Posts Tagged 'london bombings.'

Terror on the Tube 3rd Ed available now.

I’ve been busy of late so missed Nick Kollerstroms post on the matter.

Best to go to Nick’s website and read what he has to say about it. I’ve got the 2nd edition and thought it a very good book for its analysis of 7/7, I WILL be buying the third edition.

My thanks to Nick Kollerstrom for all his superb work investigating the July 6 2005 London bombings.

3rd edition

TATP – a discussion wrt British domestic terrorism

The involvement of TATP with regards to 7-7 and Richard Reid (the shoe bomber) are deeply puzzling.

The “yes it was – no it wasn’t – were still waiting for confirmation – dunno – don’t care” stance by the authorities with regards to its use in terrorist acts (both carried out and supposedly thwarted) involving the UK and Britons is damning. Are they not ashamed of their lackadaisical attitude? It is nothing short of a spit in the eye of those killed, those sent into mourning and the rest of us who have to live in the residual climate of fear – a fear entirely the fault of scum like Tony Blair and the rest of the trash who took it upom themselves to sacntion the snuffing out of over a million lives.

How can we explain the strange yes/no/never-confirmed involvement of TATP in 7-7?

The result of this TATP unknown are:

a) It has muddied the waters so as to enable any senario difficult to prove.
b) At first sight it can significantly lessen the “which military did it come from” question about 7-7, given that there were also reports of military grade explosives used in 7-7.
c) It enables the authorities in the future to apportion blame on anybody they so choose should any similar event happen becasue TATP is as they would have us believe is “Embarrassingly simple”[make1] to make and it can kill. Therefore, all of us are potentially just a few simple steps from being bombed.

Those are pretty handy outcomes if indeed the elements of the state were involved in 7-7, either from a LIHOP or MYHOP point of view.

Not only were there turbid waters in relation to the identity of the explosives used, but also specifically with regards to the properties of TATP. This issue, a bit like WTC-7 is in relation to 9-11, has the scent of an Achilles heel about it so I’ve been looking to it a bit more into the TATP case and what I found made me a bit more suspicious. Unsurprizingly there are links to Isreal involved.

Sadly whenever Isreal is mentioned, the brigade often making up the pages in “Hello” magazine, who think well within the boundary of mainstream perception; talking heads like Jeremy Beadle impersonator David Arronovich, Nick Cohen and the rest, try and use inclusion of Israel/Zionism as means to nullify honest discussion, readying accusations of “anti-Semetism”, “Holocaust denier”, and the grand ol opry herself: “Nazi sympathiser” to be fired off at will. Reluctance or dismissal of “things Israel” into 9-11 and 7-7 have been voiced by skeptics of those official naratives in the past, but at least those skeptics consider on it’s merits the information provided.

The Israel content has to do with Prof EHUD KEINAN[p1, p2] who is almost exclusively referenced in mainstream media (MSM) reportage of the properties of TATP. These properties seemingly cause contradiction and cause confusion in making headway in understanding the mechanics of 7-7. Now it could well be that Prof Keinan is quoted simply becasue he is an expert in the field, and he is an established scientist, but to me it goes deeper than that becasue there are no reports of Isreali governmental pressure of Keinan to stop what he says about TATP – which causes a lot of “problems” for the UK narrative.

It’s not too unreasonable to think that the UK govenrment and Israel have the closest of relationships (no not these types of relationships) so a word from the UK govt, to the Isreali govt inorder to stop this man talking (or change his tune) and making the British look like baffoons, isn’t ufounded. Especially when one considers the UK gave birth to Israel. It ignored Haganah terrorist atrocities agaisnt British people, It protected the Zionist state from being facing destruction, and it provided illicit nuclear materials to it with which it used to create about 150 nuclear warheads.

The reportage claims:

a)  TATP doesn’t liberate heat or act as in incendiary when it detonates[2]. It’s ‘the burn problem’. There was burning on 7-7.

b) The energy/detonation problem. Given the near zero energy output of detonating TATP, the energy input to initiate detonation would make TATP far too dangerous to make, transport and use. Page table 9.1 gives the activation energy of nitrtoglycerine as being 36.0 kcal/mol[x4] which is almost exactly the same as the activation energy of TATP, being 36.3 kcal/mole[a1]. The shock-detonation properties of nitro are well known and it has long been regarded as being to hazourdous to use.

c) TATP can be rapidly detected [a2] by adding a cationic complexing agent (Na+) and then characterised by simple MS (my previous post on the subject gives one such MS) But TATP can also be detected by a device that looks like a pen[pet1, 2]. Interesting reference [pet1] above contains this quote

“Yet [3 weeks after 9-11 Ehud Keinan carrying] a vial holding two grams of triacetone triperoxide (TATP), an improvised plastic explosive, went [through an AIRPORT]  completely undetected.”

Update: Had Keinan been a muslim, he’d be rotting, tortured daily in Guantanamo bay camp Delta and quite possibly dead. I do believe Mr. Keinan has violated laws in doing this. Why is nobody bringing charges agaist this man who too material with the explosive power of TNT and detonation profile similiar to nitroglycerine?

td) It also has explosive power comparable to TNT [d1, d2] – so there is no need for military explosives!

e) The synthesis problem. It seems problematic ficult or improbable to make TATP from commercially available products {Caveat: this is opnionated. I haven’t been able to make an exhaustive search, although one reference [old1- partial access only]  indicates 50% peroxide was used. It seems difficult to get over 35% {“technical grade”} without purifying it and its decomposition seems problematic in the presence of imputities like transition metals.  Update: One reference[re30] says “30% H2O2 is needed to create Soluble fuels (acetone, ethanol, glycerol) will detonate on admixture with peroxide of over 30% concentration, the violence increasing with concentration.” So the ‘bombers’ must have either have purchased 30% H2O2 and or purified up to that degree. One must search for records of purchases or apparatus to ensure the necessary purification. Both of which I can find no record of. 

The Isreal connection to public perceptions of TATP and therefore 7/7 in relation to relating to Professor Ehud Keinan: Dean of the Faculty of Chemistry, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (TIIT) is clear. It must me said that it’s entirely possible he may be being entirely truthful in what he says and it is VERY important to state Keinan is NOT THE ONLY source of such contradictory information, but in my opinion, he is disproportionalely cited by the mainstream media, made all the more strange when he says

“Most of my research has nothing to with explosives,”… “I work on drug discovery to treat asthma, cancer and ventricular fibrillation [an electrical disorder in the heart].” – Ref:[pet1]

 I will try and post more on TATP and 7-7 as time goes on, I’m very busy and can only give these dynamic posts, but do so as I feel if I don’t publish now, I never will.

[make1] = Panorama journalist in discussion Prof EHUD KEINAN Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa

[x4] Thermal Decomposition and Combustion of Explosives and Propellants By G. B. Manelis, G Manelis Manelis

[a1] Scientific paper: Decomposition of Triacetone Triperoxide Is an Entropic
Explosion, Ehud Keinan is cited His name appears at the end of the workers which usually means his input is minimal, however it is there and so he does have some involvement.



[2] Referencing Prof EHUD KEINAN. Note: this is an Isreali government website.

[3] Intresting read about Isreali aggression.

[a2] Scientific paper “Rapid trace detection of triacetone triperoxide (TATP) by complexation reactions during desorption electrospray ionization 


[d1] B. T. Fedoroff, Encyclopedia of Explosives and Related Items, Vol. 1, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, NJ, 1960, pp. A42–A45.

[d2] 11  J. Yinon, Forensic and environmental detection of explosives, John Wiley, Chichester, NY, 1999, pp. 10–11.\

[old1] Scientific paper: “Studies in Organic Peroxides. XXVI. Organic Peroxides Derived from Acetone and Hydrogen Peroxide,”  N. A. Milas and A. Golubovic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959, 81, 6461–6462

[re30] Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 1198. **PEER REVIEWED**

On: Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmad’s – The London Bombings – an Independent inquiry

After a somewhat tasteless and expensive Mexican meal (save for the Tabasco) a couple of days ago, I happened to catch one of my local bookstores just before they closed for the night. After the religion section, I went to the politics section, which being adjacent, brought a wee smile to my non-secular chops.


I saw Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmad’s – The London Bombings – an Independent inquiry, picked it up without hesitation and bought it (along with a book on the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – a subject I have always resisted doing significant research into).


Nafeez’s 7-7 book
‘The London Bombings – an Independent inquiry’
NB: The asian version I bught has a the No 20 bus depicted.
Should mention the authors publication date is 2006.


Buying Nafeez’s book may have a little bit hasty I thought to myself on reaching home, discovering quite a few pages had “Section removed for legal reasons” throughout. Gurrrr. Those pages were probably going to be the juiciest bits. Perhaps Nafeez can ‘do a Craig Murray’ and let me know where I can read them :)

 A quick flick and scan of the index didn’t find any mention of J7 – which was disappointing, No index mention usually means no mention whatsoever, but I’m presently only about 10% through it.

 And whilst flicking, It seemed as if little else other than the ‘blowback theory’ was going to see the light of day. No conspiracy, no ‘false-flag’, no dark clouds emanating from the numerous UK Ministry’s of Death. Nothing, but perhaps a light covering of grey highland mist because they could have prevented it but somehow failed to do so.

 The synopsis on the back cover and the 10% read thus far sees Nafeez pushing: Al-Qaeda is a Large scale, highly organised interconnected network including Serbian mafia (yawn, it had to be Serbian didn’t it!) etc, but because there are associations with the CIA and MI6 with these organisations, disinformation has been fudge-mixed into 7-7 revelations so that the MegaTerror plc and it’s links to the CIA and MI6 etc wouldn’t be exposed.

 Which is of course utter nonsense that the Serbian Mafia (and who else should we pick, ah! Iranians, ummm, Sudanese government officials, North Koreans…) would have no qualms about helping Al-Qaeda to take over the world (or whatever bum-fluff someone else wants to make up about them) and is more suited to the output of a USUK graduate in propaganda.


Nafeez quotes a large array of Newspaper articles and official sounding people one might suspect are ‘people close to being in the know’, which for what it’s worth has its merits. So what is it worth? Not much I’m afraid.

 The MSM on 7-7 seemingly avoid conspiracy, other than fully embracing the official conspiracy documented by the government narrative, and perhaps the odd occasion where it is “discussed” for the purposes to ridicule. Am I wrong in thinking there are quite a few people out there who do lean towards the position that Blair knew the bombs were coming? and if so, why aren’t these people getting airtime? Why aren’t people who know about the fraud that is banking and paper money on the air. Isn’t that public interest?


This pic of Katie (looking spookily like Liza Minelli) came up when searching for Mainstream Media :)


Other than the odd slip-through, MSM reportage serves its owners and rarely encourages you to take a look at the alternatives in an intelligent and serious way. If I tuned into the Al-Qaeda breakfast time special hosted by fat and blurry bin Laden, I’d think the world was full of fornicating Satans that needed to be eradicated because Fattie Laden or Houdini Aiman Zawahiri said so – That is strangely enough, apart from all the fornicating Satans like the Serbian Mafia and so on who do business with Al-Qaeda.


In only reporting MSM, Nafeez falls into the other camp. And we all know the MSM is littered with intelligence agents. Just like dear Frankie, Frank “Khobar” Gardiner, the BBC’s “security expert”. He while investigating the Khobar bombings got shot. Oh, by the way Franks mini-Qur’ans which he carries (or used to before someone found out his game and shot him) in the ass pocket of his trousers weren’t to try and convince people he was a Muslim for free passage. No. Absolutely not. They were for Gifts to Muslims because he respects Islam so much.


Khobar towers, in Arabia. Looking coincidentally like the Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma. But I guess one bombed building looks pretty much similiar to any other. Same culprits? perhaps but not the ones your probably thinking of.






 I mean give us a break, we’re not children, we’re not stupid, Endings of fairy tales involving wicked witches and beautiful princesses are harder to predict than MSM intentions and the foreign policy of the occidentals.

 It’s my stated opinion that the possibility that 7/7 was executed with knowledge of the state. The role of the four is unclear and contains no proof which doesn’t seem planted. To me the ‘black-op’ theory is more persuasive than ANY alternative I’ve heard. It’s not because I’m retreating into some kind of Muslim mind-shell of denial – I’ve always maintained if significant proof that they did it (inc. Mohammed Atta and the 9-11 crew) then I have no qualms about accepting and denouncing them. However Nafeez Quoting DEBKA and ‘a police source’ referenced in the Daily mail giving two contradictory opinions, IMO counts for virtually nothing.


The only question I have left is: Will Nafeez even touch-upon the possibility of Government advanced knowledge in the remaining 90%? Well, if he doesn’t at least I’ve got a permanent record of many of the public statements that were made about 7-7 to draw upon as reference.






Sodium and cationic complexed TATP MS characterization from the Royal Society of Chemistry.


The focal point of what I’m reading at the moment concerns the type of explosive used. In regards to TATP, once again a new inconsistency has caught my eye regarding it.


Before I get to that, Nafeez supplies references that 7-7 was supposed to involve Military explosives, then he goes on to gives references that now TATP was the culprit. Nafeez’s own conclusion on page 36 is that both were used saying


“In view of the contradictory evidence in the public record, including the recommendations for bomb making-making instructions within al-Qaeda documents, it is perhaps most reasonable to infer that the explosives used a combination of military plastic C4 and TATP,as Richard Reid the shoe-bomber had done. This is consistent with al-Qaeda’s modus operandi…”


My analysis and response to the above would be as follows:


1) What “evidence ” in the public record?

There is only MSM speculation, reports of what police supposedly say is evidence – which they refuse to confirmed, and some supposedly cross-government exclusive government intelligence collective based in Washington-DC which when you look in the index came from a website with the URL (/news/dfasa071805.htm). Nafeez promotes their spin on the explosives as ‘authoritative’.


2) al-Qaeda documents.

For pity’s sake. He accepts without a morsel of questioning the authenticity of these documents probably found in Kabul, with I would guess a yellow-sticky saying “I Osama bin Laden wrote this” lying beside a Qur’an lying in a bin somewhere and a picture of a nuclear explosion mushroom cloud, and an Iranian state-airline ticket. Wonder if NAfeez questioned the Galloway-oil documents, or the Niger yellowcake documents, and if so why don’t these al-Qaeda documents get similar scrutiny?


3) Richard Reid is a bizarre story. Even if one accepts the narrative about him, what’s it got to do with 7-7?


4) What modus operandi? What al-Qaeda? Nafeez has 100% embraced much of the ‘intelligence’ that the pro-secular, pro-occidental, pro-fake money embezzlers pump out.


5) I think is equally reasonable to entertain the possibility that the government is lying and/or fabricating stories (possibly evidence too) about the explosions and other things besides.

 Now onto the new TATP thing:

 Nafeez supports the line TATP used as primer to detonate Al-Qaeda recipe C4 (let’s call it A4 shall we?). The chemistry of this seems a bit odd to me. If TATP generates quote: “just enough energy to spread the reaction to the next molecule” then how can it activate the secondary explosive? Kinetically, this doesn’t seem possible. A primer would need to provide more energy than is needed to initiate reaction on the secondary explosion.

UPDATE: If TATP evolves no heat on reaction, and passes just enough energy onto another TATP molecule to allow it to decompose, that means not only is the ΔH(rxn) next to zero, but the E(act) for decomposition must also be next to zero. Furthermore, the total possible energy change will ΔH(rxn)+E(act) must also be next to zero. Not only does that make TATP extremely dangerous (its kinetic instability being so poor that a tiny input of energy would make it spontaneously decompose) but also would render it utterly useless as a (primary)detonator for a secondary explosive.



Freshman reaction profile diagram.


The only other explanation I can think of is that of some kind of compression detonation would, it seems to me, to be totally unnecessary and very, bvery difficult, and how on earth that could be engineered into a soft and pliable shoe is beyond me. Unless Mr. Reid had shoes like these:

And Nafeez never questions any possible motives or vested interests a Professor at TIIT (Technion-Isreal Institute for Technology – you can see why they bolted on the Israel bit) might have. But a greater source of curiousity is why would and Israeli Professor be interviewed about it, and why is contradicting elements of the 7-7 story?


If the rubbish about the science ever gets too big I may take it upon myself to investigate and report upon the difficulties of making it from such weedy/dilute and impure retail products like hair stuff. The stuff doesn’t have to be actually synthesised to discover a load of crap about it.

  Two other things have already worried me.:

 Introduction, p 19:

“The London bombings were a far more sophisticated operation than the government has so far admitted. Further-more, they were planned and executed by a terrorist network inside Britain that has unambiguous linkages to the international al-Qaeda organisation and leadership”

 Oh dear oh dear. Errrm proof??? Funny how such a big organisation with so many members, hand making so many things, with such large communications networks (they even have their own ewebsites – LOL) with such large money and arms transfers cant be caught. It’s either as Nafeez says; because they work in tandem with the Brits and Yanks, or they don’t exist (certainly in the way they are portrayed)

 From the section called: A Month Under Siege (PartII) 3. Two Weeks After 3.1 21/7 – Failed Criminals. The Devices. Page 95 (discovered in the initial flick)

 “Almost before the 7/7 criminal investigation got off the ground,, on 21 July 2005, London was again hit by a series of small explosions in a coordinated attack that almost replicated the events of 7 July”


Utter nonsense! Tupperware containers, chapatti flour and no dead-people are nowhere near a replication of 7-7.


It continues… “A BBC News analysis [Ed: *groan*] cited officials [Ed: *double groan*] saying that the 21/7 devices ‘were put together in a way very similar [Ed: *triple groan*] to those used two weeks ago.’ They were in fact, ‘so similar to those used two weeks ago that they may [Ed: *quadruple groan*] even have been part of the same batch.’

 Sorry, but really that’s worthless. A Hollywood movie probably contains more hard facts.


21/7 Flour bomb. Pic from the BBC.
BBC labels the pic as bombblob


Obviously the terrorists had put some overtime in on this one. You can clearly see a Muslim terrorist (the veiled one and wearing black of course). Shaving foam is legal however, flour musn’t be. Pic from

 The way Nafeez writes his book (same for his 9-11 one which I also bought and for which his style is more suited) is to provide a deluge of mainstream reports which he strings together into a continuous narrative. He never expresses scepticism about it and only applies a weak analysis afterwards posing somewhat obvious questions, but the veracity of the premise is accepted.  

Well it’s a bit premature to write such a post after only about reading 10% of a book, and if I realise I’m wrong, I’ll certainly make a post about it, but don’t wait up.




More beef with Northy

Revised wording 17th Apr:

On the straw-man creator, non-sequiter sower Rachel North in her excessive slurrs about one-size-fits-all ‘conspiraloons’, I feel like saying a bit more. It’s doubtful thick skulled R will understand any such comment but so what… long live blogs.  

Rachel, If a fully independent enquiry (outside the jail of the  Inquiries Act 2005) about 7-7, an enquiry that examined ALL aspects, actually found that 4 Muslims did bomb London on 7-7, then fine – 4 Muslim suicide bombers killed 52 people. If other honest court cases find that there are networks of Muslims in the UK trying to do the same thing then great.

So don’t cast you idiotic aspersions willy nilly in the way that you do, as if nobody will ever accept it could possibly have been the case, and that nobody could ever accept there isn’t a group of Muslims plotting to inflict pain and misery.

You see, your rebuttals are as unstable as your emotional state. Your never answer points of contention in fact you do exactly what you accuse skeptics of (skeptics or fruitloop loons as you like to name call – reminds me of the nasty bully element in school) and that is, you get the teeny weensiest bit of a something (which may or may not be true) and you say its definite proof that the skeptics are wrong. Well YOUR wrong. There isn’t one thing you have ever “rebutted” from which a handful or so of other strong queries spring forth. While you swallow the most meagre bit of illogical ill reasonsed propaganda and outright crapola even before the proverbial drop of a hat, you just can’t comprehend why people don’t believe everything the government say. Unlike in your world, one government statement doesn’t  dismiss all other consequential lines of questioning.

Just one example is this… If as you harp on about “the CCTV times were wrong” something about mobile phones/watches/clocks or whatever it was you said, but then, HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU ASSERT ANY TIME LINE (OR DISPROVE ALTERNATIVE TIME LINES) THAT YOU ARE NOW CLINGING TO AND REPORT IN RESPECT OF THE LATEST 7/7 TRIAL? You have taken it upon yourself to disbelieve the time on the CCTV that raised serious questions about the whole 7-7 narrative. You dismiss it becasue it doesn’t feed into your perception. All other times are correct except the ones that bring about suspicion of alternative explanations to the narrative of what happened that day. Magic! 

You just don’t get it do you?

You post about ‘day one of the trial’ verges on racism and islamophobia – certainly some of your contributors let the mask slip. You seem to think ‘truthers’ (and I’m not embarrassed to use the word despite your best attempts to ridicule people who actually do want the truth, and you too claim to want the truth in your called for a non-independent enquiry, but of course its only your preconcieved truth that doesn’t deserve your unfounded and mean ridicule) have a crush of these for men and Muslims in general. I wonder if you consider yourself to be living in Londonistan?

 With regards as to your ‘lunch with a truther’ (Friday, April 11, 2008), being a personal victim of your bizarre imagination, I’d like to say thanks for reporting it. ‘cos it seems I am now likely to know what DIDN’T happen.


Rachel on the latest 7/7 trial



Yet another thing I very much dislike stemming from her blogging fingers, is her implicit slurr that people who WEREN’T ABLE to get to court to see the latest 7/7 CCTV imagery somehow couldn’t be bothered. Characteristic of her, and damn annoying. She probably knows it – perhaps why she keeps repreating it over and over and over and over and over and over again..

However she does have a seemingly relevant question. Why are the defence NOT contesting that the 4 alleged 7/7 bombers did it. Well, it’s not long before one can provide a plausible answer to that. Some Judges won’t allow certain approaches of a legal defence. Perhaps the defence were briefed as to what line they could or could not pursue.

Secondly, The defence may have thought: to take the possible (IMO probable) conspiracy face on, would be seen in the minds of the jury (or trial Judge – I don’t know the system employed here) as ‘diversionary’ or would carry some other negativism – especially if the defence thought the jury were of an initially skeptical mindset towards the non-official 7/7 conspiracy.

The Peter Power issue has not been debunked IMO because Power was never interviewed as part of a Criminal Investigation. Until investigated, the police should NOT have ruled out the possibility that in some way, “same stations, same times” Power has some kind of connection to the bombs, either directly or an employee passing on information onto the ‘bombers’ (assuming they did it). There would only THREE reasons why he would NOT be interviewed:

1) Police Incompetency (They are very incompetent at times, but unlikely forgetful-incompetency is not likely here)

2) They know Power/Powers company is not a part of it. (Impossible to make this conclusion in the ABSENCE of that criminal investigation)

3) There is some kind a connection between Power or Powers company to the bombers but it’s being covered up.

Which I ask you is most likely? (If you can think of any more, please drop me a line)

Power issue debunked?  I don’t bloody well think so.


Her blog is here:


2 other pages of note from R on this topic…
1] Monday, April 14, 2008
Title: Nick Kollerstrom, mainstay of the ‘truth movement’ is a holocaust denier
a.k.a The Holocaust denier cum ‘anti-semetic card’ is played early. A well used tool employed by some of the non-Blair watching “Blairwatch”ers

Title links to:

Rachel leaves another link in that post, pointing to:
2] Next – Off to Kingston for day 2 of the trial


July 7 bombings update

Yet another strange connection…

I have just published a story about the KLIA 3 million RM robbery at KLIA airport the other day making it known my belief the British CCTV footage had been interfered with by criminal elements who are jointly responsible for the London July 7 attacks and part of the British establishment.

Rachel North – someone not a stranger to being mentioned on my blogs posts a significant new bit of information about the July 7th bombings and in particular about the CCTV footage reported to be connected with the alledged J7 bombers.

Sadly Rachel pays no attention to any possible alternative explanations as to what she casts as purely being in the context of bombing innocent people in London. When actors say “break a leg” or vulture capatilists “make a killing” on the markets, the man who offered a response to a request for words of wisdom, someone tells Mohammed Siddique Khan ‘ A few words of wisdom – kill everyone there is’ may not mean the literal ‘kill’, but could well mean to champion some challenge and succeed as if all opponents had been killed and therefore never be able to challenge the victor.

And in the context of not watching his little girl grow up, that could also mean he was going to Pakistan inorder to undertake religious Study (Pakistan and India are well known for their excellence for Islamic study) abroad and will therefore not be with his daughter.

But Rachel reports there is more CCTV footage of that murderous day on July 7th, for example at a petrol station and so forth.

I am intregued at this, but also angered. The rightful place for such ‘new’ information is NOT from a gradual hemmoraging of material in lock-down under the  possession of the Government but in a totally Independent enquiry that will leave no stone unturned.

I dont have time to write further I’m rushing like mad. Please read Rachels report and decide for yourself if it add to the likely guilt of the supposed 4 bombers.

Gotta shoot ( – Not literally you understand)


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!


JUST - International Movement for a Just World


Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
January 2022