Posts Tagged 'unworthy journalism'

Mexican swine flu ‘pandemic’ – disgraceful journalism by the BBC

Latest:

There is a video going around called: Swine Flu Was Cultured In A Laboratory Dr John Carlo Dallas Co Medical Director. Link here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZYi7QAIwPA DON’T BELIEVE THE CLAIMS MADE ABOUT IT. The video has obviously been deliberately cut to make it appear as though a slip-up has been made, yielding an unwitting confession that the virus is synthetic. That is just as disgusting as what the BBC has done. There is sufficient evidence to suggest a conspiracy here at worst, gross sloppyness and rampant commercialisation at best, but this video is definately something that needs to be binned.  

Please copy the information here. Lwtc247. I think I’ve finished the post now. Please read it. I believe it raises VERY IMPORTANT QUESTIONS.

Once again the BBC News and Current affairs exhibits some of the most appalling journalism possible.

On Friday 24th April the BBC was reporting 60 had died…

-

Friday  24th April 2009:

—————————————————————————————————-

 mexican-swine-flu-pandemic-disgraceful-bbc-junk-journalism-fri-24th-60-dead

—————————————————————————————————-

-

Note: They say it began in the middle of March. That’s peculiar. As you will find out below, there are only 8 confirmed dead. If this has been going on for OVER one month already, then 8 deaths over one month from an as yet uncharacterised virus(?-see later) could surely NOT have caused alarm. Also it means that over 30 days passed where maximum of  8 confirmed cases were known, yet they reported it as over 60.

Shameful.

More recently, on Tuesday April 28th and Wed 29th April 150 had died…

-

 

Tuesday 28th April 2009:

—————————————————————————————————-

 mexican-swine-flu-pandemic-disgraceful-bbc-junk-journalism-3-apr-28-tues-150-dead

-

—————————————————————————————————-

Wednesday 29th April 2009:

-

 mexican-swine-flu-pandemic-disgraceful-bbc-junk-journalism-wed-apr-29-150-dead1

-

—————————————————————————————————-

 What on earth is Garden Broom doing revealing information about suspected swine fever cases? Well it’s obvious isn’t it really. He’s the ‘leader’ – the big reassuring, informed boss to guide us through this so called pandemic. What a guy. My hero. The same NeoLabour stinky ‘management’ [i.e. control freakery] that we’ve come so used to seeing.

150 dead from swine flu now. Given the rubbish the BBC are reporting about the numbers of dead, I wonder about the number in hospital with symptoms as reported on Tuesday.  Where did these numbers come from?

As well as reporting these definitive statements (lies by another name). Today we have this:

Friday Thurs 30th Apr 2009)

—————————————————————————————————-

 

mexican-swine-flu-pandemic-disgraceful-bbc-junk-journalism-who-report-thurs-apr-30-morning1

-

So, for at least 4 days, the BBC were reporting as FACT that large numbers of deaths had occured and now it says only 8 are confirmed to have died from it. That’s 4 WHOLE days (minimum) of peddling total fear-inducing,  incorrect rubbish. That is utterly disgraceful. A complete failure of journalist. BBC Newz (Newz, cos it certainy ain’t ‘News’) heads should be fired. No public apologies. No shame, no remorse of their slip-slop-swill.

And to make matters worse all the other supporting BS about this has gone unchecked too. Click this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p002v3jh/Analysis_Swine_flu/ to listen to this piece of presstituting.

I’ve made a VERY ROUGH transcript (Note: some bits missing) Report by Matt McGrath – BBC Science reporter.

Note: PLEASE capture this audio and save it! I’m not able to so. In addition to the stunning revelation in this audio file, there are chilling words spoken at the end by Rahm Emanuel who says things loons are familiar with – the political expediency of crises (all of which look increasingly synthesised).

 ——————

Scients though believe pigs are a perfect mixing vessels for more than one type of influenze virus, being able to support the replication of human and avian flu strains aswell. All these virus’s have the ability to swap genetic material and recombine in into new forms in the right conditions. According to the CDC, that’s what’s happened in Mexico, where this new H1N1 virus has emerged from pigs and become infectious to people.

Prof Jangu Banatvala an expert on clinical virology at Kings College London (see appendix) he says that as new flu virus’s go, this one is quite unusual: “Interestingly enough, the swine virus was not a very spreadable virus – there were a few cases from time to time, but this one is rather different. The pig is a very good mixing vessel [lwtc247: duplicitious - 'reinforcement'. The journo heard Prof. Banatvala say this before compiling his report and mantioned the word forst which 'shows' the Prof is agreeing with what the journo said. What a clever journo] for viruses and if you look a the genetic make up of the virus, it’s got a bit of human, 2 bits of pig virus - one from the states, one from europe, and a touch of the avian virus as well. Anyway it is spreading….. [This is DATED: BBC World Service, 11:41pm Tuesday 28th April 2009 (see later). URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p002v3jh/Analysis_Swine_flu/] I can think of one way in which Prof Banatvala knows the structure of this virus, and I’m sure you can too.

Comment: Yet http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8021167.stm, a BBC article by Fergus Walsh dated Monday, 27 April 2009 16:42 UK says a UK lab is ready to analyse swine flu . Are you telling me in the space of a day Prof Jangu Banatvala managed to accumulate all this information about this virus? A man who wasn’t even sent the

Getting back to Matt McGraths’s report:

Since 1997 flu scientists have been monitoring avian influenza very carefully. that strain has killed people all over the world. Mostly those who have been in direct contact with infected birds. 

What’s worrying  What is unusual about this new swine flu is how rapidly it has aquited the ability to transfer between people. Pigs are no longer required to spread this infection. [WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF THIS?] 

Dr Mike Skinner is a virologist at Imperial College London:

Flu seems to be very well adapted at spreading between humans when it has evolved in the right way. We’ve seen H5N1 is unable to spread at the moment between humans but this flu, clearly seems to have the abilities of the normal flu we are all familiar which spreads readily each season.

Flu viruses are spread by droplets these infected secretions can travel about a metre via coughs and sneezes. The virus itself can survive for several hours on a surface such as door knob or a telephone. What it needs most of all is people and according to Dr. Francisco Moreno, a professor of medicine and infectious diseases at the American and British Calare hospital in Mexico, his city is an ideal environment for a new flu virus to spread.

Dr Moreno: “…”
  
Scientists are concerned that this new H1N1 swine virus is already showing itself to be a deadly strain. Prof High Pennington form the University of Aberdeen explains how a flu virus like this can kill:

“The virus itself can cause a very severe pneumonia and the body reacts very violently to the virus and basically the lungs fill with water and you die because you cant breathe. Or you get damage to the lungs caused by the virus which can be very severe in its own right…”


One of the most mysterious aspects of this outbreak is why it appears to be is killing people in Mexico and not elsewhere in the world. Some experts say [who? which experts?] that it could be because o the presence of other infections in those who have died or a lack of nutrition compared to people who have contracted the virus in other countries. According to Prof Paul Hunter front he School of med and health policy and practice at the Uni in East Anglia it could be the virus has change tack to ensure it spreads further. If it’s too virulent too quickly, it wont get very far.
“?The Virus can evolve, and you see this with a range of virus you get from animals. The 1st people exposed have a vey high fatality rate, but people who get infected from them, have a much lower mortality rate as the virus sort of seems to realise that actually if it wants to propagate itself, it better not kill these people and so it sort of loses its virulence as it passages through humans. And that may well explain what we’re seeing in that the way the symptoms are not as severe as the visitors to Mexico as in some of the primary cases”
But while the authorities say that around 150 people have died in Mexico as a result of this new influenza strain, tests carried out on samples from the country, at the CDC in Atlanta, have so far only confirmed only a small number of those are suffering from the same virus that has appeared in several US states.
According to Dr Francesco Moreno it may be that actually there’s more than one virus affecting people in Mexico  and that might complicate attempts to stop it.
“you may be having here in Mexico a different stereotype(??) of the strain that has been recovered(recorded?) from the US. Secondly, probably some of the  cases treated when the patients was a very severe deal and the response to anti-virals when the patient has had the disease for more than 72 hours is not as good as if used … right away.
(?)
The fact that most of the victims of this swine flue have been young people is troubling for scientists/ Its an irony of very dangerous outbreaks of flu, that the young and the healthy are the ones who succumb first. This is because The virus turns your immune system against you, and The stronger you are the quicker you can die. As well as its potential virulence scientists are also concerned that this infection has spread far enough and wide enough to speak a global pandemic. Dr. Mike Skinner of Imperial College London  says while the new strain of sewing flue cannot be contained it can be dealt with.
“Were beyond the containment one can hope to slow it down, the spread, but we probably would never stop it spreading around the world effectively, its hard to see how we would be able to do that but we can slow it down and give authorities time to handle it. If indeed it does turn out to be a true pandemic threat.”

 

However the years of preparation and observation caused by worries over avian influenza, have not been wasted. Monitoring systems in many parts of the world have been upgraded and plans to deal with pandemic outbreaks have been developed and rehearsed. 

 

[Contradicts nutrition problem mentioned earlier in Mexico.]

Crucially though many countries have stockpiled doses of anti-viral medications, such as tamiflu and rolenza(?). Both of these have been shown to be effective against the Mexican outbreak. Professor sir Hu Pennington again:

“Tamiflu works against this virus which is one very good piece of news. We’ve ['We' ? does that mean Pennington was instrumental in making Tamiflu? If so is he on royalties, and if so why are the BBC allowing this free advertising?] never really tried it on a large scale so we’ll have to see how well it works, but at least we have something which works well against the virus which in previous pandemics we didn’t have so we have an advantage, a big advantage over previous pandemics.”

The world has had 4 viral pandemics over the last 100 years, including SARS in 2003 and scientific experts say we are overdue another. But whether this new swine flu outbreak becomes a global disease with the potential to infect millions remains to be seen. We have better monitoring and action plans and effective drugs. However the best weapon against a deadly virus is a new vaccine. That will take at least 6 months to deliver (!!! – Horrifying. LONG CLINICAL TRIALS bypassed!) in that time lag a pandemic virus could have a deadly impact all over the world.

Rahm Emanuel:

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. What I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SUMMARY:

1) How does Prof Banatvala know the detailed structure of this virus? This is a VERY significant question. The report saying UK labs were expecting samples to analyse was published only ONE DAY before Banatvala detailed description of the virus.

2) Pennington says Tamiflu works against THIS virus. How does he know? Were are the results the tests of Tamiflu with THIS virus. This could mean they had access to that virus before last month. This is also a freightening question? If the explanation isn’t the sinister one, he is still talking absolute rubbish as there is no quantified scientific data about how good Tamiflu is. And in fact, I looked up what the FDA said about Tamiflu. The FDA specifically says this:

“Tamiflu has not been shown to treat flu-like illnesses caused by any virus other than influenza A and B” – source

3) Why would governments stock up on tamiflu when it is only authorised to claim it trreats influenza A and B? Who has been arranging for governments to buy this? How does McGrath know governments have been doing this.

4) McGrath once again repeats what a scientist says before playing the clip of what the scientist says. Just like he did about pigs. This time, McGrath also claimed Tamiflu had been shown to be effective against the Mexican outbreak, yet still, no scientific study had been undertaken.

5) The BBC lied about the number of deaths and does not reveal it’s sources of important information.

-

Update on (We will take from you your) Labor day. 1st May 2009.

1) The BBC report by Matt McGrath has been captured. You can listen to it here.

Alex Jones’ Prison Planet hosts an article witht he title: Swine Flu Does Not Contain Human and Bird Genes
Thursday, April 30, 2009 (URL=http://www.prisonplanet.com/swine-flu-does-not-contain-human-and-bird-genes.html). In the article we get this quote

“This is what we call a reassortment between two currently circulating pig flu viruses. Why it’s emerged in humans is anyone’s guess. It hasn’t been seen before in pigs, as far as I know,” – University of Edinburgh Viral Geneticist Andrew Rambaut….The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) harvested the viral samples, and then made the genome sequence available to a number of research teams around the world, under what was known as an international database of flu genomes. Though Wired could not obtain an immediate response from the American authorities, documents released by the agency to scientists seem to confirm the suspicions that the lethal strain is actually made up entirely of pig genes, without any other additions…”The experts said that the two strains involved in the new pathogen were the North American and the European pig flu”

That sounds very similar to what Prof Banatvala was saying. BUT Prof Banatvala said it also contained avian and human genetic information. It seems very unlikely therefore that the Prof was getting his data from the centre that mapped out the swine fever genome. So we must still ask: What info does/did the prof have that made him say it contianed human and avian flu? Where did it come from? And what does it mean? If the ‘expert in clinical virology’ Prof Banatvala is correct,  HOW did human genes get into the pig? How did bird flu get into the pig? It is not unreasonable to suggest they were DELIBERATELY put them there. After all, the ‘experts’ have told us pigs are excellent ‘mixing labs’ for hybrid virus’s . It is not surprosing that the story has evolved to talk down the presence of human and bird flu in this new H1N1. That is typical of a conspiracy.

This article: Swine flu source spawns wild theories, Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:27pm EDT (URL=http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE53T3ZK20090430) reports Paul Yeo, a virologist at Durham University in Britain, saying on Thursday (30th April 2009):

The problem now with this virus is that it has picked up a mixture of elements, now including human elements. It’s a complex virus.”

and  the New Scientist’s biology editor Michael Le Page wrote in the same article:

“The claim of the conspiracy theorists is that this new combination could not have occurred naturally, but this is not true,”

“Flu viruses consisting of a mixture of human, swine and bird strains have been found before.”

Clearly some DISINFORMATION is abound.

-

-

-

Appendix:

 

 1) Professor Jangu Banatvala CBE MA MD FRCP FRCPath FMedSci [Chairman]
Emeritus Professor of Clinical Virology
Guy’s, King’s & St.Thomas’ School of Medicine

http://www.cfsrf.com/Staff.htm

 

2) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8021167.stm
Page last updated at 15:42 GMT, Monday, 27 April 2009 16:42 UK
 E-mail this to a friend   Printable version 
 UK lab ready to analyse swine flu
By Fergus Walsh 
 
Quote: In a high level containment lab, UK scientists are getting ready to receive live samples of swine flu, which they intend to analyse in the hope of combating this disease.

The samples will come from affected patients in California, and possibly Mexico and Spain.

The scientists at the NIMR will take different virus samples, grow them and infect laboratory ferrets with them.

Ferrets get flu in a similar way to humans and produce an immune response.

Scientists will analyse the antibodies found in the ferrets’ blood and see whether the virus is showing signs of antigenic drift – in simple terms whether it is adapting and changing as it passes from person to person.

Seasonal vaccine protection?

Swine flu is an H1N1 virus, but it seems quite distinct from the human H1N1 strain included in the current seasonal, winter vaccine.

It is unclear whether the seasonal vaccine would give any protection.

One theory is that while it might not prevent someone getting swine flu, it could lessen its effects.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Simple Case study: The charter mark of quality journalism.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7182637.stm Last Updated: Friday, 11 January 2008, 10:56 GMT

 (P.S. I’ve occasionally been putting a few of these time stamps on a couple of posts recently, but following a couple of sentences within the excellent refusal by J7 to take up an offer of being involved the hard hitting, no-stone-unturned “The Conspiracy Files” – Guffaw !!!,    I guess this timestamp serves purely as a curious piece of object d’art - See footnote 2)

 ———————————————————————-

US-Iran stand-off not mere propaganda

By Paul Reynolds World affairs correspondent BBC News website 

Aggressive behaviour or routine checking? 

The admission by the US Navy that Iranian speedboats might not have been the source of an apparent threat to attack American ships in the Gulf is a significant move that raises new fears about the chances of unintended clashes in the region.

*

I used to like Paul Reynolds. He got closer than many to outing murdering scum filth Tony bLiar’s lies about the WMD “dossiers”. But he never did actually ‘turn the corner’. Since then however, he’s gone down in my estimation and this latest report does absolutely nothing to counter that.  

Paul, I find your wording strange, particularly this “Admission that….Might not have…apparent threat“. Does this “might” mean there is still the possibility that the speedboats were actually have been the threat? If so, then what’s the point of the admission?

Let’s explore: With this second statement, the ‘admission’, the US have tried to pull off an unassertive binomial, but it only works if one ignores the initial impact of the first statement. The second statement is a corrective act, which draws attention to the erroneous nature of the first and therefore all but nullifies the first statement. Logically then, the strongest assertion is that the speedboats were in fact NOT the provoking act and we can be confident therefore that the video was an work of propaganda, which was selectively pieced together to focus on the presence of speedboats, scary sounding warning of the warships klaxon being blown at them the supposed attempted communications them and oh, the ambiguous “going to explode” part, which seems like a tid-bit thrown in for good measure to reinforce the preamble. However, for whatever reason, the USans had to make that tid-bit the main focus.

I wonder if Paul’s helpful report gives us an insight into why it now has taken pride of place.

So, Paul, why didn’t you seek clarification from the Pentagon as to exactly what was the main threat actually was, instead of letting the masses who don’t generally scrutinize mass media reports for logic and interconnectivity.

It should not be forgotten also that ‘your’ organization, the BBC – and I doubt it was alone, did absolutely noting but support that primary bout of Yank propaganda by printing it verbatim as fact without raising the slightest questions as to its veracity. You cocked up that time by acting as a Pentagon megaphone, and now once again you unquestioningly bullhorn the follow-up propaganda without even the faintest breeze of objectivity.

Assuming it’s not you personally that is casting this vague “might” into the public arena, then  what about this “apparent threat” issue. An apparent threat to who? I didn’t see or hear any apparent threat. Just because some Muslim hating Yankee Pentagon said there was a threat doesn’t mean there actually was one, does it?

Guess what? A methodology which yields a greater proportion of truth from the Pentagon and similar USUK supporting institutions and that is to invert their statements, and when we do that here, we conclude that in fact there  was no threat; the Pentagon simply manufactured one.

It has worrying similarities with the incident in 1988 when, in the same Strait of Hormuz, the USS Vincennes shot down an Iranian civilian airliner, having failed to monitor the radio traffic properly.

This is a lie and censorship by omission. It had nothing to do with failing to monitor radio traffic properly. What an utterly pathetic statement, and you fail to mention also that the Vincennes was in Iranian waters and they (the US) lied saying they were in international waters. 

The crew of the Vincennes became wrongly convinced that the airliner, an Airbus with 290 people on board, all of whom died, was an Iranian fighter jet.

No they didn’t Paul. You have just entered the grave sin bin of tripey journos. The crew knew exactly what that plane was, and even after they spun their lies about it and admitted they lied, the Captian of that ship, William Rogers, was decorated as a hero for killing 290 innocent people. That is sickening and so is your role as an apologist for that monstrous act.

The Iranian government said that the destruction of the plane was done in full knowledge of what it was.

And was it only Iran that said this Paul? Did no other countries condemn it? Did not other people on the planet condemn it? Or was it just the Iranians as your ‘history’ tries to impress upon us.

‘Scenario fulfilment’

The US government later suggested that one factor at play on the Vincennes was a condition called “scenario fulfilment” in which military personnel are under such pressure that they expect and then execute a particular scenario, as if in an exercise.

Total red herring Paul. There are millions of other soldiers around the world doing their daily job or as you put it ‘under pressure’,  yet news of other armies doing such acts is near zero. I suspect you say ‘under pressure’ as you are searching for people to give sympathy to these ‘stressed workers’ if so, it’s quite obnoxious Paul.

Whether the same expectation was at play in this latest incident is not clear.

So why raise it????? Hey Paul, WHY DID you raise it???? Forgive me for thinking you are trying to plaster on some of that sympathy you just tried to muster for US soldiers many thousands of nautical miles away from the US, interfering in the affairs of other countries.

What is clear is that there are grave doubts about who uttered the warning picked up by the US ships. A deep voice was heard to say: “I am coming at you. You will explode after a few minutes.”

Again I have to say, noted is your lack of criticism of the BBC and other western news organizations that reported it as reliable fact.

The video released by the US implied that the warning was part of a series of transmissions to the ships from the Iranian craft. It turns out that the warning was added onto the video. It was a radio recording made separately. Experts say it could have come from another ship in the area or from a radio transmitter on shore. The channel used by the Iranian vessels to make their inquiries is an open one.

You mean YOUR experts – the experts YOU choose to listen, speak to and report on,  experts that strangely don’t include any Iranians or those who suggest it could have been a fake transmission to deliberately make it look as though the Iranians were hostile and about to initiate the attack. Like the racist cowboy movies you probably watched as a kid and the racist ‘terrorist movies’ we are unfortunately bombarded with these days, they need the pretext of the savage native American,  “Indian” (which the west calls them in a display of their stupidity) or Muslim who shoots first shoots first and the good old cowboy is therefore justified in killing the aggressor, whereas in reality it’s the kill loving USans and their British pax-Zion scum that shoot first and ask questions (or conspire) afterwards and you have just aided that scurrilous perception.

Iranian version

 The Iranians later issued their own video, in which one of their sailors, in a much higher and quite different voice from the one which issued the “warning”, asks the US ships who they are and what course they are on.

No comment Paul as to what heading the US ships were on? I feel that if it was Iranians heading towards Iraq for example, then you’d have given a follow up comment on that.

He gets a dusty reply that the US vessels are in international waters. The Iranian video does not show their boats buzzing close (200m or so) to the Americans. The US said that in any case the Iranian speedboats acted aggressively. Iran’s version is that this was a routine check by its sailors. Beyond the propaganda

Propaganda you are doing nothing to dispel.?

This goes beyond the back and forth of a propaganda battle, in which once again the Iranians show themselves to be masters. It recalls the ease with which they ran rings round the Royal Navy when they captured British sailors and marines off Iraq last year, exposed them to damaging publicity before releasing them with handshakes by their president.

WOAH! OFF IRAQ? Phoarw Paul. The stench is getting unbearable.

The real concern is that a possibly misread radio transmission should be at the heart of this incident, nearly 20 years after the Vincennes disaster.

No Paul you silly billy. The slaughter of 290 people in the Iran air flight wasn’t from a misread of transmissions, and there wasn’t a misreading of transmission here. Red herring again Paul. Sloppy!

 Tensions between Iran and the US have diminished recently following the US National Intelligence Estimate that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.

Again no comment from Paul as the implications of that NIE that the previous accusations and the accusations by the Zionist occupiers of Palestine made after was therefore an utter lie! BBC journalistic integrity shining bright. And of course opportunities to associate Iran and nuclear bomb must be taken when they arise.

 But there are still serious points of potential conflict between the two, with Iran always determined to exert its influence in what it insists on calling the Persian Gulf and the US maintaining strong naval forces there in international waters and in the waters of its Gulf Arab allies.

No Paul. The conflict is nearly 100% going to be initiated the US lead Coalition of the Killing. Stop making it look as if Iran and the US are itching for a fight together. That’s highly dishonest. I suggest this wording “But the Americans are looking to exploit any circumstance which they feel would justify a first strike on Iran, reassured that their technology will make it very much a one horse race, yet the Iranians show no sign of ceding their International rights to their territorial waters to a nation nowhere near its, nor of those US puppet regimes in the same region”

 Iran is also subject to UN sanctions, having refused the demands of the Security Council to suspend its enrichment of uranium.

Paul… Once again let me help you: “Iran is also subject to illegal but low level UN sanctions, having rejected the demands and threats refused the demands of the Security Council, the same Council that say a collapse of will to impose a third round of sanctions due to Russian and Chinese concerns, who wrongly tried to force Iran to stop its international rights, and was supported by the IAEA at least twice in reporting there was no evidence of an illegal Iranian nuclear weapons programme.”

Paul.Reynolds-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk  

Iran, USS Vincennes, American lies, more lies, BBC propaganda, BBC failure to question official statements, Paul Reynolds, unworthy journalism

 ——————————————————————

 FOOTNOTES: *    I fell into a hole when initially composing this article. I didn’t read it in its entirety when I forst composed it. I didn’t fully grasp the threads of thought in the initial paragraphs. Sometimes a reports can be commented successfully paragraph by paragraph, but in this case a complete reading first is more beneficial.  So this is a revised edition of the original article. As there haven’t been any comments yet, it’s OK. Most of it is the same anyway…

2) Quote from: http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j7-refuse-bbc-conspiracy-files-offer.html :

Quote: There are several documented examples demonstrating the BBC’s guilt in editing stories on the BBC News web site where phrases implying details about the alleged bomber’s journey, such as, “Passengers on the 0748 Thameslink from Luton to King’s Cross”, have been edited out, yet the ‘last edited’ date and time has, rather disingenuously, not been updated to reflect these amendments. This is in direct contravention of the Press Complaints Commission guidelines which specify, “A significant inaccuracy, mis-leading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and – where appropriate – an apology published.” Endquote


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
April 2014
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers