Bridget Dunne, July 7th Campaign, speaks at SCADs conference

The independent  investigator bridget would rather you didn’t know of was Dr Nick Kollerstrom. Nick – while others may have been fixated with power surges – kickstarted the 7/7 truth movement with him uncovering the fact the 7:40am train, which the supposed bombers caught, was actually cancelled that day.

–

–

You can see Nick in a recent interview here: http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=72&part=1

–

Here’s a questioning voice, Paul Taylor, of which I share some views (but I don’t ‘love’ my country)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Another official trampling on July 7th truth.

This blog came about primarily as a result of needing {in a ‘not in my name‘ type way} to voice-out rejection of – what I see as being – an ocean of officially created, sanctioned and encouraged lies regarding the terrorist attacks of 9-11 and 7-7 as well as to facilitate discussion of those two events. ‘Success’ at doing this isn’t important at all; simply, to remain quiet, would be a crime.

That said, then to all intents and purposes, it’s almost compulsory that I  notify passing readers about websites that are doing standard-bearing, sterling-efforts in pursuit of 7th July 2005 truth.

The links are ripped from Stef, but that’s to his credit. One link I will add to Stef’s, is to that of Nick Kollerstrom, who along with a few others, may offer alternative narratives (partial or full). It must be said this ‘alternative anrrative’ approach is strongly disliked by some, but it’s there. I feel this is important to add NK’s site, because although good ‘J7 truths’ method is, I believe in the latter stages of more mature official narratives, that it will have to change. I’m not interested in debating the philosophical aspects of that belief, other than to sat that it seems likely to me that should the govt plug the gaping holes in their ripping yarn of 7/7 then that in no way means any competing narratives is null and void. Other narratives may still be possible. Fingers will be put in the dam until it is just passible/palusible to the majority of the public, thereby allowing more minor, outstanding questions, to pass. Such is the power of states – they monopolise.

And if there is a deadly dark secret to 7/7 (and 9-11) e.g. false flag / inside job, then this barely passible/get-by hogging the limelight is to be fully expected and we must all be aware of it. There is simply no way the full deadly plots,  will be allowed to gain the majority of publicity or acceptance. No way!

And there could well be a point when the govt says case closed, simply ignoring any remaining (few) voices on matters of concern relating to 7-7.

This simple post is evolving into an essay!

1. J7 Homepage
2. J7 Forum
3. *** J7 Inquests Blog ***
4. Any thing that defies my sense of reason – The Antagonist
5. http://stefzucconi.blogspot.com – Stef  Zucconi, Famous for 15 megapixels
6. Wideshut
7. Howard Beale’s News Hour
8. Official 7/7 Inquest Site
9. http://terroronthetube.co.uk/ – Nick Kollerstrom (khan widow banned from inquest)

Anyone interested in the 7-7 (and we should ALL be!) then please check out those links periodically.

By the way, the title of this post is a result of the totally dreadful way the inquest has been going over the last two weeks. I am not however surprised. And the lego thing is symbolic of the respect that officialdom has shown for the truth

Because it’s the truth that matters, not whether we agree or otherwise.

Cheers.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

New 7/7 footage: conclusive proof the 4 bombers did it.

Well no, it doesn’t, like nothing about 7/7 does,  but don’t let that stop you from allowing the BBC’s NLP telling you it does.

a) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11546549

[A lesson in NLP tricks!]

Ben Geoghagen:

“This is really chilling footage, I would describe it John”

– BBC Journo once again expressing a personal opinion, but as a BBC journo (the BBC still, incredibly, can successfully draw upon it’s image of the informed and informative ‘trusted’ institution of Britishness), he has an open passageway into your brain, even though you’ve never het him before and know absolutely nothing about him (esp. his political leanings – or how passionate he holds those views and what what extent therefore that he will promote them)

“What you’re about to see…”

NLP ‘preparation’

“I’ll show you the first one. The first one. It’s of H.H. HE exists KX underground station and you see him going into Boots…” [footage1] time = 08:59:46  “it’s part of the property there part of the concourse”

NLP ‘expansion’

[footage2]

“There you can see hi actually entering the shop”

time = 9:05:54-7 (WH Smith sign seen in footage)

“What is striking about all this footage…”

[footage3 – grey] time = 09:53:13-5

“And here is him coming out of KX station onto the main concourse…”

“…what is so striking about it, is the number of people he passes as he wonders outside Kings Cross station.”

At this point the journo talks about the problems/delays/congestion on the tube that day. [back to footage3 – grey] time = 9:53:13- Note almost impossible to identify any person. And he says

“..a lot of people are on their MOBILE PHONES making calls to friends or their bosses saying they are going to be late.”

Really??? Mobile phones at 09:52:29? This is something that should be checked. Note: it’s almost assured the BBC journo didn’t check.

“and here’s H.H. walking with this rucksack amongst them and obviously they are totally oblivious to the danger they face because here’s a man whose carry a bomb on his back and a bomb which he later detonates on the No 30 Bus at Tavistock square and kills 13 people as he does so” – This is lazy pre-concluded supposition. There is no proof he did it. There has been no trial.

[Inside BMA building? footage.  Time 09:42-04. Supposed explosion on the bus at 9:42:18]

yet Bus aerial debris footage: VLW 173 time = 09:34:23 BST

Of course the “BMA? footage time and the ‘aerial blast debris time” footage is inconsistent. They differ by 7min 41seconds and TAKE A LOOK AT THE BIG TREE: The branches on the left hardly move at all. If this wasn’t ‘explained’ to you, you would have virtually no idea it was describing an explosion. There is NO obvious blast movement up or to the right on the trees left hand side. If this ‘blast debris’ was faked I’d not be surprised, esp. as there only seems to be one shot with ‘hazy blobs’ in it.

Journo goes on about

[how much footage was gone through] in order to get good evidence of the movements of this one bomber H.H.”

Who said it was ‘good’ – the journo. He’s giving you his opinion and his opinion is that it’s good. My opinion (and I’m going to cover it up that it is my opinion) is that it’s bullshit footage and it doesn’t prove anything.

“…there were cameras on some of the busses showing you footage on SOME of the busses, showing you the No 30 thirty bus that he eventually got on”

NLP again. And very clever. He ‘covers’ footage from busses, but not a peep from him about a total lack of footage is available from any specific bus he’s supposed to have gotten onto.

“to piece together his movements on that day…”

Yet more NLP commands telling you what to think. And it’s not pieced together. The timelines once again are inconsistent.

“before he detonated his device”

This is NLP ‘reinforcement’

“on that bus” – my emphasis

more ‘reinforcement’ having been told earlier about the No. 30 bus.

Not once does he expose you to anything other than it’s a ‘fact’ the these guys did it. He never said the word likely, supposed, possible or even the commonly used mild get out clause of ‘alleged”

What a terrible so-called journalist this Ben Geoghagen is. Well, that’s probably why he’s working at the BBC.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Oh dear 7/7

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69M_GhOb8Ug 

Much stupidity on display here, e.g. 19:38 – 21:31 and especially 20:22 – 21:31 by  mental trollop Houriya Ahmad.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

 

MS give herr mudjesty’s government a lesson in photoshopping

 

–

–

–

–

–

Shady 7-7 Terror suspect wanted for questioning: Peter Power

Peter “Powderkeg” Power

Preface:

Peter Power a man who is number one on my list of people that should be intensively questioned about the July 7 bombings in London 2005, is a man of two identities.

One is the public face – that of the serious (an unelected of course) “anti”-terror professional who apparently the country needs to defend it from dangerous Muslims of who, possess wondrous powers of summoning from the ether, grand quantites of purified chemicals with which magical bombs are created, or fanatical Muslims that really should just learn to sit down quietly whilst Aznar BuSh bLiar and little Jonnie Coward gorge themselves on Abu Graib pictures and figures of 1,000,000+++ slaughtered.

The other face is the face Peter would rather you didn’t know, and the establishment are going very far to hide.

Even from what information warriors have gleaned (our thanks to them), Peter’s two faces are in such opposition to each other that questioning and investigation into the whole of this mans life and those around him, becomes even more pressing.

In fact the breadth of Peter’s dichotomy has inspired plans for the the latest potential dot com megabuster, which is an improved version of facebook called: 2facedbook. Here’s a picture of Peter at its secret launching on 7th July 2005. If you look closely enough you can see that actually the hairs on the back of his neck are not standing upright at all!

   

Here’s an extract about Peter’s amazing life, best consumed from the source…

J7: July 7th Truth Campaign Blog

The blog of the July 7th Truth Campaign

Thursday, 7 February 2008

J7 EXCLUSIVE: Peter Power Dorset Police Suspension & the DPP File

On July 7th 2005, Peter Power was running a terror exercise which, in his own words that evening, was “based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!“. He has since refused to give a more detailed account of his activities that day, for some reason believing that the commercial interests of his client, which require confidentiality, are more important than the public interest in incidents which resulted in many deaths and injuries. Disappointingly, the media appears to share that belief as it has not insisted on him making a credible full disclosure. Instead, it continues to present him with regular opportunities to propagate his views on such matters as the necessity of a 90 day detention period.

J7 has discovered, though, that Peter Power was once the subject of a file passed to the Director of Public Prosecution as a result of an investigation by Dorset Police. This is all the more remarkable because, at the time, Peter Power was a Superintendent in the Dorset Police Force! Read the full story here. He retired from Dorset Police, which had suspended him on full pay, on the grounds of ill health before any decision was taken by the DPP on whether to act upon the file.

— Go here and then here to read the rest of this important development —

–

–

–

–

–

–