Global Peace Organisation (Perdana4Peace – based in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia) for inspration to expend some physical effort to help your fellow man.

 

The whites are sooooo superior

I’ve just come back from a rural part of the Muslim world – the kind of place that traditionally makes its money from agriculture but has in recent times, tried to gain more money from tourism.

There was one white tourist there, British or American (probably British) sporting a T-shirt with a marijuana leaf on it and with the headline words “FUCKIN’ MAGIC” along with some accompanying text similar to “you never feel down when your on a high”.

What a piece of white trash.

I would  hazard a guess that the T-shirt reflected his opinions of the matter, and before anyone’s fingers start to get itchy, this isn’t  about his opinions, to which he is perfectly entitled, but about him shoving those opinions in my face in a very vulgar way. The people there are quite humble and polite – salt of the earth kind of people – the kind of people that put the west to shame.

If I was back home in Manchester, him ramming such crap down my throat would be much less of an issue. After all, western ‘culture’ (for want to of a better word) has been in the gutter for some time now. But in this environment, this society, this culture, the guy was way out of line.

While we are told not to judge a book by it’s cover (a saying I feel is overly and incorrectly applied) but if on that cover there was a picture of the Taj Mahal, it’s a fair bet that the books content is not going to be about the Russian Revolution, astrophysics, or the fraud of Neo-Darwinism!

And so looking at this guy: crew cut cum skinhead, army style trousers, bit on the fat side and earrings, then my guess is that he was pro-narcotic, used drugs or tried to portray himself as ‘cool’ because he was promoting drug culture.

I can imagine his reaction of walking down the suburban streets of Bradford or Bristol if he saw a T-shirt advocating immigrants defraud the benefits system, for the death of Salman Rushdie or for the firebombing of public houses. He wouldn’t be a happy chappie, and if my picture of him is correct, I bet he would not stay quiet about it, but staying quiet was no doubt, exactly what he was expecting from the locals who has little choice other than to see his pro-narcotic and intimidating words.

The guy revealed the imperialist mindset resembling “When abroad, to hell with the locals, their society customs and norms. Chuck them in the bin ‘cos superior whitey is here, he who knows what’s good for you and laughs at your backward ways.”

I have a number of criticisms of the society I live in, and sometimes, but very rarely, I voice them, but my criticisms are usually far removed from societal norms, values and culture (e.g. I have criticisms of locals attitude to litter, transport & infrastructure as well as education) but I don’t shove my views in front of anyone, and only express them when asked first.

The guy kind of summed up whitey’s (and wannabe whitey’s) global attitude.

See this (Note: It is likely to have been shot by a police camera)


from www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDrgrxrR3c

Some of this white trash are holding signs up saying things like “Muslim Extremists Go to Hell” – what Muslim extremists??? What it actually means is “Muslims go to hell”. The illogical appearance of the word ‘extremists’ is to try and sanitise their hate of Muslims and Islam. While I think the British police are largely scum,  the people taking part in this demonstration are worse than scum.

I simply dread what would have happened if I had come across that crowd wearing Asian clothes with a ‘muslim hat’ on top of my head with a long beard showing. Read the comment by Pat Riot. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=604002&p=6913204#post6913204 You just know what his ‘conversation’ is going to involve.

As for Luton Borough Council (LBC) refusing the planned march, that was a stupid (or purposeful) thing to do. They should have done what they do with all marches these days… allow it and then afterwards, completely ignore it!

I feel so far removed from the white trash in that video. I am so glad that uglyness no longer touches my life. My Hijrah has proven to be good, but my heart aches for those poor people who have to live with such stuff every day. Well, when the majority of people in the UK become Muslim (many if not most of them will be white or mixed :))))  ) then at least they will be lucky enough to see the UK declaring itself to be an Islamic state. InsyaAllah, and the good thing, if the UK is ever to become a Muslim nation, is, I believe, that the huge majority of the people will actually WANT it to happen – so terrible their lives will have become outside Islam.

Another miserable site http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2009/04/people-of-luton-protest-against-muslim.html hosts a comment that says this:

“FINALLY! I’ll keep on praying that european people start to realize that Islam is NOT a religion: it is a political supremacist ideology based on hate! STOP THEM NOW! Congratulations for the brave people of Luton!”

Sadly the mental contortions of the person who wrote it, forgot to say he swapped the word Islam for Zionism. Well “Lionheart” the white trash coward whose site hosts that comment has a shield with a picture of the cross of St. George and the star of David. Funny how he is utterly ignornat of the shameful things the so called Christian west inflicted upon the Jews. You see, Lionheart is a Zionist (‘Christian’ or ‘Jewish’ – excuse the oxymorons, it makes no difference) and will do whatever it takes, including a reinvention of history to try and attack Islam, but he will fail.

lionhearts solidarity pics

lionhearts solidarity pics.jpg

 

 

To gay or not to gay? There is no question.

This is a relatively unstructured post, based on comments on Craig Murray’s site. His post gave some discussion to a recent Gallup poll about Muslims in the West. Link HERE. It will help to read his post first.
  

Can a person who is “25% Arab” be a racist? Of course. Genetic make-up isn’t a guarantee against being a racist. Is say, a black African, who has ‘no problem’ with South American natives, welcome the white Europeans, but disfavour the Chinese, a racist? Of course, but if that disfavour doesn’t manifest in anything then it’s trivial racism. I think most people are ‘trivially racist’. A room contains 18 people who can be classified by race.  3 whites, 3 Africans 3 Chinese, 3 Indians, 3 Aborigines, 3 South Americans. They are instantly placed in that room in a random fashion. What’s the chances they arrange/group themselves into race?

That is what I call trivial racism. What have you done when you see a room nearly full of your own ethnic group, and there’s been one foreigner? Have you ‘turned away’ from the foreigner, or have you made a conscious effort to speak to the other race? If the former, then you are displaying trivial racism. If the latter, then you are still displaying trivial racism because you had to artificially make an effort to engage with the person of a different race.

If your mind never at any stage had any effect on whether you talk to them or not, then I’d say such a thing is rare. But I can guess your mind will have flagged their race when first spotting them which I’d classify as sub-trivial racism. Purchasing goods from your own race without the conscious decision not to buy from other races is also trivial racism. Trivial racism is hardly ever discussed. It is ‘deliberately discriminatory’ or ‘prejudicial racism’ is the thing most of us should reject.

Time moves forward; What then of somebody who holds an idea that was commonplace 50 years ago but is uncommon these days. Is he ‘backward’. Are Luddites backward or do they have a case that innovations will cause a greater harm in the long term.

sexual irony - whose message is guaranteed to be misunderstood
 
Why do pro-gay people and liberals who ‘let homosexuality be’, attack Muslims and Christians and the theology they base their anti-Gay opinion on, but very rarely Jews and Judaism?

If sexual acts  between two (or more) men are OK, as the gay parade make out, then is having sex with your parents or your grandmother OK? What then is it wrong with have sex with two year old? A 12 year old? A person who is 15 years 363 days 23 hours old yet it is OK to have sex with a person 61 minutes older? Why is not OK to be naked in public? Why is it wrong to have sex in public on the No 14 bus or while waiting at the chippy?

These are serious questions. But they probably won’t be addressed by gays because it exposes the hypocrisy of pro-gay arguments and ties the liberal clergy in ‘knots’. The problem for them is the liberalism they deploy to justify their behaviour isn’t applicable to ALL and EVERY sex act (lets keep it simple and exclude ‘underage’ sex) say with your parents, brother or sister or the newly born kitten, and it will never be applicable without human restrictions. 

Fundamentalist liberalism which gays and pro-gays drivel out is a nonsense. All societies impose boundaries of social acceptance, because all societies recognise the need for these thresholds of behaviour. That some of these boundaries are solid and long established is seem by some as an irrelevance or even a point for attack. Traditional values which have aided fruitful societies, get cursed as ‘static’ and – probably deliberately – conflated with ‘badness’ and ignorance. Tradition is cast akin to an affliction. Yet all homosexuals will at some stage espouse ‘old’ moral principles that goes against the liberty they use to excuse their sexual acts. This shows their hypocrisy. Liberalism/liberty actually becomes self defeating at some stage.

Things aren’t bad just because they are old, but that’s the garbade the gay lobby churn out. And really, are humans and their needs so different now than what they were 4, 6, 8000 years ago? Do we no longer need food, shelter, security, the community? Of course not.

We are being asked to believe by the gay parade that traditionalists, either by theology or otherwise, are essentially “negative” elements of society. What then of the need for food, shelter etc? Funeral rituals, the formalities of a Japanese party or kissing the nipples of a tribal leaders daughters {as is the social norm in some societies}, or aboriginal rights of passage into manhood, birthday celebrations, New Years eve/day? Pass the liberal dustbin please darling.

The human mind is great at justifying human behaviour. We see this today with Bush/Blair/Rove/Cheney justifying torture. We see it in Palestine, with the bombing of women and kids and bulldozing they houses, making them give birth (and death) at a checkpoint because they are refuses leave to get to a hospital etc etc etc.

People do the same thing with gay sex. Gay sex is a mental choice. You don’t have to shove your penis in and out of a mans anus. If you like things in your bottom, then it doesn’t HAVE to be a mans penis, and from some X-ray’s I’ve seen, it sometimes isn’t.

And so the mind works on many fronts, citing homosexuality as “development” and “progression” (both those claims are preposterous and fiercely contestable) or that what they call ‘love’ but actually mean sex. NONE of their spins relate to the conscious decision to have your bottom poked by another, other than individual desire to engage in such acts.

Again, you can love your Mother and Father yes? The gay advocates position on same sex means you cannot argue against having sex with your parents. But of course you shouldn’t have sex with your parents – because it’s perverse. The word “love” is the cloak for ‘sexual acts’ and cloaks gay sex acts. The mind can easily be made to think there is nothing wrong with it especially when the mind determines for itself what is permissible and when the mind has decided that’s what it wants.
 
This mind bending doesn’t stop there, it’s evident in virtually EVERY part of human society. Monotheists recognise their minds are bent. They cannot argue with God. They have to put aside their quirks and follow the clear advice God has issued. That’s the essence of being a believer coined by the term Muslim – One who submits. Practicising Christians and Jews are also Muslims in that context.

And in regards to homosexuality, what could be argued is the Hebrew founded denunciation of homosexuality is passed over (via mind bend again) so that the Jewish condemnation of homosexuality never gets a mention. Of course not. It would invite the unwanted attention of the “you’re an anti-Semite!” spotlight.

In occidental looking countries, the mind game sees Islam and Christianity the soft targets to aim for. Christianity because these days it’s essentially legally powerless, and Islam for the same reason.

 Not that I want Judaism to be attacked for it’s correct stance of homosexuality, I’m simply pointing a case of where the mind self-censors and beguiles itself. Trivially: the mind has even thrown out the correct meaning of the word ‘gay’ – meaning happy.

Hope my spam filter’s working.

I have the fingers of one hand waiting to count the proclamations that Judaism is backward, and retrograde, and that practicing Jews are prejudiced who have a ‘problem’ and that they really must learn to conform to western values.

So I disagree with the execution of homosexual acts. But it seems to me, there are far more serious matters to concern ourselves with.

 Further reading: “Genetic Disorders Like S.A.D. Deserve Treatment, Not Acceptance – by George Kocan

(apologies for publishing the ‘scratchpad draught” of this earlier)

 


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
March 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031