BBsCum

The BBC newz (newz, ‘cos it certainty ain’t news) and current department really turns my stomach. Medialens [1, 2, 3] amongst others has consistently uncovered the filth (my words, not their) that gets passed off as journalism, and not only that, but insanely the worlds best journalism – so they would have us believe]. Far from the pinnacle of journalism, it’s the pinnacle of propaganda and downright lies.

Here’s an article stolen from: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.mx/2012/07/bbc-rides-with-al-qaeda-in-aleppo-syria.html (thanks to ICH for publicising it]

–

BBC Rides with Al Qaeda in Aleppo, Syria

BBC Covers Up War Crimes – Misleads Over Syrian Security Operations.
by Tony CartalucciUpdate: Indeed BBC did not see “MIGs” bombing Aleppo, though it appears they weren’t even anti-tank SU-25’s but rather training aircraft. Aero L-39 Albatros are also not even “Russian-made” as the BBC claimed. The article below has been amended to reflect this information. Read here for more. 

July 25, 2012 – When big lies must be told, BBC is there. From Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya and now Syria, BBC has paved the way for Western disinformation meant to mange public perception around a war the public would otherwise never support or tolerate.

The BBC, caught on record producing entire “documentaries” on behalf of corporate-financier interests, has already been caught in immense lies regarding the NATO-fueled destabilization of Syria. This includes the disingenuous use of photos from Iraq, to depict a so-called “massacre” in the village of Houla, Syria.

Now, as NATO’s Al Qaeda mercenaries operating under the banner of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” flow over the Turkish-Syrian border in an attempt to overrun the city of Aleppo, BBC is there, attempting to manipulate the public’s perception as the conflict unfolds.

BBC’s Ian Pannell admits he rode with a convoy of milatnt fighters into Aleppo at night. He claims many are desperate for the FSA to succeed, “clamoring for freedom denied by their president,” but concedes many others fear an “Islamic takeover” and sectarian “division and bloodshed.” The latter of course, is self-evident, while the former is the repeated, unfounded mantra of the Western media used to cover up the latter.

Pannell poses amongst staged settings, claiming a single burning tire equates to a barricade set up by the militants (see more on the use of burning tires as propaganda here and here). He concedes that militants are taking to the rooftops with sniper rifles in the districts they claim they control – begging one to wonder where else terrorist snipers have been, and how many “sniper” deaths have been mistakenly blamed on the government.

Covering Up FSA War Crimes

Pannell then attempts to cover up serious war crimes committed by the FSA militants he is traveling with, claiming that men the FSA arbitrarily rounded up while “seeking revenge” were “suspected Shabiha,” harking back to Libya’s NATO-backed terrorist death squads rounding up and killing Libya’s black communities in orgies of sectarian genocide – which outlets like the BBC defended as simply rebels targeting “suspected African mercenaries.” Pannell papers over what he just reported with the unqualified claim that there is “little justice” on either side. What became of the FSA’s victims is not revealed.

Image: From BBC’s Ian Pannell – young men “suspected” of being “Shabiha” are rounded up as the FSA “seeks revenge.” BBC fails categorically to explain how NATO-backed terrorists can “liberate” a city that is admittedly pro-government – but it appears it will be done through terrorism, brutality, mass murder, and intimidation. 

….

BBC reporter Ian Pannell’s failure to report on the war crimes he admitted witnessing, smacks of endorsement and complicity – an attempt to preserve the romanticism the West has desperately tried to associate with their FSA death squads. Pannell’s report also confirms earlier descriptions of widespread atrocities committed by the so-called “Free Syrian Army.”

In Libya, when the government of Muammar Qaddafi collapsed, and as Libyan terrorists overran the last of the nation’s security forces, entire cities of Libya’s blacks were overrun, their populations either mass-murdered, imprisoned, or forced to flee to refugee camps. These are people who had lived in Libya for generations. A similar fate awaits Syrians should NATO prevail.

BBC Confirms Syrian Army Use of Heavy Weapons ARE Proportional to FSA Threats

Pannell’s propaganda in Aleppo continues, where he admits FSA militants possess tanks they allegedly “captured” from the Syrian military, but then, showing video of what is either an anti-tank SU-25 aircraft or an Aero L-39 Albatros training jet, rolling in with machine guns, claims it marks a “dramatic escalation” and a sign of “desperation.”

Image: From BBC’s Ian Pannell -FSA tanks are positioned in or around Aleppo, according to BBC. The myth that NATO-backed militants are “lightly armed” is unraveling as they attempt to take on large cities flush with cameras and media from both sides. Eager propagandists attempting to portray victories have more than once shown “captured tanks” in the hands of militants. Heavy militant weapons beget heavy government weapons. 

….

In reality the Syrian army is using force directly proportional to the threats NATO-backed militants have presented. Tanks and heavy weapons mounted on trucks, also featured in the BBC report, are legitimate targets for government heavy weapons. The precision an SU-25 lends the battlefield versus heavy artillery bombardments when neutralizing FSA heavy weapons is the only conceivable way to minimize civilian casualties.

Images: (Top) From BBC’s Ian Pannell – BBC and other Western media outlets have claimed “MIGs” are bombing Aleppo’s civilian populations. This all based on a single “tweet” made by BBC’s Ian Pannell. Pannell now reports this video depicts what he saw – which in reality is either an anti-tank SU-25 or Aero L-39 deploying machine guns, not bombs, versus what Pannell already admits are FSA heavy weapons, not civilian populations. (Bottom) Several orthographic views of the SU-25 and Aero L-39 for comparison. 

….

And as the Western media is so found of reminding its viewers, Aleppo is decidedly pro-government, and pro-President Bashar al-Assad. Therefore to indiscriminately use disproportionate force serves no purpose for the Syrian government, who has gone through extraordinary lengths and placed its soldiers at great risk to minimize damage to the city and its inhabitants – a city and population that serves both an important role economically and culturally for all Syrian people.

Remember Fallujah, Iraq

A government is put in a difficult position when armed gangs enter a city “seeking revenge” as BBC’s Ian Pannell puts it, when these gangs have trucks mounted with heavy weapons as well as tanks in their possession. For the West, to berate the Syrian government and portray its security operations as unmitigated “brutality” is disingenuous at best, especially considering the militants are there solely because of years of financial, military, and political support from the US, Israel, and the Gulf State despots.

Image: Western hypocrisy – Fallujah, Iraq in 2004 was bombarded by artillery and airstrikes for weeks leading up to the final invasion. When over 10,000 troops entered the city, they were accompanied by tanks, and supported by heavy artillery and airstrikes. When the West is subjugating others, heavy weapons seems acceptable – but not when another nation attempts to defend itself from admittedly Western-backed terrorists. 

….

The West might want to also revisit the lessons it learned from flattening the Iraqi city of Fallujhah, twice. The US bombarded the city for weeks prior to its final invasion in 2004, where over 10,000 troops entered with heavy artillery and air support. Apparently it is acceptable for the West to subjugate others using such tactics, but nations are prohibited from using similar tactics to defend themselves. The Syrian uprising was a foreign-plot stretching back as far as 2007, foreign militants admittedly flowing over the border from across the Arab World, admittedly armed and funded by the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.

The Battle of Fullujah is considered a notch in the belt of Western military prowess, while the West condemns Syria’s attempts to defend one of its most important cities from foreign-subversion and destruction. While NATO believes it can still win the geopolitical battle it is waging against the Syrian people, it has already long lost the battle for moral superiority.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

New 7/7 footage: conclusive proof the 4 bombers did it.

Well no, it doesn’t, like nothing about 7/7 does,  but don’t let that stop you from allowing the BBC’s NLP telling you it does.

a) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11546549

[A lesson in NLP tricks!]

Ben Geoghagen:

“This is really chilling footage, I would describe it John”

– BBC Journo once again expressing a personal opinion, but as a BBC journo (the BBC still, incredibly, can successfully draw upon it’s image of the informed and informative ‘trusted’ institution of Britishness), he has an open passageway into your brain, even though you’ve never het him before and know absolutely nothing about him (esp. his political leanings – or how passionate he holds those views and what what extent therefore that he will promote them)

“What you’re about to see…”

NLP ‘preparation’

“I’ll show you the first one. The first one. It’s of H.H. HE exists KX underground station and you see him going into Boots…” [footage1] time = 08:59:46  “it’s part of the property there part of the concourse”

NLP ‘expansion’

[footage2]

“There you can see hi actually entering the shop”

time = 9:05:54-7 (WH Smith sign seen in footage)

“What is striking about all this footage…”

[footage3 – grey] time = 09:53:13-5

“And here is him coming out of KX station onto the main concourse…”

“…what is so striking about it, is the number of people he passes as he wonders outside Kings Cross station.”

At this point the journo talks about the problems/delays/congestion on the tube that day. [back to footage3 – grey] time = 9:53:13- Note almost impossible to identify any person. And he says

“..a lot of people are on their MOBILE PHONES making calls to friends or their bosses saying they are going to be late.”

Really??? Mobile phones at 09:52:29? This is something that should be checked. Note: it’s almost assured the BBC journo didn’t check.

“and here’s H.H. walking with this rucksack amongst them and obviously they are totally oblivious to the danger they face because here’s a man whose carry a bomb on his back and a bomb which he later detonates on the No 30 Bus at Tavistock square and kills 13 people as he does so” – This is lazy pre-concluded supposition. There is no proof he did it. There has been no trial.

[Inside BMA building? footage.  Time 09:42-04. Supposed explosion on the bus at 9:42:18]

yet Bus aerial debris footage: VLW 173 time = 09:34:23 BST

Of course the “BMA? footage time and the ‘aerial blast debris time” footage is inconsistent. They differ by 7min 41seconds and TAKE A LOOK AT THE BIG TREE: The branches on the left hardly move at all. If this wasn’t ‘explained’ to you, you would have virtually no idea it was describing an explosion. There is NO obvious blast movement up or to the right on the trees left hand side. If this ‘blast debris’ was faked I’d not be surprised, esp. as there only seems to be one shot with ‘hazy blobs’ in it.

Journo goes on about

[how much footage was gone through] in order to get good evidence of the movements of this one bomber H.H.”

Who said it was ‘good’ – the journo. He’s giving you his opinion and his opinion is that it’s good. My opinion (and I’m going to cover it up that it is my opinion) is that it’s bullshit footage and it doesn’t prove anything.

“…there were cameras on some of the busses showing you footage on SOME of the busses, showing you the No 30 thirty bus that he eventually got on”

NLP again. And very clever. He ‘covers’ footage from busses, but not a peep from him about a total lack of footage is available from any specific bus he’s supposed to have gotten onto.

“to piece together his movements on that day…”

Yet more NLP commands telling you what to think. And it’s not pieced together. The timelines once again are inconsistent.

“before he detonated his device”

This is NLP ‘reinforcement’

“on that bus” – my emphasis

more ‘reinforcement’ having been told earlier about the No. 30 bus.

Not once does he expose you to anything other than it’s a ‘fact’ the these guys did it. He never said the word likely, supposed, possible or even the commonly used mild get out clause of ‘alleged”

What a terrible so-called journalist this Ben Geoghagen is. Well, that’s probably why he’s working at the BBC.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

BBC Baloney – protecting Merck’s commercial interests

(I shouldn’t swear, so title changed)

In Dec 2007, I published an article A case for anti-vaccination, I transcribed an interview {the interview can be found in the documentary In Lies We Trust – go here: http://www.inlieswetrust.com/} with Dr. Maurice Hilleman (now deceased as of 11th April 2005)

An extract of that video, in which Hilleman is interviewed, can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=327_1195303011

Here’s a snipped from the transcription:

Hilleman:  Well that was in Merck, I came to Merck and I was going to develop vaccines, and we had wild viruses in those days, you remember the wild monkey kidney virus’s and so forth, and I finally after six months gave up. I said that you cannot develop vaccines with these damn monkeys. Were finished and if I cant do something about it I’m gonna quit. Am I going to try it? So I went to see Bill Mann at the Zoo in Washington DC and I told Bill Mann, I said “Look, here’s a, I got a problem, I don’t know what the hell were doing, Bill Mann is a really bright guy, and I said these lousy monkeys are picking it up  while being stored in the airports, in transit at these loading offloading and loading. He said its very simple. He said you go ahead get the monkeys out of west Africa, and get the African Green, bring ‘em into Madrid. Onload them there, there are no other traffics through there for animals, Fly them into Philadelphia, pick ‘em up. Or fly them pick ‘em up in New York and pick ‘em up. Right off the airplane.

[2:16] Hilleman: So I brought African Greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus of course at the time.”

Dr Maurice Hilleman, pioneer of over 40 vaccines, believed this is where HIV came from. I wish I knew the date he was interviewed.

This was well before todays story on the BBC:

See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8175379.stm

In that typically disgraceful article, the BBC says:

“Although HIV/Aids was first recognised by scientists in the 1980s, it is thought it first entered the human population early in the twentieth century in the region of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The virus probably originally jumped into humans after people came into contact with infected bush meat.

SIV viruses have been reported in other primates, including gorillas.”

“It is thought” – This is a classic piece of modern day junk journalism. Even wikipedia calls this ‘weasel words’ and warns against it. Andwhen seemingly factual points are given, wikipedia in an attempt to improve the quality of its entrys, often suffixs’ the statement with [citation neeed]. Even wikipedia is putting the BBC to shame.

So BBC, who thinks this? What are those supposed ‘thoughts’ based on?  Why not quote the words of Dr. Maurice Hilleman himself, who said it came from African Green monkeys, which MERCK exploited and ultimately gave HIV/AIDS to the world.? What of that BBC? – you sheishmeisters!  

The BBC’s miserable junk continues: “The virus probably originally jumped into humans after people came into contact with infected bush meat.” – ‘Probably’ & ‘originally’. Again BBC, who exactly thinks this? Who thought it was possible? Names and data if you please! How can your miserable attempt to give an explanation that avoids litigation square with the fact that Gorilla and chimp bushmeat were consumed for thousands of years! It’s pathetic! Come on BBC try and haul yourself out of the presstitutes red light house and act like a news organisation for a change. Are you watching Helen Boaden you most notorious of newz madams.

You see, by spitting out this liquid poo, the BBC helps MERCK avoid hundreds of millions of law suits which could and should bankrupt the company. Yet another example of the mergence of the established media with corporate interests. It may not even be deliberate but the culture and the career pathway in writing this slime opens up to people who already have the predisposition to let corporatism flow from their pen. It’s becoming a way of life.

Can the BBC be sued for spreading bullshit like this? If there is a MERCK friendly plant in the BBC, for example someone with MERCK shares or someone that benefits from MERCK’s financial success, then it’s very there is indeed a case for at least the prosecution of a individual if not the BBC. But newspaper and magazines companies get sued for carrying libel and stuff like that so hopefully the BBC couls also be subject to that.

And MERCK, oh MERCK, I hope every victim of your vaccine death bombs an grieving relatives sue the crap out of you.

–

–

–

–

–

–

Dumb and dumbing

Update: The MS data Dr. Chris Busby posted on Blairwatch is showing now: This is what it says as of 10th June 2009:

The data are up on the website of the Low Level Radiation Campaign. The measurements were made at Harwell. Isotope ratio in the soil sample was 108. Toatal U was 13mg/kg. LOD was 0.0002mg/kgU238 and 0.0001mg/kgU235. Instrument was Agilent ICPMS. Diffetnt method alpha spectrometry gave same result in different lab. We have now found EU in a car filter. Check out llrc.org. Thank you. Chris

End of update.

The BBC newz and current affairz division, ever the nucleus of stinking lies (evidence #1) in support of mass murder, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ‘environmentalcide’, report on a particular illegal bombing of Sytria by the Zionist entity in 2007  2006.

Amongst those who followed this, you will probably remember there was a strange information vacuum on behalf of the Syrians. The pro-Zionist corporate mainstream media (to give it it’s proper, full title), may have assisted in the silence from Syria, but news on the anti-NWO news outlets whch I read were also pretty much devoid of Syrian comminiques.

Anyway, before you read further please the the BBC newz article HERE.

Hopefully you will have read the earlier evidence #1 above, and so, on reading this:

“Now in a confidential report obtained by the BBC…”

then, if you’re capable of at least half an independent thought, you would now have a rather large ‘pinch of salt’ in your mind. Continuing directly from where we left off, the BBC newz article says:

“it [the report] says it has discovered new traces of uranium of a type not included in Syria’s declared nuclear material.”

 

——————————————————————————————————-

Asside:

does this cry then ring out:

“A ha! I knew it. Those damn Arab/Muslims. I knew they were up to something. I knew the fascile, politically correct respect I felt compelled to give them wasn’t sustainable. They deserve to be bombed.”

 People who may think that way remind me of that nasty man called Winston Churchill…

I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.

I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.” – source

Supporters of ‘Death by Churchill’ may counter he only wanted to make their eyes water. What nonsense. He was pimping for weapons to fascilitate his desire for military advantage/supremacy potenial, much like all weapon pimps before him and those who followed him when they bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, sprayed Agent Orange across SouthEast Asia, used depleted uranium and white phosphorous against the people of Fallujah and Gaza. He was deliberately underplaying it. To think that by making peoples eyes water they would them agree to be colonbised is ridiculous and offering apologies for imperialistic murder. Harmless lachrymatory substances had long been known (e.g. thiopropanal S-oxide – the volatile gas produced from damaged onion cells or Allyl isothiocyanate, reported to be a dangerous lachrymator. His pretence that gas was just to make peoples eyes water is shown for the sack of crap it is when in 1920 he wrote to Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare:

“the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.” – source

Here Churchill is revealing that to permanently disabling them, something that doesn’t happen if you just make their eyes water, would be more advantageous to British imperilism because the would be too sick to fight but dain the resources of the those targeted for British colonisation.

Churchill gloves really comes out of his fake concern against human suffering when in a prime ministerial minute (1944) he writes:

“I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard.” – Winston Churchill 6th July 2944. Personal minute aka the “Secret Poison Gas Memo” – source

Eerily, in that same source, we see this written by British scumbad Bomber(i.e. killer) Harris saying:

“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.” Remember other British filthy killers Tony bLiar / Alistair Campbell / John Scarlett / Geff ‘Hoon / Richard Dearlove / Lard Goldsmith  45 minute lie?

and interestingly enough, Churchill didn’t consider the V1 and V2 bombs even reaching the level of a “serious nuisance” yet these bombs are often cited as justification for the destruction of Dresden, Munich and other British strocities.

——————————————————————————————————-

Of course the BBC does it’s part to foment angst towards the Arabs and the Iranians, who are tossed into this report. Iran let’s not forget, is absolutely within its its right to develop nuclear energy even though it is ridiculously stupid to do so.

Right. Now this post is coming to an end, who spotted the flaw?

Come on, surely someone spotted it?

(Huh>? lwtc really has gone mad this time…)

What do you think the Israyhelli’s bombed the Syrian target with? Have a guess. go on? There must be someone that can guess?? Here’s some clues:

TITLE: Bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads used by Israel against civilian targets in Lebanon
By: Dr. Doug Rokke
www: (http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m28056&hd=0&size=1&l=e)
Dr. Doug Rokke is former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project

See Fisk:
Mystery of Israel’s secret uranium bomb
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1935945.ece

Those reports came from the ironically named ‘Blairwatch‘ – a site which at times was unashemed in displaying it’s pro-Zionism (depending on which author was posting at the time) – unless to happen to think it’s OK to delete the scientific Mass Spectroscopy iosotopic anaysis given by Chris Busby which proved:

Israel did in fact use enriched uranium to bomb Lebanon in the summer of 2006.

The BBC doesn’t give a toss about news nor does it care about exposing Zionist rot, in fact it seems to relish opportunities to cover it up at each and every opportunity.

–

–

–

–

–

 

Vaccine Orgy

I used to think vaccines were a good thing. That was until I actually learned something about them.

Here’s a short video:

Vaccines REALLY Safe? – Mary Tocco  2m 55s

http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/4934905/13143344

–

In a conversation with a family member about vaccines, a lady said she vaccinated her son to prevent measles. Guess what? He got measles. I told her the vaccine didn’t work. She said if he hadn’t have had the vaccine his measles would have been worse. I asked her how did she know that? I got no logical reply.

The issue of vaccines is dominated on public percieved wisdom, which is actually: wholesale ignorance. Cheerleading ‘things vaccine’  are the public who mentally convince themselves they are ‘sicnece liberated’ and will, for a few reasons, repeat what ‘sounds scientific’. The second set are those who gain financially from the idea and infrastructure of vaccines, either by earning a salary as say a cleaner in a lab that deals with vaccines, or via royalties which doubltessly claimed by many so called ‘experts’ in the field of virology.

If the claims about vaccines were true, then I wouldn’t have any problem with the above. However the mind-warping rubbish spouted out about vaccines and the obvious conflict of interest by vaccine advocates, as well as the FACT that the field of vaccine research is parallel with that biowarfare, all comes to mean that I have a VERY BIG PROBLEM with ‘things vaccine’.

On the one hand vaccines appear successful: Polio and Smallpox to name but two, however it is rather intellectually fraudulent to only look at the apparent successes and not the dangers or possible dangers? But let’s leave aside a few issues for now, e.g. the biowarfare element.

We have been pumping vaccines into our bodies for decades yet the new viri (the awkward sounding but correct plural of virus)  viruses (OED does not recognise viri) seem to be breaking out with greater frequency.

Why?

Sanitation and general nutrition as generally improved globally has it not? (at this point we’ll leave out food pollutants like aspartame, MSG and E-numbers). Allow me to stick with that debateable claim.

I can think of a few reason why:

1) The nucleic acids and proteins of all these accumulated vaccines in our bodies produce unstudied effects within our bodies which are detrimental to our health.

2) The additives e.g. stabilizers such as thiomersal (a compound containing mercury) exert a toxic effect. In fact I think about a year ago I read a US medical report calling for zero mercury levels to exist in human biological applications (can’t remember the specifics, sorry)

3) Vaccines themselves, by the very way they are produced COULD THEMSELVES mutate in ways similar to the viri viruses the vaccines are supposed to nullify).

Here’s some stuff from the BBC Newz website:

  

Two different techniques are being used.

First, “reverse genetics”, where scientists take the H and the N surface proteins from the H1N1 virus and mix them with a laboratory virus known as PR8.

This creates a harmless hybrid virus which can be used for the vaccine.

The second technique involves injecting both the H1N1 and PR8 viruses into eggs and allowing the hybrid strain to be created through a natural re-assortment of their genes.

The vaccine will work by tricking the immune system into thinking it has been infected with the H1N1 swine flu virus so that it creates antibodies against it.

Is this seemingly greater occurance of scary viri viruses (again I’ll have to leave out another important element: Govt fear mongering, burying of significant events and junk journalism) connected with the numbers of vaccines we are taking? – source http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8029917.stm

 

The hype and presstituting of selling Tamiflu and masks over the last few weeks have been a disgrace. No doubt about it.

The danger is that from all this JUNK – FEAR – OVER-INFLATION of the dangers etc, that should a real pandemic occuer then like the boy who cried wolf, the outcome could be serious. We should we wary in the light of suspected pandemic. 

I think the makers of Tamiflu should only have their costs met from the Tamiflu sales. The rest into an investigation into their research on these viri viruses.

–

Michel Chossudovsky, in his article here, says:

The Real Global Crisis is marked by poverty, economic collapse, ethnic strife, death and destruction, the derogation of civil rights and  the demise of State social programs. The EU announcement of the swine flu pandemic inevitably serves to weaken the social protest movement which has spread across Europe. – source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13433

He’s got a very strong point. But the-scum-that-be (tstb) who rule over us positively LOVE these events. Remember Rahm Emannuel the other day? It gives these scumsuckers enhanced dictaroial powers as well as the opportunity to make themselves look good and all ‘leadership’ like. YUCK! It so insincere. so fake. Just like the crap the BBC feveroushly pumped out ove the last week or so.

Henry Makow Ph.D. says:

When we hear about pig flu, let’s keep our focus on the big picture. We are infected by a more serious and widespread cancer, satanism, under the guises of communism, liberalism, socialism, zionism, fascism, feminism and globalism. Luciferianism permeates society in the form of materialism, naturalism, occultism, obscenity, sadism, violence, pornography and promiscuity. – source: http://www.henrymakow.com/luciferian_revolution_reaches.html

–

–

Here then, is a hopeful remedy, some counter-propaganda videos to try and give you a more knowledgeable view:

–

Vaccination – The Hidden Truth
(Pay careful attention to the Romanian(?) female Doctor  Dr. Viera Scheibnew PhD – an Australian scientist and her presentaion on the effectiveness of vaccines, who uses articles from some of the the most prestidgeous peer reviewed medical journals around)http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6696666502913965744&ei=F6X8SdbFKYnYwgP1srH9CA&q=vaccination+the+hidden+truth
–

Mary Tocco. Are vacciens safe? 2:37:45
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6351515212287981735&ei=G6f8ScP2GozIwgPRiPz0CA&q=Are+vaccines+safe

–

Vaccine Nation – Director’s Cut (Gary Null)   1:29:40
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6531447125053615129&ei=86P8SdeUJIWiwgOD0eSiCQ&q=vaccine+nation

 –

Why Vaccines Aren’t Safe (www.mercola.com)  44:48
http://www.viddler.com/explore/mercola/videos/56/–

–

• Vaccination – Miracle or Mayhem – Part 1 of 5  – Vaccine ingredients – 8m58s.flv
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svUXgyHzZqY
• Vaccination – Miracle or Mayhem – Part 2 of 5 – Are vaccines safe – 9m22s.flv
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-meXbNUcvE
• Vaccination – Miracle or Mayhem – Part 3 of 5 -Are vaccines effective – 6m35.flv
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52wcoAnA6qk
• Vaccination – Miracle or Mayhem – Part 4 of 5 -Doctors speak out – 8m09s.flv
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LBn6hBv0Wk
• Vaccination – Miracle or Mayhem – Part 5 of 5 -Smallpox vaccination – 9m58s.flv
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nat9X1WOEaE

—

–

–

–

–

BBC supports scorched earth

In its continuing propaganda frenzy, the BBC this time, spends effort to support a scorched earth policy and to beguile you into condoning it too: the ‘scorched earth policy’ is that being carried out by the slimy and corrupt US puppet Pakistani “leadership”.

“With tanks, artillery and airstrikes, the army is trying to clear villages, towns and roads of militants, attempting to drive the Taleban from the sanctuaries they have occupied.

Once each village or town is taken, bulldozers move in, flattening houses so the Taleban cannot sneak back and occupy them again.” – source

Do you see the mind games at play here? Well, can you? Read it again if you didn’t notice it. Go on, it’s important! The BBC ‘only’ mentions “villages” and “towns (via use of the word ‘each’)” – yes! towns, not a few houses in a town, not a few streets in a town, not even a town, but complete and whole “towns”. It does so in the context with what it calls ‘the Taleban’. The other association links ‘Taliban’ with ‘sneaking’, inculcating a picture of Taleban and malevolence. And the icing on the cake of all these dangling carrots is, the use of the word ‘again’. Slam dunk! because it is hoped in your mind now you have the impression ONLY the Taliban occupy buildings/villages/towns initially, and that if these villages and towns were not destroyed, the Taleban would return.

It is an outrageous and hideous lie. An example of the most appalling standards of journalism I have ever witnessed from this deplorable and deceitful corporation, although Saddams Bomb is perhaps its equal. The inhabitants of villages are most likely to comprise mostly of women and children compared to men and far outweigh Taliban men. That a whole town, let alone village, is made up of Taliban is a disgraceful conspiracy.

What complete bastards!

Thousands of poor people, likely to be far better human beings than you or I, have already been displaced by Pakistani puppets who wait for their next 10% pay cheque, and many of them have been killed (see https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/a-deadly-deception/)

If you don’t feel angry and ashamed at what they wrote, you seriously need to examine your sense of justice and fair play.

And when people are killed, either by US airstrikes or puppet Pakistani troops killing fellow Muslims – again far worthier then themselves, the BBC doesn’t relent; automatically issuing reports that ‘Al Qaeda/Militants’ were killed. They know this becasue the slain Taliban carries an ID card that says “If I die, this is just to let you know I am an Al Qaeda militant – don’t ya know”

Just before the Beeb sanctions the destrictuon of villages and towns, it said:

“Bit by bit, and at huge cost, territory is being seized back”

Yet again we witness the total non-questioning methodology of  “BBC journalism”. This time spoon fed by the Pakistani department of war and propaganda. The BBC clearly sees its role to act as a mouthpiece for a unified moral-less hegemonic fascism, largely going under the recognisible umbrella of globalisation. it also synthesises the false impression that that Pakistan ‘lost’ the territory in the first place.

Again outrageous.

If you don’t think the BBC is pumping sewage into your brain, aren’t you just a little bit flummoxed at how there are numerous reports from Afghanistan, whereby the Taliban are said to have successfully pushed the invading vermin (Coalition of the killing) into relatively small restricted areas, yet the Pakistani army (which drains money away from the countries economy leaving millions hungry, homeless and on the edge of life itself) somehow is achieving unique success???

The ooze simply doesn’t stop…

“First they have struck back near the Khyber Pass, hijacking and burning trucks driving towards the Afghan border.”

“trucks” huh? What kind of trucks? Trucks owned by Iqbal the rice merchant? Trucks containing medical supplies carried by the Red Crescent? Trucks carrying a family of refugees feeling from the Pakistani army who have just destroyed their, sorry, ‘a Taleban town’? Trucks carrying supplies for the US military? Do you really think ALL trucks are being targeted (along with the tactical pitfalls such persistent operations would entail) or do you think it is certain trucks? Come on THINK FOR YOURSELF. The BBC creates the impression any truck is game.

The BBC plays another card, telling us of one trucker, “Haji Haghaley” who the beeb says was hit by the Taliban. This is possible, but I refuse to discount the possibility that the Pakistani army or even US/NATO forces themselves were the ones who fired upon him. We know the US (and it’s wannabe’s) shoot-to-kill first, then try to cover up later. How is it known the bullet came from a “Taliban” and not someone else – like a common bunch of nomadic criminals trying to steal the goods? And they had to pick a Haji didn’t they? (A Muslim that has done the Hajj – one of the 5 central rituals every Muslim must try and do, and is generally regarded as being a ‘devout Muslim’). “Haji Haghaley” is there to give the appearance that pious Muslims are trucking US supplies through Pakistan, and therefore, it’s what ‘good Muslims’ do. You are supposed to get from all this that the Taliban are a bunch of mean killers who shoot at other Muslims, therefore, Muslims of the world: the Taleban are YOUR enemy too!

Anyway, who determines what a Taleban is or isn’t, naturally enough, this question isn’t qualified because it’s simply a tool to be used for the purposes of fear and propaganda. They don’t never show mercenaries driving these trucks and pointing to ambiguous holes and they NEVER describe those killed alleged Taleban as being Haji’s.

I am running out of negative words to describe the BBC, such is the frequency of its brainwashing output, of which I only have limited amounts of time to point out.

Sadly the mindless Zombies populating the UK swallow much of what at vile newz (newz ‘cos it aint no news!) organisation spews out. I am ashamed to be British – a title people thoght meant something respectable, but, I am immensely proud to be ashamed.

The propaganda level in that “report” would put Goebbels to shame,
 
Dear people, reject this toxic spittle that enters your eyes, ears and brain. We can be something better, we just need to wake up see the monster dancing in front of us, taunting us in our blindness. This current path of hegemonic domination and oppression is madness. It’s not the way things are supposed to be.

Life should be an adventure of discovery, happyness and love. Why are we letting it be anything but?

–

–

–

–

Conspiramoon!

 I often slate the BBC for its utterly crap job it and its “journalsts” do.  It’s fully deserved and I plan to continue the endevour. But I still read it quite a lot doing a BBCwatch on it if you like – keeping on eye on the sewerage works for you and I. As well as its miserable political news section, its science section is just as crap. 

Reading the latest bit of unchallenging scientific moonery on the BBC, my eyes caught this headline:…

US plans permanent base on Moon    –   05 Dec 06

Wow. Abitious huh? Imagine all the hard planning and those d0ll0r$ being spent. The real thrust of this blog entry is the sequence of headlines which cummarises the pathetic speils the BBC pumps out without a moments contemplation. Still… the contents of the article are also amusing in their own right.

Here’s some extracts…

blah blah blah…The structure of the base and the exact duties of the astronauts stationed there have not been decided…. blah blah blah……Nor is it clear when the base will begin functioning.

comment:> Must be one HELL of a plan!

blah blah blah…The permanent base will be built near one of the two poles, as these are felt to have a moderate climate and more sunlight – essential if the base is to use solar energy.….then….”It’s exciting,” Shana Dale told the Reuters news agency. “We don’t know as much about the polar regions.”

comment:> Yeah. If I was going to build a base on a new ‘planet’ I’d build it in a place we know the least about too! Like I said… one H E L L of a plan.

Then we are treated to some proof by computer graphics… Aaaaa innit cute!

 But get this…. next headline showing how utterly crap the BBC were to simply act as reprinter of words without the slightest challenge to what it was being told.

Lunar dust ‘may harm astronauts’   –  18 Mar 07 |  Science/Nature

MAGIC!

–

–

–

–