I often slate the BBC for its utterly crap job it and its “journalsts” do. It’s fully deserved and I plan to continue the endevour. But I still read it quite a lot doing a BBCwatch on it if you like – keeping on eye on the sewerage works for you and I. As well as its miserable political news section, its science section is just as crap.
Reading the latest bit of unchallenging scientific moonery on the BBC, my eyes caught this headline:…
US plans permanent base on Moon – 05 Dec 06
Wow. Abitious huh? Imagine all the hard planning and those d0ll0r$ being spent. The real thrust of this blog entry is the sequence of headlines which cummarises the pathetic speils the BBC pumps out without a moments contemplation. Still… the contents of the article are also amusing in their own right.
Here’s some extracts…
blah blah blah…The structure of the base and the exact duties of the astronauts stationed there have not been decided…. blah blah blah……Nor is it clear when the base will begin functioning.
comment:> Must be one HELL of a plan!
blah blah blah…The permanent base will be built near one of the two poles, as these are felt to have a moderate climate and more sunlight – essential if the base is to use solar energy.….then….”It’s exciting,” Shana Dale told the Reuters news agency. “We don’t know as much about the polar regions.”
comment:> Yeah. If I was going to build a base on a new ‘planet’ I’d build it in a place we know the least about too! Like I said… one H E L L of a plan.
Then we are treated to some proof by computer graphics… Aaaaa innit cute!
But get this…. next headline showing how utterly crap the BBC were to simply act as reprinter of words without the slightest challenge to what it was being told.
Lunar dust ‘may harm astronauts’ – 18 Mar 07 | Science/Nature
MAGIC!
–
–
–
–
Recent Comments