Zion Attacks !!!

But not if you read the disgraceful reporting on the BBC.

To the BBC which claims impartiality/neutrality, as uncannily does “fair and balanced” FOX News, the Zionist macabre love of killing Palestinians is only ever mentioned in terms of Palestinian “militants” killed or “Israeli strikes”  – and here we get to the crux – in retaliation to rocket fire.

Over the lst few days especially, the BBC has always made it out as though Zionist Israel only responds to violence by the Palestinians as first aggressors. Claims that are of course ridiculous.

Zionists are always the defenders, never the seeders of death and destruction.

Aah, the fabled Zionist reality inversion strikes again.

It is incredible that the BBC’s pro Zionist bias has been exposed very well over the last decade or so yet it has provided no change at all and the BBC cum BBZ continues to pump out the utter lies and distortions again and again.

I remember some time back George Galloway said words to the effect of: If an Iraqi whose family had been killed by bliar’s lies retaliated and tried to kill Bliar or his family, then it would be justified.

Similarly, I think one could make a case for legitimacy of a victim of the BBC’s propaganda to attack the BBC given its contributory role in the gross oppression and suffering of various peoples across the world, including Palestinians, Arabs and Persians – especially Muslims ones in particular or even Russians.

In fact that logic was used by Clinton and bLiar when NATO attacked a TV station in the former Yugoslavia.

Oh how I look forward to the passing of the BBC Newz (“Newz” because it certainly ain’t ‘News’). But it will always go on, won’t it? Because it’s purpose is to serve the nauseating pro-Zionist British establishment, britain is the mother of Zionist entity known as Israel.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Application of Child porn – Forest Gate.

Nobody has commented yet on the previous post,  which is kind of a pity ‘cos I think it highlights well the ease at which) when man can departs from the pure and unbettered Divine doctrine, and the inherent hypocrisy of such a man made civil code. Oh well. My guess is people are even more scared of discuss tis than what they are about the holocaust lies {lampshades made of skin, soap made of human fat, numbers of victims etc…)

Perhaps we have found the ultimate ‘fear’ weapon, child porn? That is why the police planted child pornography on the electronic devices[1] in the Abdul Kahar household, targeting the Abdul Kahar brothers, better known as the victims of the “Forest Gate” attack, one of whom survived an attempt by the police to kill him.

 

 Dead men don’t talk you see, nor can they refute, fighting tooth an nail against the lies against police planted evidence, as witnessed from the murderous actions of the Metropolitan police force who planted cocaine on the corpse of the Jean Charles de Menezes – a completely innocent man murdered by British establishment death squads, therefore the lies of him being responsible for his own assassination go mostly unchallenged.

Mohammed survided his assassination attempt and the police started getting nervous. A mountain of questions about 7-7, 21-7 and 22-7 were blowing an enormous hole in the official narrative official lie. So the police swine engineered some elaborate rubbish about the aspects of where and how these images were stored.

Get this…

A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said[Ref 1]:

“To transfer to the phone [note: just one of the numberous devices], the suspect would have to have specialist knowledge. There was no evidence that Mr Abdulkahar had possession of, or access to, equipment or the technical knowledge to do so.”

WOAH! too bloody right mate! He didn’t do it at all – it was the bloody tech monkeys in the Met that did it! Perhaps the same ones what did such a crap job on 7-7 and put iron bars the bodies of the 7-7 bombers. If it wasn’t the Met (which it was) then Who the hell put those images there? WHO WHO WHO? Why was there no investigation into such a serious thing? BECASUE IT WAS THE SCUMBAG POLICE, AND THEY WANTED TO BURY IT!

And don’t forget this[Ref 2]…

“The officer who fired the shot which hit Mr Kahar was wearing two pairs of gloves as protection. The officer, known as B6, suffered a loss of sensation in his trigger finger and was unaware that he had fired the shot”

WOAH! Two pairs of gloves??? And wielding a firearm??? – To allow keep the ‘story’ open allowing the killers to help get away with the assassination of MAK. Don’t people see this utter BS that’s going down here? Bloody hell! WAKE UP SMELL THE BLOODY COFFEE!!! We have an serious evil gripping the land. Read that article in the Guardian please, you can see the numerous establishment lies they spew forth in attempting to get away with murder.

Far weaker evidence has been used to presecute child porn offencers. Difference is perhaps, offenders in those cases were genuinely guilty – no difficult answers stemming from a police frame-up to answer.

 I remember how they talked about Bin Laden sending secret codes encrypted in pornographic pictures in the planning of 9-11. All utter BS of course, but BS that nobody challenged. It seems like

Refs:

[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/6092624.stm
[2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1837067,00.html
[3] http://leninology.blogspot.com/2006/10/victims-of-police-shooting-not-evil.html (leninstomb also suspicious of the how ‘specialist knowledge required’ images got there)

–

–