New 7/7 footage: conclusive proof the 4 bombers did it.

Well no, it doesn’t, like nothing about 7/7 does,  but don’t let that stop you from allowing the BBC’s NLP telling you it does.

a) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11546549

[A lesson in NLP tricks!]

Ben Geoghagen:

“This is really chilling footage, I would describe it John”

– BBC Journo once again expressing a personal opinion, but as a BBC journo (the BBC still, incredibly, can successfully draw upon it’s image of the informed and informative ‘trusted’ institution of Britishness), he has an open passageway into your brain, even though you’ve never het him before and know absolutely nothing about him (esp. his political leanings – or how passionate he holds those views and what what extent therefore that he will promote them)

“What you’re about to see…”

NLP ‘preparation’

“I’ll show you the first one. The first one. It’s of H.H. HE exists KX underground station and you see him going into Boots…” [footage1] time = 08:59:46  “it’s part of the property there part of the concourse”

NLP ‘expansion’

[footage2]

“There you can see hi actually entering the shop”

time = 9:05:54-7 (WH Smith sign seen in footage)

“What is striking about all this footage…”

[footage3 – grey] time = 09:53:13-5

“And here is him coming out of KX station onto the main concourse…”

“…what is so striking about it, is the number of people he passes as he wonders outside Kings Cross station.”

At this point the journo talks about the problems/delays/congestion on the tube that day. [back to footage3 – grey] time = 9:53:13- Note almost impossible to identify any person. And he says

“..a lot of people are on their MOBILE PHONES making calls to friends or their bosses saying they are going to be late.”

Really??? Mobile phones at 09:52:29? This is something that should be checked. Note: it’s almost assured the BBC journo didn’t check.

“and here’s H.H. walking with this rucksack amongst them and obviously they are totally oblivious to the danger they face because here’s a man whose carry a bomb on his back and a bomb which he later detonates on the No 30 Bus at Tavistock square and kills 13 people as he does so” – This is lazy pre-concluded supposition. There is no proof he did it. There has been no trial.

[Inside BMA building? footage.  Time 09:42-04. Supposed explosion on the bus at 9:42:18]

yet Bus aerial debris footage: VLW 173 time = 09:34:23 BST

Of course the “BMA? footage time and the ‘aerial blast debris time” footage is inconsistent. They differ by 7min 41seconds and TAKE A LOOK AT THE BIG TREE: The branches on the left hardly move at all. If this wasn’t ‘explained’ to you, you would have virtually no idea it was describing an explosion. There is NO obvious blast movement up or to the right on the trees left hand side. If this ‘blast debris’ was faked I’d not be surprised, esp. as there only seems to be one shot with ‘hazy blobs’ in it.

Journo goes on about

[how much footage was gone through] in order to get good evidence of the movements of this one bomber H.H.”

Who said it was ‘good’ – the journo. He’s giving you his opinion and his opinion is that it’s good. My opinion (and I’m going to cover it up that it is my opinion) is that it’s bullshit footage and it doesn’t prove anything.

“…there were cameras on some of the busses showing you footage on SOME of the busses, showing you the No 30 thirty bus that he eventually got on”

NLP again. And very clever. He ‘covers’ footage from busses, but not a peep from him about a total lack of footage is available from any specific bus he’s supposed to have gotten onto.

“to piece together his movements on that day…”

Yet more NLP commands telling you what to think. And it’s not pieced together. The timelines once again are inconsistent.

“before he detonated his device”

This is NLP ‘reinforcement’

“on that bus” – my emphasis

more ‘reinforcement’ having been told earlier about the No. 30 bus.

Not once does he expose you to anything other than it’s a ‘fact’ the these guys did it. He never said the word likely, supposed, possible or even the commonly used mild get out clause of ‘alleged”

What a terrible so-called journalist this Ben Geoghagen is. Well, that’s probably why he’s working at the BBC.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

MS give herr mudjesty’s government a lesson in photoshopping

 

–

–

–

–

–

February and MK-ULTRA

 
image c/o www.sprword.com

 When I first heard of MK-Ultra, I scoffed and rolled my eyes. Maybe it was the goofy name which certainly to me, resonated of Roswell/Area 51/Nirabu kind of things and so on, and those latter ‘conspiracies’ seem mostly hearsay and frankly a bit of a waste of time really. 

But thing is, MK-Ultra was actually true!!

 

The US government <b>did</b> engage in mind control research to for civilian and military purposes. Some of the experiments actually used psychoactive drugs such as LSD on unwary people. It is well documented. The US government is on record as paying compensation to a handful of its victims.

 

Nazi scientists, syphilis tests on African Americans, radioisotope poisoning, lobotomies of the mentally-ill, electric shocks all related to the physical and mental ‘research’ in the country that proclaims ‘God shed his grace on thee’. What a terrible slur towards God that is.

 

I’ll come back onto MK-Ultra a wee bit later.

 

So, at the end of this week, for my sins, I was watching TV. One of Darren Browns shows came on. It was called ‘The Heist’ (2006), and it was absolutely <b>extraordinary</b>

 THE HEIST (2006)
(If anyone knows of a Google link to ‘the heist’ plz let me know – I can’t access streaming video sites at the mo.)    

Basically, he programmed people without their realisation, which on exposure to visual and kinaesthetic stimuli, would predictably commit a major crime: robbing a security guard at gunpoint (the gun was a toy gun) who was carrying ‘valuables boxes’ (£100K cash in money although this is irrelevant as the contents of the boxes were not known to the participants) who was just about to load them into the security van parked in the street in the City of London. In effect, these people were to lose control over their own actions, and/or were going to give in to their dark side, albeit fertilized.

 

When the program started I didn’t really get what was going on. But later, I think when they were in a green room being conditioned, MK-Ultra popped into my head and it struck me the Darren Brown was employing knowledge associated with that. It was fascinating to see the psychology that was going on.

 

I had seen a previously aired, theatre based show by Mr. Brown, who at the end claimed to use similar techniques. Some of those techniques were employed in ‘The Heist’. In the theatre show, I believed I could have explained away virtually all it as a magicians ‘slight of hand’ and so on, but for one thing: If he wasn’t actually steering the minds of these people as he claimed, then he would have to had an entire audience of plants to ensure it’s success – i.e. his show was purely for the folks watching on TV, not in the theatre. Although I suspected one or two people might have been deliberately ‘selected’ I didn’t get the impression that the whole audience was in on it. Therefore, the alternative explanation: that he did indeed use the power of suggestion to make his objective a success was my conclusion.

 

I never thought of MK-Ultra during that theatre show, as there was no element of bad intent, and at the end I was left thinking that it was very possible he was employing a highly skilled degree of neuro linguistic programming (NLP) which I studied as a ‘module’ at University.

  

You really should watch ‘The Heist’ to see for yourself this very possible and powerful practice and understand what I’m going to write about below, and you really should also ponder on this… Darren Brown stated in ‘The Heist’ that he only programmed them for 5 hours. That’s right. 5 hours to program someone to carry out a very serious crime. That is incredible – and indicates a very big danger.

 

The end of the program was chilling, but at least three things that deserve a specific mention of a few things of extra spookiness which left me in a mild state of shock afterwards.

  

At the end, we were shown the participant walking down a drizzle soaked street on a dark day, presumably very early morning. There was a slight kink in the road due to what looked like a building jutting out a metre or two into the street compared to the other buildings in the street at that point. A shot of the participant from behind was shown and immediately on seeing this, I thought of the highly questionably CCTV image supposedly taken outside Luton train station in which it is claimed to showing the supposed July 7th bombers. My eyes widened at that point.

 

Not only that, but on the same side of the street that the participant was walking down, stuck up on the kink was a narrow yet long poster showing a womans legs and a hand on the upper leg suggesting a rubbing of the leg. On the poster was the words ‘DO IT!’ at the bottom. The rubbing of the leg formed part of their preconditioning and was one of the one visual cue to respond to the subliminally implanted suggestions, along with the ‘DO IT!’ words that appeared on the poster.

 

So what is chilling about this? Well, because again the instant I saw it, this poster came to my mind…

   

(full and hi-res picture here)

 

This ‘poster’ is of course the one of the Tavistock Square No 30 bus bomb that detonated on a Thursday morning on the 7th of July 2005, killing and injuring many people.

 

In the show, the colour green was also used as part of the programming, as was a Jackson 5 song called ‘Can You Feel It?’ which was played to them by a car that just happened to be ‘passing’ by, all designed to make their  programming rise up and take control of them, as the individual participant walked down that street.

 

After all these audio visual taps, 3 out of the 4 participants pulled out their toy gun and robbed the security guard in a way that strongly resembled the aspects of the power programming Brown has instilled within them.

 

After the participant robbed the guard, the film crew, previously hidden, came out from all directions and surrounded the participant who was trying to run away, and the expressions on the thief’s face was either the best EVER acting I’ve seen by anyone, OR, it showed that they were infact in a totally different psychological state to what is their normality. Only when they saw Darren Brown did they seem to snap back to their former selves.

 

So?

 

Well, given the strong associations with 7-7 that kept hitting me during the climax, and that if Darren brown can achieve such an act of mind manipulation after just 5 hours of programming, I started wondering to myself saying “Could something similar to the London bombers have taken place? Were they subjected to something similar? Just ordinary people who perhaps were consciously directive of being part of an exercise that day, only to have someone waiting to set off a number of triggers to make then ‘fire’ off their bombs, they thought may have just been props?

 

I would have thought before that show, even with a brief knowledge of NLP, that it was most unlikely, but now I feel it is a very real possibility, it also helps explain a few other questions I had.

 

Pre-heist, In just 5 hours, Darren Brown used the following while programming these people:

 

Colour: Green and logo.

Audio:  Jackson 5 song ‘Can You Feel It’

Physical association:  Leg rubbing attached to empowerment)

Key word: DO IT!

Taste of illegality: Stealing sweets

Meditation: Thought of energies flowing through the body

He also probed their obedience to a perceived knowledgeable person in authority, using close repeat of the famous 1963 Stanley Milgram experiment where a scientist convinced a member of the public to administer lethal electric shocks to someone else (the civvie wasn’t aware the shocks weren’t genuine).

 

On the day of the heist,

Colour: Green and logo.

Audio:  Same Jackson 5 song

Depiction of Leg rubbing along with the words DO IT! was used on the poster.

The participant belief in a Chi energy or strong use of assertion was used

 

And when you consider that these people were only there in the first place because they were supposed to meet Darren Brown, but got side-tracked into stealing from a security van, makes the power of their manipulation even more incredible and creepy.

 

Even the 4th participant who didn’t actually try and steal, had a look in his face as if he was seriously thinking about the robbery that he had the potential to do it, but was dismissing it in his mind as we walked past the guard and van.

 

We must ask, is all this in ‘The Heist’ fake? The way the participants acted once they were surrounded, which if you watch it, you will see that their movements, facial expressions and so forth looks really really genuine. Because of that I don’t think it was fake. Not just because of that, but because there are broadcasting regulations that prohibit fake/scripted shows from appearing real without stipulating as such. I think it is genuine demonstration of mind manipulation.

 

With regards to 7-7, was the ‘terror’ poster on the bus significant? What about the Kingstar van? Was any particular music playing that morning? Was any scent dispersed? How about on the tubes? There are currently too many unknowns to answer these questions but I’ll certainly be keeping an eye out for any reports mentioning such things.

 

But that’s not all. I stated the program was made in 2006. That’s  almost one year AFTER the 7-7 bombings (depending on the month of production which I guess was summer – given the light and the very empty streets – likely to be 4am morning).

 

Darren Brown said the police had sealed off a RADIUS of 200 metres in the surrounding and a camera shot of a police helicopter was seen in the sky {whether this helicopter was part of the cordon is not possible to discern}. But, you may well remember that the filthy disgrace of a human, none other than blood drinking mass murderer, the very repugnant Tony bLiar, said to conduct an independent enquiry of 7-7 would be a ludicrous diversion. A crass statement which induces the same bewilderment in me today as it did then.

 

His argument was that it would waste time and resources of those who are trying to stop such terrorist acts and so forth is what Count bLiar and his cultists chant. Well you butchering fascist pig, what about the polices involvement in this show? Or at football matches ever week (where private security firms could be present).

 

Scum sucker bLiar’s argument is of course easy to destroy because it based on a lie. That wasn’t the reason why he denied any enquiry. He doesn’t want it because as is my personal firm belief, that elements within the UK establishment were involved in the horrific mass slaughter that took place that day.

–

–

–

–

–

–