Destroy the BBC before it’s too late

This is a call to all British people the world over to rise up and destroy the BBC before it’s too late! Why? – You are being prepped for yet MORE WAR. Here’s what the ascupulous BBC have on their main page as I type:

I added the second pic of the guy holding two stones which is in a sequence with the first pic at the top. It is important to note the BBC’s words:

“Iranian security forces kill at least four protestors”

 

becasue it goes to prove my point.  and I’ve saved a copy just in case the BBC decide to edit it. I have an early edition.  The main link entitled: Iranian protestors die in clashes is linked to here. People with a memory might well recall this…

source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7988828.stm

Notice the words now… A man who died during the G20 protest was pushed to the pround.

Do you see any difference there? The man died – words which ‘naturalise’ the death, just as 85 year old people die in their sleep.  He died during the G20 protest. Actually it seemed Mr Tomlinson had nothing at all to do with the protest other than the fact that the police themselves had shut off various streets becasue of the protest that others were participating in, and because of this police action, they had prevented Mr Tomlinson from just seemingly trying to go home. the BBC say he wasn’t protesting, but they have previously made the associaton (innocently or not) of Tomlinson with the protest. I might come back to expand on the BBC’s shameful role in this latest pile of Horeshit ‘jounalism’ later, but the point is, when it comes to UK domestic issues involving the police the BBC almost ALWAYS make to appear as thought the police are innocent bystanders when people are killed in the presence of the police.

However with IRAN, the BBC (once again getting that all important first impression into you mind) that the Iranian forces killed people. Yes those nasty Iranians – you know, that country that launches pre-emptive illegla murderous wars killing tens of millions of ordinary people for over 100 years, fixes it’s intelligence around the police, actually has nuclear weapons and uses them against innocent people. OOOPS! sorry, that isn’t Iran at all! In fact, it’s the Unites Snakes and its pal the UK. Yes, that’s right, Iran is the total opposite, it does NONE of those things.

Yet here we have the BBC that has conducted a coroner and police investigation, taken eye witness statements, cross-checked witnesses, recorded and analysed the forensic evidence at the scene, including ballistics tests, conduced the courtroom trial and all this within a few hours, and arrived at an unbaised and clear  judgeemt that the Iranisan security to be 100% guilty of murder. 

And to answer the bipolar-ites (bipolites), No, I don’t “love” Iran (or Russia or China) because I hate the British establishment, however it MUST be said, the Iranian government hardly resister on the ‘crappy country/governments’ league table compared to the scum that is the US and UK.

That the BBC does these dirty mind games, is well documented, for example in the Media Lens book: “Newspeak in the 21st century”

The “horse shitometer” has been reading higher than usual recently. From Sudan to the Philippines the War OF Terror goes on and the next most important part of it is the likely Pakistan civil war seeing USUK military invention, and Israyhell/US/UK (USUKZ) initiating war against Iran.

So How to destroy the BBC?

Violence in this case is stupid. Instead, simply don’t but a TV licence and don’t let any supposed TV licence inspectors to enter your house. Not watchin the telly is probably better. If you see an advert on the BBC persuade yourself that the adversts you see on the BBC would actully transpire to make you NOT buy that product – a kind of reverse adverting strategy if you will.

If you don’t destroy the BBC this monstor of a mind warp will continue to eat away at you’re sence of justice.

DESTROY THE BBC, Don’t watch/listen/read it’s rubbish.\

Time is of the essence!

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

When is fear and panic, fury?

When it’s the pathetic BBC inventing words in assistance to the hands that feed it – the hell bound regime currently occupying Palestine.

Update: Afterwards, you would do well to read Al Jazeera’s Ayman Mohyeldin (Middle East Correspondent) about this issue: http://blogs.aljazeera.net/middle-east/2009/12/15/true-lies or http://tinyurl.com/yduz875

The BBC headlines :

“Israel fury at UK’s Livni warrant” – What fury? Which one of the Ziofreak child killers said the word “fury/furious”? This word ‘fury’ ONLY appears in the headline! None of the Zioscum are quoted as saying it. The BBC is putting words into their foul mouths. The unusual use of the word fury is to make it look as if Israyhell has incurred some serious unjust action. The BBC’s reporting is ropey ar the best of times and when it’s about the US administration, it’s sickening but when it’s about Israyhell it’s positively corrupt.

Here’s a screenshot I took from the BBC’s ME page.

Interesting that

I know what this is, it’s a total coincidence that there it’s kind of like the Union Jack flag. Slippy tZippy standing in front of the stupid British flag bringing a level of ‘association’ of her to the UK – making her one of us.

Can you imagine if the very twisted David Milliband was a Muslim and that some Muslim country somewhere had killed 410 children for him to interfere with the British legal system in order that the killers of those kids got off scott free?. There would be nationwide uproar. Milliband would be sacked and probably stand no chance of winning a seat in the next election.

But twisted Milliband is Jewish, so anything goes.

David Milliband. The idiot schoolboy British Foreign Secretary who’s Zionist
slaveishness, does not play any part whatsoever in how he directs British foreign policy.
Well that’s what he would say so let’s believe him shall we, and all the other Zionists
in the UK.

Millibandit again…

READ MORE…

– Lets take another look at BBC mind manipulation coincidence…

Notice “Israel and the Palestinians” – No mention of Palestine. That’s right, there is a bunch of people called Palestinians IN Israyhell. Bah humbug. That is coincidence too, it’s not that the BBC presstitutes have mentally sterisised their own minds to come up with disgraceful little tricks like that. Oh no.

These Ziofreaks should face a court of international law for their actions, the consequences of a guilty verdict resulting in them being hung. But that’s not going to happen. The UK is a dastardly slave to and supporter of Israyhell.

–

–

–

–

–

 

BBC Baloney – protecting Merck’s commercial interests

(I shouldn’t swear, so title changed)

In Dec 2007, I published an article A case for anti-vaccination, I transcribed an interview {the interview can be found in the documentary In Lies We Trust – go here: http://www.inlieswetrust.com/} with Dr. Maurice Hilleman (now deceased as of 11th April 2005)

An extract of that video, in which Hilleman is interviewed, can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=327_1195303011

Here’s a snipped from the transcription:

Hilleman:  Well that was in Merck, I came to Merck and I was going to develop vaccines, and we had wild viruses in those days, you remember the wild monkey kidney virus’s and so forth, and I finally after six months gave up. I said that you cannot develop vaccines with these damn monkeys. Were finished and if I cant do something about it I’m gonna quit. Am I going to try it? So I went to see Bill Mann at the Zoo in Washington DC and I told Bill Mann, I said “Look, here’s a, I got a problem, I don’t know what the hell were doing, Bill Mann is a really bright guy, and I said these lousy monkeys are picking it up  while being stored in the airports, in transit at these loading offloading and loading. He said its very simple. He said you go ahead get the monkeys out of west Africa, and get the African Green, bring ‘em into Madrid. Onload them there, there are no other traffics through there for animals, Fly them into Philadelphia, pick ‘em up. Or fly them pick ‘em up in New York and pick ‘em up. Right off the airplane.

[2:16] Hilleman: So I brought African Greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus of course at the time.”

Dr Maurice Hilleman, pioneer of over 40 vaccines, believed this is where HIV came from. I wish I knew the date he was interviewed.

This was well before todays story on the BBC:

See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8175379.stm

In that typically disgraceful article, the BBC says:

“Although HIV/Aids was first recognised by scientists in the 1980s, it is thought it first entered the human population early in the twentieth century in the region of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The virus probably originally jumped into humans after people came into contact with infected bush meat.

SIV viruses have been reported in other primates, including gorillas.”

“It is thought” – This is a classic piece of modern day junk journalism. Even wikipedia calls this ‘weasel words’ and warns against it. Andwhen seemingly factual points are given, wikipedia in an attempt to improve the quality of its entrys, often suffixs’ the statement with [citation neeed]. Even wikipedia is putting the BBC to shame.

So BBC, who thinks this? What are those supposed ‘thoughts’ based on?  Why not quote the words of Dr. Maurice Hilleman himself, who said it came from African Green monkeys, which MERCK exploited and ultimately gave HIV/AIDS to the world.? What of that BBC? – you sheishmeisters!  

The BBC’s miserable junk continues: “The virus probably originally jumped into humans after people came into contact with infected bush meat.” – ‘Probably’ & ‘originally’. Again BBC, who exactly thinks this? Who thought it was possible? Names and data if you please! How can your miserable attempt to give an explanation that avoids litigation square with the fact that Gorilla and chimp bushmeat were consumed for thousands of years! It’s pathetic! Come on BBC try and haul yourself out of the presstitutes red light house and act like a news organisation for a change. Are you watching Helen Boaden you most notorious of newz madams.

You see, by spitting out this liquid poo, the BBC helps MERCK avoid hundreds of millions of law suits which could and should bankrupt the company. Yet another example of the mergence of the established media with corporate interests. It may not even be deliberate but the culture and the career pathway in writing this slime opens up to people who already have the predisposition to let corporatism flow from their pen. It’s becoming a way of life.

Can the BBC be sued for spreading bullshit like this? If there is a MERCK friendly plant in the BBC, for example someone with MERCK shares or someone that benefits from MERCK’s financial success, then it’s very there is indeed a case for at least the prosecution of a individual if not the BBC. But newspaper and magazines companies get sued for carrying libel and stuff like that so hopefully the BBC couls also be subject to that.

And MERCK, oh MERCK, I hope every victim of your vaccine death bombs an grieving relatives sue the crap out of you.

–

–

–

–

–

–

BBC supports scorched earth

In its continuing propaganda frenzy, the BBC this time, spends effort to support a scorched earth policy and to beguile you into condoning it too: the ‘scorched earth policy’ is that being carried out by the slimy and corrupt US puppet Pakistani “leadership”.

“With tanks, artillery and airstrikes, the army is trying to clear villages, towns and roads of militants, attempting to drive the Taleban from the sanctuaries they have occupied.

Once each village or town is taken, bulldozers move in, flattening houses so the Taleban cannot sneak back and occupy them again.” – source

Do you see the mind games at play here? Well, can you? Read it again if you didn’t notice it. Go on, it’s important! The BBC ‘only’ mentions “villages” and “towns (via use of the word ‘each’)” – yes! towns, not a few houses in a town, not a few streets in a town, not even a town, but complete and whole “towns”. It does so in the context with what it calls ‘the Taleban’. The other association links ‘Taliban’ with ‘sneaking’, inculcating a picture of Taleban and malevolence. And the icing on the cake of all these dangling carrots is, the use of the word ‘again’. Slam dunk! because it is hoped in your mind now you have the impression ONLY the Taliban occupy buildings/villages/towns initially, and that if these villages and towns were not destroyed, the Taleban would return.

It is an outrageous and hideous lie. An example of the most appalling standards of journalism I have ever witnessed from this deplorable and deceitful corporation, although Saddams Bomb is perhaps its equal. The inhabitants of villages are most likely to comprise mostly of women and children compared to men and far outweigh Taliban men. That a whole town, let alone village, is made up of Taliban is a disgraceful conspiracy.

What complete bastards!

Thousands of poor people, likely to be far better human beings than you or I, have already been displaced by Pakistani puppets who wait for their next 10% pay cheque, and many of them have been killed (see https://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/a-deadly-deception/)

If you don’t feel angry and ashamed at what they wrote, you seriously need to examine your sense of justice and fair play.

And when people are killed, either by US airstrikes or puppet Pakistani troops killing fellow Muslims – again far worthier then themselves, the BBC doesn’t relent; automatically issuing reports that ‘Al Qaeda/Militants’ were killed. They know this becasue the slain Taliban carries an ID card that says “If I die, this is just to let you know I am an Al Qaeda militant – don’t ya know”

Just before the Beeb sanctions the destrictuon of villages and towns, it said:

“Bit by bit, and at huge cost, territory is being seized back”

Yet again we witness the total non-questioning methodology of  “BBC journalism”. This time spoon fed by the Pakistani department of war and propaganda. The BBC clearly sees its role to act as a mouthpiece for a unified moral-less hegemonic fascism, largely going under the recognisible umbrella of globalisation. it also synthesises the false impression that that Pakistan ‘lost’ the territory in the first place.

Again outrageous.

If you don’t think the BBC is pumping sewage into your brain, aren’t you just a little bit flummoxed at how there are numerous reports from Afghanistan, whereby the Taliban are said to have successfully pushed the invading vermin (Coalition of the killing) into relatively small restricted areas, yet the Pakistani army (which drains money away from the countries economy leaving millions hungry, homeless and on the edge of life itself) somehow is achieving unique success???

The ooze simply doesn’t stop…

“First they have struck back near the Khyber Pass, hijacking and burning trucks driving towards the Afghan border.”

“trucks” huh? What kind of trucks? Trucks owned by Iqbal the rice merchant? Trucks containing medical supplies carried by the Red Crescent? Trucks carrying a family of refugees feeling from the Pakistani army who have just destroyed their, sorry, ‘a Taleban town’? Trucks carrying supplies for the US military? Do you really think ALL trucks are being targeted (along with the tactical pitfalls such persistent operations would entail) or do you think it is certain trucks? Come on THINK FOR YOURSELF. The BBC creates the impression any truck is game.

The BBC plays another card, telling us of one trucker, “Haji Haghaley” who the beeb says was hit by the Taliban. This is possible, but I refuse to discount the possibility that the Pakistani army or even US/NATO forces themselves were the ones who fired upon him. We know the US (and it’s wannabe’s) shoot-to-kill first, then try to cover up later. How is it known the bullet came from a “Taliban” and not someone else – like a common bunch of nomadic criminals trying to steal the goods? And they had to pick a Haji didn’t they? (A Muslim that has done the Hajj – one of the 5 central rituals every Muslim must try and do, and is generally regarded as being a ‘devout Muslim’). “Haji Haghaley” is there to give the appearance that pious Muslims are trucking US supplies through Pakistan, and therefore, it’s what ‘good Muslims’ do. You are supposed to get from all this that the Taliban are a bunch of mean killers who shoot at other Muslims, therefore, Muslims of the world: the Taleban are YOUR enemy too!

Anyway, who determines what a Taleban is or isn’t, naturally enough, this question isn’t qualified because it’s simply a tool to be used for the purposes of fear and propaganda. They don’t never show mercenaries driving these trucks and pointing to ambiguous holes and they NEVER describe those killed alleged Taleban as being Haji’s.

I am running out of negative words to describe the BBC, such is the frequency of its brainwashing output, of which I only have limited amounts of time to point out.

Sadly the mindless Zombies populating the UK swallow much of what at vile newz (newz ‘cos it aint no news!) organisation spews out. I am ashamed to be British – a title people thoght meant something respectable, but, I am immensely proud to be ashamed.

The propaganda level in that “report” would put Goebbels to shame,
 
Dear people, reject this toxic spittle that enters your eyes, ears and brain. We can be something better, we just need to wake up see the monster dancing in front of us, taunting us in our blindness. This current path of hegemonic domination and oppression is madness. It’s not the way things are supposed to be.

Life should be an adventure of discovery, happyness and love. Why are we letting it be anything but?

–

–

–

–