Child Porn in the UK

I read an article once (which I am so gutted that I never recorded the URL) that tried to estimate the number of paedophiles in the UK, based on crime statistics [I think the investigators might have run some in-depth articles about child p in the Independent or something] . I think it said something like 60,000 were convinced but that reflected only an estimated 10% conviction rate, which, if you choose to believe that to 90% who ‘got off’ were actually guilty (yes, I know, that’s a very ‘dangerous’ thing to do), then that means the actual level of child paedophiles is 600,000 which is about 1% of the UK population.

1 in 100 people would be paedophiles.

That – if accurate – is deeply disturbing.

Peter Oborne was wrong, it’s paedophiles that are the most despised and hated section of society.

Reading the ever good writing by Ian Thorpe over at “Little Nicky Machiavelli” in his article Simon Danczuk Becomes A National Hero one commentator said:

“Good to see that at least ONE politician has some sort of conscience about openly investigating these horrendous crimes”

But I think that praise is far too generous. I would like to reply on Ian’s blog, but I always have difficulty in posting there, so I’ll vent my opinion here:

 

“some sort of conscience” – a pretty corruptible/intimidateable one, verging to the point of irrelevance. If he has information about it – to the point where he previously threatened to say the persons name in parliament, then isn’t he covering up a crime and hence guilty of a crime himself? Same for Edwina Curry the slapper.

I have to say, over the years I have become almost totally disbelieving that what gets through the media isn’t made to go through for a purpose. I mean, I find it incredibly hard to believe that the groundswell against child rapists/soddomists/snuffers/torturers has come about without the nod and wink of someone within the establishment.

Is it a ‘pressure’ game so that those being manipulated play ball in these crucial times?
Who knows? But what we do know is that “important” people involved with this are going to get off scott free and some scruffy loner will get the can.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

On Jon Venables and Child Porn

Jon Venables must NOW declare himself to the world as a sincere effort to recognise his crime sodden past and truly show remorse over Little Jamie Bulger in order to move into the future.

I am not sure if Denise and Jamie’s Dad will think about it, but I’m sure nothing else would be as effective a first step. Actually, I suspect they would feel justice was done if Thompson and Venables were locked away for life.

May I remind you, Venables was the one that the authorities thought had the best chance of rehabilitation. Doesn’t that show you that they are WRONG and that letting them out was wrong too? The fact Venables is now looking at child porn reveals a twisted mind. He killed a toddler – remember the tales that batteries were inserted into James anus? and now Venables is looking at child porn.

Dear lord, this guy wasn’t ‘cured’ he wasn’t ‘rehabilitated’. The authorities screwed up! Stick ’em both in jail, don’t endanger any more kids.

And what the hell is Thompson doing?

THE PUBLIC and Jamies PARENTS (should they wish) have a right to know exactly where these two toddler killers are at any time of day.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10742019

Previous lwtc247 post : James (Jamie) Bulger

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Application of Child porn – Forest Gate.

Nobody has commented yet on the previous post,  which is kind of a pity ‘cos I think it highlights well the ease at which) when man can departs from the pure and unbettered Divine doctrine, and the inherent hypocrisy of such a man made civil code. Oh well. My guess is people are even more scared of discuss tis than what they are about the holocaust lies {lampshades made of skin, soap made of human fat, numbers of victims etc…)

Perhaps we have found the ultimate ‘fear’ weapon, child porn? That is why the police planted child pornography on the electronic devices[1] in the Abdul Kahar household, targeting the Abdul Kahar brothers, better known as the victims of the “Forest Gate” attack, one of whom survived an attempt by the police to kill him.

 

 Dead men don’t talk you see, nor can they refute, fighting tooth an nail against the lies against police planted evidence, as witnessed from the murderous actions of the Metropolitan police force who planted cocaine on the corpse of the Jean Charles de Menezes – a completely innocent man murdered by British establishment death squads, therefore the lies of him being responsible for his own assassination go mostly unchallenged.

Mohammed survided his assassination attempt and the police started getting nervous. A mountain of questions about 7-7, 21-7 and 22-7 were blowing an enormous hole in the official narrative official lie. So the police swine engineered some elaborate rubbish about the aspects of where and how these images were stored.

Get this…

A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said[Ref 1]:

“To transfer to the phone [note: just one of the numberous devices], the suspect would have to have specialist knowledge. There was no evidence that Mr Abdulkahar had possession of, or access to, equipment or the technical knowledge to do so.”

WOAH! too bloody right mate! He didn’t do it at all – it was the bloody tech monkeys in the Met that did it! Perhaps the same ones what did such a crap job on 7-7 and put iron bars the bodies of the 7-7 bombers. If it wasn’t the Met (which it was) then Who the hell put those images there? WHO WHO WHO? Why was there no investigation into such a serious thing? BECASUE IT WAS THE SCUMBAG POLICE, AND THEY WANTED TO BURY IT!

And don’t forget this[Ref 2]…

“The officer who fired the shot which hit Mr Kahar was wearing two pairs of gloves as protection. The officer, known as B6, suffered a loss of sensation in his trigger finger and was unaware that he had fired the shot”

WOAH! Two pairs of gloves??? And wielding a firearm??? – To allow keep the ‘story’ open allowing the killers to help get away with the assassination of MAK. Don’t people see this utter BS that’s going down here? Bloody hell! WAKE UP SMELL THE BLOODY COFFEE!!! We have an serious evil gripping the land. Read that article in the Guardian please, you can see the numerous establishment lies they spew forth in attempting to get away with murder.

Far weaker evidence has been used to presecute child porn offencers. Difference is perhaps, offenders in those cases were genuinely guilty – no difficult answers stemming from a police frame-up to answer.

 I remember how they talked about Bin Laden sending secret codes encrypted in pornographic pictures in the planning of 9-11. All utter BS of course, but BS that nobody challenged. It seems like

Refs:

[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/6092624.stm
[2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1837067,00.html
[3] http://leninology.blogspot.com/2006/10/victims-of-police-shooting-not-evil.html (leninstomb also suspicious of the how ‘specialist knowledge required’ images got there)

–

–