If 9/11 was a false flag opration, why hasn’t anyone squealed?

For some, that question is enough to stop them believing anything other than the official conspiracy theory or ‘official narrative’ as others may phrase it.

But lets be frank, it is a thoroughly stupid stance to take.

1) That someone involved in one of the most significant world shaking event would, having initially been a willing participant, simply MUST admit to the fact later. This ‘opening’ condition alone, is likely to result in the majority of participants having a very strong reason to keep it secret.

2) Given the likely real suspects behind 9/11 and the dirty things they get up to, it is more than reasonable to believe any potential squealer would face execution with a similar threat facing their families.

3) Imagine some false-flag (FF) has occurred and a squealer came forth 7 years alter. From the time the event happened up until the ‘confession’ the false flag was still a false-flag. It does not magically become a FF simply when someone admits to it.

4) Even if a confession does come forth, the following powerful filters need to be successfully penetrated; The ‘confession’ needs
a) mass exposure
b) mass communication (not necessarily the same as a)
c) mass acceptance.
These filters even when overcome still don’t guarantee people will abandon the adopted mental barrier heading this post.

5) Not all FF’s will have a whistle-blower. To believe that to date, the FF’s and black-ops that have been exposed are the only FF / black-ops that have ever occurred and that no deadly secret has ever been taken to the grave  is simply the philosophical stance of cretin.

The weight of ALL evidence towards official forces being involved in 9-11 is simply overwhelming relative to the ‘official conspiracy story’, and in my opinion is is well beyond all reasonable doubt.

Why should justice and punitive action NOT be taken just because of the idiots who adopt such pathetic stances as “If 9/11 was a false flag operation, why hasn’t anyone squealed?” The only answer to that is surely this: Because in reality, possibly deep in their conscious, they prefer and benefit from the consequences that followed the FF rather than the consequences of having true justice be served and all ramifications from that.

What a world, huh!

Suggested reading:  “Conspiracy Theorists & Cognitive Dissonance” by http://eleveneleventruth.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/conspiracy-theorists-cognitive-dissonance/

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Anthony Lawson, man of truth a standard bearer against Zionism

Anthony Lawson, man of truth a standard bearer against Zionism.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Nuke my PFI, opportunism knocks.

http://www.5min.com/Video/What-to-Do-With-US-Nuclear-Waste-517135229 (brief news report)

Has Obomber’s Obama’s Blue Ribbon Commission examining the US’s huge radioactive nuclear waste stockpile issue, set in place a plan to deliberately try and defraud the US public?

The Commission has apparently launched an attack on the DoE and has effectively called for it’s nuclear waste management responsibilities to ripped away from it and a corporation established to do the job instead.

That’s simply NOT within the interests of the US citizens. A corporation WILL put money before public safety FAR MORE than a miserable and pathetic US government agency.

It’s precisely this kind of role that the state should be taking up and the polluters should be funding it.

–

I suspect the Blue Ribbon Commission have / would have a financial conflict of interest.

See also: http://global-security-news.com/2011/08/30/blue-ribbon-commission-on-nuclear-waste-missing-opportunity-for-lasting-reform/

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

AJE mind games?

Is Al Jazeera English (AJE) deliberately using the wording “pull” to normalise or numbify peoples minds against this ‘9-11 loaded’ word’? – i.e. the pull word used in the infamous Larry Silverstein interview in which he mentioned watching WTC7’s collapse?

The AJE article in question says “Israel pulls envoy after embassy attack “. Isn’t the usual way to report these things like this: ABC withdraws envoy/ambassador? Isn’t AJE’s title an unusual one? I think what AJE says is grammatically incorrect. The article was written by “Al Jazeera and sources ” – Well, at least the “Last Modified: 10 Sep 2011 07:45” version is.

A friend of mine said Silversteins famous “pull” comment was similarly grammatically incorrect either (in context of getting firemen out of WTC7)

WTC 7 – Pull It By Larry Silverstein

by the way, the alledged comment to firemen was challenged by a “We Are Change” activist:

Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies

“…the slang in those terms is related the a certain aspect of English, its an adjective. You do not say “pull it ” to bring out people”

If my friend is correct, it is even more pucluar that AJE are also doing it. So I’m even more suspicious of AJE. And dear AJE fans, don’t bother writing in to me to tell me how AJE is good on XYZ and tht reporter PQR is what a journalist should be. I’m NOT talking about individuals here, I’m taking about the whole ethos of AJ and AJE.

Well the mainstream media have done an absolutely pathetic job at bringing up many – or perhaps more accurately: ANY questionalbe points of the events of 9-11.

How far down the inescapable hole have we gone I wonder? Just what are we going to find at the very bottom of it I wonder.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Source: Al Jazeera and sources

États-Unis et Israyhell, zero point.

Here’s something to make the usual Israyhell apologists happy, not watch and then criticise.

Yip, there gonna burn some Qur’ans

Here’s some words of wisdom from someone I fell in love with him  almost the moment I met him. That’s brotherly Islamic love dear readers, not Hollywood Love. & thanks to the person who e-mail me this earlier.

–

Subject: Celebrating Eid and Burning the Quran by Idris Tawfiq

Asalaamu alaykum,

The more I read about the tragic events of September 11th 2001 in the United States, the more I feel that we will probably never get to the bottom of what really happened on that terrible day. What we do know for sure is that thousands of innocent people were cruelly murdered.

I think all educated and civilized people can also say with certainty that the religion of Islam itself was not responsible. Maybe misguided Muslims were involved, and their actions are to be condemned, but Islam cannot be held to blame for such an atrocity.

How sad it is, then, that a religious leader in the United States should be calling for the Quran to be burned on 11th September, calling Islam, Muhammad (pbuh) and Shariah Law as evil. On the other hand, it is very heartening to see that so many religious leaders, both in the United States and elsewhere, have made clear that such a Quran Burning Day does not represent their views at all.

How sad, too, that many misguided people will react in a violent way to such a provocation.

So how are Muslims to react to their holy book being burned? I think we should react with some Wisdom. If a whole country and its government were holding a Quran Burning Day, then Muslim leaders would be justified in reacting against that country and that government. To be quite honest, though, a small church with a congregation of only fifty people does not warrant overreaction. It is clear that they represent only themselves and a handful of bigotted people who would choose to follow them.

Instead, as Muslims, we can condemn such an insensitive and irreligious action, then try as best we can to build bridges between people of faith.

I remember last year, meeting His Eminence Archbishop Demetrios of America in his office in New York. The Archbishop told me that on 12th September 2001 he had gone down to Ground Zero to pay his respects, and the journalists there asked him if this atrocity did not shake his own faith. “On the contrary,” he replied. “Yesterday we witnessed here an explosion of evil. Today we are witnessing an explosion of love, as people of all faiths and of none come here to pray and to offer their condolences.”

Inshallah, this heinous Quran Burning episode can actually bring people of faith closer together, rather than driving them apart.

Happy Eid.

Idris Tawfiq

Love you Idris.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7186832044176923755

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Stolen from afghancentral.blogspot.com

http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/
(http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/smearing-wikileaks-and-julian-assange.html)  

Monday, 23 August 2010  

Smearing Wikileaks And Julian Assange

I [afghancentral.blogspot.com] was going to post on the inevitable smears on Assange. Fortunately Chris Floyd at Empire Burlesque has done it quicker and better:

 We have the President of the United States — who has already openly proclaimed his “right” to assassinate anyone on earth, including American citizens, without the slightest due process of law, simply at his arbitrary command — now feverishly expanding the use of death squads, whose stealthy night raids on sleeping villages have already killed a vast number of innocent civilians in Afghanistan (as the Wikileaks documents show). This same administration is now running “black ops,” secret armies, proxy wars and other covert activities in more than 75 countries around the world. That is to say, the Obama Administration is now murdering people in their beds, fomenting bloody ethnic conflict, supporting and/or carrying out acts of terrorism, spreading corruption, assisting dictators, arming warlords, spreading hate and suffering all over the world — and doing it knowingly, proudly. (“Evil in broad daylight” indeed, as Arthur Silber details here.)  

And these are the moral paragons who have now turned their machinery of lies and smears against Wikileaks. For make no mistake; although the rape charges were manufactured in Sweden — which, incidentally, is where some of Wikileaks’ servers are located — they emanate from the proud deathlords in Washington. Indeed, didn’t we hear just a few weeks ago that the Peace Laureate’s people had launched a campaign of pressuring foreign governments to put fetters on Assange and his organization? Now Sweden’s center-right government — no, Rush, Sweden is no longer the super-socialist fairyland of your nightmares — has obviously hearkened to the master’s voice.

But although this first foray has been rebuffed, it is certain that what we are seeing is the beginning of a concerted effort to destroy Assange as a public figure and thereby discredit the work of Wikileaks — and by extension, the truth of its revelations.

 

   

And smearing, of course, is just the first step. If that doesn’t work … well, the avowed and openly proclaimed proponents of assassination certainly have other, more “prejudicial” methods at their disposal, nicht war?  

 

Comments on lwtc247 have been removed.  Go to:

http://afghancentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/smearing-wikileaks-and-julian-assange.html 
to comment 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

The greatest economic collapse of ALL time

Thanks to Matthias at FutureFastForward:
http://futurefastforward.com/feature-articles/4140

Following the collapse there will have to be a proposed solution. For soverign debt there is the special drawing rights (SDR’s – which apparently the Bank of International Settlements is involved with) but as part of soverign wealth management, I’m predicting it will involve/require domestic wealth having to move to an electroic form of currency. The people doing this are already clearly pro-Zion and when it happens, Zion will rule the world and declare Jerusalem as its capitol.

It’s damn close, I’m sure.

P.S. Mark Pitman has since passed away…. Hummm… a case of SADS?

Update (6 September 2010 Last updated at 18:15 GMT):

• Obama unveils $50bn building plan
  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11203656

  President Barack Obama is announcing a new $50bn infrastructure plan as part of efforts to jump-start the US economy.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

WTC7 is THE KEY

WTC7 is THE KEY to realising your govt (and those controlling them) think nothing about ‘their’ own citizens.

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA&NR
–

Supposedly ‘New’ WTC7 video apparently showing the collapse of the ‘penthouse’ at the TOP of the building before the main building collapsed {via controlled demolition}

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

–

The other side: NIST propaganda.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rawrAdoccDk

–

Yet WTC 7 this ‘New’ phenonemon decided not to show itself here…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41OCQvu7ULQ

or here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3B1OnhSucP8

or here (to the point to total structural collapse):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4MjsVnasLA

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Disband the police – esp the USan ones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLhi_1eLnPE&