Posts Tagged 'BBC bias'

Dumb and dumbing

Update: The MS data Dr. Chris Busby posted on Blairwatch is showing now: This is what it says as of 10th June 2009:

The data are up on the website of the Low Level Radiation Campaign. The measurements were made at Harwell. Isotope ratio in the soil sample was 108. Toatal U was 13mg/kg. LOD was 0.0002mg/kgU238 and 0.0001mg/kgU235. Instrument was Agilent ICPMS. Diffetnt method alpha spectrometry gave same result in different lab. We have now found EU in a car filter. Check out Thank you. Chris

End of update.

The BBC newz and current affairz division, ever the nucleus of stinking lies (evidence #1) in support of mass murder, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ‘environmentalcide’, report on a particular illegal bombing of Sytria by the Zionist entity in 2007  2006.

Amongst those who followed this, you will probably remember there was a strange information vacuum on behalf of the Syrians. The pro-Zionist corporate mainstream media (to give it it’s proper, full title), may have assisted in the silence from Syria, but news on the anti-NWO news outlets whch I read were also pretty much devoid of Syrian comminiques.

Anyway, before you read further please the the BBC newz article HERE.

Hopefully you will have read the earlier evidence #1 above, and so, on reading this:

“Now in a confidential report obtained by the BBC…”

then, if you’re capable of at least half an independent thought, you would now have a rather large ‘pinch of salt’ in your mind. Continuing directly from where we left off, the BBC newz article says:

“it [the report] says it has discovered new traces of uranium of a type not included in Syria’s declared nuclear material.”




does this cry then ring out:

“A ha! I knew it. Those damn Arab/Muslims. I knew they were up to something. I knew the fascile, politically correct respect I felt compelled to give them wasn’t sustainable. They deserve to be bombed.”

 People who may think that way remind me of that nasty man called Winston Churchill…

I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.

I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.”source

Supporters of ‘Death by Churchill’ may counter he only wanted to make their eyes water. What nonsense. He was pimping for weapons to fascilitate his desire for military advantage/supremacy potenial, much like all weapon pimps before him and those who followed him when they bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, sprayed Agent Orange across SouthEast Asia, used depleted uranium and white phosphorous against the people of Fallujah and Gaza. He was deliberately underplaying it. To think that by making peoples eyes water they would them agree to be colonbised is ridiculous and offering apologies for imperialistic murder. Harmless lachrymatory substances had long been known (e.g. thiopropanal S-oxide – the volatile gas produced from damaged onion cells or Allyl isothiocyanate, reported to be a dangerous lachrymator. His pretence that gas was just to make peoples eyes water is shown for the sack of crap it is when in 1920 he wrote to Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare:

“the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.” – source

Here Churchill is revealing that to permanently disabling them, something that doesn’t happen if you just make their eyes water, would be more advantageous to British imperilism because the would be too sick to fight but dain the resources of the those targeted for British colonisation.

Churchill gloves really comes out of his fake concern against human suffering when in a prime ministerial minute (1944) he writes:

“I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard.” – Winston Churchill 6th July 2944. Personal minute aka the “Secret Poison Gas Memo”source

Eerily, in that same source, we see this written by British scumbad Bomber(i.e. killer) Harris saying:

“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.” Remember other British filthy killers Tony bLiar / Alistair Campbell / John Scarlett / Geff ‘Hoon / Richard Dearlove / Lard Goldsmith  45 minute lie?

and interestingly enough, Churchill didn’t consider the V1 and V2 bombs even reaching the level of a “serious nuisance” yet these bombs are often cited as justification for the destruction of Dresden, Munich and other British strocities.


Of course the BBC does it’s part to foment angst towards the Arabs and the Iranians, who are tossed into this report. Iran let’s not forget, is absolutely within its its right to develop nuclear energy even though it is ridiculously stupid to do so.

Right. Now this post is coming to an end, who spotted the flaw?

Come on, surely someone spotted it?

(Huh>? lwtc really has gone mad this time…)

What do you think the Israyhelli’s bombed the Syrian target with? Have a guess. go on? There must be someone that can guess?? Here’s some clues:

TITLE: Bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads used by Israel against civilian targets in Lebanon
By: Dr. Doug Rokke
www: (
Dr. Doug Rokke is former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project

See Fisk:
Mystery of Israel’s secret uranium bomb

Those reports came from the ironically named ‘Blairwatch‘ – a site which at times was unashemed in displaying it’s pro-Zionism (depending on which author was posting at the time) – unless to happen to think it’s OK to delete the scientific Mass Spectroscopy iosotopic anaysis given by Chris Busby which proved:

Israel did in fact use enriched uranium to bomb Lebanon in the summer of 2006.

The BBC doesn’t give a toss about news nor does it care about exposing Zionist rot, in fact it seems to relish opportunities to cover it up at each and every opportunity.


The right to believe

The fascists are out once more, jabbing the knives into the belly of those who hold contrary opinions. To these fascists, it doesn’t matter one bit, that what they perceive as an ‘offensive belief’, actually has a reasonable basis behind it.

The result? Attack the person, not the information by which that belief was established. When you see that methodology being employed, you know the knife-jabbers have lost the argument and wallow in their own ignorance.

I am of course talking about Catholic Bishop Mr. Richard Williamson.

And the repugnant BBC plays it’s part in it, providing only 1m23s clip of the Bishop exclusively devoid of the Bishop citing some of the basis that forms his belief. Funny how the BBC clip stops just before the Bishop actually goes onto the explain the rationale behind his stance. Althought, perhaps ‘funny’ isn’t quite the word!

Please compare the BBC selected portion [LINK HERE] with a more fuller(but still edited) version found on YouTube.

And as usuall from the scummy BBC, it doesn’t give any critical analysis of the interviewer who tries to put words into the Bishops mouth and/or spin what he says.

Well done to all those torch and pitchforkers for once again demonstrating how cowardly they are to debate the real issues in order for them to hide behind their zeal for cognitive homogeneity.

I’ll transcribe what the admirable rational Bishop says and post it here later.

And perhaps I’ve actually been a bit unkind accessing the variants of ‘belief’: Although the Bishop himself used the words "I believe" in this matter, really, the element of faith is rather absent. Therefore, and actually the Bishop does indicate this from what he says, he adops a "current stance" on the issue based on what he has seen. He clearly gives the impression tht if he saw stronger evidence which would support 6m Jews died ot that the hundreds of thousands of Jews who did die was a result of gassing, then he would – based on what he said – change his opinion.

That matter of course gets no airing and in places like Germany – to it’s deep shame – isn’t allowed, in some ways resembling its recent history, and it also shows there are numerous fascists still supporting Germany. Ho ho!


UPDATE: Rest assured, if you want to debate the holocaust issues (or non-holocaust issues) here then you can. There is no thought police here, unlike some other blogs. Feel free to discuss and lay-out ANY evidence you wish, (even the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion if you must – although that is heading into a side issue). Unlike other blogs where discussion is stifled, I fully encourage it. A reminder is given however that one can argue without causing deliberate offence.


The real story behind the BBC banning the appeal for blitzed Gazans?

Honourable pre-reading recommendation:
1) Retired consultant, Dr Chris Burns-Cox, calls BBC ban of Gaza appeal scandalous.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 08:00

2) In Lyons we (dis)Trust  ( BBC, Thompson, complaints, BBC petiton – all ignored.

The MPAC (UK) forum, here, reports:

In November 2005, Thompson traveled with his Jewish wife to Israel, where he held direct talks with Ariel Sharon, which were intended to let the BBC ‘build bridges with Israel’.
Mark Thompson travelled to Israel in 2005 with his wife Jane Blumberg who is Jewish.’…on-517400.html – and his wife is an extreme Zionist. The BBC is Occupied Territory. It’s not clear if he regards Palestinians as animals or humans. – NominalActor (talk) 10:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

this factual statement has already been removed several times by the zionist cabul on wikipedia 

The above sentence comes up in search but is missing in the article. Why was it removed, is it factually incorrect? –Wool Bridge (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

He has had talks with Ariel Sharon –

Is this why the Disaster Emergency Committee (DEC) Gaza Aid Appeal that wasn’t broadcast by the BBC? (BSKYB,  being Zionist freindly MurdochCorp unsurprizingly followed suit). Other discussion HERE on World Press Network.

Seems likely to me. The swines. The BBC is well known for its pro-Israyhell bias but I never thought a connection to the Godforsaken thieved state of occupation was so blunt.

Wiki says this about Mr. Thompson:

“Later that day he told BBC staff, via an internal televised message[6], that deception of the public was never acceptable. “ source

From which we can conclude Mark is quite open about his Zionist leanings.

Murder in Mumbai

Once again more senseless killing  is happening across the world.

And before you ask, yes there are sensible killings – for example the killing of Mr. BuSh or Tony bLiar by an Iraqi (and a few others besides), A native Indian killing General Custer, A Russian peasent killing Stalin, A Cambodian civillian killing Poll Pot, A Palestinian killing Ehud Olmert, a Jew killing Hitler, an Incan killing Pizarro, An Aztec killing Cortes – you get the picture.

The BBC loves this kind of event because it serves to strengthen its propaganda agenda. That Agenda is to strengthen support for the War OF Terror.

Just the other day the Indian Government comitted state sponsored terrorism against about 20 fishermen in the Gulf of Aden (or Indian Ocean as I called it previously). The BBC never criticised it once and NEVER reported on the human side of that illegal crime. They never sought interviews with the familes of those murdered fishermen, they never reported on the massive hole left in the lives of the mens children (assuming they had children that is – the scumbag BBC didn’t even bother to try and find out! QED!) and they never mentione the financial impact on the fishermens grieving loved ones.

Yet now that some different scum is mowing innocent people down in Mumbai, the BBC goes bang slap into human impact mode, to one-sidedly tweak your sence of anger and resentment towards the latest killers to running rampant causing more misery.

State sponsored terrorism and death is OK in the BBC’s eyes, non-state sponsored terrorism isn’t.


Page last updated at 07:11 GMT, Thursday, 27 November 2008
‘Those men killed so many people’

Not only that of course, but as I type, the 1.5 million or so civillian prisoners in Gaza are being starved to death. The BBC has a great yet another excuse not to point out about this most massive utterly perverse evil crime.

The BBC Newz and current affairs management stink to high heaven!

UPDATE: Here’s the latest rubbish from the what the BBC

“This [the shooting in mumbai] points to either a major shift in strategy by an existing group or the influence or direction of outside parties, perhaps even al-Qaeda, whose style of attacks this mimics.” source Timestamp: 11:32 GMT, Thursday, 27 November 2008)

Becasue we all remember the last time “Al Qaeda” did this dont we? Remember it was… ummmm…..

Interestingly, they say the ‘rebels’ speak Hindi and are of South Asian appearance (Indian/Indian sub-continent according to the BBC’s world map)

And just like the Jackass idiot George Bush who should have said in the hours after 9-11, (assuming 9-11 was what Bush cracks it out to be) “We will examine why people hate us so much that they would do such a thing” but didn’t, instead did the only thing braindead denialists like him do – bring more suffering, now Mr Manmohan Singh does the same thing, saying:

“We will take the strongest possible measures to ensure that there is no repition of such terrorist acts. We are determined to take whatever measures are necessary to ensure the safety and security of our citizens.”source Timestamp: 12:14 GMT, Thursday, 27 November 2008

In other words India, like it’s navy just over a week ago will break the law and norms of international law as it sees fit, for whatever purpose it wants, all under the guise of fighting terrorism. I’ve heard words akin that many times, this is the first time I’ve heard the Indian accent version.

Mr. Singh also says these people came from outside the country. How on earth can he know that? It’s simple: He cannot.

And that brings me to another point. The BBC LIES again. On that very page, the BBC says:

“India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has vowed to take “whatever measures are necessary” to track down those responsible for the Mumbai attacks.”ibid Timestamp: 12:14 GMT, Thursday, 27 November 2008

But if you read my rush transcript or even better watch Mr. Singh’s statement you will realise he NEVER said it was to track down those responsible, as the BBC is claiming.

I wonder if Mr. Singh will also say “an investigation into the killings will be a ‘ludicrous diversion'”

ut €-

Raja Petra, ISA and the BBC’s sneeky journalism


AFP pic of Raja Petra as used on the BBC website

AFP pic of Raja Petra as used on the BBC website

The Malaysian blogger, Raja Petra (which on a point of trivia, probably means he’s related to the Malaysian royal family in the North East of the county)  has a site called Malaysia today. It is very critical of the Malaysian government.

In an article by the BBC we are informed of Raja Petra’s detention under the countries ISA law. At the side of the page, Malaysia Today is the first link under the “RELATED INTERNET LINKS ” section. The link to Malaysia Today is fair enough, we’d expect an organisation which never tires telling us how good and impartial (!) it is, to live up to that once in a while and give a balance or reasonable discussion in it’s reports. Although solely in regard to their filed reportz, I must say, I’ve never seen one that doesn’t discuss Malaysia in anything other than in a negative light. It’s worth bearing in mind that there may actually be ‘favourable’ reports, but I’ve never seen a single one!

Raja Petra is challenging the the Malaysian ruling class – which is known for also being heavily intertwined with the business class. As such, Petra’s activities are to be welcomed (if legitimate). Critique of any power structure (including and especially anything calling itself Islamic) is in my opinion an essential part of a healthy society.

But when it comes to SOME news stories the BBC’s impartiality goes out of the fake, self declared window!

Disagree? Look up a selection of BBC Newz articles about 7-7 and 9-11. See how many times they link to  and You’re going to be sadly disappointed. I saw a link to loose change but guess what? It linked to google video, not their website at (which weirdly now directs to some blog)

But it’s not just that. When did you last see a link to etc.

Answer: You probably didn’t and you probably wouldn’t.

Like the tactics of the British empire of old, the BBC is (intentionally or not)pursuing a line of ‘divide and conquer’ whereby it appears to encourage dissent/strife abroad (Russia, Malaysia, Sudan etc) which strangely happens to correspond with the British government foreign policy, but when that dissent relates to serious British domestic issues and British/occidental centres of power, the BBC vividly practices self-censorship against alternative streams of information.

This makes made the think once more about “BBC BLOGS” – Why do they exist? I’ve suggested one or two reasons in the past. In these blogs/forums you do find subjects like 9-11 and 7-7 getting a bit more of a discussion there, and that’s good, however in those ‘informal’ pages, you will find no links to things like the 9-11 and J7 truth campaigns (if you find one PLEASE let me know !) but it allows the BBC to claim that it has had an even handed approach to matters like the state sponsored terrorist actions of 9-11 and 7-7

I hope all Brits bin their TV, depriving the BBC the TAX which funds it. Its serious documentary works can largely be obtained on the internet, as can much more accurate factual and less prejudicial reports of stories around the world from different organisations.

Here’s hoping TPTB in the Malaysian government come to their senses and release Mr. Petra.

P.S. Please read John Pilgers latest article relating to the perverse (dictator director of BBC newz), Helen Boaden . The article is entitled: “A MURDEROUS THEATRE OF THE ABSURD

And on the subject of balance, here’s a zionist blogger saying

“BBC is trying to rewrite history by lying about Israel, spreading anti-semetic ideas, and make it appear that anyone that is willing to fight Radical Islam is clueless.”

in an article entitled: “BBC Lies About Bush Speech, Then Tries To Cover It Up” Give it a read see if he’s right and I’m wrong.


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
February 2020
« Jul