Posts Tagged 'journalism died in the BBC long long ago'

Jim Corr – doing what he feels is right – speaking the truth as he sees it

It really is easy pickings to show the BBC throwing out garbage dressed as journalism.

Simply read a page on its website.

Consequently, it’s really quite boring to keep referring to it, but sometimes I cannot just let it pass unchallenged. While going through it’s swin(dl)e flu nonsense (e.g. computer models of what to do in possible said pandemic cases)


tip: use this image if you want one to illustrate garbage in garbage out.
Do not use google image to look for gigo
unless you like pictures of men is strange shaped underpants.

I spotted a link to Jim Cor and conspiracy, or HIS conspiracy as it said twice in the very short article. Being the BBC it’s gonna try and paint him as a nut-job or anti-Semite (or double jeopardy: both!). As it turns out the BBC(hite) tries to make it look as if these opinions are his and his alone, which of course they are not. It continues…

“Mr Corr said he took an interest in what he calls “geo-politics” – source http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12268558

Oh, so now “geo-politics” is a term, his term, that’s specific to Corr. The BBC really have no shame. And if the BBC ever use that term are they going to put it quotes along with the overtones of eye-rolling ridicule.

Here’s Jim on RTE’s ‘The Late Late Show’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seU4xsz9vsY

P.S. When I lived in Ireland as a youngster I used to watch the show. Gay Byrne (Gaybo as he was affectionately known) used to present it then. But looking back I think that program plus the influence of British culture upon the Irish youth who migrated in droves to the UK in search of jobs when Ireland’s economy was said to be terrible (my, how history repeats – but this time it’s got loads and loads of lovely debt to service too!) was a pivotal point for Ireland as it began to destroy the restraints the Catholic church placed on society. Now, it seems to me,  Ireland is pretty much a polythene version of the neighbouring nightmare neighbour the UK. Shame.

Anyway, reading the “article” I began thinking (re-thinking is more accurate) that it seems (I may be wrong) that people who have time for one conspiracy seem more prone to embrace the other quite well known conspiracies as a package.

The BBC showed this (as of course was their intention) mentioning HAARP / Earthquake causing technology and man made viruses (H1N1) something I actually agree with. And they do it as a way to ‘rubbish’ such conspiracies. The extremes of this are UFO’s. Which hardens my opinion that these fringe conspiracies are disinformation/diversion.

By way of deception thou shalt wage war. A motto المسيح الدجّال‎ would be proud of.

Advertisements

New 7/7 footage: conclusive proof the 4 bombers did it.

Well no, it doesn’t, like nothing about 7/7 does,  but don’t let that stop you from allowing the BBC’s NLP telling you it does.

a) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11546549

[A lesson in NLP tricks!]

Ben Geoghagen:

“This is really chilling footage, I would describe it John”

– BBC Journo once again expressing a personal opinion, but as a BBC journo (the BBC still, incredibly, can successfully draw upon it’s image of the informed and informative ‘trusted’ institution of Britishness), he has an open passageway into your brain, even though you’ve never het him before and know absolutely nothing about him (esp. his political leanings – or how passionate he holds those views and what what extent therefore that he will promote them)

“What you’re about to see…”

NLP ‘preparation’

“I’ll show you the first one. The first one. It’s of H.H. HE exists KX underground station and you see him going into Boots…” [footage1] time = 08:59:46  “it’s part of the property there part of the concourse”

NLP ‘expansion’

[footage2]

“There you can see hi actually entering the shop”

time = 9:05:54-7 (WH Smith sign seen in footage)

“What is striking about all this footage…”

[footage3 – grey] time = 09:53:13-5

“And here is him coming out of KX station onto the main concourse…”

“…what is so striking about it, is the number of people he passes as he wonders outside Kings Cross station.”

At this point the journo talks about the problems/delays/congestion on the tube that day. [back to footage3 – grey] time = 9:53:13- Note almost impossible to identify any person. And he says

“..a lot of people are on their MOBILE PHONES making calls to friends or their bosses saying they are going to be late.”

Really??? Mobile phones at 09:52:29? This is something that should be checked. Note: it’s almost assured the BBC journo didn’t check.

“and here’s H.H. walking with this rucksack amongst them and obviously they are totally oblivious to the danger they face because here’s a man whose carry a bomb on his back and a bomb which he later detonates on the No 30 Bus at Tavistock square and kills 13 people as he does so” – This is lazy pre-concluded supposition. There is no proof he did it. There has been no trial.

[Inside BMA building? footage.  Time 09:42-04. Supposed explosion on the bus at 9:42:18]

yet Bus aerial debris footage: VLW 173 time = 09:34:23 BST

Of course the “BMA? footage time and the ‘aerial blast debris time” footage is inconsistent. They differ by 7min 41seconds and TAKE A LOOK AT THE BIG TREE: The branches on the left hardly move at all. If this wasn’t ‘explained’ to you, you would have virtually no idea it was describing an explosion. There is NO obvious blast movement up or to the right on the trees left hand side. If this ‘blast debris’ was faked I’d not be surprised, esp. as there only seems to be one shot with ‘hazy blobs’ in it.

Journo goes on about

[how much footage was gone through] in order to get good evidence of the movements of this one bomber H.H.”

Who said it was ‘good’ – the journo. He’s giving you his opinion and his opinion is that it’s good. My opinion (and I’m going to cover it up that it is my opinion) is that it’s bullshit footage and it doesn’t prove anything.

“…there were cameras on some of the busses showing you footage on SOME of the busses, showing you the No 30 thirty bus that he eventually got on”

NLP again. And very clever. He ‘covers’ footage from busses, but not a peep from him about a total lack of footage is available from any specific bus he’s supposed to have gotten onto.

“to piece together his movements on that day…”

Yet more NLP commands telling you what to think. And it’s not pieced together. The timelines once again are inconsistent.

“before he detonated his device”

This is NLP ‘reinforcement’

“on that bus” – my emphasis

more ‘reinforcement’ having been told earlier about the No. 30 bus.

Not once does he expose you to anything other than it’s a ‘fact’ the these guys did it. He never said the word likely, supposed, possible or even the commonly used mild get out clause of ‘alleged”

What a terrible so-called journalist this Ben Geoghagen is. Well, that’s probably why he’s working at the BBC.

BBC psycheporn once more

The pro-Zion BBC obviously thinks it’s clever. It believes it can push sexually suggestive pics to keep it’s visitors keep coming back for more. The BBC should stick to comedy and drama, the rest should be disbanded.

Unfortunately I don’t have the time to report as much of the BBC Bernaysian psychological mind tricks as I would like, but sometimes it is just too blatent not to get a mention.

Is this how the BBC thinks of Muslims not in it’s control?
You betcha!

 

Richard Madeley – you can NOT be serious!

Richard Madeley – you can NOT be serious! Tell me you are just missing the attention.

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/8493132.stm

p.s. sorry to follow a Howard Zinn post with one featuring Richard Madeley.

Al-Qaeda’s in the plug hole.

—UPDATED—

Any budding musicians out there with a camcorder?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOlcfuXd_og

ori lyrics

With your sleeper cells throughout the free world
The fear of you is why Obama’s hair is curled

Al Qaeda’s in my backbone
Mullah Omar’s down my knee bone
Yeah Zarqawi’s in my thigh bone
Al Qaeda’s all over

Because of you we kill where and whom we like
Afghani couples married just the other night

Al Qaeda’s in my laptop
Al Qaeda’s in the Tiptop
Al Qaeda made that pitstop
Al Qaeda’s all over

Al Qaeda’s in the local bank
Al Qaeda’s in that ham shank
Al Qaeda’s in my table lamp
Al Qaeda’s all over

Well, you be fake but so few know it, baby
Imposter Sheikh on blurry video, baby
Well, shake, shake, shake
Shake, shake
Shake, shake, shake
Shake, shake, shake
(see the story below)

———————————————————————————

The torrents of pro-war pimping coming from the BBC of late is as
spectacular as the Dubai tower is a hideous use of (fake) money.

I refer to this latest piece of dreadful crap the BBC cheerfully parrots without scrutiny.

The spineless and nauseating soap-box pile of crap the BBC “news” and current affairs department is at it again. Before I give details of the BBC (f)article, here’s a snippet covering the same topic from The TruthSeeker’s website.


http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/link.asp?ID=11923&URL=
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=115378&ionid=351020206

Here’s the BBC (f)article…

http://news.bbc.co.uk
/2/hi/middle_east/8439201.stm

(‘heal the URL yourself by combining the two lines)

In case you missed it, look at the devilish opportunism of phanto-muck raker John Brennan.

This bastard Brennan is trying to demonise and frame Al Awlaki – a Muslim scholar held in DEEP respect and admiration by many, a man who one of my friends said about a month or so ago was put in prison by the Yemeni authorities.

Note also what the the BBC spy correspondent in Yemen says in the side box. i.e. only questioning the risk element of possible UK aggression. Again I ask DOES THAT ATTACK ON YOUR SENSE OF REASON NOT OFFEND YOU? Isn’t it the journo’s responsibility to take the Hawkishness and be critical of it. E.g. report something like this:

“There is no meaningful British connection to claimed acts of terror the US says it has been the target of. Yet the British government have issued numerous statements over the last few days indicating it will involve itself in acts of warfare in Yemen, acts that will assuredly kill yet more innocent people in persuit of US claims that Al Qaeda activity. Given this stance the British government involves many risk factors not least those involving legality….”

But of course the BBC is not going to do that.

Once more we have proof of the BBC acting as a channel for pure lies and hate and as a cheerleader for war. My disgust at the BBC “news” and current affairs department is oceanic. Any journalist with the slightest degree of professionalism would ask these USUKZ pieces of trash for PROOF of what they were saying or at the very least report them as claims should proof not be forthcoming.

BBC supports scorched earth

The media has a massive responsibility to challenge and be critical of EVERYTHING those in positions of power say, and it should be done responsibility, and not (obviously) for ulterior motives. The existence of a characteristic in national media is a very strong sign of a healthy society. Its absence is a sign of a society in deep trouble that’s speeding down the road to collapse, with a blossoming of despotism along the way.

And so I ask ALL of you to REALLY think about what the media is telling you because it has become increasingly politicised and is feeding you enormous amounts of tosh. Please, if you can {I’m going to restate a recently made plea} stop watching the BBC and these foul craft(y)smen  who are busy shaping a hideous world. Get your news from sources (mostly) independent of corporate funding and political subversion. 

It’ll be the death of us, sooner rather than later.

Salam.

News and yet more Newz

One of these comes from a UK government funded corporation, the other from an indpendently funded news base. Guess which is which.

This gives me a sliver of opportunity to slip in some nostalgia…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW8HqoDV_lM

The one at the bottom (the news item that is, not the kid in the video) came from the independently (non government) funded  news base globalresearch.ca the one at the top came from the government funded BBC.

Did you guess correctly?

Good. Now we’ll begin…

errr are you sitting confortably?

Here’s the URL’s if yor interested.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16667
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/default.stm 

Yeah I know, I could have made it tougher. I didn’t play fair – a bit like the BBC really. Well you can probably guess at what’s coming next.

The BBC… hummm where to start? Perhaps this: The BBC is a training camp for journalistic genocide. Its propaganda is flagrant and crass but that’s all it needs to be. A form of Occams razor that billows upon the masses. A presstitite  – the self employeed variety, one that actually looks sexy but inside is a utter mess.

If you are new here, yo might wondering what’s rubbing me up the wrong way? Well look at the BBC headline. Put the routing that dominates your life to the side for just a moment and look at it closely. Think about it.

Can UK US stop extremsim in Yemen?

Oh boy!

It’s implying that Yemen [yes YEMEN – the country, the coutry of 203,850 sq miles (527,970 sq km)]  has extremism in it,  the WHOLE country! If this implication isn’t delibate*, then the journalism presented is the culinary equivalent akin to a hard boiled egg. So now you think Yeme n is an exremist country what other propaganda alpha-waves enter your primed skull?

UK US. Hey, wait a minute. What the HELL does this have to do withthe UK? 
N-O-T-H-I-N-G—A-T—A-L-L    that’s what.

Are you not offended yet at what the BBC is doing to you? Are you not outraged that this disgusting filth? You should be. It’s WORSE than the Nazis! Worse? Yeah because the Nazi’s were nearly 70 years ago! WE should have learned. Actually YOU should have learned!!!! (OK they perverted your schooling – you have an atoms wothh of an excuse)

Why put the UK first? Well the rather descriptice USUK would be frowned upon, a little bit like the planet Uranus properly pronounced “Your Anus” (which is kind of funny really) is now pronunced Your-ran-us a bit like your highess (altho I think your heighness should also be pronounced “Your Anus” – if you said it quickly enough and semi-mumbled it, you might just get away with it :)

But is it really an attempt to avoid saying “YOU SUCK” No. As aluded to before it’s an attempt to rope the UK in to the next phase of the War OF  Terror – one that I think has taken most of us by surprise. It superglue’s us to the United Snakes, or AmeriKKKa as it’s somethimes known. I think I might start thinking of it as Israyhells back yard, or playgroind…. or toilet! An Iraqi friend of mine told me today he thought the US in it’s collapse will break out into a civil war. I think he’s right. The battle lines will be divided roughly between the good decnt salt of the earth people who at some stage say through the rotten corporate mainstream media  and those on the other side that eats and drinks from the Zionist banquet. Unfortantely I think the Zionist side will win and the decent people massacred (ZioMurFeDo – the martial art: The way of the Zionist Murder Fest). Those that survive will be left separating sourting out scrap metal in the FEMA camps. You know the way the Americans (and Ozzies to a degree) are damn lazy and just steal names of places like NEW York, New Orleans, New Hampshire and so on? Well I wonder if there’s a FEMA camp in New Belsen, New Treblinka to New Auschwitz. If not then in some odd way, perhaps there should be. They could twin with any three towns in the Gaza strip. They might have to forgo mutual sighseeing though – and food and water and medicine.

Getting back to “UK US” Not only that, but the question has buried in it some kind of “right” like a moral right or a human right or even a legal right to ‘sort out’ Yemen.

Man, this British BBC junk just gets worse and worse. Bury the BBC before it buried you.

Next the Swin(dl)e Flu… bt actually no comment is needed really. The headline summaries the con pretty well. Yes people died and so its orignins MUST be investigated in the public area and by independent investigators. But of course, this ain’t gonn happen. Wonder what the next lab modified virus wull be and when they will release it, supported by a whoreporate mainstream media announcing early on ‘200 dead’ and then blame others for scaremongering other than themselves. Oh, we’re back to the BBC and its newz again. And maybe next time, they’ll discuss its bird/pig.human make-up having allowed a few days to ‘discover’ its genetic charasteristcs from the time they sent it for analysis – unlike last time. hey guess what… were back at the BBC again!

Notice anything worth being concerned about?

I’ll leave you now with a snippted from the ever worthy Aletho News…

http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/uk-to-follow-us-intervention-in-yemen/

Destroy the BBC before it’s too late

This is a call to all British people the world over to rise up and destroy the BBC before it’s too late! Why? – You are being prepped for yet MORE WAR. Here’s what the ascupulous BBC have on their main page as I type:

I added the second pic of the guy holding two stones which is in a sequence with the first pic at the top. It is important to note the BBC’s words:

“Iranian security forces kill at least four protestors”

 

becasue it goes to prove my point.  and I’ve saved a copy just in case the BBC decide to edit it. I have an early edition.  The main link entitled: Iranian protestors die in clashes is linked to here. People with a memory might well recall this…


source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7988828.stm

Notice the words now… A man who died during the G20 protest was pushed to the pround.

Do you see any difference there? The man died – words which ‘naturalise’ the death, just as 85 year old people die in their sleep.  He died during the G20 protest. Actually it seemed Mr Tomlinson had nothing at all to do with the protest other than the fact that the police themselves had shut off various streets becasue of the protest that others were participating in, and because of this police action, they had prevented Mr Tomlinson from just seemingly trying to go home. the BBC say he wasn’t protesting, but they have previously made the associaton (innocently or not) of Tomlinson with the protest. I might come back to expand on the BBC’s shameful role in this latest pile of Horeshit ‘jounalism’ later, but the point is, when it comes to UK domestic issues involving the police the BBC almost ALWAYS make to appear as thought the police are innocent bystanders when people are killed in the presence of the police.

However with IRAN, the BBC (once again getting that all important first impression into you mind) that the Iranian forces killed people. Yes those nasty Iranians – you know, that country that launches pre-emptive illegla murderous wars killing tens of millions of ordinary people for over 100 years, fixes it’s intelligence around the police, actually has nuclear weapons and uses them against innocent people. OOOPS! sorry, that isn’t Iran at all! In fact, it’s the Unites Snakes and its pal the UK. Yes, that’s right, Iran is the total opposite, it does NONE of those things.

Yet here we have the BBC that has conducted a coroner and police investigation, taken eye witness statements, cross-checked witnesses, recorded and analysed the forensic evidence at the scene, including ballistics tests, conduced the courtroom trial and all this within a few hours, and arrived at an unbaised and clear  judgeemt that the Iranisan security to be 100% guilty of murder. 

And to answer the bipolar-ites (bipolites), No, I don’t “love” Iran (or Russia or China) because I hate the British establishment, however it MUST be said, the Iranian government hardly resister on the ‘crappy country/governments’ league table compared to the scum that is the US and UK.

That the BBC does these dirty mind games, is well documented, for example in the Media Lens book: “Newspeak in the 21st century”

The “horse shitometer” has been reading higher than usual recently. From Sudan to the Philippines the War OF Terror goes on and the next most important part of it is the likely Pakistan civil war seeing USUK military invention, and Israyhell/US/UK (USUKZ) initiating war against Iran.

So How to destroy the BBC?

Violence in this case is stupid. Instead, simply don’t but a TV licence and don’t let any supposed TV licence inspectors to enter your house. Not watchin the telly is probably better. If you see an advert on the BBC persuade yourself that the adversts you see on the BBC would actully transpire to make you NOT buy that product – a kind of reverse adverting strategy if you will.

If you don’t destroy the BBC this monstor of a mind warp will continue to eat away at you’re sence of justice.

DESTROY THE BBC, Don’t watch/listen/read it’s rubbish.\

Time is of the essence!

 


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
May 2019
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Advertisements