Posts Tagged 'uranium'

Dumb and dumbing

Update: The MS data Dr. Chris Busby posted on Blairwatch is showing now: This is what it says as of 10th June 2009:

The data are up on the website of the Low Level Radiation Campaign. The measurements were made at Harwell. Isotope ratio in the soil sample was 108. Toatal U was 13mg/kg. LOD was 0.0002mg/kgU238 and 0.0001mg/kgU235. Instrument was Agilent ICPMS. Diffetnt method alpha spectrometry gave same result in different lab. We have now found EU in a car filter. Check out llrc.org. Thank you. Chris

End of update.

The BBC newz and current affairz division, ever the nucleus of stinking lies (evidence #1) in support of mass murder, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ‘environmentalcide’, report on a particular illegal bombing of Sytria by the Zionist entity in 2007  2006.

Amongst those who followed this, you will probably remember there was a strange information vacuum on behalf of the Syrians. The pro-Zionist corporate mainstream media (to give it it’s proper, full title), may have assisted in the silence from Syria, but news on the anti-NWO news outlets whch I read were also pretty much devoid of Syrian comminiques.

Anyway, before you read further please the the BBC newz article HERE.

Hopefully you will have read the earlier evidence #1 above, and so, on reading this:

“Now in a confidential report obtained by the BBC…”

then, if you’re capable of at least half an independent thought, you would now have a rather large ‘pinch of salt’ in your mind. Continuing directly from where we left off, the BBC newz article says:

“it [the report] says it has discovered new traces of uranium of a type not included in Syria’s declared nuclear material.”

 

——————————————————————————————————-

Asside:

does this cry then ring out:

“A ha! I knew it. Those damn Arab/Muslims. I knew they were up to something. I knew the fascile, politically correct respect I felt compelled to give them wasn’t sustainable. They deserve to be bombed.”

 People who may think that way remind me of that nasty man called Winston Churchill…

I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.

I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.”source

Supporters of ‘Death by Churchill’ may counter he only wanted to make their eyes water. What nonsense. He was pimping for weapons to fascilitate his desire for military advantage/supremacy potenial, much like all weapon pimps before him and those who followed him when they bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, sprayed Agent Orange across SouthEast Asia, used depleted uranium and white phosphorous against the people of Fallujah and Gaza. He was deliberately underplaying it. To think that by making peoples eyes water they would them agree to be colonbised is ridiculous and offering apologies for imperialistic murder. Harmless lachrymatory substances had long been known (e.g. thiopropanal S-oxide – the volatile gas produced from damaged onion cells or Allyl isothiocyanate, reported to be a dangerous lachrymator. His pretence that gas was just to make peoples eyes water is shown for the sack of crap it is when in 1920 he wrote to Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare:

“the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.” – source

Here Churchill is revealing that to permanently disabling them, something that doesn’t happen if you just make their eyes water, would be more advantageous to British imperilism because the would be too sick to fight but dain the resources of the those targeted for British colonisation.

Churchill gloves really comes out of his fake concern against human suffering when in a prime ministerial minute (1944) he writes:

“I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard.” – Winston Churchill 6th July 2944. Personal minute aka the “Secret Poison Gas Memo”source

Eerily, in that same source, we see this written by British scumbad Bomber(i.e. killer) Harris saying:

“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.” Remember other British filthy killers Tony bLiar / Alistair Campbell / John Scarlett / Geff ‘Hoon / Richard Dearlove / Lard Goldsmith  45 minute lie?

and interestingly enough, Churchill didn’t consider the V1 and V2 bombs even reaching the level of a “serious nuisance” yet these bombs are often cited as justification for the destruction of Dresden, Munich and other British strocities.

——————————————————————————————————-

Of course the BBC does it’s part to foment angst towards the Arabs and the Iranians, who are tossed into this report. Iran let’s not forget, is absolutely within its its right to develop nuclear energy even though it is ridiculously stupid to do so.

Right. Now this post is coming to an end, who spotted the flaw?

Come on, surely someone spotted it?

(Huh>? lwtc really has gone mad this time…)

What do you think the Israyhelli’s bombed the Syrian target with? Have a guess. go on? There must be someone that can guess?? Here’s some clues:

TITLE: Bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads used by Israel against civilian targets in Lebanon
By: Dr. Doug Rokke
www: (http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m28056&hd=0&size=1&l=e
)
Dr. Doug Rokke is former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project

See Fisk:
Mystery of Israel’s secret uranium bomb
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1935945.ece

Those reports came from the ironically named ‘Blairwatch‘ – a site which at times was unashemed in displaying it’s pro-Zionism (depending on which author was posting at the time) – unless to happen to think it’s OK to delete the scientific Mass Spectroscopy iosotopic anaysis given by Chris Busby which proved:

Israel did in fact use enriched uranium to bomb Lebanon in the summer of 2006.

The BBC doesn’t give a toss about news nor does it care about exposing Zionist rot, in fact it seems to relish opportunities to cover it up at each and every opportunity.

 

Nuclear cloud spreads over earth.

 

So Pig state finally managed to spread the radioactive nuclear components in satellite – USA 193, catalog number 29651, international designation 06-057A.

Pigs will be pigs!

The Rorsat-class reconnaissance satellites contained a nuclear reactor as a power source. It was later shown that 16 of 31 Rorsats had been leaking potentially radioactive coolant into space, creating a trail of droplets in orbit. [1]

 Mars Rover contained Plutonium (one millionth of a gram will kill a human). NASA’s Environmental Impact Statement for the Mars Exploration Rover-2003 Project says, “the overall chance of an accident occurring” for each launch “is about 1 in 30” and “the overall chance of any accident that releases radioactive materials to the environment is about 1 in 230.” People “offsite in the downwind direction…could inhale small quantities of radionuclide’s,” says NASA’s statement. An area as far as 60 kilometers from the launch site could be impacted, says NASA. [2]

Uranium fallout from the nuclear-powered satellites and volcanic eruptions. J. Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chem.:
Increased Uranium concentration is rain due to volcano and 1983 fall of the nuclear-powered satellite Cosmos-1402, respectively.[3]
– Yes, as early as 1983 radionuclide’s were used in satellites.! More importantly perhaps is that it also contained plutonium.[4]

 Two basic types of nuclear power supply have been used in space nuclear
reactors and radioisotope sources. In a space nuclear reactor system, the energy source is the heat generated by the controlled fission of uranium. …In an isotope power supply, the heat is produced by the natural decay of a radioisotope, which in all US-launched systems is plutonium-238.[5]

[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jan/27/spaceexploration.usa

[2] http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Apr2003/grossman0403.html

 [3] http://www.springerlink.com/content/n0847109g61534r1/

 [4] www.springerlink.com/index/WLG804U05L4G15T4.pdf

[[5] http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/pdf/1_1-2Aftergood.pdf

[[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrazine

[7] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7213147.stm

[8] Saddams bomb: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm

P.S. Remember the BBC report (the website is read my millions worldwide) which carried the title “Why the spy satellite won’t fall on your head“[7] – addressed to its million+ readers it is obviously saying to all these millions there is no risk, but after the USS Lake Eire fired its missiles the BBC reports this “the missile needs to pierce the bus-sized satellite’s fuel tank, containing more than 450kg (1,000lbs) of toxic hydrazine, which would otherwise be expected to survive re-entry. ” Hydrazine is very unstable. [6]

If hydrazine is capable of surviving to pose a health risk, it MUST be in a container, so it could have fallen on your heard you stupid “newz” organisation.

Shouldn’t the BBC be challenging the authorities at the very beginning, e.g. demanding to know the totality of the satellites nuclear components, What the official risks were, what will be the environmental pollution aspect of all this and then keep following it up if there were serious environmental concerns afterwards? YES of course it bloody well should. Instead what does it do? Tells a stream of lies which help the powers that be and then post event shrugs its shoulders and says ‘oh well’

Think I’m being too harsh on the BBC? then read the BBC’s filthy propaganda speil and conspiracy and establishment lies report on how Saddam detonated a nuclear bomb in secret. (Saddams Bomb – report filed Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT )


Saddam Hussein.
He detonated a secret nuclear bomb
you know. OH YES HE DID! – The BBC says so.

oink bloody oink!

-P


Viva Palestina – break the siege:

Viva Palestina - break the siege

This blog supports victims of western aggression

This blog supports victims of western aggression

BooK: The Hand of Iblis. Dr Omar Zaid M.D.

Book: The Hand of Iblis
An Anatomy of Evil
The Hidden Hand of the New World Order
Summary Observations and History

Data on Fukushima Plant – (NHK news)

Fukushima Radiation Data

J7 truth campaign:

July 7th Truth Campaign - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE!

Recommended book: 3rd edition of Terror on the Tube – Behind the Veil of 7-7, An Investigation by Nick Kollerstrom:

J7 (truth) Inquest blog

July 7th Truth Campaign - INQUEST BLOG
Top rate analysis of the Inquest/Hoax

Arrest Blair (the filthy killer)

This human filth needs to be put on trial and hung!

JUST:

JUST - International Movement for a Just World

ICH:

Information Clearing House - Actual News and global analysis

John Pilger:

John Pilger, Journalist and author

Media Lens

My perception of Media Lens: Watching the corrupt corporate media, documenting and analysing how it bends our minds. Their book, 'Newspeak' is a gem.

Abandon the paper $cam:

Honest and inflation proof currency @ The Gold Dinar
October 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031