But not if you read the disgraceful reporting on the BBC.
To the BBC which claims impartiality/neutrality, as uncannily does “fair and balanced” FOX News, the Zionist macabre love of killing Palestinians is only ever mentioned in terms of Palestinian “militants” killed or “Israeli strikes” – and here we get to the crux – in retaliationto rocket fire.
Over the lst few days especially, the BBC has always made it out as though Zionist Israel only responds to violence by the Palestinians as first aggressors. Claims that are of course ridiculous.
Zionists are always the defenders, never the seeders of death and destruction.
Aah, the fabled Zionist reality inversion strikes again.
It is incredible that the BBC’s pro Zionist bias has been exposed very well over the last decade or so yet it has provided no change at all and the BBC cum BBZ continues to pump out the utter lies and distortions again and again.
I remember some time back George Galloway said words to the effect of: If an Iraqi whose family had been killed by bliar’s lies retaliated and tried to kill Bliar or his family, then it would be justified.
Similarly, I think one could make a case for legitimacy of a victim of the BBC’s propaganda to attack the BBC given its contributory role in the gross oppression and suffering of various peoples across the world, including Palestinians, Arabs and Persians – especially Muslims ones in particular or even Russians.
In fact that logic was used by Clinton and bLiar when NATO attacked a TV station in the former Yugoslavia.
Oh how I look forward to the passing of the BBC Newz (“Newz” because it certainly ain’t ‘News’). But it will always go on, won’t it? Because it’s purpose is to serve the nauseating pro-Zionist British establishment, britain is the mother of Zionist entity known as Israel.
wee willie hague never thought sharing a hotel room with another man would look bad. I’m sure he was completely bowled over when he realised whar some thought that his activities suggestes a streak of homosexuality. Come on, give wee wille a break. One could easily tell if he’s fibbing. Just look at the guys life to see other fountains of communal generosity. For example does he share his car, house, bank account, office, constituency surgery, many pints of beer, shoes, tie, toothbrush, trousers, atm card, business class airline seats? If he’s honest about all this, I’m sure such altruistic tendencies could be easily spotted. Caveat: caring and sharing are of course exempt when it comes to those dark skinned types in the ‘stans’ etc. in continuum of British foreign policy.
Later, oor wille shed light on his personal life saying “I have made no secret of the fact that Ffion and I would love to start a family.” giving gossip guru’s something a number of exclusives to wag their tongues on, pollute the airwaves more heavily than usual.
It is thought that wee willie may have called the BBC and thanked them for the ‘kinder’ snaps of him and his shared room mate…
BBC pics:
–
The Truthseeker hosted pic (also by XPOSURE) – the pic the BBC didn’ show.
Meanwhile one of the UK’s filthy cops has surprisingly been given a jail term.
Pigs like the paradoxical ‘lightfoot’, are probably 10 a penny (and 50Kg a pound) who usually have no action taken against them because unlike lightfoot, they are not unlucky enough to get caught on camera. I bet lightfoot regrets not moving the US some time ago. Where even when caught on camera, the penalty isn’t nearly as punitive.
Getting back to coward ‘lightfoot’ How ironic that lightfoot beat up some scumsucking ‘soldier’ that was a member of a force that bombs the hell out of Iraqi and Afghani kids.
Scum on scum methinks.
When a non-extablishment whore is beaten up then that’s ok.
Oh, by the way, when the media report Israyhelli settler thieves and assassins being killed, it’s a “senseless slaughter” according to US president Barack Obomber, yet when 9 turkish humanitarian volunteers are known to have been murdered in international waters by Israyhelly commandos in no danger, then (to paraphrase) we must wait to see what an Israyhelli investigation says about the matter.
Here’s a partial screenshot of todays (Mon 28th Dec) BBC Middle East page. Note: my previous blogpost pictured yesterdays BBC’s frontpage pic.
–
Do you notice anything? Look at my post from yesterday and then look again at this one.
It’s the same guy!
So? Well it’s quite possible the BBC is just using smaps taken in one session – the background does look similar, but look at the dudes right hand. In yesterdays pic there is no red patch AND there is no green band either. Where did that red colour come from? The immediate impression is that the red colour is blood. But it seems to me that it’s probably bene painted on. In which case the BBC is showing a misleading picture without any discussion as to what’s going on. The cameraman is pretty keen on this guy so it’s likely the cameraman knows whether the red is real or not (It’s my contention that it’s paint).
what does yesterdays pic and todays pic actually show us? One guy in what seems like a pretty isolated spot. The second pic with the red paint has much higher flames in the background, more smoke AND is of a narrower angle, focusing more on the guy.
Is all this not an act of manipulation? Worse still, it lends itself to the suggestion that the BBC is actually aiding the unrest in Iran in a deliberate context.
Given the disgraceful record of the politicised BBC News and Current affairs departmant and the lack of public awareness of its ”Governers’, I think that last possibility cannot be discounted.
I’ve been looking for news of the extraordinary Viva Palestina convoy delivering humanitarian aid to Palestine. But the BBC hasn’t said a peep. the BBC really is a Horseshit of an organisation protecting a Horseshit of an establishment using censoring by omission to try and fool the world nobody cares about the crushing oppression of the Palestinian people.
Well the Horseshit is wrong, very wrong. Tens of thousands of people have contributed to the convoy either as activists, donators, organisaers or simply boosted the morale of the convoy participants by standing out in the cold streets cheering them on.
In fact I would guess tens of millions world wide have had Palestine in their heart for a long time already, catalysed by the murderous slaughter last year – every aspect of which was illegal. The world is turning Palestinian.
“Israel fury at UK’s Livni warrant” – What fury? Which one of the Ziofreak child killers said the word “fury/furious”? This word ‘fury’ ONLY appears in the headline! None of the Zioscum are quoted as saying it. The BBC is putting words into their foul mouths. The unusual use of the word fury is to make it look as if Israyhell has incurred some serious unjust action. The BBC’s reporting is ropey ar the best of times and when it’s about the US administration, it’s sickening but when it’s about Israyhell it’s positively corrupt.
Here’s a screenshot I took from the BBC’s ME page.
Interesting that
I know what this is, it’s a total coincidence that there it’s kind of like the Union Jack flag. Slippy tZippy standing in front of the stupid British flag bringing a level of ‘association’ of her to the UK – making her one of us.
Can you imagine if the very twisted David Milliband was a Muslim and that some Muslim country somewhere had killed 410 children for him to interfere with the British legal system in order that the killers of those kids got off scott free?. There would be nationwide uproar. Milliband would be sacked and probably stand no chance of winning a seat in the next election.
But twisted Milliband is Jewish, so anything goes.
David Milliband. The idiot schoolboy British Foreign Secretary who’s Zionist
slaveishness, does not play any part whatsoever in how he directs British foreign policy.
Well that’s what he would say so let’s believe him shall we, and all the other Zionists
in the UK.
– Lets take another look at BBC mind manipulation coincidence…
Notice “Israel and the Palestinians” – No mention of Palestine. That’s right, there is a bunch of people called Palestinians IN Israyhell. Bah humbug. That is coincidence too, it’s not that the BBC presstitutes have mentally sterisised their own minds to come up with disgraceful little tricks like that. Oh no.
These Ziofreaks should face a court of international law for their actions, the consequences of a guilty verdict resulting in them being hung. But that’s not going to happen. The UK is a dastardly slave to and supporter of Israyhell.
Just like Iranan Human right’s lawer Shirin Ebadi, was awareded her prize by occidental predjuiced trades union, Henry Kissinger was also awarded the Nobel preace prize for bringing to an ‘end’ HIS killing of millions upon millions of people is South East Asia in an undeclared and of course thoroughly illegal war, the dirty war’ in the 60’s and 70’s.
Well the old vampire, Henry ‘the shit’ Kissenger, is still in people devouring mode…
You Tube: Kissinger threatens regime change in Iran if coup fails (Thanks to The Truthseeker)
Update: The MS data Dr. Chris Busby posted on Blairwatch is showing now: This is what it says as of 10th June 2009:
The data are up on the website of the Low Level Radiation Campaign. The measurements were made at Harwell. Isotope ratio in the soil sample was 108. Toatal U was 13mg/kg. LOD was 0.0002mg/kgU238 and 0.0001mg/kgU235. Instrument was Agilent ICPMS. Diffetnt method alpha spectrometry gave same result in different lab. We have now found EU in a car filter. Check out llrc.org. Thank you. Chris
End of update.
The BBC newz and current affairz division, ever the nucleus of stinking lies (evidence #1) in support of mass murder, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ‘environmentalcide’, report on a particular illegal bombing of Sytria by the Zionist entity in 2007 2006.
Amongst those who followed this, you will probably remember there was a strange information vacuum on behalf of the Syrians. The pro-Zionist corporate mainstream media (to give it it’s proper, full title), may have assisted in the silence from Syria, but news on the anti-NWO news outlets whch I read were also pretty much devoid of Syrian comminiques.
Anyway, before you read further please the the BBC newz article HERE.
Hopefully you will have read the earlier evidence #1 above, and so, on reading this:
“Now in a confidential report obtained by the BBC…”
then, if you’re capable of at least half an independent thought, you would now have a rather large ‘pinch of salt’ in your mind. Continuing directly from where we left off, the BBC newz article says:
“it [the report] says it has discovered new traces of uranium of a type not included in Syria’s declared nuclear material.”
——————————————————————————————————-
Asside:
does this cry then ring out:
“A ha! I knew it. Those damn Arab/Muslims. I knew they were up to something. I knew the fascile, politically correct respect I felt compelled to give them wasn’t sustainable. They deserve to be bombed.”
People who may think that way remind me of that nasty man called Winston Churchill…
I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.
I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.” – source
Supporters of ‘Death by Churchill’ may counter he only wanted to make their eyes water. What nonsense. He was pimping for weapons to fascilitate his desire for military advantage/supremacy potenial, much like all weapon pimps before him and those who followed him when they bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, sprayed Agent Orange across SouthEast Asia, used depleted uranium and white phosphorous against the people of Fallujah and Gaza. He was deliberately underplaying it. To think that by making peoples eyes water they would them agree to be colonbised is ridiculous and offering apologies for imperialistic murder. Harmless lachrymatory substances had long been known (e.g. thiopropanal S-oxide – the volatile gas produced from damaged onion cells or Allyl isothiocyanate, reported to be a dangerous lachrymator. His pretence that gas was just to make peoples eyes water is shown for the sack of crap it is when in 1920 he wrote to Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare:
“the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.” – source
Here Churchill is revealing that to permanently disabling them, something that doesn’t happen if you just make their eyes water, would be more advantageous to British imperilism because the would be too sick to fight but dain the resources of the those targeted for British colonisation.
Churchill gloves really comes out of his fake concern against human suffering when in a prime ministerial minute (1944) he writes:
“I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard.” – Winston Churchill 6th July 2944. Personal minute aka the “Secret Poison Gas Memo” – source
Eerily, in that same source, we see this written by British scumbad Bomber(i.e. killer) Harris saying:
“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.” Remember other British filthy killers Tony bLiar / Alistair Campbell / John Scarlett / Geff ‘Hoon / Richard Dearlove / Lard Goldsmith 45 minute lie?
and interestingly enough, Churchill didn’t consider the V1 and V2 bombs even reaching the level of a “serious nuisance” yet these bombs are often cited as justification for the destruction of Dresden, Munich and other British strocities.
——————————————————————————————————-
Of course the BBC does it’s part to foment angst towards the Arabs and the Iranians, who are tossed into this report. Iran let’s not forget, is absolutely within its its right to develop nuclear energy even though it is ridiculously stupid to do so.
Right. Now this post is coming to an end, who spotted the flaw?
Come on, surely someone spotted it?
(Huh>? lwtc really has gone mad this time…)
What do you think the Israyhelli’s bombed the Syrian target with? Have a guess. go on? There must be someone that can guess?? Here’s some clues:
TITLE: Bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads used by Israel against civilian targets in Lebanon
By: Dr. Doug Rokke
www: (http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m28056&hd=0&size=1&l=e)
Dr. Doug Rokke is former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project
Those reports came from the ironically named ‘Blairwatch‘ – a site which at times was unashemed in displaying it’s pro-Zionism (depending on which author was posting at the time) – unless to happen to think it’s OK to delete the scientific Mass Spectroscopy iosotopic anaysis given by Chris Busby which proved:
Israel did in fact use enriched uranium to bomb Lebanon in the summer of 2006.
The BBC doesn’t give a toss about news nor does it care about exposing Zionist rot, in fact it seems to relish opportunities to cover it up at each and every opportunity.
The fascists are out once more, jabbing the knives into the belly of those who hold contrary opinions. To these fascists, it doesn’t matter one bit, that what they perceive as an ‘offensive belief’, actually has a reasonable basis behind it.
The result? Attack the person, not the information by which that belief was established. When you see that methodology being employed, you know the knife-jabbers have lost the argument and wallow in their own ignorance.
I am of course talking about Catholic Bishop Mr. Richard Williamson.
And the repugnant BBC plays it’s part in it, providing only 1m23s clip of the Bishop exclusively devoid of the Bishop citing some of the basis that forms his belief. Funny how the BBC clip stops just before the Bishop actually goes onto the explain the rationale behind his stance. Althought, perhaps ‘funny’ isn’t quite the word!
Please compare the BBC selected portion [LINK HERE] with a more fuller(but still edited) version found on YouTube.
And as usuall from the scummy BBC, it doesn’t give any critical analysis of the interviewer who tries to put words into the Bishops mouth and/or spin what he says.
Well done to all those torch and pitchforkers for once again demonstrating how cowardly they are to debate the real issues in order for them to hide behind their zeal for cognitive homogeneity.
I’ll transcribe what the admirable rational Bishop says and post it here later.
And perhaps I’ve actually been a bit unkind accessing the variants of ‘belief’: Although the Bishop himself used the words "I believe" in this matter, really, the element of faith is rather absent. Therefore, and actually the Bishop does indicate this from what he says, he adops a "current stance" on the issue based on what he has seen. He clearly gives the impression tht if he saw stronger evidence which would support 6m Jews died ot that the hundreds of thousands of Jews who did die was a result of gassing, then he would – based on what he said – change his opinion.
That matter of course gets no airing and in places like Germany – to it’s deep shame – isn’t allowed, in some ways resembling its recent history, and it also shows there are numerous fascists still supporting Germany. Ho ho!
UPDATE: Rest assured, if you want to debate the holocaust issues (or non-holocaust issues) here then you can. There is no thought police here, unlike some other blogs. Feel free to discuss and lay-out ANY evidence you wish, (even the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion if you must – although that is heading into a side issue). Unlike other blogs where discussion is stifled, I fully encourage it. A reminder is given however that one can argue without causing deliberate offence.
In November 2005, Thompson traveled with his Jewish wife to Israel, where he held direct talks with Ariel Sharon, which were intended to let the BBC ‘build bridges with Israel’.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mark_Thompson Mark Thompson travelled to Israel in 2005 with his wife Jane Blumberg who is Jewish.’http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe…on-517400.html – and his wife is an extreme Zionist. The BBC is Occupied Territory. It’s not clear if he regards Palestinians as animals or humans. – NominalActor (talk) 10:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
this factual statement has already been removed several times by the zionist cabul on wikipedia
The above sentence comes up in search but is missing in the article. Why was it removed, is it factually incorrect? –Wool Bridge (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
He has had talks with Ariel Sharon –
Is this why the Disaster Emergency Committee (DEC) Gaza Aid Appeal that wasn’t broadcast by the BBC? (BSKYB, being Zionist freindly MurdochCorp unsurprizingly followed suit). Other discussion HERE on World Press Network.
Seems likely to me. The swines. The BBC is well known for its pro-Israyhell bias but I never thought a connection to the Godforsaken thieved state of occupation was so blunt.
Wiki says this about Mr. Thompson:
“Later that day he told BBC staff, via an internal televised message[6], that deception of the public was never acceptable. “source
From which we can conclude Mark is quite open about his Zionist leanings.
Living with the Conspiracy 24-7 
Recent Comments